On Mon, Oct 7, 2013 at 7:00 PM, Christopher Faylor wrote:
> On Mon, Oct 07, 2013 at 06:44:56PM +0200, Francis ANDRE wrote:
>>Le 07/10/2013 11:54, Andrey Repin a ?crit :
>>>> Can I have a official statement from Cygwin about this? ie that bash is
>>>> supportin
On Mon, Oct 07, 2013 at 06:44:56PM +0200, Francis ANDRE wrote:
>Hi
>
>Andrey
>
>Le 07/10/2013 11:54, Andrey Repin a ?crit :
>> Greetings, Francis ANDRE!
>>
>>> Can I have a official statement from Cygwin about this? ie that bash is
>>> supporting MS-D
On 7 October 2013 06:13, Francis ANDRE wrote:
> Le 07/10/2013 00:33, Christopher Faylor a écrit :
>> More likely it is just because ksh automatically prepends the current
>> working directory to something that it considers to be relative.
>>
>> I know I'm a broken
Greetings, Francis ANDRE!
> Can I have a official statement from Cygwin about this? ie that bash is
> supporting MS-DOX path by accident and ksh won't and that is not a
> requirement
> of Cygwin?
> Or
> Can Cygwin adds the understanding of absolute DOS path as a requir
/hotspot
moves the cwd without error to
FrancisANDRE@idefix /cygdrive/z/DEV/OpenJDK_7u40/hotspot
So why the ksh cannot do the same?
That question ksh developers or cygwin package maintainers should be
able to answer. They might just use different syscalls which vary in
behavior on Cygwin. You could
and
>>
>> FrancisANDRE@idefix /cygdrive/c/Cygwin
>> $ cd Z:/DEV/OpenJDK_7u40/hotspot
>>
>> moves the cwd without error to
>> FrancisANDRE@idefix /cygdrive/z/DEV/OpenJDK_7u40/hotspot
>>
>>
>> So why the ksh cannot do the same?
>
>That question k
to
> FrancisANDRE@idefix /cygdrive/z/DEV/OpenJDK_7u40/hotspot
>
>
> So why the ksh cannot do the same?
That question ksh developers or cygwin package maintainers should be
able to answer. They might just use different syscalls which vary in
behavior on Cygwin. You could try to find that
world.
Moreover, when using the bash shell, the command
FrancisANDRE@idefix /cygdrive/c/Cygwin
$ cd Z:/DEV/OpenJDK_7u40/hotspot
moves the cwd without error to
FrancisANDRE@idefix /cygdrive/z/DEV/OpenJDK_7u40/hotspot
So why the ksh cannot do the same?
Francis
Le 05/10/2013 12:22, Robert
On Sat, Oct 5, 2013 at 8:33 AM, Francis ANDRE
wrote:
> Hi Cygwin List
>
> I have a problem with the cd command in a ksh script. In the log below,
> there is this error:
> /make/scripts/webrev.ksh[2899]: cd:
> /cygdrive/z/DEV/OpenJDK_7u40/hotspot/Z:/DEV/OpenJDK_7u40/hotsp
Hi Cygwin List
I have a problem with the cd command in a ksh script. In the log below, there is
this error:
/make/scripts/webrev.ksh[2899]: cd:
/cygdrive/z/DEV/OpenJDK_7u40/hotspot/Z:/DEV/OpenJDK_7u40/hotspo
t/make/windows/makefiles: No such file or directory
and the snippet producing this
I'm working to get the ast-ksh cygwin download installed under Cygwin 1.7.
I've run into a couple pecularities. First, the file that gets downloaded is
ast-ksh.blahblahblah.tgz . I presumed it was a gzip'd tar file, but discovered
that, instead, it was a plain tar file.
I extr
On Sat, Sep 19, 2009 at 4:01 PM, Paul McFerrin wrote:
> Hello:
>
> The following simple script fails to produce a leading "0" on variable
> "nextnum". Am I doing something wrong or did I discover a bug?
>
> PD KSH v5.2.14 99/07/13.2
> /home/paul.$
Hello:
The following simple script fails to produce a leading "0" on variable
"nextnum". Am I doing something wrong or did I discover a bug?
PD KSH v5.2.14 99/07/13.2
/home/paul.$ cat /lbin/testit2
#!/bin/pdksh
n="06"
typeset -L2 nextnum
nextnum=`expr $n +
een different shells.
