Greetings, Bruce Visscher!
> As a matter of fact, perhaps I don't need winpty anymore. I used to
> have to prefix some windows console apps with this but that doesn't
> seem to be necessary now.
There have been some progress on Microsoft side regarding console behavior in
general, yes.
But in g
Brian,
On Wed, May 17, 2023 at 7:23 PM Brian Inglis wrote:
> You are definitely missing and need to install libffi8 and libgc1.
Thanks. After installing these via cygwin setup, make is working well.
In fact, the installation also corrected an issue I was having with
python. Previously,
> whi
On 2023-05-17 13:11, Bruce Visscher via Cygwin wrote:
On Wed, May 17, 2023 at 10:43 AM Brian Inglis wrote:
You need to generate cygcheck output using -hrsv options to include package info
for us to help you.
I have attached the output of `cygcheck -hrsv`. (Perhaps someone
should update the
On Wed, May 17, 2023 at 10:43 AM Brian Inglis wrote:
>
> Hi Bruse,
>
> You need to generate cygcheck output using -hrsv options to include package
> info
> for us to help you.
I have attached the output of `cygcheck -hrsv`. (Perhaps someone
should update the FAQ?)
> You need the library libgui
Hi Bruse,
You need to generate cygcheck output using -hrsv options to include package info
for us to help you.
You need the library libguile3.0_1 installed - we can not see if that is the
case or if there are any issues.
You also need to drop C:\Program Files\Microsoft\jdk-11.0.16.101-hotsp
Am 24/10/2022 um 11:36 schrieb marco atzeri:
On Sun, Oct 23, 2022 at 7:27 PM Ferenc Valenta wrote:
Hi,
Just found a possible issue with Cygwin:
If cygwin is not on the default path, and make is started by specyfing
the path to it (e.g., c:\cygwin64\bin\make), $(MAKE) works in the
top-level
On Sun, Oct 23, 2022 at 7:27 PM Ferenc Valenta wrote:
>
>
> Hi,
>
> Just found a possible issue with Cygwin:
> If cygwin is not on the default path, and make is started by specyfing
> the path to it (e.g., c:\cygwin64\bin\make), $(MAKE) works in the
> top-level makefile, but it does not work in ma
>Hey,
>I was trying to run the "make" command when installing darknet through the
>conda prompt.
>Below is the error message
>"(NAME) C:\Users\ngingihy\test\test2\imagetool\labelImg\darknet>make
> 1 [main] make 23544 find_fast_cwd: WARNING: Couldn't compute FAST_CWD
>pointer. Please report
Hi,
On Thu, Sep 27, 2018 at 4:31 PM, Tapas Mishra wrote:
> Hi,
> I am trying to do a project when I do a make on project code
> in cygwin environment I get following error
>
> gcc -Wall -g -c main.c -o main.o
> main.c: In function ‘main’:
> main.c:50:8: warning: unused variable ‘physmem’ [-Wunus
Tapas Mishra wrote:
Hi,
I am trying to do a project when I do a make on project code
in cygwin environment I get following error
gcc -Wall -g -c main.c -o main.o
main.c: In function ‘main’:
main.c:50:8: warning: unused variable ‘physmem’ [-Wunused-variable]
char *physmem = page_table_get_phys
2018-01-22 20:14 GMT+01:00 szgyg:
> You should reinstall libgc1.
>
> https://marc.info/?l=cygwin-apps&m=151603424924010
Yes, that worked! Thank you!
Regards,
Jan Nijtmans
--
Problem reports: http://cygwin.com/problems.html
FAQ: http://cygwin.com/faq/
Documentation
On 2018-01-22, Michael Demoulin wrote:
> The latest Make on the latest 64-bit version of Cygwin fails with the
> error 'C:/cygwin64/bin/make.exe: error while loading shared libraries:
> ?: cannot open shared object file: No such file or directory'
>
> I have included a sanitized output of 'cygche
Michael Demoulin writes:
> The latest Make on the latest 64-bit version of Cygwin fails with the
> error 'C:/cygwin64/bin/make.exe: error while loading shared libraries:
> ?: cannot open shared object file: No such file or directory'
Cannot reproduce.
