Re: [ITP] onc-rpc-devel-2_19_20140211-1

2014-02-12 Thread Charles Wilson
On 2/12/2014 7:45 AM, Pavel Fedin wrote: This is me again, and this is my promised RPC package. Folder URL: https://www.dropbox.com/sh/s95jz1ql5xs8yx7/8mhUDlI_Kg I have updated the whole thing using recent source code. Translations included. I hope you'll like the result. One small question

Re: [ITP] onc-rpc-headers-20140129-1

2014-02-07 Thread Charles Wilson
On 2/6/2014 12:46 AM, Pavel Fedin wrote: I'd be happy to hand off rpcgen. All it would take is a coordinated upload, once Pavel's combined package is ready. Good. I think we can safely experiment on x86-64 version. On i386 this new package would conflict with old sunrpc, however sunrpc > cont

Re: [ITP] onc-rpc-headers-20140129-1

2014-02-05 Thread Charles Wilson
On 2/5/2014 4:19 AM, Corinna Vinschen wrote: On Feb 5 10:39, Pavel Fedin wrote: Hello! Presumably you could find some public cloud with free storage space - I use Dropbox, but I'm sure there are plenty of others. https://www.dropbox.com/sh/s95jz1ql5xs8yx7/8mhUDlI_Kg However, before add

Re: Cygport and auto-manifestize compatibility manifest

2013-11-20 Thread Charles Wilson
On 11/20/2013 8:28 AM, Corinna Vinschen wrote: Apart from the fact that it would be nice if our linker would do this automatically and transparently, Or libtool, if you use it to link your exe? PTC...since $new-libtool is pretty high on my to-do list. It'd be better if there was an option t

[64bit] inetutils-1.9.1-1

2013-11-15 Thread Charles Wilson
is now available. However, neither the servers nor the clients have been well tested...so report any problems (that didn't already show up in 32bit cygwin with inetutils-1.7-2) to the main list. -- Chuck

Re: [HEADSUP] Re: Obsolete Packages in "Requires" Lines

2013-11-13 Thread Charles Wilson
On 11/13/2013 7:05 AM, Corinna Vinschen wrote: libproj-devel libproj0 proj libproj0 I think these dependencies are deliberate, to cover the older 4.5.0a-2 version. Chuck? Shouldn't they go away in favor of libproj1 only? Yep. Fixed on sware (32bit only, as I

Re: sunrpc patch that fixes nfs-server failure when reading files of specific sizes

2013-11-04 Thread Charles Wilson
On 11/4/2013 7:22 AM, marco atzeri wrote: Hi George, unfortunately the nfs-server is without a package maintainer http://cygwin.com/cygwin-pkg-maint Yes, but the patch is actually for sunrpc, of which I am (nominally) listed as the maintainer. There's an issue with sunrpc in general (I'll ha

Re: subtle problem with x86_64 automake1.4

2013-09-13 Thread Charles Wilson
On 9/10/2013 1:50 PM, Christopher Faylor wrote: upset's version normalizer considers (not unreasonably I think) 4-1.4p6-11 to be the same as 4-1.4-p6-11. So, having both files in the same directory is going to confuse things. Yaakov explained downthread how this came about. I /did/ notice tha

Re: why does setup keep trying to install non-required packages?

2013-08-12 Thread Charles Wilson
On 8/12/2013 11:45 AM, Corinna Vinschen wrote: On Aug 12 11:29, Christopher Faylor wrote: On Mon, Aug 12, 2013 at 01:16:33PM +0200, Corinna Vinschen wrote: On Aug 12 07:10, Ken Brown wrote: Maybe I jumped to an incorrect conclusion, but that (and earlier instances of the same problem) made me

[64bit] Updated/added automake packages

2013-08-02 Thread Charles Wilson
automake (wrapper)9-1 automake1.14 1.14-1 automake1.13 1.13.4-1 automake1.12 1.12.6-2 automake1.11 1.11.6-2 automake1.10 1.10.3-2 automake1.9

Re: Sorted list of packages missing in the 64 bit distro yet

2013-08-01 Thread Charles Wilson
st is also available online at http://cygwin.com/cygwin-64bit-missing. I'll keep it up-to-date as new packages arrive. ORPHANED editrights Really? it's in the cygwin-apps repository; I thought *you* were the maintainer. Charles Wilson automake1.5 automake1.6

Re: tftp for x86_64 uploaded (was Re: Please build 64 bit packages)

2013-08-01 Thread Charles Wilson
On 8/1/2013 5:18 AM, Corinna Vinschen wrote: Btw., I just built and uploaded the tftp package for x86_64. For some reason, even though inetutils is built without tftp and tftpd support, it still needs the arp/tftp.h file provided by the tftp package. stock inetutils assumes that tftp.h is provi

