Re: building lapack with cygwin

Cezary Sliwa wrote: > I tried to build Lapack 3.1.1 using cygwin. Compilation works fine, but > testing reports failures. I often build lapack 3.1.1 with G77, GFortran and G95, and I do not observe any failure in testing. To build with G77 (3.4.4-3) I simply copy make.inc.example to make.inc an

Re: building lapack with cygwin

On Thu, Aug 02, 2007 at 12:46:16AM +0200, Cezary Sliwa wrote: > > Hello, > > I tried to build Lapack 3.1.1 using cygwin. Compilation works fine, but > testing reports failures. The g77 flags were -O3 -funroll-all-loops. > > For gcc 3.3.3 failures are reported by CEV, CVX, CGV, DGV, SGV, ZGV. >

Re: Building LAPACK and ATLAS under cygwin

On Tuesday 01 April 2003 19:04, Underwood, Jonathan wrote: > Hi > > Apologies if this is a little off topic. Probably more than a little. Failing to follow instructions for non-cygwin applications is likely to make you a target for such accusations. >However i run into trouble > when compiling

Re: Building LAPACK

Erin Catto wrote: > That worked. Is it usually necessary to modifiy make > files for Cygwin? Only when they haven't been written carefully to begin with. > Are there any other common problems? Silly question - of course there aren't one or two problems that nearly everybody runs into. If there w

Re: Building LAPACK

That worked. Is it usually necessary to modifiy make files for Cygwin? Are there any other common problems? Thanks, Erin --- Max Bowsher <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Short answer: Add ".PHONY: install" to the makefile > > Long answer: make sees the INSTALL directory, and > concludes that it is

Re: Building LAPACK

Erin Catto wrote: > I'm having trouble building LAPACK. I downloaded > lapack.tgz from www.netlib.org/lapack. I'm using > make.inc.LINUX for make.inc. I type > > make install > > and make says that install is up to date but it is > not! I have done the same operation on Linux and it > works. > > He