On Sat, Aug 13, 2011 at 4:09 AM, Dag Sverre Seljebotn
wrote:
> I read up on Go's interface model last week and am very excited about it.
> Perhaps this was old news to a lot of you, but it was new to me.
>
> This post is mostly just to make sure everybody is aware of prior art here
> in case it is
On Fri, Aug 12, 2011 at 9:41 PM, Vitja Makarov wrote:
> 2011/7/30 Stefan Behnel :
>> Robert Bradshaw, 30.07.2011 18:49:
>>>
>>> The only reason I haven't pushed a release branch is that last
>>> time I did that it kept getting the mainline development pulled into
>>> it
>>
>> That was just an acci
On 08/13/2011 02:28 PM, Stefan Behnel wrote:
Dag Sverre Seljebotn, 13.08.2011 13:09:
I read up on Go's interface model last week and am very excited about it.
Perhaps this was old news to a lot of you, but it was new to me.
This post is mostly just to make sure everybody is aware of prior art
h
Dag Sverre Seljebotn, 13.08.2011 13:09:
I read up on Go's interface model last week and am very excited about it.
Perhaps this was old news to a lot of you, but it was new to me.
This post is mostly just to make sure everybody is aware of prior art here
in case it is a good fit for Cython down t
I read up on Go's interface model last week and am very excited about
it. Perhaps this was old news to a lot of you, but it was new to me.
This post is mostly just to make sure everybody is aware of prior art
here in case it is a good fit for Cython down the road. I hope I'm not
starting a lon