[64bit] Added i686-pc-mingw32 toolchain

2013-07-17 Thread Charles Wilson
The following packages are now available for cygwin64: mingw-gcc-4.7.3-1 mingw-gcc-core mingw-gcc-g++ mingw-gcc-fortran mingw-gcc-objc mingw-gcc-ada mingw-binutils-2.23.1-1 mingw-w32api-4.0-1

Re: Please try new setup exe's

2013-07-17 Thread Charles Wilson
On 7/16/2013 2:59 PM, Christopher Faylor wrote: On Tue, Jul 16, 2013 at 08:50:08PM +0200, Corinna Vinschen wrote: The former setup64 doesn't complain, but I don't think this is a setup problem. Rather, it's a difference between the generated ini files. The old setup64.ini was only generated by

Re: Please try new setup exe's

2013-07-17 Thread Charles Wilson
On 7/17/2013 10:21 AM, Christopher Faylor wrote: If you want to keep parity with upset, then only arch is filled out automatically. If there is no --release then that field doesn't show up in the generated ini file. With that change, feel free to checkin. done. -- Chuck

[64bit] Upload procedure

2013-07-17 Thread Charles Wilson
I just uploaded some new packages to the 64bit area. Do I still need to run GEN-sware, or is x86_64 upset-enabled now? -- Chuck

Re: [64bit] Some packaging problems

2013-07-17 Thread Charles Wilson
On 7/17/2013 9:48 AM, Corinna Vinschen wrote: On Jul 17 09:26, Charles Wilson wrote: so it's not like it could coexist with a future libexpat2-devel. I think the "libexpat1-devel" name in 2.1.0-2 is a mistake, and it expat should be repackaged to use "traditional" na

Re: [64bit] Some packaging problems

2013-07-17 Thread Charles Wilson
On 7/17/2013 4:30 AM, Corinna Vinschen wrote: On Jul 16 17:25, Ken Brown wrote: 1. The x86_64 distro has both libexpat1-devel and libexpat-devel, with the files of the latter being a subset of those of the former. In addition, libexpat1-devel is missing a setup.hint, so it is put into the Misc c

Re: Please try new setup exe's

2013-07-16 Thread Charles Wilson
On 7/16/2013 8:28 PM, Ken Brown wrote: On 7/16/2013 6:23 PM, Charles Wilson wrote: @@ -277,6 +289,9 @@ Create cygwin setup.ini from setup.ini, missing tarballs. --okmissing=source is useful for LOCAL-ONLY[*] srcless install media

Re: Please try new setup exe's

2013-07-16 Thread Charles Wilson
On 7/15/2013 2:58 PM, Christopher Faylor wrote: On Mon, Jul 15, 2013 at 02:32:24PM -0400, Charles Wilson wrote: What changes did you have to make to upset, to teach it about the new format? I'd like to replicate those changes in genini... http://cygwin.com/cgi-bin/cvsweb.cgi/~che

Re: Please try new setup exe's

2013-07-15 Thread Charles Wilson
On 7/15/2013 1:05 PM, Christopher Faylor wrote: The setup.ini's used by these two new programs are not backwards-compatible with old setup.exe. What changes did you have to make to upset, to teach it about the new format? I'd like to replicate those changes in genini... http://cygwi

old automake vs. cygwin64 [Was: Automake 1.9 bug: config.guess does not recognize Cygwin64]

2013-07-10 Thread Charles Wilson
On 7/10/2013 2:11 AM, Fedin Pavel wrote: Hello! I've just stumbled accross a bug in Automake v1.9 package. I was trying to regenerate files in a source tree which sets automake version to 1.9. 'automake -icf' has copied files, but config.guess bundled with this version of automake appears to no

[64bit] autoconf packages updated

2013-07-08 Thread Charles Wilson
I've updated the following 64bit packages: autoconf-13-1 (wrapper) autoconf2.1-2.13-12 autoconf2.5-2.69-2 See the 32bit announcement(s) for details. -- Chuck

Re: Preparation for gcc 4.7.3-1

2013-07-03 Thread Charles Wilson
On 7/3/2013 12:04 PM, Achim Gratz wrote: Yaakov (Cygwin/X) writes: I can't test it myself at the moment, but I believe that mingw-gcc is now broken due to its dependency on libmpc1. As a stopgap measure we could provide a libmpc1 package that copies libmpc3, otherwise a new mingw-gcc would ha

Re: [HEADSUP] wrong permissions in 64bit release dir

2013-07-03 Thread Charles Wilson
On 7/3/2013 4:34 AM, Corinna Vinschen wrote: cwilson: csih csih/csih-debuginfo jbigkit run run/run-debuginfo done.

