Re: bash (3312) C:\tools\cygwin\bin\bash.exe: *** fatal error - cygheap base mismatch detected - 0x180331408/0x18032D408.

On 2019-10-19 06:44, Ilʹja Šipicin wrote: > sb, 19 okt. 2019 g. v 17:32, Biswapriyo Nath: >> It seems to be issue in Travis CI. See this forum post: >> https://travis-ci.community/t/cygwin-issue-cygheap-base-mismatch-detected/5359 >> If you are in hurry you can use Appv

Re: bash (3312) C:\tools\cygwin\bin\bash.exe: *** fatal error - cygheap base mismatch detected - 0x180331408/0x18032D408.

I want to resolve it. My issue is the same as described on forum - builds used to work and accidentally stopped working (with the same error) сб, 19 окт. 2019 г. в 17:32, Biswapriyo Nath : > It seems to be issue in Travis CI. See this forum post: > > > https://travis-ci.community

Re: bash (3312) C:\tools\cygwin\bin\bash.exe: *** fatal error - cygheap base mismatch detected - 0x180331408/0x18032D408.

It seems to be issue in Travis CI. See this forum post: https://travis-ci.community/t/cygwin-issue-cygheap-base-mismatch-detected/5359 If you are in hurry you can use Appveyor CI. I'm using it without any issue. One has to just add `C:\cygwin64\bin` in PATH variable in YAML file. -- Pr

Re: bash (3312) C:\tools\cygwin\bin\bash.exe: *** fatal error - cygheap base mismatch detected - 0x180331408/0x18032D408.

btw, is there recommended way of unattended installation ? so, for example, I need certain cygwin packages installed during CI process. I decided to use chocolatey for that. Maybe there are better ways ? сб, 19 окт. 2019 г. в 14:52, Илья Шипицин : > thank for the hint > > here's output of > > po

Re: bash (3312) C:\tools\cygwin\bin\bash.exe: *** fatal error - cygheap base mismatch detected - 0x180331408/0x18032D408.

thank for the hint here's output of powershell -c '$env:PATH.Split(";") | gci' (seems there no duplicates of cygwin1.dll, no even a single dll) https://travis-ci.com/chipitsine/travis-cygwin/builds/132640664 сб, 19 окт. 2019 г. в 10:23, Brian Inglis : > On 2019-10-18 23:00, Илья Шипицин wrote

Re: bash (3312) C:\tools\cygwin\bin\bash.exe: *** fatal error - cygheap base mismatch detected - 0x180331408/0x18032D408.

On 2019-10-18 23:00, Илья Шипицин wrote: > something has changed in travis-ci (it uses windows 1803 images). > script below used to work earlier. any idea why it could happen ? > very simple script: > https://github.com/chipitsine/travis-cygwin/blob/master/.travis.yml > result: > https://travis-ci.

bash (3312) C:\tools\cygwin\bin\bash.exe: *** fatal error - cygheap base mismatch detected - 0x180331408/0x18032D408.

something has changed in travis-ci (it uses windows 1803 images). script below used to work earlier. any idea why it could happen ? very simple script: https://github.com/chipitsine/travis-cygwin/blob/master/.travis.yml result: https://travis-ci.com/chipitsine/travis-cygwin/builds/132624829 --

Re: cygheap base mismatch detected

port\cmd\sh.exe: *** fatal error - cygheap base mismatch detected - 0x25F27E0/0x27D27E0. This problem is probably due to using incompatible versions of the cygwin DLL. Search for cygwin1.dll using the Windows Start->Find/Search facility and delete all but the most recent version. The most rec

cygheap base mismatch detected

Controls\30_Software\30_Sources\FBL_D00\MakeSupport\cmd\sh.exe: *** fatal error - cygheap base mismatch detected - 0x25F27E0/0x27D27E0. This problem is probably due to using incompatible versions of the cygwin DLL. Search for cygwin1.dll using the Windows Start->Find/Search facility and delete all b

Re: make command is throwing a "cygheap base mismatch detected" error.

Looks like I solved the issue by re-installing Docker Toolbox. Thanks. Sorry for the trouble. From: cygwin-ow...@cygwin.com on behalf of Rory Charles Sent: 05 April 2016 11:49 To: cygwin@cygwin.com Subject: Re: make command is throwing a "cygheap

Re: make command is throwing a "cygheap base mismatch detected" error.

