On Mon, Jun 11, 2012 at 01:04:22AM -0500, Yaakov (Cygwin/X) wrote:
>>
>On 2012-06-10 23:26, Christopher Faylor wrote:
>> If there is a bug it is with make ever equating foo.exe with foo. It's
>> undoubtedly happening because of Cygwin's attempts at transparency.
>>
>> I'm not kidding about EXEEXT.
On 2012-06-10 23:26, Christopher Faylor wrote:
If there is a bug it is with make ever equating foo.exe with foo. It's
undoubtedly happening because of Cygwin's attempts at transparency.
I'm not kidding about EXEEXT. Surely you know about this from having
maintained cygport.
Am I ever, but I
On Sun, Jun 10, 2012 at 03:57:33PM -0500, Yaakov (Cygwin/X) wrote:
>On 2012-06-10 13:29, Christopher Faylor wrote:
>> On Sun, Jun 10, 2012 at 01:06:18PM -0500, Yaakov (Cygwin/X) wrote:
>>> I can confirm that this previously reported bug in make .exe handling
>>> still affects the cross-compile of t
On 2012-06-10 13:29, Christopher Faylor wrote:
On Sun, Jun 10, 2012 at 01:06:18PM -0500, Yaakov (Cygwin/X) wrote:
I can confirm that this previously reported bug in make .exe handling
still affects the cross-compile of the Linux kernel:
http://cygwin.com/ml/cygwin/2009-11/msg00935.html
Withou
On Sun, Jun 10, 2012 at 01:06:18PM -0500, Yaakov (Cygwin/X) wrote:
>I can confirm that this previously reported bug in make .exe handling
>still affects the cross-compile of the Linux kernel:
>
>http://cygwin.com/ml/cygwin/2009-11/msg00935.html
Without diving into the depths of the linux makefile
I can confirm that this previously reported bug in make .exe handling
still affects the cross-compile of the Linux kernel:
http://cygwin.com/ml/cygwin/2009-11/msg00935.html
Yaakov
--
Problem reports: http://cygwin.com/problems.html
FAQ: http://cygwin.com/faq/
Documenta
6 matches
Mail list logo