Some explanations:
Shell Versions used:
AIX uses as the default sh shell a ksh Version 88.
HP-UX uses as the default sh shell a ksh Version 88.
Solaris uses as the default sh shell a non posix compatible shell.
The ksh on Solaris is mostly a Version 88, opensolaris us
Hubert Samm wrote, On 6.3.2009 14:26:
> Hi All... I've searched and found nothing this script runs just fine on
> AIX, Solaris, and Linux, but under cygwin, the array VALUE prints only
> blanks.. has anyone else run into this... I've tried a bunch of different
> things around typecast, etc
Hi All... I've searched and found nothing this script runs just fine on
AIX, Solaris, and Linux, but under cygwin, the array VALUE prints only
blanks.. has anyone else run into this... I've tried a bunch of different
things around typecast, etc, but it looks like VALUE is local in the tabl
efore I got here!
> But then I found out that the "real" Dave Korn is the primary author of
> UWIN, which is where the ksh that "our" Dave Korn is talking about
> comes from.
Ah, but I wasn't talking about ksh. I only got dragged into this
thread when it w
wireless connectivity.
But then I found out that the "real" Dave Korn is the primary author of
UWIN, which is where the ksh that "our" Dave Korn is talking about
comes from. So I got confused again.
Just to be clear, "our" Dave Korn provides excellent, well considered
a
Mark J. Reed wrote on 19 May 2008 03:52:
> On Sun, May 18, 2008 at 5:58 PM, Ralph Hempel wrote:
>> OT, and probably a stupid question, but is the Dave Korn on this
>> list the same Dave Korn that, ummm, wrote the Korn shell?
>
> Nope. And I used to wonder the same thing, so it can't possibly b
On Sun, May 18, 2008 at 5:58 PM, Ralph Hempel <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> OT, and probably a stupid question, but is the Dave Korn on this
> list the same Dave Korn that, ummm, wrote the Korn shell?
Nope. And I used to wonder the same thing, so it can't possibly be a
stupid question, right?
Ri
Ralph Hempel wrote:
Mark J. Reed wrote:
You can also get UWIN there, as an alternative to Cygwin, which
includes ksh.
Thank you, Mr. Korn.
OT, and probably a stupid question, but is the Dave Korn on this
list the same Dave Korn that, ummm, wrote the Korn shell?
No.
It's his evil
Mark J. Reed wrote:
You can also get UWIN there, as an alternative to Cygwin, which includes ksh.
Thank you, Mr. Korn.
OT, and probably a stupid question, but is the Dave Korn on this
list the same Dave Korn that, ummm, wrote the Korn shell?
Cheers, Ralph
--
Unsubscribe info: http
For anyone else interested in replacing the (pd)ksh that comes with
Cygwin with real AT&T ksh, you can download a Cygwin binary from
http://www.research.att.com/~gsf/download/ (hit cancel, read the
license agreement, and get the username/password from the bottom if
you agree).
There are bina
Luke Bakken wrote:
> Check the manual for "emacs" command line editing mode.
>
Wonderful! Thank you.
--
Harold Fuchs
London, England
--
Unsubscribe info: http://cygwin.com/ml/#unsubscribe-simple
Problem reports: http://cygwin.com/problems.html
Documentation: http://cygwi
Check the manual for "emacs" command line editing mode.
On 12/23/06, Harold Fuchs <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
I'm using pdksh on Win XP Pro.
If I use bash, then each time I hit the up-arrow key the previous command is
displayed at the cursor ready for editing and/or re-submitting. DOS/CMD can
be
I'm using pdksh on Win XP Pro.
If I use bash, then each time I hit the up-arrow key the previous command is
displayed at the cursor ready for editing and/or re-submitting. DOS/CMD can
be made to behave the same way by invoking DOSKEY.
How do I get pdksh to behave the same way?
--
Harold Fuch
On 24 May 2006 09:24, Thorsten Kampe wrote:
> * mwoehlke (2006-05-23 16:37 +)
>> It does seem like this doesn't work - at least, not how I would expect
>> it to - on bash (either on Cygwin or on Linux). Maybe you should try ksh
>> on Cygwin.
>
> He said
Thorsten Kampe wrote:
* mwoehlke (2006-05-23 16:37 +)
It does seem like this doesn't work - at least, not how I would expect
it to - on bash (either on Cygwin or on Linux). Maybe you should try ksh
on Cygwin.
