[Cython] GSoC Proposal for Supporting Parallelism, Fused Types and Typed Views on Memory

2011-04-08 Thread mark florisson
Hey, My GSoC proposal can be found here: http://www.google-melange.com/gsoc/proposal/review/google/gsoc2011/markflorisson88/1 . It's about implementing the prange CEP (524), Fused Types (522) and Typed Memory Views (517). I really hope to participate this year, but due to time constraints I may n

Re: [Cython] GSoC Proposal - Reimplement C modules in CPython's standard library in Cython.

2011-04-08 Thread Arthur de Souza Ribeiro
My mistake, I just typed wrong, I was talking about the nis one... By the way, I changed this module to the array one... Best Regards. Arthur 2011/4/8 mark florisson > On 8 April 2011 19:59, Arthur de Souza Ribeiro > wrote: > > The moduels suggested for the first two milestones you think are

Re: [Cython] GSoC Proposal - Reimplement C modules in CPython's standard library in Cython.

2011-04-08 Thread mark florisson
On 8 April 2011 19:59, Arthur de Souza Ribeiro wrote: > The moduels suggested for the first two milestones you think are ok? > Best Regards.. > []s > Arthur You mention the 'dis' module, but isn't that one (and 'opcode' too) entirely written in Python?

Re: [Cython] GSoC Proposal - Reimplement C modules in CPython's standard library in Cython.

2011-04-08 Thread Arthur de Souza Ribeiro
The moduels suggested for the first two milestones you think are ok? Best Regards.. []s Arthur 2011/4/8 Robert Bradshaw > On Fri, Apr 8, 2011 at 10:31 AM, Arthur de Souza Ribeiro > wrote: > > > > > > 2011/4/8 Robert Bradshaw > >> > >> Looking better. I would add some details about how you p

Re: [Cython] GSoC Proposal - Reimplement C modules in CPython's standard library in Cython.

2011-04-08 Thread Robert Bradshaw
On Fri, Apr 8, 2011 at 10:31 AM, Arthur de Souza Ribeiro wrote: > > > 2011/4/8 Robert Bradshaw >> >> Looking better. I would add some details about how you plan to >> compare/profile your new implementations, and also at least add a note >> that compatibility will be ensured with the Python regre

Re: [Cython] GSoC Proposal - Reimplement C modules in CPython's standard library in Cython.

2011-04-08 Thread Arthur de Souza Ribeiro
2011/4/8 Robert Bradshaw > Looking better. I would add some details about how you plan to > compare/profile your new implementations, and also at least add a note > that compatibility will be ensured with the Python regression tests. > I'm going to update this on the wiki page, it's just because

Re: [Cython] GSoC Proposal - Reimplement C modules in CPython's standard library in Cython.

2011-04-08 Thread Stefan Behnel
Robert Bradshaw, 08.04.2011 01:08: On Thu, Apr 7, 2011 at 2:31 PM, Arthur de Souza Ribeiro wrote: I've submitted to google the link is: http://www.google-melange.com/gsoc/proposal/review/google/gsoc2011/arthur_sr/1# It would be really important if you could give me a feedback to my proposal...

Re: [Cython] GSoC Proposal - Reimplement C modules in CPython's standard library in Cython.

2011-04-08 Thread Robert Bradshaw
Looking better. I would add some details about how you plan to compare/profile your new implementations, and also at least add a note that compatibility will be ensured with the Python regression tests. It may make sense to let the exact list of modules be somewhat flexible, for example, based on