Re: cygipc-1.13-2.tar.bz2 download

Rajendra S. Gad schrieb: Sir Igor, I am installing the DSpace application on the UBUNTU version 5.10 . Please inform me where I will have better instruction for installing and configuring DSpace on this plateform. Slightly off-topic, but for the sake of interest: I'm just crosscompiling libstdc

Re: cygipc-1.13-2.tar.bz2 download

Ugh, top-posting again... Reformatted again. On Tue, 21 Mar 2006, Rajendra S. Gad wrote: > > Ugh, top-posting... Reformatted. > > > > On Mon, 20 Mar 2006, Rajendra S. Gad wrote: > > > >> > On Fri, 17 Mar 2006, Rajendra S. Gad wrote: > >> > > >> >> Sir, > >> >> I am not in position ot download t

Re: cygipc-1.13-2.tar.bz2 download

Sir, Thanks for your comment. Infact initially I was installing the DSpace(is a digital repository system, Linux based application, http://www.dspace.org/). on the windows Xp hence I was playing with Cygwin, and hence cygipc. Presently I am trying on the Linux plateform , since many compatibility

Re: cygipc-1.13-2.tar.bz2 download

--On Monday, March 20, 2006 12:17:31 -0500 Igor Peshansky wrote: On Mon, 20 Mar 2006, Rajendra S. Gad wrote: Please inform me where I will have better instruction for installing and configuring DSpace on this plateform. I have no idea what DSpace is, but if it does indeed require Cygwin tools

Re: cygipc-1.13-2.tar.bz2 download

Ugh, top-posting... Reformatted. On Mon, 20 Mar 2006, Rajendra S. Gad wrote: > > On Fri, 17 Mar 2006, Rajendra S. Gad wrote: > > > >> Sir, > >> I am not in position ot download the above file from the portal > >> > >> http://www.neuro.gatech.edu/users/cwilson/cygutils/cygipc/cygipc-1.13-2.tar.bz

Re: cygipc-1.13-2.tar.bz2 download

Sir Igor, I am installing the DSpace application on the UBUNTU version 5.10 . Please inform me where I will have better instruction for installing and configuring DSpace on this plateform. Also let suggest me other linux plateform which will be user friendly for instyallinf DSpace( Specially whic

Re: cygipc-1.13-2.tar.bz2 download

Igor Peshansky wrote: http://www.neuro.gatech.edu/users/cwilson/cygutils/cygipc/cygipc-1.13-2.tar.bz2 Please guide me. The question is: why do you need it? This package has been obsolete for some time, and has been superceded with functionality within Cygwin itself (see /usr/share/doc/Cygwin

Re: cygipc-1.13-2.tar.bz2 download

On Fri, 17 Mar 2006, Rajendra S. Gad wrote: > Sir, > I am not in position ot download the above file from the portal > > http://www.neuro.gatech.edu/users/cwilson/cygutils/cygipc/cygipc-1.13-2.tar.bz2 > > Please guide me. The question is: why do you need it? This package has been obsolete for so

Re: CygIPC-2.01-2

On Oct 3 02:37, TAN TH wrote: > hi Wilson, > from > http://sources.redhat.com/ml/cygwin-announce/2003-09/msg00055.html > you say that CygIPC 2 is now an official package. > > at > http://www.neuro.gatech.edu/users/cwilson/cygutils/cygipc/ > > it is not longer valid. > Also, I see quite a number

Re: CygIpc

Emanuele, On Tue, Nov 04, 2003 at 07:57:43AM +0100, Emanuele Bonin wrote: > How can i check if i have all the neccessary things to run postgresql? By reading the README: http://www.tishler.net/jason/software/postgresql/postgresql-7.3.4.README Jason -- PGP/GPG Key: http://www.tishler.net/j

Re: cygipc shutdown patch

Chuck, On Wed, Oct 01, 2003 at 11:50:45AM -0400, Charles Wilson wrote: > Jason Tishler wrote: > >The attached patch expands "normal" above to include the following > >two cases: > > > >[snip] > > Thanks for the patch. You are quite welcome. > I will include it in the next release which should b

Re: cygipc shutdown patch

Jason Tishler wrote: The attached patch expands "normal" above to include the following two cases: 1. SIGINT, SIGQUIT, and SIGTERM signals when running as a process 2. SERVICE_CONTROL_SHUTDOWN requests when running as a service Now ipc-daemon2 will clean up after itself during system shutd