He said he did. Read the subject of this thread.
Sorry, my apol
* mwoehlke (2006-05-23 16:37 +)
> It does seem like this doesn't work - at least, not how I would expect
> it to - on bash (either on Cygwin or on Linux). Maybe you should try ksh
> on Cygwin.
He said he did. Read the subject of this thread.
--
Unsubscribe info: http:/
ing I would change about your
installation. You are running with a 4(!)-year-old version of Cygwin.
> Cygwin Package Information
> [snip]
> pcre3.7-1
> rcs 5.7-3
> > > I have come to realize that there is more than 1 implementation of
> > >
I tried changing case but to no avail. there is no pdksh file in my cygwin/bin
directory so I think I am out of luck w/ pdksh.
use the Cygwin Setup program and install pdksh. It is not installed by default.
--
Unsubscribe info: http://cygwin.com/ml/#unsubscribe-simple
Problem reports:
2.0-2
shutdown1.2-2
tar 1.13.19-1
termcap 20020403-1
terminfo5.2-3
texinfo 4.2-3
textutils 2.0.21-1
tiff3.5.7-1
On Tue, 23 May 2006, bob wrote:
> > Two comments.
> >
> > One: the output above didn't come from PDKsh in Cygwin (and, most
> > likely, didn't even come from the script you posted, since the export
> > statement is on line 9 in your script). FYI, there is
>
> Two comments.
>
> One: the output above didn't come from PDKsh in Cygwin (and, most likely,
> didn't even come from the script you posted, since the export statement is
> on line 9 in your script). FYI, there is more than one ksh implementation
> in Cygwin,
On Tue, 23 May 2006, bob wrote:
> Help
>
> Trying to use ksh and export arrays in cygwin. It works on my unix
> workstation but not on PC cygwin. Any help would be appreciated.
> Tried to post earlier and it did not make it apparently.
>
> Thanks
> Bob
>
> #!/bin/k
mwoehlke wrote:
bob wrote:
I have an hp unix script that runs in ksh and am porting it to PC. It
uses and exports arrays in hp unix. Does not seem to work in cygwin.
Can anybody offer suggestions to accomodate? I tried to put an
example below, but I was labeled a top poster and it would
bob wrote:
I have an hp unix script that runs in ksh and am porting it to PC. It uses and
exports arrays in hp unix. Does not seem to work in cygwin. Can anybody offer
suggestions to accomodate? I tried to put an example below, but I was labeled
a top poster and it would not let me do it
* bob (2006-05-23 12:37 +)
> I have an hp unix script that runs in ksh and am porting it to PC.
You mean you have a ksh script that runs on HP Unix?
> It uses and exports arrays in hp unix. Does not seem to work in
> cygwin.
"does not seem to work in Cygwin"... To quote
Help
Trying to use ksh and export arrays in cygwin. It works on my unix workstation
but not on PC cygwin. Any help would be appreciated. Tried to post earlier
and it did not make it apparently.
Thanks
Bob
#!/bin/ksh
echo "in test1"
vname[1]="Dog"
vname[2]="Cat
Hi
I have an hp unix script that runs in ksh and am porting it to PC. It uses and
exports arrays in hp unix. Does not seem to work in cygwin. Can anybody offer
suggestions to accomodate? I tried to put an example below, but I was labeled
a top poster and it would not let me do it
[No need to Cc me.]
Op Wed, 25 Jan 2006 20:28:32 + schreef Eric Blake
in
<012520062028.10525.43D7DF6F0008E6E6291D22007507840A050E040D0C079D0Acomcast.net>:
[Adding attrib to self:]
: Buzz:
: > I (now) understand what's happening. I think it's undesirable, though.
:
: That's a relative vi
>
> I (now) understand what's happening. I think it's undesirable, though.
That's a relative viewpoint. Personally, I like the fact that
the rules are consistent (process instructions one line at
a time; and apply pipelines first, then apply all redirections,
including here-docs, in left-to-righ
Op Wed, 25 Jan 2006 07:41:45 -0700 schreef Eric Blake
in <43D78E29.4060504byu.net>:
:
: According to Bas van Gompel on 1/24/2006 10:11 PM:
[script]
: First line: This could be rewritten "exec /bin/ksh 5<&0 < In ash it prints ''
: > First exec: Done.
