On 1/30/2012 3:32 PM, Eric Blake wrote: > In particular, it is much more powerful than the realpath(1) currently > offered by cygutils. Should I build my next coreutils package with > realpath included, and wait to upload it until we can coordinate a build > with cygutils dropping the weaker variant? Or do we want to keep the > cygutils variant for a while longer?
I prefer standard tools when possible, and smaller cygutils. So, let's go ahead and coordinate removing realpath from cygutils-$next. I should have some time in the next few days to do this -- and the pending csih bugfix... -- Chuck