[64bit] Uploaded libXpm-noX/libXpm-noX-devel/libXpm-noX_4}-3.5.10-1

2013-07-01 Thread Charles Wilson
The libXpm-noX packages provide a version of the X.Org XPM image format library that do NOT require the use of an X server. This library can be used to read, process, and save XPM images, but all display code has been removed, because that requires X. It is useful for applications that need to m

Re: [64bit] libXpm-noX

2013-07-01 Thread Charles Wilson
On 6/2/2013 11:02 AM, Ken Brown wrote: Could we get a 64bit build of libXpm-noX when you get a chance? It would be useful for emacs-w32. Done. -- Chuck

Re: p7zip

2013-06-28 Thread Charles Wilson
On 6/28/2013 12:05 PM, Charles Wilson wrote: Who updated p7zip from 9.20.1-1 to 9.20.1-2 (32bit), and why? (Also, I don't see an announcement on cygwin-announce). Never mind; false alarm. I forgot I had cygwin-ports hooked into my cygwin 32 bit install. -- Chuck

p7zip

2013-06-28 Thread Charles Wilson
Who updated p7zip from 9.20.1-1 to 9.20.1-2 (32bit), and why? (Also, I don't see an announcement on cygwin-announce). -- Chuck

[64bit] run2-0.4.2-1

2013-06-16 Thread Charles Wilson
The run2 package provides two utilities: 'run2' and 'checkX' (as the package is actually a renamed and updated successor to the now-obsoleted checkx package). The first utility is a more powerful replacement for the venerable 'run' utility that has long been a part of the cygwin distribution. The

[64bit] libustr/libustr1/libustr-devel-1.0.4-12

2013-06-16 Thread Charles Wilson
ustr (Micro string library) is a string API for C. It has tiny overhead over just plain strdup(), is much safer, is easier to use, is faster for many operations, and can be used with read-only or automatically allocated data. You don't even need to link to the library to use it (so there are no de

64bit inetutils request [Was:: gettext packaging bug?]

2013-06-16 Thread Charles Wilson
On 6/12/2013 3:47 PM, Corinna Vinschen wrote: Btw., any chance you could have a look into a 64 bit inetutils? :} Oh, ouch. That's going to be miserable, assuming I do full testing of the included servers and clients. For this reason, it was on the very END of my TODO list. Or...I could just

Re: gettext packaging bug?

2013-06-13 Thread Charles Wilson
On 6/12/2013 10:50 PM, Yaakov (Cygwin/X) wrote: On 2013-06-12 14:08, Charles Wilson wrote: However, in actuality, neither Bruno's "gettext-runtime" (our gettext) nor his "gettext-tools" (our gettext-devel) really represent a "traditional" runtime-vs-devel spli

Re: gettext packaging bug?

2013-06-12 Thread Charles Wilson
On 6/12/2013 11:13 AM, Corinna Vinschen wrote: I was just trying to build a package on a new 64 bit Cygwin test machine, when I encountered a missing libintl.h. As it turned out, I had gettext-devel installed, but not gettext. In the 64 bit version of gettext, gettext-devel depends on libintl8,

Re: [RFU] sqlite3-3.7.17-3

2013-06-11 Thread Charles Wilson
On 6/11/2013 10:10 AM, Warren Young wrote: On 6/11/2013 01:37, marco atzeri wrote: you should make it test adding the relevant prev/current/test entries as specified on http://cygwin.com/setup.html Is there a way to set this via the .cygport file? I tried searching its HTML manual, and did

Re: Cygwin libtool update

2013-06-10 Thread Charles Wilson
On 6/9/2013 7:01 AM, JonY wrote: Care to put up 2.4.2? It's been out for some time now. It will take some time, but yes. That'll be on the queue right after run2 and libXpm-noX (and perhaps another 'run' b/c...well, JobQueues. See upcoming post on main list). -- Chuck

[64bit] run-1.2.0-1

2013-05-30 Thread Charles Wilson
for mingw64 (32bit,64bit) as well as mingw.org compilers. -- Charles Wilson volunteer run maintainer for cygwin

Re: "run" 64 bit package?

2013-05-24 Thread Charles Wilson
On 5/23/2013 4:22 AM, Corinna Vinschen wrote: is there a chance we can get a 64 bit "run" package any time soon? It's required for starting X from the start menu... Sure, I'll work on that and run2 tonight. -- Chuck

Re: [64bit] autoconf test for GetConsoleScreenBufferInfo

2013-05-14 Thread Charles Wilson
On 5/14/2013 3:05 PM, Corinna Vinschen wrote: I fear you might not like my answer: The problem here is NOT that the linking works, the problem is that, if the configure test is used to find out if we're running on Windows or not, it's simply not feasible anymore when taking x86_64 Cygwin into ac

[64bit] Updated: {zlib/zlib0/zlib-devel/minizip/libminizip1/libminizip-devel}-1.2.8-1

2013-05-09 Thread Charles Wilson
/Makefile.gcc * First 64bit build * Added debuginfo package -- Charles Wilson volunteer zlib maintainer for cygwin

[64bit] cygutils-1.4.12-1 update

2013-04-27 Thread Charles Wilson
Which utilities need this? mkshortcut and lpr, probably. Any others? -- Charles Wilson volunteer cygutils maintainer for cygwin

[64bit]: New: {jbigkit/libjbig2/libjbig-devel}-2.0-12

2013-04-26 Thread Charles Wilson
es * Added debuginfo package * First 64bit build -- Charles Wilson volunteer jbigkit maintainer for cygwin

Re: Recent cygport and cygwin-specific READMEs [Was: Re: GCC-4.7.2-2: Go/No-go?]