: &g
On Wed, 25 Jan 2006, Eric Blake wrote:
> > You might want to quote <<'EOSH', but that's not the cause of your
> > problem. Here's a funny thing:
> >
> > #!/bin/bash
> > exec 5<&0 /bin/bash <<'EOSH'
> > echo "First exec: Done."
> > cat
> > exec 0<&5
> > echo "Second exec: Done."
> > exit 0
> > EOS
> You might want to quote <<'EOSH', but that's not the cause of your
> problem. Here's a funny thing:
>
> #!/bin/bash
> exec 5<&0 /bin/bash <<'EOSH'
> echo "First exec: Done."
> cat
> exec 0<&5
> echo "Second exec: Done."
> exit 0
> EOSH
>
> works for me. Don't ask me why, though. Perhaps Eric
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
According to Eric Blake on 1/25/2006 7:41 AM:
>>>=== begin testexec.sh ===
>>>#!/bin/ksh
>>>
>>>exec 5<&0 /bin/ksh <>>echo "First exec: Done."
>>>exec 0<&5
>>>echo
On Wed, 25 Jan 2006, Bas van Gompel wrote:
> Hi,
>
> Try the following script:
>
> === begin testexec.sh ===
> #!/bin/ksh
> exec 5<&0 /bin/ksh < echo "First exec: Done."
> exec 0<&5
> echo "Second exec: Done."
> exit 0
> E
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
According to Bas van Gompel on 1/24/2006 10:11 PM:
> Hi,
>
> Try the following script:
>
> === begin testexec.sh ===
> #!/bin/ksh
>
> exec 5<&0 /bin/ksh < echo "First exec: Done."
> exec 0<&5
Hi,
Try the following script:
=== begin testexec.sh ===
#!/bin/ksh
exec 5<&0 /bin/ksh <http://cygwin.com/ml/#unsubscribe-simple
Problem reports: http://cygwin.com/problems.html
Documentation: http://cygwin.com/docs.html
FAQ: http://cygwin.com/faq/
>>>>> L A Walsh writes:
> I was wondering who "owned" the tzcode package and if they
> could include an install script to check for the existance
> of "bash" OR "ksh", and create a link at install time to
> the installed sub
I was wondering who "owned" the tzcode package and if they
could include an install script to check for the existance
of "bash" OR "ksh", and create a link at install time to
the installed substitute or just patch tzselect so the
dependency on pdksh could be removed.
Robert Body wrote:
> I have not been able to figure out how to send escape codes to ksh
>
> I saw a syntax for ksh on
> http://www.steveshilling.pwp.blueyonder.co.uk/scripts/xtermtitle.txt
> -
> PS1='^[]0;[EMAIL PROTECTED]: ${PWD}^Gksh$ '
I don't thin
On Tue, 22 Nov 2005, Robert Body wrote:
> I have not been able to figure out how to send escape codes to ksh
KSH does not understand escape codes. You have to embed literal special
characters into $PS1.
> I saw a syntax for ksh on
> http://www.steveshilling.pwp.blueyonder.co.u
I have not been able to figure out how to send escape codes to ksh
I saw a syntax for ksh on
http://www.steveshilling.pwp.blueyonder.co.uk/scripts/xtermtitle.txt
-
PS1='^[]0;[EMAIL PROTECTED]: ${PWD}^Gksh$ '
-
where ^[ is used instead of \033 and ^G instead of \007
b
any things, how come the following ksh
> doesn't work in
> 1) Linux xyz 2.4.7-10 #1 Thu Sep 6 17:27:27 EDT 2001 i686 unknown
> 2) HP-UX xyz B.11.00 U 9000/785 2004606272 unlimited-user license
>
> the PS1 line below puts path into the title of the xterm, and puts
> "$PWD&
I don't suppose there is a way of NOT letting %HOME% take priority over
"/etc/passwd" for my home directory?
Brian,since you know about so many things, how come the following ksh
doesn't work in
1) Linux xyz 2.4.7-10 #1 Thu Sep 6 17:27:27 EDT 2001 i686 unknown
2) HP-UX xyz B.11.0
gt; 90%.
Does the Task Manager show that it's the ksh process that's taking up the
CPU?
> Its scary...
Calm down. :-)
> If possible can you tell me about in which Lcation I
> should run "cygcheck -svr" script and what will will
> be the format of the command ?