~ (2001) make --version
GNU Make 4.2.1
Built
2018-01-22 16:28 GMT+01:00 Michael Demoulin:
>
> The latest Make on the latest 64-bit version of Cygwin fails with the error
> 'C:/cygwin64/bin/make.exe: error while loading shared libraries: ?: cannot
> open shared object file: No such file or directory'
I didn't check the 64-bit version, but t
On 07/12/2016 07:34, Arnaut B wrote:
On Tue, 06 Dec 2016 18:41:25 -0800, Ken Brown wrote:
On 12/6/2016 6:54 PM, Arnaut B wrote:
Hi All,
After updating cygwin to the latest current release, my "make" command
is broken. It spits the following error:
/usr/bin/cygcrypt-0.dll is provided b
On Tue, 06 Dec 2016 18:41:25 -0800, Ken Brown wrote:
On 12/6/2016 6:54 PM, Arnaut B wrote:
Hi All,
After updating cygwin to the latest current release, my "make" command
is broken. It spits the following error:
C:/cygwin/bin/make.exe: error while loading shared libraries: ?:
cannot open sh
On 12/6/2016 6:54 PM, Arnaut B wrote:
Hi All,
After updating cygwin to the latest current release, my "make" command
is broken. It spits the following error:
C:/cygwin/bin/make.exe: error while loading shared libraries: ?:
cannot open shared object file: No such file or directory
My setup-x8
On 15/09/16 22:18, Marco Atzeri wrote:
On 14/09/2016 18:04, Cesar wrote:
Marco, thanks for your response, mosml is a lightweight implemetation
of SML -standard ML, a functional programming language similar to
Haskell-, i tried running "--trace" and it does the same thing. I've
just confirmed tha
Cesar,
Please bottom post on this list.
On 14/09/2016 18:04, Cesar wrote:
Marco, thanks for your response, mosml is a lightweight implemetation
of SML -standard ML, a functional programming language similar to
Haskell-, i tried running "--trace" and it does the same thing. I've
just confirmed th
Marco, thanks for your response, mosml is a lightweight implemetation
of SML -standard ML, a functional programming language similar to
Haskell-, i tried running "--trace" and it does the same thing. I've
just confirmed that is not an issue with the make command since it
worked for the M4 macro pro
On 14/09/2016 17:01, Cesar wrote:
hi, i'm having an issue with make, i'm trying to install mosml and
when i type make, it seems to start ok but then it stops at "this is a
little endian architecture" and freezes there, it does nothing else.
is there something i'm missing?
thanks in advance.
On 01/06/2016 20:37, Tony Kelman wrote:
Marco and anybody else,
Has anyone been seeing issues with the latest make version on big
parallel compiles? I'm having trouble with LLVM for example, which
I've been building every few days or so on older versions of make
with no trouble. e.g.
curl -LO
Looks like I solved the issue by re-installing Docker Toolbox.
Thanks.
Sorry for the trouble.
From: cygwin-ow...@cygwin.com on behalf of Rory
Charles
Sent: 05 April 2016 11:49
To: cygwin@cygwin.com
Subject: Re: make command is throwing a "cygheap
I would add a cygcheck file for you, but I'm not able to add attachments, it
seems.
--
Problem reports: http://cygwin.com/problems.html
FAQ: http://cygwin.com/faq/
Documentation: http://cygwin.com/docs.html
Unsubscribe info: http://cygwin.com/ml/#unsubscribe-s
Dear Achim
>Tatsuro MATSUOKA yahoo.co.jp> writes:
>> The last step of setup seem to be autorebase then setup command is the
> easiest way
>> to use "rebase". Am I right?
>
> Yes.
>> After rebase sometime one needs to restart PC. Right?
>
> No. You only need to restart if in-use DLL have bee
Tatsuro MATSUOKA writes:
> However,I have no confidence that I kill all other cygwin-x86 process
> at that time. I will take care during cygwin setup process.
Install procps and just issue "pkill ." in an admin shell (or make a
shortcut for that) if you want to be sure.
Regards,
Achim.