2013-04-24 Thread Charles Wilson
On 4/24/2013 4:34 AM, Corinna Vinschen wrote: On Apr 24 00:52, Charles Wilson wrote: Why would simply shortening the PATH have this effect? Do you have a big environment? Thre's a chance that the stack address moves due to that. $ printenv | wc 65 1162418 $ echo $PATH

Re: Recent cygport and cygwin-specific READMEs [Was: Re: GCC-4.7.2-2: Go/No-go?]

2013-04-23 Thread Charles Wilson
On 4/13/2013 11:45 PM, Yaakov (Cygwin/X) wrote: On 2013-04-13 00:55, Andy Koppe wrote: I've also tried installing cygport from git master but got this after running ./autogen.sh && make: make: *** No rule to make target `data/gnuconfig/config.guess', needed by `all-am'. Stop. This is one qui

Re: [64 bit] ghostscript configure script doesn't recognize libtiff

2013-04-23 Thread Charles Wilson
On 4/23/2013 4:21 AM, Corinna Vinschen wrote: On Apr 23 06:55, Dr. Volker Zell wrote: I need help compiling ghostscript for 64 bit. The configure script doesn't recognize libtiff somehow. Any ideas ? Yes. libtiff-3.9.7-2 is apparently 32 bit: $ file /bin/cygtiff-5.dll /bin/cygtiff-5.dl

Re: Recent cygport and cygwin-specific READMEs

2013-04-12 Thread Charles Wilson
On 4/11/2013 6:37 PM, Yaakov (Cygwin/X) wrote: No, cygport(1) doesn't generate README content. Too bad. Well, maintaining the READMEs in my local git repo side-by-side with the cygport(5) is not that big a deal -- especially with the other cygport(1) improvements, incl #3 below. #2) Is it

Re: [64bit] type conflict for INT32

2013-04-12 Thread Charles Wilson
On 4/11/2013 6:08 PM, Yaakov (Cygwin/X) wrote: It does mean that Win32API (or X11, for that matter) headers must be #include'd before . Before I spin a new release, could you test if this works with emacs? Would this problem go away if we switched to jpeg-turbo? -- Chuck

Recent cygport and cygwin-specific READMEs [Was: Re: GCC-4.7.2-2: Go/No-go?]

2013-04-11 Thread Charles Wilson
On 4/11/2013 2:58 AM, Yaakov (Cygwin/X) wrote: Something else you missed: cygport supports a new, unversioned file format, and creates setup.hint files, including dependency detection. I suggest using git master right now. I know that cygwin-specific READMEs are now no longer required or expe

Re: [RFC] libjpeg-turbo

2013-04-10 Thread Charles Wilson
On 4/10/2013 4:03 AM, Yaakov (Cygwin/X) wrote: The libjpeg-turbo project provides SIMD acceleration while remaining API and ABI compatible with IJG libjpeg 6b/7/8 (based on configure flags). I have been using this libjpeg8 locally instead of the IJG one from the distro for some time, and have see

Re: Maintainers please weigh in on 64-bit Cygwin

2013-04-09 Thread Charles Wilson
On 3/17/2013 12:45 PM, Christopher Faylor wrote: 1) Do you have a 64-bit version of Windows available? 2) If no, would you be willing to install one? 3) Are you willing to download the current 64-bit Cygwin and start porting your stuff, knowing that there are still bugs? 4) Or, would you rathe

Re: 64 bit editrights package & csih

2013-04-08 Thread Charles Wilson
On 4/7/2013 12:21 AM, Charles Wilson wrote: On 4/5/2013 10:15 AM, Corinna Vinschen wrote: Chuck, editrights was the last dependency missing for csih. Would you mind to build a new package? I was going to just copy it over from the 32 bit release area, but then it occured to me that it isn&#

Re: 64bit cygport

2013-04-08 Thread Charles Wilson
On 4/7/2013 7:11 AM, Achim Gratz wrote: I've just set up a Cygwin64 system. It seems I can run a 32bit Cygwin in parallel without disturbing anything, is that right? FYI, unless I've misinterpreted, I think you need to use git master cygport to build "natively" in cygwin64. If you're cross-

Re: [ITP] mingw64-x86_64-winpthreads 3.0b_svn5726-1

2013-04-08 Thread Charles Wilson
On 4/7/2013 5:47 AM, JonY wrote: For now, I intend to push it to 64bit Cygwin only, once gcc 4.7 for the 32bit cygwin hits release, I will push it there too. There are some files in the package that replaces e.g. "conflict with" some of the mingw-w64-headers CRT headers, this is done on purp

Re: 64 bit editrights package & csih

2013-04-06 Thread Charles Wilson
On 4/5/2013 10:15 AM, Corinna Vinschen wrote: Chuck, editrights was the last dependency missing for csih. Would you mind to build a new package? I was going to just copy it over from the 32 bit release area, but then it occured to me that it isn't just a script, but contains binaries as well...