I would add a cygcheck file for you, but I'm not able to add attachments, it seems. -- Problem reports: http://cygwin.com/problems.html FAQ: http://cygwin.com/faq/ Documentation: http://cygwin.com/docs.html Unsubscribe info: http://cygwin.com/ml/#unsubscribe-s

make command is throwing a "cygheap base mismatch detected" error.

80) C:\cygwin64\bin\make.exe: *** fatal error - cygheap base mismatch detected - 0x18032B400/0x180324400. This problem is probably due to using incompatible versions of the cygwin DLL. Search for cygwin1.dll using the Windows Start->Find/Search facility and delete all but the most recent version.

Re: Help: cygheap base mismatch detected

On Nov 2 18:24, Jim Reisert AD1C wrote: > On Mon, Nov 2, 2015 at 4:31 AM, Corinna Vinschen wrote: > > > It seems a Windows DLL or a virus scanner DLL gets loaded to this > > address for some reason. I'm a bit at a loss to make a suggestion here, > > except for switching to 64 bit Cygwin which ha

Re: Help: cygheap base mismatch detected

On Mon, Nov 2, 2015 at 4:31 AM, Corinna Vinschen wrote: > It seems a Windows DLL or a virus scanner DLL gets loaded to this > address for some reason. I'm a bit at a loss to make a suggestion here, > except for switching to 64 bit Cygwin which has much less problems with > this due to the huge ad

Re: Help: cygheap base mismatch detected

; Any ideas? > > F:\>dash > $ rebase-trigger fullrebase > 0 [main] dash (4564) C:\Cygwin\bin\dash.exe: *** fatal error - > cygheap base mismatch detected - 0xABB400/0xD1B400. *Both* addresses are wrong. The 32 bit Cygwin DLL has to be loaded to address 0x6100 (as noted

Re: Help: cygheap base mismatch detected

On Sun, Nov 1, 2015 at 7:36 PM, Mark Geisert asked: > Is it possible F: has its own conflicting Cygwin installation on it? What > happens if you run the rebase from C: (where dash is installed)? No. There has only ever been one Cygwin installation on this computer. Running rebaseall from dash

Re: Help: cygheap base mismatch detected

gt; F:\>dash > $ rebase-trigger fullrebase > 0 [main] dash (4564) C:\Cygwin\bin\dash.exe: *** fatal error - > cygheap base mismatch detected - 0xABB400/0xD1B400. > This problem is probably due to using incompatible versions of the cygwin DLL. [...] > 0 [main] d

Re: Help: cygheap base mismatch detected

On Sun, Nov 1, 2015 at 5:22 PM, Jim Reisert AD1C wrote: > I installed the latest Windows 10 update this morning and rebooted. > Now Cygwin won't work at all. Using the latest test release of > Cygwin: > > CYGWIN_NT-10.0-WOW JJR 2.3.0(0.291/5/3) 2015-10-22 17:54 i686 Cygwin I went back to the Cy

Help: cygheap base mismatch detected

:\Cygwin\bin\dash.exe: *** fatal error - cygheap base mismatch detected - 0xABB400/0xD1B400. This problem is probably due to using incompatible versions of the cygwin DLL. Search for cygwin1.dll using the Windows Start->Find/Search facility and delete all but the most recent version. The most rec

Re: fatal error - cygheap base mismatch detected (2nd attempt)

On 1/2/2013 8:24 AM, tobias schlottke wrote: Sorry, I forgot. See attachment. It looks like you haven't updated your Cygwin installation in a couple years. I would try that first. Ken -- Problem reports: http://cygwin.com/problems.html FAQ: http://cygwin.com/faq/ Do

Re: fatal error - cygheap base mismatch detected (2nd attempt)

On 02/01/2013 12:18, marco atzeri wrote: On 1/2/2013 12:10 PM, tobias schlottke wrote: Hi I have a cygwin terminal window open and I try to execute a perl program and get the following message: === 5 [main] perl 8172 C:\cygwin\bin\perl.exe: *** fatal error - cygheap base mismatch detected

Re: fatal error - cygheap base mismatch detected (2nd attempt)

On 1/2/2013 12:10 PM, tobias schlottke wrote: Hi I have a cygwin terminal window open and I try to execute a perl program and get the following message: === 5 [main] perl 8172 C:\cygwin\bin\perl.exe: *** fatal error - cygheap base mismatch detected - 0x61239790/0xC79790. This

fatal error - cygheap base mismatch detected (2nd attempt)