--
+<[Q
Greetings, Tatsuro MATSUOKA!
>> rebase-trigger full
>> setup to the last
>> rebase-trigger full ?
> I started up ash from Windows command prompt and tried to start
> $ rebase-trigger full
> but
> ash: 1: rebase-trigger: not found
Then your installation is sorely out of date.
$ which rebase
Greetings, Achim Gratz!
> Tatsuro MATSUOKA writes:
>> However,I have no confidence that I kill all other cygwin-x86 process
>> at that time. I will take care during cygwin setup process.
> Install procps and just issue "pkill ." in an admin shell (or make a
> shortcut for that) if you want to be
Tatsuro MATSUOKA yahoo.co.jp> writes:
> The last step of setup seem to be autorebase then setup command is the
easiest way
> to use "rebase". Am I right?
Yes.
> After rebase sometime one needs to restart PC. Right?
No. You only need to restart if in-use DLL have been replaced during setup.
Re
Dear Andrey Repin
>That's a bit of a requirement. Considering this can be resolved with no
external
>packages.
It is very useful. Thanks a lot.
Tatsuro
--
View this message in context:
http://cygwin.1069669.n5.nabble.com/make-command-fails-on-cygwin-x86-cyggmp-10-dll-Loaded-to-different-a
- Original Message -
> From: Achim Gratz
> To: cygwinm
> Cc:
> Date: 2016/3/17, Thu 05:13
> Subject: Re: make command fails on cygwin-x86 (cyggmp-10.dll: Loaded to
> different address)
>
>T atsuro MATSUOKA writes:
>> However,I have no confidence th
- Original Message -
> From: Andrey Repin
> To: Tatsuro MATSUOKA ; cygwin
> Cc:
> Date: 2016/3/16, Wed 20:51
> Subject: Re: make command fails on cygwin-x86 (cyggmp-10.dll: Loaded to
> different address)
>
>G reetings, Tatsuro MATSUOKA!
>
>>> r
Tatsuro MATSUOKA yahoo.co.jp> writes:
> I started up ash from Windows command prompt and tried to start
That's not necessary anymore, but if you do you either need to set PATH or
prepend /bin/ to all commands.
> $ rebase-trigger full
> but
> ash: 1: rebase-trigger: not found
>
> I have instal
rebaseall and restart PC solves the issue.
Thanks!
Tatsuro
--
View this message in context:
http://cygwin.1069669.n5.nabble.com/make-command-fails-on-cygwin-x86-cyggmp-10-dll-Loaded-to-different-address-tp125247p125251.html
Sent from the Cygwin list mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
--
Pr
Thank you for the reply
> rebase-trigger full
> setup to the last
> rebase-trigger full ?
I started up ash from Windows command prompt and tried to start
$ rebase-trigger full
but
ash: 1: rebase-trigger: not found
I have installed rebase package from the cygwin package.
> setup to the las
Greetings, Tatsuro MATSUOKA!
> Hello
> Today I have check out by setup command on Cygwin-x86.
> The make command does not work.
> $ LC_ALL=C make
> 0 [main] make 8704 child_info_fork::abort:
> E:\cygwin\bin\cyggmp-10.dll: Loaded to different address: parent(0x8B) !=
> child(0x7B)
V.99 seznam.cz> writes:
>On 14.2.2015 4:25, andy wrote:
>> It doesn't have a drive letter in Windows Explorer. The name is
>> simply "Moto G". When I "ls /cygdrive", I see on the c-drive. I
>> think that the handset's visibility to Windows Explorer is based on
>> MTP USB, but that's just someth
On 14.2.2015 4:25, andy wrote:
It doesn't have a drive letter in Windows Explorer. The name is simply
"Moto G". When I "ls /cygdrive", I see on the c-drive. I think that the
handset's visibility to Windows Explorer is based on MTP USB, but that's
just something I'm learning about right now.
H
On Feb 14 07:49, Andrey Repin wrote:
> Greetings, andy!
>
> >> > My Moto G connects to the laptop via USB, and can be seen using Windows
> >> > Explorer. Is there a way to make it visible as a Unix path? /cygdrive
> >> > does
> >> > not show it.
