Re: Using a secondary install of gcc/g++ binutils

Brian Dessent wrote: > However, it seems you also want it to not even consider /usr/include and > /usr/lib (or for the case of -mno-cygwin it's actually > /usr/include/mingw and /usr/lib/mingw) and instead use a different tree > alltogether. That is going to take a lot more work, and just changin

Re: Using a secondary install of gcc/g++ binutils

Brian Dantes wrote: > I am trying to deploy a secondary install of gcc/g++ under Cygwin. For a > package I am developing I need to keep the compiler and binutils stable even > if the Cygwin environment itself changes. I am using the the compiler in > -mno-cygwin mode to generates Win32 binaries --

Re: [ontopic again] RE: [OT] RE: Using a secondary install of gcc/g++ binutils

Dave Korn wrote: ps. still don't want be spammed! Wimp! ;-) -- Larry Hall http://www.rfk.com RFK Partners, Inc. (508) 893-9779 - RFK Office 216 Dalton Rd. (508) 893-9889 - FAX Holliston, MA 01746 ___

[ontopic again] RE: [OT] RE: Using a secondary install of gcc/g++ binutils

On 11 June 2007 20:20, Dave Korn wrote: > ObTopic: I was going to discuss the libstdc++ ABI change we introduced in > 3.4.4, but since you have announced your intention to post my email address > and get me spammed for my pains if I attempt to help you, I'm not inclined > to do so. However,

[OT] RE: Using a secondary install of gcc/g++ binutils

On 11 June 2007 19:58, Brian Dantes wrote: > I see no way to configure my email client to do this -- nor do I believe it > to be a reasonable request. It /is/ a "reasonable request". Posting someone's email address to a web archive gets them harvested and spammed. It is universally accepted a

Re: Using a secondary install of gcc/g++ binutils

> . Reformatted. If I am responding to something specific point (like now) -- I won't "top-post" -- but when I'm reading responses myself, I much prefer at least some lead-in right at the top. >>> To: cygwincom> >

Re: Using a secondary install of gcc/g++ binutils

t;http://cygwin.com/acronyms/#PCYMTNQREAIYR>. Don't feed the spammmers. Thanks. Subject: Re: Using a secondary install of gcc/g++ binutils On 06/11/2007, Brian Dantes wrote: As an aside, is object code and libraries generated by MinGW gcc/g++ 3.4.2 (the latest stable release, I believe) fully co

Re: Using a secondary install of gcc/g++ binutils

[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > Reply-To: > Date: Mon, 11 Jun 2007 13:36:09 -0400 > To: > Subject: Re: Using a secondary install of gcc/g++ binutils > > On 06/11/2007, Brian Dantes wrote: >> As an aside, is object code and libraries generated by MinGW gcc/g++ 3.4.2 >> (the l

Re: Using a secondary install of gcc/g++ binutils

On 06/11/2007, Brian Dantes wrote: As an aside, is object code and libraries generated by MinGW gcc/g++ 3.4.2 (the latest stable release, I believe) fully compatible with Cygwin's gcc/g++ 3.4.4 code generated in -mno-cygwin? You mean object code-wise? Yes. Cygwin is building Win32 executable

Using a secondary install of gcc/g++ binutils

Hello, I am trying to deploy a secondary install of gcc/g++ under Cygwin. For a package I am developing I need to keep the compiler and binutils stable even if the Cygwin environment itself changes. I am using the the compiler in -mno-cygwin mode to generates Win32 binaries -- I am not using the M