On Mon, Jun 11, 2012 at 01:04:22AM -0500, Yaakov (Cygwin/X) wrote: >> >On 2012-06-10 23:26, Christopher Faylor wrote: >> If there is a bug it is with make ever equating foo.exe with foo. It's >> undoubtedly happening because of Cygwin's attempts at transparency. >> >> I'm not kidding about EXEEXT. Surely you know about this from having >> maintained cygport. > >Am I ever, but I suspect *you* know that incorporating EXEEXT into the >Linux kernel buildsystem will likely never be accepted upstream.
>>On 2012-06-10 14:29, Christopher Faylor wrote: >>>Makefiles which expect .exe extensions usually use the EXEEXT variable >>>for just this purpose. Linux's makefile doesn't do that for probably >>>obvious reasons. -- Problem reports: http://cygwin.com/problems.html FAQ: http://cygwin.com/faq/ Documentation: http://cygwin.com/docs.html Unsubscribe info: http://cygwin.com/ml/#unsubscribe-simple