See
&
Hi Igor,
Before I had only DOS-Window for CYGWIN.
Now I have XTERM also.
But XTERM only works If I START the X-SERVER.
Whether it is DOS/XTERM Mode CPU Goes up more that
90%.
Its scary...
If possible can you tell me about in which Lcation I
should run "cygcheck -svr" script and what will will
On Mon, 31 Oct 2005, al1_24 wrote:
> I would like to use ksh as shell but, if most of commands work as
> desired, an ugly prompt is displayed before each line, something like
> "[e]0;[EMAIL PROTECTED] [e[33m]w[e[0m]n$", until I change the PS1 value.
> Is there a way to get
Sure change PS1 in your .profile or .kshrc file. Export it to be
whatever you want it to be. Not a cygwin specific question by the
way.
On Mon, Oct 31, 2005 at 05:22:48PM +0100, al1_24 wrote:
> I would like to use ksh as shell but, if most of commands work as
> desired, an ugly pro
I would like to use ksh as shell but, if most of commands work as
desired, an ugly prompt is displayed before each line, something like
"[e]0;[EMAIL PROTECTED] [e[33m]w[e[0m]n$", until I change the PS1 value.
Is there a way to get the "[EMAIL PROTECTED] pwd $" prompt inside k
On Fri, 28 Oct 2005, S.Sunil Kumar wrote:
> Hi ...,
>
> If I enter KSH for KORN-Shell mode , CYGWIN is not
> responding.
>
> And when I start CYGWIN the CPU-Usage rises up to 60
> to 70 % easily.
>
> Is it due to some wrong package installation ?
You have not prov
Original Message
From: S.Sunil Kumar [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Friday, October 28, 2005 8:43 AM
To: cygwin@cygwin.com
Subject: KSH Mode in CYGWIN & CPU-Usage
> Hi ...,
>
> If I enter KSH for KORN-Shell mode , CYGWIN is not
> responding.
>
> And when I star
Hi ...,
If I enter KSH for KORN-Shell mode , CYGWIN is not
responding.
And when I start CYGWIN the CPU-Usage rises up to 60
to 70 % easily.
Is it due to some wrong package installation ?
Regards
Sunil
__
Yahoo! Mail - PC Magazine
PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: problems with configuring ksh (pdksh) in Cygwin and
following problems with Linux cross-compilation there
Igor Pechtchanski wrote:
{building of pdksh, modifying cygwin.bat}
>>: not foundrofile[2]:
>>: not foundrofile[8]:
>>: not foundrofile[11]:
>>: not
Igor Pechtchanski wrote:
{building of pdksh, modifying cygwin.bat}
: not foundrofile[2]:
: not foundrofile[8]:
: not foundrofile[11]:
: not foundrofile[14]:
: not foundrofile[17]:
: not foundrofile[20]:
: not foundrofile[23]:
: not foundrofile[26]:
: not foundrofile[30]:
: not foundrofile[36]:
ksh
On Mon, 2 Aug 2004, Povolotsky, Alexander wrote:
> *** Igor Pechtchanski wrote: ***
> >yes, Cygwin can be configured to use ksh
> >instead of bash. The two places that should be changed are "/Cygwin.bat"
> >(you'll have to invoke "pdksh.exe", thoug
*** Igor Pechtchanski wrote: ***
>yes, Cygwin can be configured to use ksh
>instead of bash. The two places that should be changed are "/Cygwin.bat"
>(you'll have to invoke "pdksh.exe", though, since "ksh.exe" is a symlink),
>and "/etc/passwd
Pennell, Daniel J. (Civ)~U wrote:
Does CYGWIN have the full ISO POSIX compatible version of KSH 93?
Check the mailing list archives. Work was done by the guys at AT&T research
to make a Cygwin ksh93 package, but I don't remember how it ended up. It might
be as simple as getting the so
> -Original Message-
>
> Does CYGWIN have the full ISO POSIX compatible version of KSH 93?
>
www.kornshell.com. You have to install it yourself
--
Unsubscribe info: http://cygwin.com/ml/#unsubscribe-simple
Problem reports: http://cygwin.com/problems.html
D
Does CYGWIN have the full ISO POSIX compatible version of KSH 93?
