On 15 February 2012 15:45, mark florisson wrote:
> On 14 February 2012 21:33, Robert Bradshaw
> wrote:
>> On Tue, Feb 14, 2012 at 1:09 PM, mark florisson
>> wrote:
>>> On 14 February 2012 17:19, Robert Bradshaw
>>> wrote:
On Tue, Feb 14, 2012 at 7:49 AM, mark florisson
wrote:
>
On 14 February 2012 21:33, Robert Bradshaw wrote:
> On Tue, Feb 14, 2012 at 1:09 PM, mark florisson
> wrote:
>> On 14 February 2012 17:19, Robert Bradshaw
>> wrote:
>>> On Tue, Feb 14, 2012 at 7:49 AM, mark florisson
>>> wrote:
On 14 February 2012 07:07, Robert Bradshaw
wrote:
Hi,
following up on the thread on the PyPy mailing list where this topic was
started, I've started a CEP in our Wiki in order to focus the different
ideas and opinions.
http://wiki.cython.org/enhancements/pypy
The current state of the discussion seems to be that PyPy provides ways to
talk to C c
2012/2/15 mark florisson :
> On 15 February 2012 09:37, Stefan Behnel wrote:
>> Hi,
>>
>> I'd like to suggest that instead of overwriting pull requests and all of
>> their comments on github by pushing replaced commits over them, it would be
>> better to keep any existing discussions accessible by
On 15 February 2012 09:37, Stefan Behnel wrote:
> Hi,
>
> I'd like to suggest that instead of overwriting pull requests and all of
> their comments on github by pushing replaced commits over them, it would be
> better to keep any existing discussions accessible by rejecting the current
> pull requ
Hi,
I'd like to suggest that instead of overwriting pull requests and all of
their comments on github by pushing replaced commits over them, it would be
better to keep any existing discussions accessible by rejecting the current
pull request and creating a new one.
Does that make sense for everyo