Hi I have a cygwin terminal window open and I try to execute a perl program and get the following message: === 5 [main] perl 8172 C:\cygwin\bin\perl.exe: *** fatal error - cygheap base mismatch detected - 0x61239790/0xC79790. This problem is probably due to using incompatible

Re: Cygwin cygheap base mismatch detected error. Cygwin 1.5.18 XP SP3

in\emake.exe (6848): *** cygheap base mismatch >detected - 0x611548E0/0x1A848E0. > >This problem is probably due to using incompatible versions of the cygwin DLL. > >Search for cygwin1.dll using the Windows Start->Find/Search facility > >and delete all but the most recen

Re: Cygwin cygheap base mismatch detected error. Cygwin 1.5.18 XP SP3

On 9/11/2012 7:57 AM, ranjeet kandari wrote: Hi Cygwin Team, c:\ECloud\i686_win32\bin\emake.exe (6848): *** cygheap base mismatch detected - 0x611548E0/0x1A848E0. ERROR EC1018: Unable to load cygwin1.dll: LoadLibrary(cygwin1.dll): Invalid access to memory location. (998) I have

Cygwin cygheap base mismatch detected error. Cygwin 1.5.18 XP SP3

Hi Cygwin Team, I need your urgent help in resolving the below error : GENFILE = /cygdrive/d/CODE/UtopiaEC_Extracted/S5610ECLF1_SRC/S5610ECLF1_SRC/GV_TARGET/series_telesto/utopia/S5610XX/S5610XX.gen c:\ECloud\i686_win32\bin\emake.exe (6848): *** cygheap base mismatch detected - 0x611548E0

Re: cygheap base mismatch detected

On 7/18/2012 11:38 AM, Earnie Boyd wrote: On Wed, Jul 18, 2012 at 2:15 PM, Andrew DeFaria wrote: Odd. Somebody seems to have put something in my Views directory - a directory I normally use for Clearcase views. But what's in there is not a Clearcase view! And it contained several cygwin1.dll's.

Re: cygheap base mismatch detected

On Wed, Jul 18, 2012 at 2:15 PM, Andrew DeFaria wrote: > Odd. Somebody seems to have put something in my Views directory - a > directory I normally use for Clearcase views. But what's in there is not a > Clearcase view! And it contained several cygwin1.dll's. So I blew it way. > Sorry for the confu

Re: cygheap base mismatch detected

? I suddenly started getting this error like every other time I run perl. perlrebase When I run perlrebase I get: Ltsdo-adefaria:perlrebase 3 [main] perl5.10.1 (6808) C:\Cygwin\bin\perl5.10.1.exe: *** fatal error - cygheap base mismatch detected - 0x612768B0/0xD268B0. This problem is

Re: cygheap base mismatch detected

11/msg00580.html? I suddenly started >>> getting this error like every other time I run perl. >> >> perlrebase > > When I run perlrebase I get: > > Ltsdo-adefaria:perlrebase > 3 [main] perl5.10.1 (6808) C:\Cygwin\bin\perl5.10.1.exe: *** fatal > error - cygheap b

Re: cygheap base mismatch detected

perlrebase I get: Ltsdo-adefaria:perlrebase 3 [main] perl5.10.1 (6808) C:\Cygwin\bin\perl5.10.1.exe: *** fatal error - cygheap base mismatch detected - 0x612768B0/0xD268B0. This problem is probably due to using incompatible versions of the cygwin DLL. Search for cygwin1.dll using the

Re: cygheap base mismatch detected

On Tue, Jul 17, 2012 at 7:02 PM, Andrew DeFaria wrote: > Is there a workaround for the problem mentioned in > http://cygwin.com/ml/cygwin/2006-11/msg00580.html? I suddenly started > getting this error like every other time I run perl. perlrebase -- Problem reports: http://cygwin.com/problem

cygheap base mismatch detected

Is there a workaround for the problem mentioned in http://cygwin.com/ml/cygwin/2006-11/msg00580.html? I suddenly started getting this error like every other time I run perl. -- Andrew DeFaria I'm not tense, just terribly, terribly alert. -- Problem reports: http://cy