--
Unsubscribe info: http://cygwin.com/ml/#unsubscribe-simple
Problem reports: http://cygwin.com/problems.html
Documentation: http://cygwin.com/docs.html
FAQ: http://cygwin.com/faq/
> >BTW,
> >BIG THANKS to all the people out there who already worked on a Cygwin
> >port of aforementioned packages. A grep -il cygwin on the
> sources almost
> >always gave me a clue where to put my hands on for the Uwin port.
>
> I guess this is one of the benefits of open source
> developmen
> -Original Message-
> From: Randall R Schulz [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
> Sent: Friday, March 22, 2002 4:08 PM
> To: Robert Collins; [EMAIL PROTECTED]; [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Subject: RE: OT: possible project/research project -- ksh has
> it all and is now av
Hi, Robert,
At 20:58 2002-03-21, Robert Collins wrote:
>Re:
>
>http://cygwin.com/ml/cygwin/2002-03/msg01270.html
>
>Right, I knew someone had to have thought along similar lines.
Umm... You rebuffed me when I pointed out it was not a new idea...
>I'm gonna' be a convert, I can tell.
Until an
Re:
http://cygwin.com/ml/cygwin/2002-03/msg01270.html
Right, I knew someone had to have thought along similar lines. I'm gonna
be a convert I can tell.
Rob
--
Unsubscribe info: http://cygwin.com/ml/#unsubscribe-simple
Bug reporting: http://cygwin.com/bugs.html
Documentation:
On Fri, Mar 22, 2002 at 04:15:27AM +0100, Karsten Fleischer wrote:
>> What happened to supplying this for the cygwin distribution?
>
>This is a release done by AT&T, I have nothing to do with it.
Ah. I should have realized this. Ok.
>I was waiting for their new source code to be released.
>I o
> What happened to supplying this for the cygwin distribution?
This is a release done by AT&T, I have nothing to do with it.
I was waiting for their new source code to be released.
I only noticed this discussion on the list and forwarded it to them.
As you will have noticed, they compiled with C
On Fri, Mar 22, 2002 at 02:39:10AM +0100, Karsten Fleischer wrote:
>ksh93 is capable of keeping specially prepared executables as builtins.
>Below is a copy of a mail I just got from the AT&T research labs with
>some comments on how to implement such things, and a link where you can
>download ksh9
the advantage of making commands built-in?
A2. The startup time is reduced by a couple of orders of
magnitude. In addition, built-in commands can access
ksh internals.
Q3. What is the disadvantage of making commands built-in?
A3. Errors in these built-ins can cause the shell t
pdksh compiles ootb and is pretty much the same as ksh.
this won't work the same as AT&T korn shell:
print 'hey' | read a; print $a
but it probably won't matter.
On Wed, 27 Feb 2002, Sanjay Gupta wrote:
> Thanks for information.
>
> I have some Oracle monitori
Thanks for information.
I have some Oracle monitoring scripts that have been written for Unix
platforms using ksh. I have one database which is running on NT. I was
trying to port those scripts for cygwin. Since ksh is not available for now,
what I have done is just copy bash.exe to ksh.exe. In
Sanjay,
> I want to know, whether ksh is available on cygwin. I am not able to find
> ksh. Is it called by some different name in cygwin ?
ksh93 for Cygwin will be available soon. The official downloadable source
for ksh in its current state won't compile on Cygwin OOTB.
I am wai
I'm a long-time ksh guy - but I have found bash to be a very workable
substitute. It starts up in an emacs editing mode - if you prefer vi -
do a "set -o vi".
Andy
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
- Original Message -
From: "Sanjay Gupta" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: <
Hello All,
I want to know, whether ksh is available on cygwin. I am not able to find
ksh. Is it called by some different name in cygwin ?
Thanks
Sanjay
--
Unsubscribe info: http://cygwin.com/ml/#unsubscribe-simple
Bug reporting: http://cygwin.com/bugs.html
Documentation
't really matter.
My original patches were inside the Cygwin DLL, Glenn moved them outside.
Now I'm intending to move some of them inside again. Is it OK given that
special disclaimer?
> Do you want to be the ksh maintainer for the cygwin distribution?
Yes, I'd volunteer for this
On Sat, Feb 09, 2002 at 03:35:15AM +0100, Karsten Fleischer wrote:
>Oops, my original reply was rejected somehow...
