Re[2]: Win2000 compatibility

2012-04-13 Thread iggor
Hi, Christopher, Friday, April 13, 2012, 6:18:11 AM, вы писали: CF> On Thu, Apr 12, 2012 at 07:19:07PM +0400, iggor wrote: >>It appears that Cygwin SETUP.EXE at this time is uncompatible with >>Windows 2000, since it uses function GetModuleHandleExA which leads to >>error in searching entry point

Re: Win2000 compatibility

2012-04-13 Thread Csaba Raduly
On Fri, Apr 13, 2012 at 4:18 AM, Christopher Faylor wrote: > On Thu, Apr 12, 2012 at 07:19:07PM +0400, iggor wrote: >>It appears that Cygwin SETUP.EXE at this time is uncompatible with >>Windows 2000, since it uses function GetModuleHandleExA which leads to >>error in searching entry point in kern

Re: Win2000 compatibility

2012-04-12 Thread Christopher Faylor
On Thu, Apr 12, 2012 at 07:19:07PM +0400, iggor wrote: >It appears that Cygwin SETUP.EXE at this time is uncompatible with >Windows 2000, since it uses function GetModuleHandleExA which leads to >error in searching entry point in kernel32.dll. So, I cannot run setup >at all, even get help with opt

Re: Win2000 compatibility

2012-04-12 Thread Peter Rosin
Andy wrote: > MSDN no longer supports Windows 2000. Even something as basic as > CreateFile() now allegedly requires at least Windows XP. In some cases it still mentions Win2k though, such as for MessageBox(). I wonder why there's a difference? Probably depends on the dll the api is located in.

Re: Win2000 compatibility

2012-04-12 Thread Earnie Boyd
On Thu, Apr 12, 2012 at 3:51 PM, Christopher Faylor wrote: > On Thu, Apr 12, 2012 at 03:44:10PM -0400, Christopher Faylor wrote: >>On Thu, Apr 12, 2012 at 03:35:12PM -0400, Earnie Boyd wrote: >>>On Thu, Apr 12, 2012 at 11:48 AM, jojelino wrote: -- GetModuleHandleEx is known to be supporte

Re: Win2000 compatibility

2012-04-12 Thread Earnie Boyd
On Thu, Apr 12, 2012 at 3:48 PM, Andy Koppe wrote: > On 12 April 2012 16:48, jojelino wrote: >> GetModuleHandleEx is known to be supported in minimum winxp (0x0501), >> according to >> http://msdn.microsoft.com/en-us/library/windows/desktop/ms683200(v=vs.85).aspx > > MSDN no longer supports Window

Re: Win2000 compatibility

2012-04-12 Thread Earnie Boyd
On Thu, Apr 12, 2012 at 3:44 PM, Christopher Faylor wrote: > On Thu, Apr 12, 2012 at 03:35:12PM -0400, Earnie Boyd wrote: >>On Thu, Apr 12, 2012 at 11:48 AM, jojelino wrote: >>> -- >>> GetModuleHandleEx is known to be supported in minimum winxp (0x0501), >>> according to >>> http://msdn.microsoft.c

Re: Win2000 compatibility

2012-04-12 Thread Christopher Faylor
On Thu, Apr 12, 2012 at 03:44:10PM -0400, Christopher Faylor wrote: >On Thu, Apr 12, 2012 at 03:35:12PM -0400, Earnie Boyd wrote: >>On Thu, Apr 12, 2012 at 11:48 AM, jojelino wrote: >>> -- >>> GetModuleHandleEx is known to be supported in minimum winxp (0x0501), >>> according to >>> http://msdn.mic

Re: Win2000 compatibility

2012-04-12 Thread Andy Koppe
On 12 April 2012 16:48, jojelino wrote: > GetModuleHandleEx is known to be supported in minimum winxp (0x0501), > according to > http://msdn.microsoft.com/en-us/library/windows/desktop/ms683200(v=vs.85).aspx MSDN no longer supports Windows 2000. Even something as basic as CreateFile() now allegedl

Re: Win2000 compatibility

2012-04-12 Thread Christopher Faylor
On Thu, Apr 12, 2012 at 03:35:12PM -0400, Earnie Boyd wrote: >On Thu, Apr 12, 2012 at 11:48 AM, jojelino wrote: >> -- >> GetModuleHandleEx is known to be supported in minimum winxp (0x0501), >> according to >> http://msdn.microsoft.com/en-us/library/windows/desktop/ms683200(v=vs.85).aspx >> by the

Re: Win2000 compatibility

2012-04-12 Thread Earnie Boyd
On Thu, Apr 12, 2012 at 11:48 AM, jojelino wrote: > -- > GetModuleHandleEx is known to be supported in minimum winxp (0x0501), > according to > http://msdn.microsoft.com/en-us/library/windows/desktop/ms683200(v=vs.85).aspx > by the way, in winbase.h, it is enabled with minimum of win2k. which shoul

Re: Win2000 compatibility

2012-04-12 Thread jojelino
2012-04-13 AM 12:19, iggor 쓴 글: Hello, It appears that Cygwin SETUP.EXE at this time is uncompatible with Windows 2000, since it uses function GetModuleHandleExA which leads to error in searching entry point in kernel32.dll. So, I cannot run setup at all, even get help with option. AFAIK, this f

Win2000 compatibility

2012-04-12 Thread iggor
Hello, It appears that Cygwin SETUP.EXE at this time is uncompatible with Windows 2000, since it uses function GetModuleHandleExA which leads to error in searching entry point in kernel32.dll. So, I cannot run setup at all, even get help with option. AFAIK, this function is absent in all Win2k, no