Re: perl.exe : cygheap base mismatch detected

Sorry, I should have checked the list archives first. /usr/bin/perlrebase seems to have fixed the problem. -- Jim Reisert AD1C, , http://www.ad1c.us -- Problem reports: http://cygwin.com/problems.html FAQ: http://cygwin.com/faq/ Documentation: http://cygwin.com/d

Re: cygheap base mismatch detected

On 3/2/2012 3:59 AM, Corinna Vinschen wrote: > On Mar 1 17:44, Charles Wilson wrote: >> Is there some workaround that could be used? > > Rebase pghook.dll. Oh, well, yeah -- that would work if I were allowed to do so. However, remember "paranoid corporate IT policies"? Avecto Privilege Guard i

Re: cygheap base mismatch detected

On Mar 1 17:44, Charles Wilson wrote: > On 3/1/2012 7:14 AM, Corinna Vinschen wrote: > > Hmm. cygcheck loads the Cygwin DLL dynamically. It does not depend on > > any other Cygwin distro DLL. But it's started from a Cygwin parent. So > > the loaded CYgwin DLL checks the layout just like it had

Re: cygheap base mismatch detected

On 3/1/2012 7:14 AM, Corinna Vinschen wrote: > Hmm. cygcheck loads the Cygwin DLL dynamically. It does not depend on > any other Cygwin distro DLL. But it's started from a Cygwin parent. So > the loaded CYgwin DLL checks the layout just like it had been linked > against. And apparently it gets

Re: cygheap base mismatch detected

MIGHT have occurred also on 1.7.9. > >> It persists on 1.7.11). cygcheck -- and *only* cygcheck -- is reporting > >> a cygheap base mismatch but only on an XP64 machine: > >> > >> $ cygcheck -cd cygwin > >>       1 [main] cygcheck (3756) C:\cygwin\bin\cyg

Re: cygheap base mismatch detected

ts on 1.7.11). cygcheck -- and *only* cygcheck -- is reporting >> a cygheap base mismatch but only on an XP64 machine: >> >> $ cygcheck -cd cygwin >>       1 [main] cygcheck (3756) C:\cygwin\bin\cygcheck.exe: *** fatal >> error - cygheap base mismatch detected - 0x6127087

Re: cygheap base mismatch detected

ase mismatch but only on an XP64 machine: > > $ cygcheck -cd cygwin > 1 [main] cygcheck (3756) C:\cygwin\bin\cygcheck.exe: *** fatal > error - cygheap base mismatch detected - 0x61270870/0x2170870. > This problem is probably due to using incompatible versions of the > c

Re: cygheap base mismatch detected

On Mar 1 05:56, Heiko Elger wrote: > I can agree having some times same error on multiple machines (win7/64) - but > always when running perl. > > 1 [main] perl (7796) c:\programme\cygwin\bin\perl.exe: *** fatal error - > cygheap base mismatch detected - 0xE158D0 > /0xEF5

Re: cygheap base mismatch detected

On Thu, Mar 1, 2012 at 6:56 AM, Heiko Elger wrote: > I can agree having some times same error on multiple machines (win7/64) - but > always when running perl. > > 1 [main] perl (7796) c:\programme\cygwin\bin\perl.exe: *** fatal error - > cygheap base mismatch detected - 0xE15

Re: cygheap base mismatch detected

I can agree having some times same error on multiple machines (win7/64) - but always when running perl. 1 [main] perl (7796) c:\programme\cygwin\bin\perl.exe: *** fatal error - cygheap base mismatch detected - 0xE158D0 /0xEF58D0. This problem is probably due to using incompatible versions of

Re: cygheap base mismatch detected

but only on an XP64 machine: $ cygcheck -cd cygwin 1 [main] cygcheck (3756) C:\cygwin\bin\cygcheck.exe: *** fatal error - cygheap base mismatch detected - 0x61270870/0x2170870. This problem is probably due to using incompatible versions of the cygwin DLL. Search for cygwin1.dll using the Wind

misleading message fatal error - cygheap base mismatch detected

Hi- I have some legacy FORTRAN code which works fine on ubuntu 64bit. However when I recompiled on cygwin I got the following error: $ bin/mseval   1 [main] mseval 5468 P:\rlstools\bin\mseval.exe: *** fatal error - cygheap base mismatch detected - 0x61239790/0x6D3D9790. This problem is