Re: automake: python3.2 and py-compile

2012-12-03 Thread Charles Wilson
On 11/23/2012 9:22 AM, Corinna Vinschen wrote: Chuck, are you still with us? There's also the request to update autoconf to the latest 2.69 version: http://cygwin.com/ml/cygwin/2012-11/msg00164.html On Nov 16 04:39, Yaakov (Cygwin/X) wrote: On Wed, 2012-10-17 at 11:07 -0500, Yaakov (Cygwin/X

Re: libtiff-devel (3.9.6-1): missing dependency on libjbig-devel

2012-08-21 Thread Charles Wilson
On 8/21/2012 10:17 PM, James Zern wrote: libwebp's [1] configure script [2] does a simple check for -ltiff, this will succeed, but the build will fail due to the missing library. Corrected on sourceware; next release of libtiff will include this change organically. Thanks for the heads up.

Re: gdk-pixbuf update? (attn: Chuck)

2012-08-21 Thread Charles Wilson
On 8/21/2012 3:17 PM, Yaakov (Cygwin/X) wrote: Chuck, for someone who hates flag days with a passion[1], you have most ironically forced one upon us without warning. Please rectify that by restoring libpng14-devel (with 1.4-versioned files only, of course) ASAP. Actually, I was just following y

Re: [RFC] setup: allow building with i686-w64-mingw32

2012-06-04 Thread Charles Wilson
On 6/1/2012 6:36 AM, Corinna Vinschen wrote: > On Jun 1 12:20, Corinna Vinschen wrote: >> On Jun 1 02:45, Yaakov (Cygwin/X) wrote: >>> Fedora has switched from the i686-pc-mingw32 toolchain to the >>> {i686,x86_64}-w64-mingw32 toolchains in F17. This means that setup >>> cannot currently be buil

Re: zlib: upset messages

2012-05-14 Thread Charles Wilson
On 5/14/2012 1:32 AM, Yaakov (Cygwin/X) wrote: > On 2012-05-14 00:31, upset lived up to its name and complained: >> upset: *** setup.ini: warning - package minizip requires non-existent >> package libgcc_1 > > I made the obvious fix on sourceware; please fix your local copy, etc. Thanks (and sorr

Re: cygport: user-supplied download action?

2012-05-11 Thread Charles Wilson
On 5/10/2012 10:55 PM, Yaakov (Cygwin/X) wrote: Right; sourceware.org:/cvs/src is funny that way. AFAIK it is the only time I have seen that with CVS, but do other exceptions exist? libgeotiff. This is related to one of the patches I had proposed long ago, but eventually withdrew. However, m

Re: [SECURITY] libpng vulnerabilities

2012-05-05 Thread Charles Wilson
On 5/4/2012 8:21 PM, Yaakov (Cygwin/X) wrote: I have sent notices of multiple security vulnerabilities in libpng going back LAST JULY, with several additions and pings (no pun intended) since. Can we *please* see some sign that you are still maintaining these packages? I wanted to roll out the

Re: automake 1.11.2 ?

2012-03-26 Thread Charles Wilson
On 3/25/2012 2:40 AM, Yaakov (Cygwin/X) wrote: > On 2012-03-24 22:12, Yaakov Selkowitz wrote: >> Chuck, >> >> In the last few weeks I have seen a few packages which require >> automake-1.11.2. Any chance you could update this soon? > > Actually, make that 1.11.3. > >> Oh, and ping on the libpng s

Re: [RFC] disable static libraries?

2012-03-16 Thread Charles Wilson
On 3/15/2012 11:55 PM, Christopher Faylor wrote: > On Thu, Mar 15, 2012 at 10:30:45PM -0500, Yaakov (Cygwin/X) wrote: >> libtool, while very commonly used, is the only major build system which >> creates both shared and static versions of every library by default. >> With the notable exceptions o

Re: Mingw64 and Cygwin: header and libs layout

2012-03-16 Thread Charles Wilson
On 3/13/2012 10:00 AM, Corinna Vinschen wrote: > - Either keep the files in /usr/{include,lib,lib64}/w32api, which requires > to duplicate the files as it is done today, I don't think it's THAT big a burden for (Chris S.|Joy Y.) to create two different packages for (mingw32|mingw64-platform). B

Re: Fwd: GnuPG maintainer wanted

2012-02-27 Thread Charles Wilson
On 2/27/2012 11:07 AM, marco atzeri wrote: > Thanks for status, > I was just wondering why most of the dependencies > where present but a bit old. Yep -- since the only thing those deps are actually used for, it seems, is gnupg-2.x, I haven't been keeping them up to date without an actual gnupg-2.