RE: CygIPC

On Sat, 19 Jul 2003, Kevin Jones wrote: > Thanks to everybody that replied to this, I now have cygipc-1.14.1. > However if I do an --install-as-service, it seems to install OK, but I > can't start the service (this is on Windows 2003 server). Any pointers > would be welcome, Take a look at

RE: CygIPC

Message- > From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Kevin Jones > Sent: 19 July 2003 09:20 > To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > Subject: RE: CygIPC > > > > No, No, No! This is a test package released for Cygwin 1.5.0 > > and is not > > compat

RE: CygIPC

On Sat, 19 Jul 2003, Kevin Jones wrote: > > No, No, No! This is a test package released for Cygwin 1.5.0 > > and is not > > compatible with Cygwin version 1.3.* . Unless someone has the > > package to send to > > you, you'll have to wait (which shouldn;t be too long). > > OK, so where do I get the

RE: CygIPC

GreSQL install pages talk about? Kevin Jones Developmentor www.develop.com > -Original Message- > From: Elfyn McBratney [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > Sent: 19 July 2003 08:58 > To: guenter strubinsky > Cc: 'Kevin Jones'; [EMAIL PROTECTED] > Subject: RE: CygIPC

RE: CygIPC

http://koeln.convey.de/cywgin/bluefish/ > -Original Message- > From: Elfyn McBratney [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > Sent: Saturday, 19 July, 2003 02:58 > To: guenter strubinsky > Cc: 'Kevin Jones'; [EMAIL PROTECTED] > Subject: RE: CygIPC > > On Sat, 19

RE: CygIPC

On Sat, 19 Jul 2003, guenter strubinsky wrote: > http://mirror.mcs.anl.gov/cygwin/release/cygipc/ > > > I'm trying to get PostGreSQL to run under Cygwin and need to get cygipc > > from http://www.neuro.gatech.edu/users/cwilson/cygutils/cygipc/ and I > > can't connect to the site. > > > > Does anyb

RE: CygIPC

http://mirror.mcs.anl.gov/cygwin/release/cygipc/ > -Original Message- > From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf > Of Kevin Jones > Sent: Saturday, 19 July, 2003 02:42 > To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > Subject: CygIPC > > I'm trying to get PostGreSQL to run under Cygwin and ne

Re: cygipc problem (was shmctl(blabla,IPC_RMID,NULL) question)

Jason Tishler wrote: Chuck, On Sun, Jul 13, 2003 at 03:48:43PM -0400, Charles Wilson wrote: However, it MAY be fixed in the upcoming 1.2.0 version of cygipc, ... ^ Is the above a typo? Shouldn't the next version be > 1.14? For example, 1.15 or 2.0

Re: cygipc problem (was shmctl(blabla,IPC_RMID,NULL) question)

Igor, On Mon, Jul 14, 2003 at 11:03:55AM -0400, Igor Pechtchanski wrote: > On Mon, 14 Jul 2003, Jason Tishler wrote: > > On Sun, Jul 13, 2003 at 03:48:43PM -0400, Charles Wilson wrote: > > > However, it MAY be fixed in the upcoming 1.2.0 version of cygipc, > >

Re: cygipc problem (was shmctl(blabla,IPC_RMID,NULL) question)

On Mon, 14 Jul 2003, Jason Tishler wrote: > Chuck, > > On Sun, Jul 13, 2003 at 03:48:43PM -0400, Charles Wilson wrote: > > However, it MAY be fixed in the upcoming 1.2.0 version of cygipc, ... >^ > Is the above a typo? Shouldn't the next version be

Re: cygipc problem (was shmctl(blabla,IPC_RMID,NULL) question)

Chuck, On Sun, Jul 13, 2003 at 03:48:43PM -0400, Charles Wilson wrote: > However, it MAY be fixed in the upcoming 1.2.0 version of cygipc, ... ^ Is the above a typo? Shouldn't the next version be > 1.14? For example, 1.15 or 2.0. Thanks, Jason --

Re: cygipc semaphores not persistent?

Mark Paulus wrote: Are you running the ipcdaemon process? At one time the cygipc libraries required the ipcdaemon process to manage the global objects. I thought I read something that the ipc-daemon is going away, and being incorporated into the cygwin architecture, but I did not gather that it

Re: cygipc semaphores not persistent?

