On 2023-09-24 08:10, Thomas Wolff wrote:
Am 24.09.2023 um 14:32 schrieb Jon Turney:
On 08/09/2023 18:29, Brian Inglis wrote:
Thinking we could drop the ancient (8 years) orphaned DJGPP 32-bit (by
definition) packages; they are older than djgpp current, never mind beta on
gcc 13; from DJ's late
Am 24.09.2023 um 14:32 schrieb Jon Turney via Cygwin-apps:
On 08/09/2023 18:29, Brian Inglis via Cygwin-apps wrote:
Hi folks,
Thinking we could drop the ancient (8 years) orphaned DJGPP 32-bit
(by definition) packages; they are older than djgpp current, never
mind beta on gcc 13; from DJ's
On 08/09/2023 18:29, Brian Inglis via Cygwin-apps wrote:
Hi folks,
Thinking we could drop the ancient (8 years) orphaned DJGPP 32-bit (by
definition) packages; they are older than djgpp current, never mind beta
on gcc 13; from DJ's latest Monthly Mini-FAQ summary:
djdev-2.05 binutils-2.
Hi folks,
Thinking we could drop the ancient (8 years) orphaned DJGPP 32-bit (by
definition) packages; they are older than djgpp current, never mind beta on gcc
13; from DJ's latest Monthly Mini-FAQ summary:
djdev-2.05 binutils-2.32 ... gcc-10.2.0 ...
$ cygcheck -p DJGPP
Found 18 mat
