<http://cygwin.com/acronyms/#TOFU>. Reformatted.
Brian Dantes wrote:
From: "Larry Hall (Cygwin)" <reply-to-list-only-lh<AT>cygwin<DOT>com>
Reply-To: <cygwin<AT>cygwin<DOT>com>
Date: Mon, 11 Jun 2007 13:36:09 -0400
To: <cygwin<AT>cygwin<DOT>com>
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
<http://cygwin.com/acronyms/#PCYMTNQREAIYR>. Don't feed the spammmers.
Thanks.
Subject: Re: Using a secondary install of gcc/g++ binutils
On 06/11/2007, Brian Dantes wrote:
As an aside, is object code and libraries generated by MinGW gcc/g++ 3.4.2
(the latest stable release, I believe) fully compatible with Cygwin's
gcc/g++ 3.4.4 code generated in -mno-cygwin?
You mean object code-wise? Yes. Cygwin is building Win32 executables, just
like MinGW.
> More specifically, can object code generated by Cygwin g++ 3.4.4 be linked
> with MinGW gcc 3.4.2 libraries and vice versa? For example, I know this is
> *not* true for MinGW g++ 3.2.1; libstdc++ changed significantly between
> g++ 3.2.1 and 3.4.4.
g++ is binary compatible within the 3.4 series. I believe this has been
true with each of the 3.x series.
--
Larry Hall http://www.rfk.com
RFK Partners, Inc. (508) 893-9779 - RFK Office
216 Dalton Rd. (508) 893-9889 - FAX
Holliston, MA 01746
_____________________________________________________________________
A: Yes.
> Q: Are you sure?
>> A: Because it reverses the logical flow of conversation.
>>> Q: Why is top posting annoying in email?
--
Unsubscribe info: http://cygwin.com/ml/#unsubscribe-simple
Problem reports: http://cygwin.com/problems.html
Documentation: http://cygwin.com/docs.html
FAQ: http://cygwin.com/faq/
