On Oct 3 02:37, TAN TH wrote: > hi Wilson, > from > http://sources.redhat.com/ml/cygwin-announce/2003-09/msg00055.html > you say that CygIPC 2 is now an official package. > > at > http://www.neuro.gatech.edu/users/cwilson/cygutils/cygipc/ > > it is not longer valid. > Also, I see quite a number of postings on problems > relating to CygIPC-2. What is your advice? > > ALSO, http://cygwin.com/packages/cygipc/cygipc-2.03-2 > seems to say that cygipc is part of the packages of > Cygwin.
cygipc is obsolete. It's job has been overtaken by cygserver from the cygwin package itself. See /usr/share/doc/Cygwin/cygserver.README for more information. Corinna -- Corinna Vinschen Please, send mails regarding Cygwin to Cygwin Project Co-Leader cygwin AT cygwin DOT com Red Hat, Inc. -- Unsubscribe info: http://cygwin.com/ml/#unsubscribe-simple Problem reports: http://cygwin.com/problems.html Documentation: http://cygwin.com/docs.html FAQ: http://cygwin.com/faq/
