Wouldn't it be more helpful to point out that the function is deprecated? -Rolf
> -----Original Message----- > From: Christopher Faylor [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] > Sent: Thursday, December 05, 2002 5:21 PM > To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > Cc: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > Subject: Re: strtof is missing > > > On Thu, Dec 05, 2002 at 02:54:08PM -0500, J. Johnston wrote: > >Chris, > > > > Can you clarify. Do you want me to duplicate the routine or stick > >with the solution I originally presented which is to rename > the routine > >and leave a #define that maps the old name to the new one. > > I think your plan is fine. I think just renaming the > function in newlib and creating a define to deal with legacy > newlib apps is the correct way to handle this. We can also > make modifications in the cygwin side to make it transparent > to the end user. > > cgf > > -- > Unsubscribe info: http://cygwin.com/ml/#unsubscribe-simple > Bug reporting: http://cygwin.com/bugs.html > Documentation: http://cygwin.com/docs.html > FAQ: http://cygwin.com/faq/ > > -- Unsubscribe info: http://cygwin.com/ml/#unsubscribe-simple Bug reporting: http://cygwin.com/bugs.html Documentation: http://cygwin.com/docs.html FAQ: http://cygwin.com/faq/