Re: [RFC] Packaging texlive

2012-02-27 Thread Charles Wilson
On 2/27/2012 5:51 AM, Yaakov (Cygwin/X) wrote: > TeX Live also replaces psutils, listed as maintained by Daniel > Boesswetter. AFACIS he hasn't posted to these lists since November > 2003, so I think it's fair to say that it's been orphaned. Is it possible to package this part in such a way that

Re: [SECURITY] libpng vulnerabilities

2012-02-27 Thread Charles Wilson
On 2/26/2012 3:02 AM, marco atzeri wrote: > All versions of libpng from 1.0.6 through 1.5.8, 1.4.8, 1.2.46, and > 1.0.56, respectively, fail to correctly validate a heap allocation in > png_decompress_chunk(), which can lead to a buffer-overrun and the > possibility of execution of hostile code on

Re: Fwd: GnuPG maintainer wanted

2012-02-27 Thread Charles Wilson
On 2/27/2012 8:56 AM, marco atzeri wrote: > I will give a look. > Any preference between 1.4.12 and 2.0.18 ? I made an attempt about two years ago to port gnupg 2.x. It has additional dependencies beyond those of 1.4.x, so I added all of those to the distro. However, I ran into a problem (relate

Re: realpath: cygutils or coreutils?

2012-02-08 Thread Charles Wilson
On 2/6/2012 11:49 AM, Eric Blake wrote: I've uploaded coreutils-8.15-1 as a test release; I can kick it over to current once you've got a cygutils release to match. cygutils-1.4.8-1 is uploaded as a test release. * Integrate cygstart with FD.o menu and mimetype system. (Yaakov Selkowitz) * Re

Re: CFA: support Windows 8 in /usr/lib/csih/winProductName.exe

2012-02-06 Thread Charles Wilson
On 2/6/2012 6:30 AM, Corinna Vinschen wrote: 6.2 is correct. Have a look into dump_sysinfo() in utils/cygcheck.cc. It's updated to the latest known state when the W8 test release became available. Ah, thanks. I looked at wincap.cc and didn't see anything there, so... -- Chuck

Re: Bug in csih

2012-02-06 Thread Charles Wilson
On 2/6/2012 6:25 AM, Corinna Vinschen wrote: On Feb 5 15:23, Charles Wilson wrote: How's this? (BTW, we do similar stuff in csih_create_privileged_user() but I didn't address that). That looks ok to me. As for csih_create_privileged_user, I don't see what you mean. In th

CFA: support Windows 8 in /usr/lib/csih/winProductName.exe

2012-02-05 Thread Charles Wilson
Call for assistance: can somebody with access to Windows 8 provide an appropriate tested patch so that winProductName can recognize Windows 8 (various flavors, including Windows Server 8)? Getting the System Version http://msdn.microsoft.com/en-us/library/ms724429%28v=vs.85%29.aspx has not bee

Re: realpath: cygutils or coreutils?

2012-02-05 Thread Charles Wilson
On 1/30/2012 7:01 PM, Charles Wilson wrote: On 1/30/2012 3:32 PM, Eric Blake wrote: In particular, it is much more powerful than the realpath(1) currently offered by cygutils. Should I build my next coreutils package with realpath included, and wait to upload it until we can coordinate a build

Re: Bug in csih

2012-02-05 Thread Charles Wilson
On 1/16/2012 5:14 AM, Corinna Vinschen wrote: Chuck? Ping? How's this? (BTW, we do similar stuff in csih_create_privileged_user() but I didn't address that). Index: cygwin-service-installation-helper.sh === RCS file: /cvs/c

Re: realpath: cygutils or coreutils?

2012-02-05 Thread Charles Wilson
On 1/30/2012 8:50 PM, Yaakov (Cygwin/X) wrote: While you're at it, what about ascii(1)? http://cygwin.com/ml/cygwin-apps/2011-10/msg00113.html Nobody ever responded to my comments at the end of that thread, so it kinda went into limbo. Given two +1 votes (your own and Christian Franke's) i'

Re: ITP checkbashisms -- Check for bashisms in /bin/sh scripts

2012-02-05 Thread Charles Wilson
On 2/4/2012 3:55 AM, Jari Aalto wrote: checkbashisms script has been included in Debian since 200x (don't know exatly; its git log starts in 2007). It's part of the devsripts in Debian. To check build: tar -xf check*.bz2 ./check*.sh --color --verbose all We're not debian, and don't ex

Re: realpath: cygutils or coreutils?

