2011/4/8 Robert Bradshaw <rober...@math.washington.edu> > Looking better. I would add some details about how you plan to > compare/profile your new implementations, and also at least add a note > that compatibility will be ensured with the Python regression tests. >
I'm going to update this on the wiki page, it's just because the application period in google-melange ends today and it's not recommended to put details os how you plan to make the project in there. About the comparison, I wonder talk to the community a little more about it, because I see in cython's web page and in the tutorials numbers telling how much more efficient cython is against python, so I planned to use the same strategy that is used to show the numbers that are there. And about the tests, I'm studying how can I check compatibility and do these tasks to put that on wiki too. > > It may make sense to let the exact list of modules be somewhat > flexible, for example, based on feedback from the Python and Cython > community on what would be the most worthwhile to Cythonize. Maybe the > final milestone would be "re-implement several additional modules as > chosen by the Python community to provide maximum value" or something > like that. > You mean just to tell how many modules I'm going to re-implement, but not telling what modules are these? Re-implementing by community demand? Thank you very much again. Best Regards. []s Arthur > > - Robert > > On Thu, Apr 7, 2011 at 11:38 PM, Arthur de Souza Ribeiro > <arthurdesribe...@gmail.com> wrote: > > I've made some changes to my proposal, as you said, I changed the number > of > > modules I'm going to reimplement, I jumped from three to twelve modules, > > what modules are these and when I want to implement is described at: > > > http://www.google-melange.com/gsoc/proposal/review/google/gsoc2011/arthur_sr/1# > > and > > http://wiki.cython.org/arthursribeiro > > If you could take another look I would appreciate a lot. > > Best Regards. > > []s > > Arthur > > > > 2011/4/7 Arthur de Souza Ribeiro <arthurdesribe...@gmail.com> > >> > >> > >> 2011/4/7 Robert Bradshaw <rober...@math.washington.edu> > >>> > >>> On Thu, Apr 7, 2011 at 2:31 PM, Arthur de Souza Ribeiro > >>> <arthurdesribe...@gmail.com> wrote: > >>> > I've submitted to google the link > >>> > > >>> > is: > http://www.google-melange.com/gsoc/proposal/review/google/gsoc2011/arthur_sr/1# > >>> > It would be really important if you could give me a feedback to my > >>> > proposal... > >>> > Thank you > >>> > Best Regards > >>> > Arthur > >>> > >>> Some quick points: > >>> > >>> - Python ships with extensive regression tests--use (and possibly > >>> augment) those to test your work rather than writing your own. > >> > >> Thank you for that information Robert, I didn't realize this. > >> > >>> > >>> - Three modules for a whole summer seems a bit weak, especially for > >>> someone who already knows Cython. Target at least one module/week > >>> seems like a good pace; some will be quickies, others might take 40+ > >>> hours. And I guarantee you'll get better and faster with practice. > >> > >> I'm going to refactor this Robert, as soon as I remake my project's > >> roadmap I'll send to you again. > >> > >>> > >>> - Now that generators are supported, it could also be interesting to > >>> look at compiling all the non-C modules and fixing exposed bugs if > >>> any, but that might be out of scope. > >> > >> I will try to take a look at this after implementing some cython code to > a > >> the module you suggested. > >> > >>> > >>> What I'd like to see is an implementation of a single simple but not > >>> entirely trivial (e.g. not math) module, passing regression tests with > >>> comprable if not better speed than the current C version (though I > >>> think it'd probably make sense to start out with the Python version > >>> and optimize that). E.g. http://docs.python.org/library/json.html > >>> looks like a good candidate. That should only take 8 hours or so, > >>> maybe two days at most, given your background. I'm not expecting > >>> anything before the application deadline, but if you could whip > >>> something like this out in the next week to point to that would help > >>> your application out immensely. In fact, one of the Python > >>> foundation's requirements is that students submit a patch before being > >>> accepted, and this would knock out that requirement and give you a > >>> chance to prove yourself. Create an account on https://github.com and > >>> commit your code into a new repository there. > >>> > >> > >> I will start the implementation of json module right now. I created my > >> github account and as soon as I have code implemented I will send > repository > >> link. > >> Thanks for all the points you listed, I will work on all of them and > send > >> an e-mail. > >> Best Regards. > >> []s > >> Arthur > >> > >>> Hope that helps. > >>> > >>> - Robert > >>> > >>> > >>> > 2011/4/7 Arthur de Souza Ribeiro <arthurdesribe...@gmail.com> > >>> >> > >>> >> I've wrote a proposal to the project: Reimplement C modules in > >>> >> CPython's > >>> >> standard library in Cython. > >>> >> I'd be glad if you could take a look a it and give me your feedback. > >>> >> the link for the proposal is: http://wiki.cython.org/arthursribeiro > >>> >> Thank you. > >>> >> Best Regards > >>> >> Arthur > >>> > > >>> > _______________________________________________ > >>> > cython-devel mailing list > >>> > cython-devel@python.org > >>> > http://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/cython-devel > >>> > > >>> > > >> > > > > > > _______________________________________________ > > cython-devel mailing list > > cython-devel@python.org > > http://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/cython-devel > > > > > _______________________________________________ > cython-devel mailing list > cython-devel@python.org > http://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/cython-devel >
_______________________________________________ cython-devel mailing list cython-devel@python.org http://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/cython-devel