> >>
> >> Are you including the drive letter? I
Eliot Moss cs.umass.edu> writes:
>On 2/14/2015 1:03 PM, Andy wrote:
>> Why would such a person want to access the handset via a unix path?
>> Android doesn't have a native Notes app, and if I simply use its
>> text editor, that's one more app I can avoid installing. But I
>> would want to sync it
On 2/14/2015 1:03 PM, Andy wrote:
Why would such a person want to access the handset via a unix path?
Android doesn't have a native Notes app, and if I simply use its text
editor, that's one more app I can avoid installing. But I would want
to sync it with the laptop copy of the text files via
Andrey Repin yandex.ru> writes:
My Moto G connects to the laptop via USB, and can be seen using
Windows Explorer. Is there a way to make it visible as a Unix
path? /cygdrive does not show it.
>>>
>>> Are you including the drive letter? If it’s the G: drive in
>>> Windows Explorer
Greetings, andy!
>> > My Moto G connects to the laptop via USB, and can be seen using Windows
>> > Explorer. Is there a way to make it visible as a Unix path? /cygdrive
>> > does
>> > not show it.
>>
>> Are you including the drive letter? If it’s the G: drive in Windows
> Explorer, you need t
Warren Young etr-usa.com> writes:
>
> > On Feb 13, 2015, at 7:20 PM, andy gmail.com> wrote:
> >
> > My Moto G connects to the laptop via USB, and can be seen using Windows
> > Explorer. Is there a way to make it visible as a Unix path? /cygdrive does
> > not show it.
>
> Are you including t
> On Feb 13, 2015, at 7:20 PM, andy wrote:
>
> My Moto G connects to the laptop via USB, and can be seen using Windows
> Explorer. Is there a way to make it visible as a Unix path? /cygdrive does
> not show it.
Are you including the drive letter? If it’s the G: drive in Windows Explorer,
you
On 30/05/2014 01:53 +0400, Christopher Faylor wrote:
> On Fri, May 30, 2014 at 01:50:49AM +0400, Filipp Gunbin wrote:
>>Also, it's strange that the install... command above works when run
>>directly in shell, but fails when run from make.
>
> Which implies that you probably are not running /usr/bi
On Fri, May 30, 2014 at 01:50:49AM +0400, Filipp Gunbin wrote:
>Also, it's strange that the install... command above works when run
>directly in shell, but fails when run from make.
Which implies that you probably are not running /usr/bin/install.
cgf
--
Problem reports: http://cygwin.com/
On Thu, May 1, 2014 at 10:14 AM, Thomas Wolff wrote:
> Am 01.05.2014 04:09, schrieb Richard H. McCullough:
>>
>> ... In the last week, "make" suddenly
>> changed -- it does nothing but stop on every makefile.
>
> Sounds like you changed your PATH and have a different (non-cygwin) version
> of make
Am 01.05.2014 04:09, schrieb Richard H. McCullough:
... In the last week, "make" suddenly
changed -- it does nothing but stop on every makefile.
Sounds like you changed your PATH and have a different (non-cygwin)
version of make now.
What does `type make` say?
---
Diese E-Mail ist frei von Vir
On Wed, Apr 30, 2014 at 07:09:00PM -0700, Richard H. McCullough wrote:
>I picked a bad example, since you don't have my source files.
>The point is this: I've been using Cygwin "make" for years
>and never had a problem. In the last week, "make" suddenly
>changed -- it does nothing but stop on ever
On 04/30/2014 01:13 PM, Richard H. McCullough wrote:
make no longer works on any of my makefiles.
example makefile attached.
Trying this make file on Linux and on Cygwin produced the same results.
make: *** No rule to make target `merr.icn', needed by `/bin/merr.exe'. Stop.
This does not se
I downloaded dependency walker, but I'm not sure what I'm looking for.