2012-01-30 Thread Charles Wilson
On 1/30/2012 3:32 PM, Eric Blake wrote: > In particular, it is much more powerful than the realpath(1) currently > offered by cygutils. Should I build my next coreutils package with > realpath included, and wait to upload it until we can coordinate a build > with cygutils dropping the weaker varia

Re: [RFU] mingw-w64

2011-12-18 Thread Charles Wilson
On 12/17/2011 11:35 PM, JonY wrote: New mingw-w64 build is ready. Remove the oldest in each category, leave pthreads. Done. -- Chuck

Re: ATTENTION: Tcl/Tk transition

2011-12-04 Thread Charles Wilson
On 12/4/2011 10:03 PM, Yaakov (Cygwin/X) wrote: On Sun, 2011-12-04 at 21:05 -0500, Charles Wilson wrote: I found this while building (msys) versions of tcl and tk, (loosely) based on your cygports. However...I modified tk's configure.in to do a "proper" AC_INIT. So

Re: ATTENTION: Tcl/Tk transition

2011-12-04 Thread Charles Wilson
On 12/4/2011 7:33 PM, Yaakov (Cygwin/X) wrote: On Sat, 2011-12-03 at 18:45 -0500, Charles Wilson wrote: Yaakov -- the installed tclConfig.sh and tkConfig.sh files include stuff like this: TCL_DEFS='-DPACKAGE_NAME=\"tcl\" -DPACKAGE_TARNAME=\"tcl\" -DPACKAGE_VERSION

Re: ATTENTION: Tcl/Tk transition

2011-12-03 Thread Charles Wilson
Yaakov -- the installed tclConfig.sh and tkConfig.sh files include stuff like this: TCL_DEFS='-DPACKAGE_NAME=\"tcl\" -DPACKAGE_TARNAME=\"tcl\" -DPACKAGE_VERSION=\"8.5\" -DPACKAGE_STRING=\"tcl\ 8.5\" -DPACKAGE_BUGREPORT=\"\" -DPACKAGE_URL=\"\" -DSTDC_HEADERS=1 This causes warnings (PACKA

Re: [ITP] astrometry.net-0.38-1

2011-11-09 Thread Charles Wilson
On 11/9/2011 5:00 AM, Jussi Kantola wrote: AstroTortilla is fine with a custom repo. All we ever wanted was to be able to install astrometry.net with Cygwin's setup.exe OK. How many would we need for it to be considered significant enough? No idea. Is this document still valid? http://so

Re: [ITP] astrometry.net-0.38-1

2011-11-07 Thread Charles Wilson
On 11/7/2011 11:17 AM, Christopher Faylor wrote: I've been trying not to offer an opinion here but it isn't clear to me why so many people voted +1 for this package. It seems like we're adding a huge package Meh, if you exclude the star catalogs (and I think we should; and the OP has agreed t

Re: [ITP] astrometry.net-0.38-1

2011-11-07 Thread Charles Wilson
On 11/7/2011 8:18 AM, Jussi Kantola wrote: > On Fri, Nov 4, 2011 at 11:13 PM, Charles Wilson wrote: >> You should probably do that, to ensure that the build procedure works on >> your machine. Also, to test the resuts; I have no idea how to use this >> stuff. > > It bui

Re: [ITP] astrometry.net-0.38-1

2011-11-04 Thread Charles Wilson
On 11/4/2011 2:29 AM, Charles Wilson wrote: Your build still links against libbackend.a, rather than cygbackend.dll. I'm trying to massage your -src package to DTRT. Stay tuned. I've posted a revised version of your package here: http://cygwin.cwilson.fastmail.fm/astrometry.

Re: [ITP] astrometry.net-0.38-1

2011-11-04 Thread Charles Wilson
On 11/4/2011 11:11 AM, Yaakov (Cygwin/X) wrote: software is quite unpolished. From reading the web page, it appears to be a research project by a couple of grad students -- with goals of supporting amateur and even professional astronomers by automating what is currently a labor-intensive ta

Re: [ITP] astrometry.net-0.38-1

2011-11-03 Thread Charles Wilson
On 10/7/2011 12:18 PM, Jussi Kantola wrote: However I had to modify backend-main.c so that the config file (which defines the location of index files) could be read from cygwin's preferred location, /usr/share/astrometry/etc/backend.cfg. That's a little odd, and I don't think that's exactly wha

Re: [ITP] astrometry.net-0.38-1

2011-11-03 Thread Charles Wilson
On 11/3/2011 8:02 AM, Corinna Vinschen wrote: I hoped that somebody who voted on the package would do the final GTG, but in vain it seems. Sorry...I had intended to, but got swamped with other stuff. :-( Anyway, I just had a look. The packaging now looks basically good. One issue I still ha

Re: ATTENTION: Tcl/Tk transition

2011-10-31 Thread Charles Wilson
On 10/31/2011 7:39 PM, Charles Wilson wrote: On 10/30/2011 8:44 PM, Yaakov (Cygwin/X) wrote: Please don't. ... This is just the beginning. Mixing GDI and X11 just doesn't work, and since X11 is used for all other GUIs on Cygwin, so must Tk. My suggestion, for those who wanted th

Re: cygutils: replace ascii with ESR's?