Re: cygheap base mismatch detected - only on Vista x64, not seen on Vista x86

On Nov 22 12:36, Joseph Koenig wrote: > Congrats on figuring the problem out so quickly. Forgive my lack of > familiarity with the cygwin development process (and cygwin in general), > but as you've seemingly isolated root cause, do you feel that a point > fix should be forthcoming shortly or do yo

RE: cygheap base mismatch detected - only on Vista x64, not seen on Vista x86

a Vinschen Sent: Wednesday, November 22, 2006 5:04 AM To: cygwin@cygwin.com Subject: Re: cygheap base mismatch detected - only on Vista x64, not seen on Vista x86 On Nov 17 18:29, Joseph Koenig wrote: > DISCLAIMER: Yes, I realize Vista is not officially supported. If anything I hope this e-mail

Re: cygheap base mismatch detected - only on Vista x64, not seen on Vista x86

On Nov 17 18:29, Joseph Koenig wrote: > DISCLAIMER: Yes, I realize Vista is not officially supported. If anything I > hope this e-mail will end up in the archives to prevent other uses who see > this same problem from wasting time if there is no war available. > > I have successfully used cygwi

Re: cygheap base mismatch detected - only on Vista x64, not seen on Vista x86

On 11/17/2006, Joseph Koenig wrote: Has anyone seen a similar error? Has anyone got a clue as to WAR? Perhaps a rebase? I have tried disabling DEP for bash and ls as I am worried about address space randomization causing problems with fork, but that exists in Vista32 and I don't have problems o

cygheap base mismatch detected - only on Vista x64, not seen on Vista x86

DISCLAIMER: Yes, I realize Vista is not officially supported. If anything I hope this e-mail will end up in the archives to prevent other uses who see this same problem from wasting time if there is no war available. I have successfully used cygwin on Vista32 with no problems. On Vista64 I can

Re: cygheap base mismatch detected (resolution)

On Fri, Feb 24, 2006 at 02:36:19PM -0600, Dill, Jens wrote: > I did make the changes to rebase suggested by Mark Geisert, and I will > be forwarding my updated source file to Jason Tishler for him to take > a look at. Please send them in the form of a patch against the latest source. Thanks, Jaso

RE: cygheap base mismatch detected (resolution)

I'm happy to report that I was finally able to run a successful "rebaseall" (after tracking down and stopping the pesky service that was using Oracle DLLs and restarting itself every time I killed it in the Task Manager). Now that the Oracle DLLs have been rebased, the app runs. I'm now into other

Re: cygheap base mismatch detected

On Sat, Feb 18, 2006 at 09:12:02PM -0600, Dill, Jens (END-CHI) wrote: > It seems that there is indeed more to it. I did make the "obvious" > change and reran rebaseall. The message I got from the first Oracle > DLL it encountered was: > > ReBaseImage (/cygdrive/d/oracle/app/oracle/product/9.2.

Re: cygheap base mismatch detected ( Attn: rebase maintainer )

On Tue, Feb 21, 2006 at 11:18:40AM -0800, Yitzchak Scott-Thoennes wrote: > Jason, are you following this? Not very closely. Sorry, but cycles are very scarce right now. However, I did note the following from Mark: On Sat, Feb 18, 2006 at 01:39:30AM -0800, Mark Geisert wrote: > The code at /src/

Re: cygheap base mismatch detected ( Attn: rebase maintainer )

Jason, are you following this? On Sat, Feb 18, 2006 at 09:12:02PM -0600, Dill, Jens (END-CHI) wrote: > We are finally zeroing in on the problem. > > Mark Geisert writes: > > The code at /src/rebase-2.3.1/rebase.c:255 assumes the signature is at > offset 0x80 > > in the image. This was true in th

Re: cygheap base mismatch detected

On Tue, Feb 21, 2006 at 09:25:45AM -0600, Dill, Jens (END-CHI) wrote: > (2) Rebase the CygWin DLL so that it loads by default into a > space not used in either memory map (I'd need help in > choosing such a space). I've tried both Microsoft's > rebase and CygWin's rebase, but the

Re: cygheap base mismatch detected

Brian Dessent writes: >I think your best bet would be to keep poking at rebase to see if you >can't actually rebase the Oracle DLLs. > >> (2) Rebase the CygWin DLL so that it loads by default into a >> space not used in either memory map (I'd need help in >> choosing such a space). I've