On Wed, Nov 20, 2013 at 1:12 PM, Brian Minton wrote:
> On Wed, Nov 20, 2013 at 12:48 PM, marco atzeri wrote:
>> cygcheck /usr/bin/make
>
>
> $ cygcheck /usr/bin/make
> C:\cygwin\bin\make.exe
> C:\cygwin\bin\cygwin1.dll
On Wed, Nov 20, 2013 at 12:48 PM, marco atzeri wrote:
> cygcheck /usr/bin/make
$ cygcheck /usr/bin/make
C:\cygwin\bin\make.exe
C:\cygwin\bin\cygwin1.dll
C:\Windows\system32\KERNEL32.dll
C:\Windows\system32\API-MS-Win-Core-RtlSupport-L1-1-0.dll
C:\Windows\system32\ntdll.dll
Il 11/20/2013 5:48 PM, Brian Minton ha scritto:
make (/usr/bin/make.exe) is not working. It immediately exits with a
shell return value of 127. If I run it under gdb, it gives:
Reading symbols from /usr/bin/make...(no debugging symbols found)...done.
(gdb) run
Starting program: /usr/bin/make
[N
Hello!
> The errors i obtain are as follows:
> /tmp/lcl/tmp/cygwin/cygwin-snapshot-20130731-1/winsup/c++wrap: line 2:
> use: command not found
> /tmp/lcl/tmp/cygwin/cygwin-snapshot-20130731-1/winsup/c++wrap: line 3:
> use: command not found
> /tmp/lcl/tmp/cygwin/cygwin-snapshot-20130731-1/winsup/
Hello!
> The errors i obtain are as follows:
> /tmp/lcl/tmp/cygwin/cygwin-snapshot-20130731-1/winsup/c++wrap: line 2:
> use: command not found
> /tmp/lcl/tmp/cygwin/cygwin-snapshot-20130731-1/winsup/c++wrap: line 3:
> use: command not found
> /tmp/lcl/tmp/cygwin/cygwin-snapshot-20130731-1/winsup/
On 2013-08-01 17:09, Denis Excoffier wrote:
I did
sed -i -e 's/__CYGWIN__/__NOEXIST20130801__/' make-3.99.90/configure
as suggested in
http://lists.gnu.org/archive/html/bug-make/2013-07/msg00020.html
with no improvement for the compilation of cygwin-20130731 (same
error
messages). Perhaps i sh
On 2013-08-01 15:09, Pavel Fedin wrote:
Hello!
The errors i obtain are as follows:
/tmp/lcl/tmp/cygwin/cygwin-snapshot-20130731-1/winsup/c++wrap: line
2:
use: command not found
/tmp/lcl/tmp/cygwin/cygwin-snapshot-20130731-1/winsup/c++wrap: line
3:
use: command not found
Yesterday i have
On Thu, Aug 01, 2013 at 05:39:22PM +0400, Pavel Fedin wrote:
>> i won't subject if the patch is accepted as part of Cygwin package. I'm
>> just not very fond of rebuilding tools manually after every update.
>
> Ooops, i wanted to say "won't object". I. e. won't mind. :)
You don't have to rebuild p
> i won't subject if the patch is accepted as part of Cygwin package. I'm
> just not very fond of rebuilding tools manually after every update.
Ooops, i wanted to say "won't object". I. e. won't mind. :)
Kind regards,
Pavel Fedin
Expert Engineer
Samsung Electronics Research center Russia
--
P
Hello!
> The errors i obtain are as follows:
> /tmp/lcl/tmp/cygwin/cygwin-snapshot-20130731-1/winsup/c++wrap: line 2:
> use: command not found
> /tmp/lcl/tmp/cygwin/cygwin-snapshot-20130731-1/winsup/c++wrap: line 3:
> use: command not found
Yesterday i have successfully compiled CVS version of
On Tue, Jun 11, 2013 at 5:29 AM, Matt D. wrote:
> Attempting to compile twf:
>
> http://gtk-apps.org/content/show.php/?content=83361
>
> Configures fine. Then on make it hangs on what appears to be the linking
> stage:
>
> /bin/sh ../libtool --tag=CC --mode=link gcc -rdynamic -g -O2-o twf.exe
>
On May 23 17:29, Satish Balay wrote:
> On Thu, 23 May 2013, Corinna Vinschen wrote:
>
> > On May 23 18:07, Corinna Vinschen wrote:
> > > On May 23 10:14, Satish Balay wrote:
> > > > [...]
