Re: [ITA] nano

Philippe Baril Lecavalier via Cygwin-apps writes: > Thank you for the clarifications. I thought there could be something > with rsync and cygwin-rdbxbdvo6bxqt0dzr+a...@public.gmane.org, but it might > be a nuisance to > administer properly, to prevent some crazy slurping "by mistake" or > read acc

Re: [ITA] nano

On Thu, Apr 10, 2025 at 11:30 AM Jon Turney wrote: > > But we really don't mind people making git clones, so if you want to get > a load of cygport files to grep through and whatnot, this is relatively > easy to script: Thank you for the clarifications. I thought there could be something with rsy

Re: [ITA] nano

On 10/04/2025 11:29, Philippe Baril Lecavalier via Cygwin-apps wrote: On Tue, Apr 8, 2025 at 3:48 PM Jon Turney wrote: In future, if you could please attach patches to emails, that makes them easier to use. Of course. When in doubt, I follow LKML's long established practice. Good to know mi

Re: [ITA] nano

On Tue, Apr 8, 2025 at 3:48 PM Jon Turney wrote: > > In future, if you could please attach patches to emails, that makes them > easier to use. Of course. When in doubt, I follow LKML's long established practice. Good to know mime type attachments supported here! A few questions that came up alo

Re: [ITA] nano

> On 07/04/2025 12:37, Philippe Baril Lecavalier via Cygwin-apps wrote: > > First time contribution, hold my hand please! > > > > For a first attempt, I selected `nano` as my victim (the lack of > > reverse deps means I won't do too much damage today). ... > > Done. > > I also added nano to your

Re: [ITA] nano

On 07/04/2025 12:37, Philippe Baril Lecavalier via Cygwin-apps wrote: First time contribution, hold my hand please! For a first attempt, I selected `nano` as my victim (the lack of reverse deps means I won't do too much damage today). Last version: 4.9 (2020.03.24) This: 8.0 (2024.05.01) The l

[ITA] nano

First time contribution, hold my hand please! For a first attempt, I selected `nano` as my victim (the lack of reverse deps means I won't do too much damage today). Last version: 4.9 (2020.03.24) This: 8.0 (2024.05.01) The latest available is 8.4, but starting with 8.1 there's a problem (gettext

Re: [ITA] nano package

On Mon, 17 Dec 2007, Yaakov (Cygwin Ports) wrote: > Lapo Luchini wrote: > > PS: AFAIR the g-b-s' "deps" target lists them all, but cygport's "dep" > > does not. > > The g-b-s deps check was based on cygcheck, which shows the entire > dependency tree, where cygport uses objdump, which lists only th

Re: [ITA] nano package

-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA256 Lapo Luchini wrote: > PS: AFAIR the g-b-s' "deps" target lists them all, but cygport's "dep" > does not. The g-b-s deps check was based on cygcheck, which shows the entire dependency tree, where cygport uses objdump, which lists only those that the

Re: [ITA] nano package

On Mon, 17 Dec 2007, Lapo Luchini wrote: > Igor Peshansky wrote: > >>> . > >> Doh? ;-) > > Sort of. Just making sure this time things don't get buried in the TODO > > list... :-) > > Uh.. not exactly: I was "doh"ing to the fact that that I'm not quite as > active

Re: [ITA] nano package

Dr. Volker Zell wrote: > setup.hint should only include direct dependencies OK, noted (for next revision). PS: AFAIR the g-b-s' "deps" target lists them all, but cygport's "dep" does not. -- Lapo Luchini [EMAIL PROTECTED] (OpenPGP & X.509) www.lapo.it (Jabber, ICQ, MSN)

Re: [ITA] nano package

Igor Peshansky wrote: >>> . >> Doh? ;-) > Sort of. Just making sure this time things don't get buried in the TODO > list... :-) Uh.. not exactly: I was "doh"ing to the fact that that I'm not quite as active as Jari is, in adopting packages 0=) (second hint: #JAa

Re: [ITA] nano package

On Mon, 17 Dec 2007, Lapo Luchini wrote: > Igor Peshansky wrote: > > On Mon, 17 Dec 2007, Corinna Vinschen wrote: > > > >> On Dec 17 12:50, Lapo Luchini wrote: > >> > >>> http://cyberx.lapo.it/cygwin/nano/nano-2.0.6-1.tar.bz2 > >>> http://cyberx.lapo.it/cygwin/nano/nano-2.0.6-1-src.tar.bz2 > >>> >

Re: [ITA] nano package

Igor Peshansky wrote: > On Mon, 17 Dec 2007, Corinna Vinschen wrote: > >> On Dec 17 12:50, Lapo Luchini wrote: >> >>> http://cyberx.lapo.it/cygwin/nano/nano-2.0.6-1.tar.bz2 >>> http://cyberx.lapo.it/cygwin/nano/nano-2.0.6-1-src.tar.bz2 >>> >> Looks good, uploaded. >> Thanks for takin

Re: [ITA] nano package

> Corinna Vinschen writes: > On Dec 17 12:50, Lapo Luchini wrote: >> http://cyberx.lapo.it/cygwin/nano/nano-2.0.6-1.tar.bz2 >> http://cyberx.lapo.it/cygwin/nano/nano-2.0.6-1-src.tar.bz2 > Looks good, uploaded. setup.hint should only include direct dependencies: cygport nano-

Re: [ITA] nano package

On Mon, 17 Dec 2007, Corinna Vinschen wrote: > On Dec 17 12:50, Lapo Luchini wrote: > > http://cyberx.lapo.it/cygwin/nano/nano-2.0.6-1.tar.bz2 > > http://cyberx.lapo.it/cygwin/nano/nano-2.0.6-1-src.tar.bz2 > > Looks good, uploaded. > Thanks for taking over, > Corinna

Re: [ITA] nano package

On Dec 17 12:50, Lapo Luchini wrote: > http://cyberx.lapo.it/cygwin/nano/nano-2.0.6-1.tar.bz2 > http://cyberx.lapo.it/cygwin/nano/nano-2.0.6-1-src.tar.bz2 Looks good, uploaded. Thanks for taking over, Corinna -- Corinna Vinschen Please, send mails regarding Cygwin to Cygwin Pr

Re: [ITA] nano package

Lapo Luchini wrote: Lapo Luchini wrote: Hi Gareth, just a quick question: do you plan to support the current nano-2.0.x branch in your Cygwin package relases? Gareth replied privately to me that's ok with him if I adopt the package. Should anyone take a look at the packaging? htt

[ITA] nano package

Lapo Luchini wrote: > Hi Gareth, > just a quick question: do you plan to support the current nano-2.0.x > branch in your Cygwin package relases? Gareth replied privately to me that's ok with him if I adopt the package. Should anyone take a look at the packaging? http://cyberx.lapo.it/cygwin/