On Thu, Dec 05, 2002 at 05:34:46PM -0500, Rolf Campbell wrote:
>Wouldn't it be more helpful to point out that the function is
>deprecated?
That's Jeff's call. I don't care. We still have to do cygwin def file
magic one way or the other so there could still conceivably be
applications using strto
Wouldn't it be more helpful to point out that the function is
deprecated?
-Rolf
> -Original Message-
> From: Christopher Faylor [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
> Sent: Thursday, December 05, 2002 5:21 PM
> To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Cc: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Subject
On Thu, Dec 05, 2002 at 02:54:08PM -0500, J. Johnston wrote:
>Chris,
>
> Can you clarify. Do you want me to duplicate the routine or
>stick with the solution I originally presented which is to rename
>the routine and leave a #define that maps the old name to the
>new one.
I think your plan is fi
Chris,
Can you clarify. Do you want me to duplicate the routine or
stick with the solution I originally presented which is to rename
the routine and leave a #define that maps the old name to the
new one.
-- Jeff J.
Christopher Faylor wrote:
On Thu, Dec 05, 2002 at 08:37:22PM +1100, Robert Co
> -Original Message-
> From: Robert Collins [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
> Sent: Thursday, December 05, 2002 4:37 AM
> To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Cc: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Subject: Re: strtof is missing
>
>
> On Thu, 2002-12-05 at 20:34, Corinna Vinschen wrote:
On Thu, Dec 05, 2002 at 08:37:22PM +1100, Robert Collins wrote:
>On Thu, 2002-12-05 at 20:34, Corinna Vinschen wrote:
>>Removing the symbol might break these applications (though I assume
>>there aren't that much apps using strtodf).
>
>We can just export it twice from cygwin.din. That + Jeff's pa
On Thu, 2002-12-05 at 20:34, Corinna Vinschen wrote:
> Removing the symbol might
> break these applications (though I assume there aren't that much apps
> using strtodf).
We can just export it twice from cygwin.din. That + Jeff's patch will
keep backwards compatability and provide the right API
On Wed, Dec 04, 2002 at 02:47:36PM -0500, J. Johnston wrote:
> It is not a typo. Newlib was created to be ANSI with some Unix extensions.
> Originally, strtodf was added in 1992 as an extension. Since then, C99
> has defined strtof.
>
> Now, that said, since there is a strtof() routine defined i
Corinna Vinschen wrote:
On Sun, Nov 24, 2002 at 10:34:37AM +1000, Arseny Slobodjuck wrote:
Sunday, November 24, 2002, 9:04:04 AM, you wrote:
j> I use a pretty new Cygwin release and I notice that the strtof function is
j> missing in stdlib.h. On my Linux system the function is declared in stdl
> However, I just had a look into newlib and there's a function
>
> float strtodf (const char *, char **);
>
> defined.
Thx, I saw that too. There were sevaral ways to work around this "problem"
but I when I came across it, I simply wanted to report it.
JB
--
Unsubscribe info: http://c
On Sun, Nov 24, 2002 at 10:34:37AM +1000, Arseny Slobodjuck wrote:
> Sunday, November 24, 2002, 9:04:04 AM, you wrote:
>
> j> I use a pretty new Cygwin release and I notice that the strtof function is
> j> missing in stdlib.h. On my Linux system the function is declared in stdlib.h.
>
> j> Can a
Hi,
Sunday, November 24, 2002, 9:04:04 AM, you wrote:
j> I use a pretty new Cygwin release and I notice that the strtof function is
j> missing in stdlib.h. On my Linux system the function is declared in stdlib.h.
j> Can anybody help me? I should have to convert a string to a flat and this
j> s
I use a pretty new Cygwin release and I notice that the strtof function is
missing in stdlib.h. On my Linux system the function is declared in stdlib.h.
Can anybody help me? I should have to convert a string to a flat and this
seems to be the only possibility. (O do not want to have double).
TI
13 matches
Mail list logo