> > > > - It appears to be related to the huge length of one of the commands -
> > > > and
> > > > length
On Thu, 23 May 2013, Corinna Vinschen wrote:
> On May 23 18:07, Corinna Vinschen wrote:
> > On May 23 10:14, Satish Balay wrote:
> > > [...]
> > > - It appears to be related to the huge length of one of the commands - and
> > > length of PATH
> > > - I tried it on 3 different machines [with di
On May 23 18:07, Corinna Vinschen wrote:
> On May 23 10:14, Satish Balay wrote:
> > [...]
> > - It appears to be related to the huge length of one of the commands - and
> > length of PATH
> > - I tried it on 3 different machines [with differences in default installed
> > software]
> > win200
On May 23 10:14, Satish Balay wrote:
> Hi,
>
> I'm seeing the following behavior with make, PATH on cygwin. Google
> brought up a related post [with PATH and same error]
> http://comments.gmane.org/gmane.os.cygwin/137168 with reference to
> http://cygwin.com/acronyms/#BLODA as the issue - but I do
On Thu, 23 May 2013, Satish Balay wrote:
> Hi,
>
> I'm seeing the following behavior with make, PATH on cygwin. Google
> brought up a related post [with PATH and same error]
> http://comments.gmane.org/gmane.os.cygwin/137168 with reference to
> http://cygwin.com/acronyms/#BLODA as the issue - but
On 23/01/13 15:01, Christopher Faylor wrote:
>> Does anybody have an idea how to fix this and to run the tests?
> You can't. The test suite is bit rotted and hasn't worked in a long
> time.
Oh, thank you for pointing this out. Maybe I wanted to do it too
correctly in this case. I would suggest t
On Wed, Jan 23, 2013 at 12:49:04PM +0100, Andreas Steenpass wrote:
>Does anybody have an idea how to fix this and to run the tests?
You can't. The test suite is bit rotted and hasn't worked in a long
time.
--
Problem reports: http://cygwin.com/problems.html
FAQ: http://cy
On Mon, Jun 11, 2012 at 01:04:22AM -0500, Yaakov (Cygwin/X) wrote:
>>
>On 2012-06-10 23:26, Christopher Faylor wrote:
>> If there is a bug it is with make ever equating foo.exe with foo. It's
>> undoubtedly happening because of Cygwin's attempts at transparency.
>>
>> I'm not kidding about EXEEXT.
On 2012-06-10 23:26, Christopher Faylor wrote:
If there is a bug it is with make ever equating foo.exe with foo. It's
undoubtedly happening because of Cygwin's attempts at transparency.
I'm not kidding about EXEEXT. Surely you know about this from having
maintained cygport.
Am I ever, but I
On Sun, Jun 10, 2012 at 03:57:33PM -0500, Yaakov (Cygwin/X) wrote:
>On 2012-06-10 13:29, Christopher Faylor wrote:
>> On Sun, Jun 10, 2012 at 01:06:18PM -0500, Yaakov (Cygwin/X) wrote:
>>> I can confirm that this previously reported bug in make .exe handling
>>> still affects the cross-compile of t
On 2012-06-10 13:29, Christopher Faylor wrote:
On Sun, Jun 10, 2012 at 01:06:18PM -0500, Yaakov (Cygwin/X) wrote:
I can confirm that this previously reported bug in make .exe handling
still affects the cross-compile of the Linux kernel:
http://cygwin.com/ml/cygwin/2009-11/msg00935.html
Withou
On Sun, Jun 10, 2012 at 01:06:18PM -0500, Yaakov (Cygwin/X) wrote:
>I can confirm that this previously reported bug in make .exe handling
>still affects the cross-compile of the Linux kernel:
>
>http://cygwin.com/ml/cygwin/2009-11/msg00935.html
Without diving into the depths of the linux makefile
On 3/2/2012 3:28 AM, Eliot Moss wrote:
.
Generally, getting " quotes around it will do the trick.
