> > All other patches are bug fixes or small corrections to > make Cygwin behave more consistent. > > Yeah, I was talking only about AST related stuff. If a patch > has nothing to do with AST, go ahead. But be aware that we will > discuss it and it still could be rejected, of course. That's > one of the most frustrating situations when contributing to an > OSS project for the first time but we all had to go through it.
It's not the first time I'm contributing to a project, but the first time to Cygwin. > > Are the issues cleared now? > > It would be good if *you* are thinking they are cleared. If you're > feeling to move on thin ice with one of your patches, just hold this > part back. Please understand, we *want* to trust our contributors. For me everything's clear now. The only offending patch is the $SHELL thing, which I'll be leaving out. I'll start moving my patches to the latest CVS sources tomorrow. Karsten -- Unsubscribe info: http://cygwin.com/ml/#unsubscribe-simple Bug reporting: http://cygwin.com/bugs.html Documentation: http://cygwin.com/docs.html FAQ: http://cygwin.com/faq/
