Re: [Cython] 0.16 release

2012-02-14 Thread Robert Bradshaw
On Tue, Feb 14, 2012 at 1:09 PM, mark florisson wrote: > On 14 February 2012 17:19, Robert Bradshaw > wrote: >> On Tue, Feb 14, 2012 at 7:49 AM, mark florisson >> wrote: >>> On 14 February 2012 07:07, Robert Bradshaw >>> wrote: On Sun, Feb 12, 2012 at 12:53 PM, Vitja Makarov wrote

Re: [Cython] 0.16 release

2012-02-14 Thread mark florisson
On 14 February 2012 17:19, Robert Bradshaw wrote: > On Tue, Feb 14, 2012 at 7:49 AM, mark florisson > wrote: >> On 14 February 2012 07:07, Robert Bradshaw >> wrote: >>> On Sun, Feb 12, 2012 at 12:53 PM, Vitja Makarov >>> wrote: 2012/2/12 Vitja Makarov : > 2012/2/11 Robert Bradshaw :

Re: [Cython] 0.16 release

2012-02-14 Thread Robert Bradshaw
On Tue, Feb 14, 2012 at 7:49 AM, mark florisson wrote: > On 14 February 2012 07:07, Robert Bradshaw > wrote: >> On Sun, Feb 12, 2012 at 12:53 PM, Vitja Makarov >> wrote: >>> 2012/2/12 Vitja Makarov : 2012/2/11 Robert Bradshaw : > All of Sage passes except for one test: > > sag

Re: [Cython] 0.16 release

2012-02-14 Thread mark florisson
On 14 February 2012 07:07, Robert Bradshaw wrote: > On Sun, Feb 12, 2012 at 12:53 PM, Vitja Makarov > wrote: >> 2012/2/12 Vitja Makarov : >>> 2012/2/11 Robert Bradshaw : All of Sage passes except for one test: sage -t  devel/sage/sage/misc/sageinspect.py *

[Cython] Cython compatibility thread on PyPy mailing list

2012-02-14 Thread Stefan Behnel
Hi, just wanted to point you to a thread that currently runs on the PyPy-dev mailing list about how Cython and PyPy could improve their interoperability. http://thread.gmane.org/gmane.comp.python.pypy/9437/focus=9452 Stefan ___ cython-devel mailing lis