Over the years I have managed to make many of my scripts
safe for file and directory names that have spaces. It's
a pain, but generally possible ... Eliot Moss
Eliot:
Thanks. I am usually very
[sent to wrong email address, apologies]
On 3/2/2012 12:43 PM, Paul Allen Newell wrote:
On 3/1/2012 11:19 PM, Dave Korn wrote:
On 02/03/2012 07:06, Paul Allen Newell wrote:
I'll go and figure out some way to filter $(PWD) to be acceptable to
basename.
It just needs quotes around it to prev
On 3/2/2012 2:06 AM, Paul Allen Newell wrote:
On 3/1/2012 10:50 PM, Dave Korn wrote:
I'll go and figure out some way to filter $(PWD) to be acceptable to basename.
Generally, getting " quotes around it will do the trick.
Over the years I have managed to make many of my scripts
safe for file
On 02/03/2012 07:06, Paul Allen Newell wrote:
> I'll go and figure out some way to filter $(PWD) to be acceptable to
> basename.
It just needs quotes around it to prevent the space being taken as a
separator.
cheers,
DaveK
--
Problem reports: http://cygwin.com/problems.html
F
On 3/1/2012 10:50 PM, Dave Korn wrote:
I think it's because aliases are just simple text substitutions. So if you
have 'make' being transformed to 'settitle Making $(basename $PWD)&& make
"$@"' then you would get 'make>& make.out' becoming 'settitle Making
$(basename $PWD)&& make "$@">&
On 02/03/2012 06:25, Paul Allen Newell wrote:
> +++
> type make; which -a make
> make is aliased to `settitle Making $(basename $PWD) && make "$@"'
> /usr/bin/make
> /usr/bin/make
> +++
>
> I groaned when I saw this as it is obvious the $(PWD) is feeding
> basename and that's the "make" error. Th
On 3/1/2012 10:07 PM, Dave Korn wrote:
On 02/03/2012 02:52, Paul Allen Newell wrote:
[ weird problem symptoms ]
You probably have a script or shell alias getting in between you and the
real make. Please run "type make ; which -a make" in a bash shell and show us
the results.
cheers,
On 02/03/2012 02:52, Paul Allen Newell wrote:
> [ weird problem symptoms ]
You probably have a script or shell alias getting in between you and the
real make. Please run "type make ; which -a make" in a bash shell and show us
the results.
cheers,
DaveK
--
Problem reports: htt
On 3/1/2012 7:10 PM, Kenneth Wolcott wrote:
On Thu, Mar 1, 2012 at 19:05, Kenneth Wolcott wrote:
Is it possible that scripts and executables write to file descripter 3 or
4 or 5? File descriptor 0 is STDIN (normally), and file descriptor 1 is
STDOUT (normally) and file descripter 2 is SDTERR
On Thu, Mar 1, 2012 at 19:05, Kenneth Wolcott wrote:
>
>
>
> On Thu, Mar 1, 2012 at 18:52, Paul Allen Newell
> wrote:
>>
>> Cygwin:
>>
>> I've already run an earlier version of this through the list to see if I
>> was dealing with pilot error. Its gotten to the point that it was suggested
>> I co
On Wed, Feb 8, 2012 at 12:55 AM, Robert Miles wrote:
> Gmail does not allow you to receive what appear to be email from yourself,
> sent to yourself.
>
I'm currently using the GMail GUI and have Coversation Mode set on.
This allows my response to be stored in the conversation. EZMLM uses
the Send
Gmail does not allow you to receive what appear to be email from yourself,
sent to yourself.
This mailing list is set up in a way that makes it appear that way.
You'll probably need a second email address in order to find a way to avoid
this problem.
On 2/7/2012 11:23 PM, Quinn Wood wrote:
I
I discovered that while the code is designed for Unix like operating
system, it was indeed making a call to cl. I apologize for not
recognizing that I needed to look at the line in the file it mentioned
explicitly as the fail point.
I also apologize that these are not reading as follow-ups correct
On Tue, Feb 7, 2012 at 9:57 PM, Yaakov (Cygwin/X)
wrote:
> On Tue, 2012-02-07 at 21:36 -0600, Quinn Wood wrote:
>> When attempting to compile an application I recieved this error.