Re: cygheap base mismatch detected

"Dill, Jens (END-CHI)" wrote: > I have found Microsoft's Platform SDK, and have used the VaDump utility > to find out where all the DLL's are loaded. Here is what it says about > my app (sorted into ascending order of memory address): FYI, to check the ImageBase of a given DLL you can just use o

RE: cygheap base mismatch detected

Mark Geisert writes: > >I can't do more without learning a lot more than I currently know > >about the internals of DLLs and of rebase. > > You have the "problem" Oracle DLLs, we don't :-) so you might be the > only one who can ultimately solve the problem. But see below... Right. But you (colle

Re: cygheap base mismatch detected

On Sun, Feb 19, 2006 at 09:02:10PM -0800, Mark Geisert wrote: >Forgive me for possibly reading more into your text than you intended >and thus responding inappropriately, but, Cygwin is an all-volunteer >and essentially non-managed project. (No offense Christopher :-) There >are no *guarantees* ab

RE: cygheap base mismatch detected

On Sat, 18 Feb 2006, Dill, Jens (END-CHI) wrote: [...] I finally found where to get the rebase source, and verified that in fact, what Mark noticed in 2.3.1 is still true in 2.4.2-1. I can easily make the obvious fix and change the is_rebaseable function to get the pe_signature_offset out of p

Re: cygheap base mismatch detected

On Sat, Feb 18, 2006 at 09:12:02PM -0600, Dill, Jens (END-CHI) wrote: > So, I have a workaround of sorts. I can have my script launch my app > by writing the command line to a .bat file and executing it. Definitely > not something I can use to convince my management to go with CygWin. Wouldn't j

RE: cygheap base mismatch detected

We are finally zeroing in on the problem. Mark Geisert writes: > The code at /src/rebase-2.3.1/rebase.c:255 assumes the signature is at offset 0x80 > in the image. This was true in the early Windows days but has long since been > generalized. The technique nowadays is to obtain the short integer

RE: cygheap base mismatch detected

On Fri, 17 Feb 2006, Dill, Jens (END-CHI) wrote: [...] I did try rebaseall. It told me all the Oracle DLLs were not rebaseable. The -v output is included below. [...] /usr/bin/tclpip84.dll: skipped because not rebaseable /usr/share/terminfo/a/ansi+sgrso: skipped because not rebaseable /usr/s

RE: cygheap base mismatch detected

2 [main] ? (-5768) d:\m1\voyagerdev\2006.1\bin\acqjob.exe: *** fatal error - cygheap base mismatch detected - 0x6115B900/0x36B900. is problem is probably due to using incompatible versions of the cygwin DLL. arch for cygwin1.dll using the Windows Start->Find/Search facility d delete all but the

RE: cygheap base mismatch detected

Dave Korn wrote >On 17 February 2006 19:21, Brian Dessent wrote: > >> Dave Korn wrote: >> >>> Absolutely so. I reckon doing a proper rebaseall that includes the >>> oracle dlls should make a noticeable difference. >> >> This is important. The rebaseall script only knows about DLLs installed >

RE: cygheap base mismatch detected

Dave Korn writes: > Right, thanks for giving us something we can actually get our teeth into... > it would really have been helpful to bring out some of this information a bit > earlier in the thread, like in the very first post for instance, but better > late than never! Sorry I didn't send con

RE: cygheap base mismatch detected

On 16 February 2006 23:17, Dill, Jens (END-CHI) wrote: > More test results: Right, thanks for giving us something we can actually get our teeth into... it would really have been helpful to bring out some of this information a bit earlier in the thread, like in the very first post for instance,

RE: cygheap base mismatch detected

More test results: > I can run tests in which I allocate static arrays of increasingly > large size, and I hit the cygheap base problem *exactly* when I > try to make an array bigger than 1.5 Gb. This still happens reliably, and note that I can declare an array of *exactly* 1.5 Gb, and load and r

cygheap base mismatch detected

Chris Taylor writes: > You know, it wouldn't exactly be rocket science to try 1.5.19-4 ... > Dave mentioned that there have been many improvements in the last year on this issue - > 1.5.18-1 is rather dated now. > > It can't hurt to try now, can it? Got me fair and square. I took my IT guy's ass