2011-10-31 Thread Charles Wilson
On 10/30/2011 8:26 PM, Yaakov (Cygwin/X) wrote: ESR maintains a standalone ascii(1) which appears to have more features than cygutils': http://catb.org/~esr/ascii/ Should we replace this? Patch attached if so. Well, I have mixed feelings. On the PRO side: 1) smaller cygutils == fewer heada

Re: ATTENTION: Tcl/Tk transition

2011-10-31 Thread Charles Wilson
On 10/30/2011 8:44 PM, Yaakov (Cygwin/X) wrote: Please don't. ... This is just the beginning. Mixing GDI and X11 just doesn't work, and since X11 is used for all other GUIs on Cygwin, so must Tk. My suggestion, for those who wanted this, was to build the entire tcl/tk(GDI) "stack" with a un

Re: cygutils: cygstart FD.o integration

2011-10-27 Thread Charles Wilson
On 10/25/2011 10:46 PM, Yaakov (Cygwin/X) wrote: The attached patch and new files integrate cygstart into the Freedesktop.org desktop menu system. This allows Windows-specific files (e.g. .exe, .com, .bat, .msi, .themepack) to be easily opened by cygstart from within FD.o/X file managers (e.g. N

Re: cygutils: fix bootstrap for libtool2

2011-10-27 Thread Charles Wilson
On 10/25/2011 10:30 PM, Yaakov (Cygwin/X) wrote: libtool2 uses several aclocal macros, and libtoolize copies them into m4/ automatically. Patch attached. Applied. Thanks (wow, that bug has been there a while. I usually have ignored bootstrap and simply run autoreconf, so I never noticed.)

Re: ATTENTION: Tcl/Tk transition

2011-10-26 Thread Charles Wilson
On 10/26/2011 5:53 PM, Cary R. wrote: > If I'm understanding this correctly once this change has been > pushed we will be required to start an X server beforerunning > gitk. Yes. > As someone who uses git and gitk all the time having to > start the X server to run gitk is a pain. I haven't checke

Re: [ITP] astrometry.net-0.38-1

2011-10-05 Thread Charles Wilson
On 10/4/2011 4:02 AM, Jussi Kantola wrote: > category: Science > requires: cairo libcairo2 python-cairo libnetpbm10 netpbm libpng14 > libjpeg8 zlib zlib0 python python-numpy pkg-config cygwin > sdesc:"Astrometry.net astrometrical solver." > ldesc:"Astrometry.net analyses an astronomical im

Re: [ITP] nosleep 0.1.3-1 (needs GTG)

2011-09-30 Thread Charles Wilson
On 9/30/2011 6:00 AM, Andrew Schulman wrote: >> I'd like to package and maintain nosleep for Cygwin. nosleep runs a >> command while inhibiting the computer from sleeping or hibernating until >> the command finishes executing. > > Thanks for voting everyone. Would someone now please review the p

Re: [ITP] nosleep 0.1.3-1

2011-09-27 Thread Charles Wilson
On 9/25/2011 6:15 AM, Andrew Schulman wrote: > nosleep has been written originally for Cygwin, so it's not available in > any Linux distros and needs to be voted on. +1 -- Chuck

Re: New rebase release

2011-09-25 Thread Charles Wilson
On 9/23/2011 11:11 AM, Jason Tishler wrote: > I'm about to commit the following patch: > > http://www.tishler.net/jason/software/rebase/rebase.patch > > Any comments before I do so? Looks fine to me. > Additionally, are there any conventions I should following when I tag > the release? "."

Re: [RFU] mingw64-*-gcc Update

2011-09-20 Thread Charles Wilson
On 9/20/2011 9:27 AM, JonY wrote: > This update is to fix a typo in the gcc configure command that went long > unnoticed, now with --enable-dynamic-string. > Anybody using C++ libraries are encouraged to recompile. > > Keep previous versions, thanks. Done. -- Chuck

Re: New rebase release

2011-09-20 Thread Charles Wilson
On 9/20/2011 11:24 AM, Jason Tishler wrote: > On Mon, Sep 19, 2011 at 02:53:54PM -0400, Charles Wilson wrote: >> After the flurry of work and new features added to rebase in late >> July/early August, any chance you could bump the version and roll a >> new release? >

  1   2   3   4   5   6   7   8   9   10   >