No that's right. The goal was to move the functionality of cygipc into the Cygwin DLL itself and expand on it. However, this work is incomplete. But cygipc and the work to add IPC functionality to the Cygwin DLL are mutually exclusive pieces of functionality. So there's nothing that's happened t

Re: cygipc semaphores not persistent?

Are you running the ipcdaemon process? At one time the cygipc libraries required the ipcdaemon process to manage the global objects. I thought I read something that the ipc-daemon is going away, and being incorporated into the cygwin architecture, but I did not gather that it had happened yet. T

Re: cygipc/cygwin-daemon

hi, i just want to know, how far the development of the cygipc-replacement is. i'm just interested in that technique. Check the email archives or CVS for details. Allot of good work has been done but more is needed. It needs maintainers with some free time to devote. Wanna sign up? :-) Nice to

Re: cygipc...

Colin, Please post instead of sending private email. On Thu, Jan 16, 2003 at 09:13:33AM -0800, Colin wrote: > Can't seem to get ipc-daemon to compile on my w2k machine??? Do you Google? http://www.google.com/search?q=cygipc Jason -- PGP/GPG Key: http://www.tishler.net/jason/pubkey.asc o

Re: cygipc ENOSYS patch (was Re: cygipc-1.13pre1)

Jason Tishler wrote: I'll post a separate "announcement-style" message... You are very welcome. Thanks for accepting my patch and for generating a release so quickly. Erg. Spoke too quickly. I forgot about another pending patch that needs to go in, and just found one (longstanding) bug

Re: cygipc ENOSYS patch (was Re: cygipc-1.13pre1)

Chuck, On Wed, Nov 13, 2002 at 02:31:22PM -0500, Charles Wilson wrote: > Jason Tishler wrote: > >Attached are the following files: > > > >o cygipc-1.13pre1.patch: ENOSYS patch > > Thanks. Applied, and cygipc-1.13 is now available at > http://www.neuro.gatech.edu/users/cwilson/cygutils/cygipc

Re: cygipc ENOSYS patch (was Re: cygipc-1.13pre1)

Jason Tishler wrote: My patch (against cygipc-1.13pre1) changes the following cygipc functions to return ENOSYS instead of EACCES if ipc-daemon is not running: msgctl() msgget() msgrcv() msgsnd() semctl() semget() semop() shmat() shmctl() shmget() sh

cygipc ENOSYS patch (was Re: cygipc-1.13pre1)

Chuck, On Tue, Nov 12, 2002 at 02:44:45PM -0500, Charles Wilson wrote: > The attached src tarball contains cygipc-1.13pre1. It has been > reverted to the 32bit key_t treatment (e.g. pre-1.12), but other > improvements in 1.12 remain. Please generate your ENOSYS patches -- > if there are more bey

Re: cygipc shmat bug

On Sat, Feb 02, 2002 at 09:16:57AM +1100, Robert Collins wrote: >From: "Michael Haubenwallner" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> >>The problem is, that the pid-numbering of Windows is quite "confuse" (i >>don't know any better word), meaning that a later ipctest.exe gets the >>same pid as before, while the atta

Re: cygipc shmat bug

=== - Original Message - From: "Michael Haubenwallner" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > The problem is, that the pid-numbering of Windows is quite "confuse" > (i don't know any better word), meaning that a later ipctest.exe > gets the same pid as before, while the attach before with the same > pid i

Re: cygipc shmat bug

Hi, while i'm looking for new messages depending on cygipc, found this and i am able to say: Christophe LEITIENNE wrote: > > Hi all, > I've noticed some problems using shared memory with cygipc, which don't > seem > to be present in the mailing list archives. > I'm running cygwin 1.3.9 with cyg

Re: cygipc-1.11 SHM-patch: fork, handling in ipc-daemon

Robert Collins wrote: > > === > - Original Message - > From: "Michael Haubenwallner" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > > - It is not clear what happens in following circumstance: > > 1) the first process creates a shm > > 2) a second one attaches to it > > 3) now the second process dies without

Re: cygipc-1.11 SHM-patch: fork, handling in ipc-daemon

=== - Original Message - From: "Michael Haubenwallner" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > - It is not clear what happens in following circumstance: > 1) the first process creates a shm > 2) a second one attaches to it > 3) now the second process dies without detaching > 4) the first process re