Re: cygheap base mismatch detected

Dill, Jens (END-CHI) wrote: Dave Korn writes: Unfortunately for me, (e) is impractical. It's not clear whether it is my source code or CygWin's that I need to fix, Have you actually *tried* this application of yours under Cygwin and discovered that it indeed *is* one of the rare ones that a

RE: cygheap base mismatch detected

On 16 February 2006 18:03, Dill, Jens (END-CHI) wrote: > I can't make this agree with the facts in front of me. > > If it has to do with executables that allocate massive amounts > of heap space, then how does the message appear before the > application even starts, before it has a chance to allo

RE: cygheap base mismatch detected

Dave Korn writes: > > Unfortunately for me, (e) is impractical. It's not clear whether > > it is my source code or CygWin's that I need to fix, > > Have you actually *tried* this application of yours under Cygwin and > discovered that it indeed *is* one of the rare ones that actually runs into

RE: cygheap base mismatch detected

Dave Korn writes: > On 15 February 2006 22:23, Jens Dill wrote: > > Jens Dill writes: > > > >> Original Message > >>> From: Andreas Heckel > >>> Sent: 07 April 2005 11:13 > ^ > > Dave: > > > > What you write makes it appear that CygWin simply will not support > > la

RE: cygheap base mismatch detected

On 16 February 2006 07:17, Dill, Jens (END-CHI) wrote: > Unfortunately for me, (e) is impractical. It's not clear whether > it is my source code or CygWin's that I need to fix, Have you actually *tried* this application of yours under Cygwin and discovered that it indeed *is* one of the rare

Re: cygheap base mismatch detected

On Thu, Feb 16, 2006 at 01:17:07AM -0600, Dill, Jens (END-CHI) wrote: >Christopher Faylor wrote: >> On Wed, Feb 15, 2006 at 10:22:30PM +, Jens Dill wrote: >> >What you write makes it appear that CygWin simply will not support >> >large executables that reference the CygWin DLL and are also laun

RE: cygheap base mismatch detected

On 15 February 2006 22:23, Jens Dill wrote: > Dave Korn artimi.com> writes: > >> >> Original Message >>> From: Andreas Heckel >>> Sent: 07 April 2005 11:13 ^ > Dave: > > What you write makes it appear that CygWin simply will not support > large executables that re

Re: cygheap base mismatch detected

Christopher Faylor wrote: > On Wed, Feb 15, 2006 at 10:22:30PM +, Jens Dill wrote: > >What you write makes it appear that CygWin simply will not support > >large executables that reference the CygWin DLL and are also launched > >from a CygWin shell. I can't believe that nobody has found a bett

Re: cygheap base mismatch detected

On Wed, Feb 15, 2006 at 10:22:30PM +, Jens Dill wrote: >What you write makes it appear that CygWin simply will not support >large executables that reference the CygWin DLL and are also launched >from a CygWin shell. I can't believe that nobody has found a better >workaround than: > > (a) not

Re: cygheap base mismatch detected

Dave Korn artimi.com> writes: > > Original Message > >From: Andreas Heckel > >Sent: 07 April 2005 11:13 > > > Since I read that the error has something do with putting the cygwin1.dll > > in a certain memory space, I am wondering, if my prog is allocating too > > much memory (big array

Re: cygheap base mismatch detected

Hi, - Original Message - From: "Mark Hadfield" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> The solutions: - Try the -mno-cygwin switch (thus creating a non-Cygwin executable). Be aware that you may need to recompile any external libraries. I tried this and it works for now, Thanx! :-) I should have come t

Re: cygheap base mismatch detected

Andreas Heckel wrote: Hello all, I know there were a lot of similar questions to this point in the past, but I didn't find a answer to my problem: I get the error message: --- v:\julian\TRAJ\Traj2.xi686 (2116): *** cygheap base mismatch detected - 0x6180/0x7214. This problem is pro

RE: cygheap base mismatch detected

Original Message >From: Andreas Heckel >Sent: 07 April 2005 11:13 > Since I read that the error has something do with putting the cygwin1.dll > in a certain memory space, I am wondering, if my prog is allocating too > much memory (big arrays) or in "bad way". > I am not an expert in these

cygheap base mismatch detected

Hello all, I know there were a lot of similar questions to this point in the past, but I didn't find a answer to my problem: I get the error message: --- v:\julian\TRAJ\Traj2.xi686 (2116): *** cygheap base mismatch detected - 0x6180/0x7214. This problem is probably due to