>>
>> make[4]: cl: Command not found
>>
>> Recognizing the line I'm either toeing or- more accurately- crossing
>> the
On 2/7/2012 9:36 PM, Quinn Wood wrote:
> what is "cl?"
The Microsoft C compiler.
--
René Berber
--
Problem reports: http://cygwin.com/problems.html
FAQ: http://cygwin.com/faq/
Documentation: http://cygwin.com/docs.html
Unsubscribe info: http://cygwin.com/ml
On Tue, 2012-02-07 at 21:36 -0600, Quinn Wood wrote:
> When attempting to compile an application I recieved this error.
>
> make[4]: cl: Command not found
>
> Recognizing the line I'm either toeing or- more accurately- crossing
> the line between on- and offtopic here (I apologize) what is "cl?"
>Just for curiosity, try changing your makefile to the following and
>running make:
>all:
which g++
g++ main.cpp -o test
>Hope this helps,
>Csaba
Hi Csaba,
When I run that it shows this in the cygwin console:
$ make
which g++
/user/bin/g++
It doesn't run g++ though, not sure i
Hi,
On Thu, Dec 8, 2011 at 4:34 PM, Fitzy wrote:
> Alright so I'm a complete newbie when it comes to anything linux related.
>
> And so I cannot figure out how make is supposed to work under cygwin,
> even creating the simplest makefile produces
>
> "Error: 'g++' not found"
Did you actually run
On Fri, Aug 19, 2011 at 11:39 AM, Tobias Manthey wrote:
> Hi guys,
>
> I wasted many hours just to find out that make 3.81 does not support MS-DOS
> path names. As cygwin is supposed to be the unix-like environment for
> Windows, from a dumb users perspective, this is not the expected behavior.
On 5/2/2011 8:38 AM, Sayth Renshaw wrote:
I am trying to use compile with emacs on windows7. Cygwin is being
called as its my make environment.
Cygwin seems to be calling ruby.exe judging by the output pasted
below, what I want to know is how do i update it to be jruby?
My path for jruby is set
On Thu, Dec 23, 2010 at 02:17:05PM -0200, Carlos Pfitzner wrote:
>I am compliling squid to run on windows - native -or- under cygwin
>./configure
>runs fine
>
>however
>make
>guives a lot off errors and termintates
>
>I believve is not possible to be c c++ forget to be updated or similar
>cause my
On 8/16/2010 12:47 PM, Mahesh P wrote:
hi!
1)I unzipped the CUnit test framework from the bash shell in cygwin
and tried installing it
./configure-works
make command gives me an error saying
cd .&& autoheader
/bin/sh : autoheader:command not found
make:*** [config.h.in]Error 127.
make install
On Sat, Jul 31, 2010 at 04:53:56PM -0700, Rob Walker wrote:
>http://lists.gnu.org/archive/html/make-w32/2010-07/msg00010.html
>
>I've downloaded and built GNU make 3.82 for Cygwin. The packages are
>available here:
>
>http://sites.google.com/a/rwalker.com/cygwin/make-381-DOS/make-3.82-1-src.tar.b
On Tue, December 29, 2009 19:09, Rob Walker wrote:
>
> Here are links to the patches I've applied to construct this package:
>
> http://lists.gnu.org/archive/html/make-w32/2006-09/msg00037.html
> http://lists.gnu.org/archive/html/make-w32/2007-12/msg00015.html
>
Ah, ok, the patches are
Edward Lam wrote:
Rob Walker wrote:
It's been almost a year and a half since I made a request to have
Cygwin's GNU make updated with the upstream patches for colons in
dependencies and VPATH directives:
Is this patch submitted upstream to the gmake project? I imagine it
would be
Hi Rob,
Rob Walker wrote:
It's been almost a year and a half since I made a request to have
Cygwin's GNU make updated with the upstream patches for colons in
dependencies and VPATH directives:
Is this patch submitted upstream to the gmake project? I imagine it
would be helpful to the HAVE_DO
1 - 100 of 347 matches
Mail list logo
