Achim Gratz writes:
> Marco Atzeri via Cygwin-apps writes:
>> $ cygport GraphicsMagick.cygport list | grep perl5
>> /usr/lib/perl5/vendor_perl/5.32/x86_64-cygwin-threads/Graphics/Magick.pm
>> /usr/lib/perl5/vendor_perl/5.32/x86_64-cygwin-threads/auto/Graphics/Magick/Magick.dll
>> /usr/lib/perl5/ven
Marco Atzeri via Cygwin-apps writes:
> $ cygport GraphicsMagick.cygport list | grep perl5
> /usr/lib/perl5/vendor_perl/5.32/x86_64-cygwin-threads/Graphics/Magick.pm
> /usr/lib/perl5/vendor_perl/5.32/x86_64-cygwin-threads/auto/Graphics/Magick/Magick.dll
> /usr/lib/perl5/vendor_perl/5.32/x86_64-cygwi
On 07.02.2021 08:14, ASSI wrote:
Marco Atzeri via Cygwin-apps writes:
should we add the perl5_032 to REQUIRES ?
Yes, as I'd written earlier in this thread:
yes, I had the impression to remember it,
but I had problem to find the point so better safe than sorry.
I assume only if we have a ver
Marco Atzeri via Cygwin-apps writes:
> should we add the perl5_032 to REQUIRES ?
Yes, as I'd written earlier in this thread:
--8<---cut here---start->8---
Please note that you need to manually insert a dependency on perl5_032
in addition to any dependencies to
On 08.12.2020 20:05, Achim Gratz wrote:
Ken Brown via Cygwin-apps writes:
Well, I get that they always want to be on the bleeding edge of UTF-8,
but otherwise is that version really a requirement? The update itself
isn't much of a problem I'd think, it's just that there's this slew of
other pac
On 1/10/2021 7:42 AM, Achim Gratz wrote:
Achim Gratz writes:
The Perl 5.32 test repository is now up at:
root=http://cygwin.stromeko.net/
$root/perl-5.32
Additionally the perl-5.32-RC1 is now available in this repo as a test
package (perl-5.32.1-0.1). The distributions are all unchanged.
I
Achim Gratz writes:
> The Perl 5.32 test repository is now up at:
>
> root=http://cygwin.stromeko.net/
> $root/perl-5.32
Additionally the perl-5.32-RC1 is now available in this repo as a test
package (perl-5.32.1-0.1). The distributions are all unchanged.
Regards,
Achim.
--
+<[Q+ Matrix-12 WAV
Ken Brown via Cygwin-apps writes:
> The only small glitch that I encountered was when upgrading
> perl-Algorithm-Diff. The version in your test repo was 1.201 instead
> of 1.2010, so setup didn't recognize it as being newer than the
> installed version (1.9xxx).
Ah, I forgot to change that, than
On 12/27/2020 1:41 AM, Achim Gratz wrote:
Ken Brown via Cygwin-apps writes:
The Perl 5.32 test repository is now up at:
root=http://cygwin.stromeko.net/
$root/perl-5.32
including all Perl distributions that I maintain or co-maintain.
Thanks very much! It worked fine for building biber.
Did
Ken Brown via Cygwin-apps writes:
>> The Perl 5.32 test repository is now up at:
>> root=http://cygwin.stromeko.net/
>> $root/perl-5.32
>> including all Perl distributions that I maintain or co-maintain.
>
> Thanks very much! It worked fine for building biber.
Did you encounter any problems with
On 12/26/2020 12:43 PM, Achim Gratz wrote:
Achim Gratz writes:
Achim Gratz writes:
I've cleaned up the patches so they still apply on top of 5.32.0 where
applicable and built the initial packages. For the rest I'll have to
set up one of my old build machines as I don't want to move my main
bui
Achim Gratz writes:
> Achim Gratz writes:
>> I've cleaned up the patches so they still apply on top of 5.32.0 where
>> applicable and built the initial packages. For the rest I'll have to
>> set up one of my old build machines as I don't want to move my main
>> build box from the official state (w
Achim Gratz writes:
> I've cleaned up the patches so they still apply on top of 5.32.0 where
> applicable and built the initial packages. For the rest I'll have to
> set up one of my old build machines as I don't want to move my main
> build box from the official state (which would mean I could no
On 12/21/2020 3:30 PM, Achim Gratz wrote:
Achim Gratz writes:
I've checked again, there was talk about getting 5.32.1 going end of
November but nothing happened since then (on the mailing list anyway).
I think it's unlikely to get released this year since Big Sur has
created a bunch of problems
Achim Gratz writes:
> I've checked again, there was talk about getting 5.32.1 going end of
> November but nothing happened since then (on the mailing list anyway).
> I think it's unlikely to get released this year since Big Sur has
> created a bunch of problems that they'll probably want to get on
On 12/9/2020 3:37 PM, Achim Gratz wrote:
I'll see to get 5.32.0 out for you as a test release (let me know which
distributions you need in addtion to perl itself).
Thanks. Here's the BUILD_REQUIRES:
perl-Business-ISBN
perl-Business-ISMN
perl-Business-ISSN
perl-Class-Accessor
perl-Config-AutoC
Ken Brown via Cygwin-apps writes:
> I've just followed up with the biber maintainer, with a copy to you.
Thanks.
I've checked again, there was talk about getting 5.32.1 going end of
November but nothing happened since then (on the mailing list anyway).
I think it's unlikely to get released this y
On 12/9/2020 1:57 PM, Achim Gratz wrote:
Achim Gratz writes:
I'd still be interested in what upstream thinks they get from 5.32 that
absolutely can't be had from 5.30.
It's even more saddening or hilarious (depending on where you are
standing) than I thought. The whole thing was developed whi
Achim Gratz writes:
> I'd still be interested in what upstream thinks they get from 5.32 that
> absolutely can't be had from 5.30.
It's even more saddening or hilarious (depending on where you are
standing) than I thought. The whole thing was developed while still
being compatible with 5.30 and i
Ken Brown via Cygwin-apps writes:
> Yes, unfortunately it really is a requirement. But I'd be perfectly
> happy to just install 5.32 locally and use it for building the
> upstream biber (which is distributed as an archive created by
> PAR::Packer). I can delay releasing Cygwin's biber package unt
On 12/8/2020 2:05 PM, Achim Gratz wrote:
Ken Brown via Cygwin-apps writes:
I've just learned that the next release of biber is going to require
5.32. Do you have any plans to package the latter?
Well, I get that they always want to be on the bleeding edge of UTF-8,
but otherwise is that versi
Ken Brown via Cygwin-apps writes:
> I've just learned that the next release of biber is going to require
> 5.32. Do you have any plans to package the latter?
Well, I get that they always want to be on the bleeding edge of UTF-8,
but otherwise is that version really a requirement? The update itse
22 matches
Mail list logo