>
>> > Is ksh available now? nobody talks about it recently
>>
>>Glenn Fowler has made workarounds inside the AST libraries for my
>>Cygwin fix
Oops, my original reply was rejected somehow...
> > Is ksh available now? nobody talks about it recently
>
> Glenn Fowler has made workarounds inside the AST libraries for my
> Cygwin fixes, especially for that ones that would not get
> accepted for Cygwin.
> He furni
Yes. The Public Domain ksh is available at:
http://www.cs.mun.ca/~michael/pdksh/
It has been the ONLY shell I've run on my cygwin. It is close to the
1988 version of the real
ksh but today lacks some compatabilities of the 1993 version. The
latest version is pdksh-5.2.14 dated Jul of
Is ksh available now? nobody talks about it recently
--
Unsubscribe info: http://cygwin.com/ml/#unsubscribe-simple
Bug reporting: http://cygwin.com/bugs.html
Documentation: http://cygwin.com/docs.html
FAQ: http://cygwin.com/faq/
> >They have the right. Everything should be cleared tomorrow. Can I fax you
> >the assignment form?
>
> It doesn't go to me. Please send it to the address mentioned on
> the assignment
> page.
OK, I'll snail it.
Karsten
--
Unsubscribe info: http://cygwin.com/ml/#unsubscribe-simple
Bug
On Wed, Jan 16, 2002 at 01:47:01AM +0100, Karsten Fleischer wrote:
>> As long as the person thinks they have the right to send the
>> message, I'm happy.
>
>They have the right. Everything should be cleared tomorrow. Can I fax you
>the assignment form?
It doesn't go to me. Please send it to the
> As long as the person thinks they have the right to send the
> message, I'm happy.
They have the right. Everything should be cleared tomorrow. Can I fax you
the assignment form?
Karsten
--
Unsubscribe info: http://cygwin.com/ml/#unsubscribe-simple
Bug reporting: http://cygwin.co
On Tue, Jan 15, 2002 at 05:45:16PM +0100, Karsten Fleischer wrote:
>> I'm just asking for assurances.
>>
>> Can you get someone from AT&T to send email here saying that they have
>> no interest in your changes? That + your assignment will be enough for
>> me.
>
>Glenn Fowler and David Korn will p
> I'm just asking for assurances.
>
> Can you get someone from AT&T to send email here saying that they have
> no interest in your changes? That + your assignment will be enough for
> me.
Glenn Fowler and David Korn will prepare a message. Is that OK? Or must an
AT&T lawyer be involved?
Karsten
On Sat, Jan 12, 2002 at 12:54:17AM +0100, Karsten Fleischer wrote:
>>I would *really* like to get something official from AT&T if you were
>>actually working for them, too.
>
>OK, I triggered this. I'll be quiet now.
I'm just asking for assurances.
Can you get someone from AT&T to send email he
> I would *really* like to get something official from AT&T if you were
> actually working for them, too.
OK, I triggered this.
I'll be quiet now.
Karsten
P.S.: I gave you some clues about real bugs in Cygwin. Maybe someone else
could have a look at those.
--
Unsubscribe info: http://cyg
On Fri, Jan 11, 2002 at 08:53:07AM -0500, Fleischer, Karsten (K.) wrote:
>> And, I'm sorry but it really looks to me like you'd need a
>> release from
>> AT&T indicating that any patches you provided to us are
>> unemcumbered by
>> this license. I don't see how you can sign away the rights to a
> > All other patches are bug fixes or small corrections to
> make Cygwin behave more consistent.
>
> Yeah, I was talking only about AST related stuff. If a patch
> has nothing to do with AST, go ahead. But be aware that we will
> discuss it and it still could be rejected, of course. That's
>
On Fri, Jan 11, 2002 at 09:50:50AM -0500, Fleischer, Karsten (K.) wrote:
> > If we just left out that patch we won't have a problem.
>
> OK.
>
> > > Two other patches mimic UWIN behavior. That can not be a
> > problem, since Cygwin also has adopted the UWIN symbolics links.
> >
> > Mimicing is
> If we just left out that patch we won't have a problem.
OK.
> > Two other patches mimic UWIN behavior. That can not be a
> problem, since Cygwin also has adopted the UWIN symbolics links.
>
> Mimicing isn't a problem as long as you didn't look into the
> sources and get the idea from there.
1 - 100 of 135 matches
Mail list logo
