Re: Possible bug retrieving IfIndex in newlib - winsup/cygwin/net.cc

2019-10-23 Thread Corinna Vinschen
Hi David, On Oct 22 18:19, David Bean wrote: > Hello Corrina, s/rrin/rinn/ ;) >> From: Corinna Vinschen >> Hi David, >> >> On Oct 22 15:56, David Bean wrote: >> > Good Day, >> > >> > I have been working on porting Samba 4.11 to Cygwin for a few days >> > and ran into an odd issue. Samba configu

Re: Possible bug retrieving IfIndex in newlib - winsup/cygwin/net.cc

2019-10-22 Thread David Bean
@cygwin.com Subject: Re: Possible bug retrieving IfIndex in newlib - winsup/cygwin/net.cc Hi David, On Oct 22 15:56, David Bean wrote: > Good Day, > > I have been working on porting Samba 4.11 to Cygwin for a few days and ran > into an odd issue. Samba configures its interfaces in s

Re: Possible bug retrieving IfIndex in newlib - winsup/cygwin/net.cc

2019-10-22 Thread Corinna Vinschen
Hi David, On Oct 22 15:56, David Bean wrote: > Good Day, > > I have been working on porting Samba 4.11 to Cygwin for a few days and ran > into an odd issue. Samba configures its interfaces in several steps, but it > relies pretty heavily on getting information from the interface structures > p

Possible bug retrieving IfIndex in newlib - winsup/cygwin/net.cc

2019-10-22 Thread David Bean
Good Day, I have been working on porting Samba 4.11 to Cygwin for a few days and ran into an odd issue. Samba configures its interfaces in several steps, but it relies pretty heavily on getting information from the interface structures populated by Cygwin. While I was walking through the call m

2.10.0: Possible bug with Clang 5.0.1-2 on cygwin 64 bit (Win 10 N) when optimizing code

2018-04-02 Thread tdotreppe
Hi, It looks like there is a bug in clang in cygwin when using optimizations (found by a contributor). You can find details on https://github.com/aircrack-ng/aircrack-ng/issues/1835 Here is his comment in question: --- After thoroughly researching this matter, I settled on a less-than-ideal,

Re: vim-8.0.1376-1: Possible bug with ruby extensions

2018-02-09 Thread Yaakov Selkowitz
On 2018-02-08 20:51, Ameya Vikram Singh wrote: > I tried the latest ViM package(vim-8.0.1428-1). > Even the current version has the same problem. > > I do have the **ruby** runtime libraries installed and even the > development headers package also installed. Confirmed. The configure script chan

Re: vim-8.0.1376-1: Possible bug with ruby extensions

2018-02-08 Thread Ameya Vikram Singh
Hello, I tried the latest ViM package(vim-8.0.1428-1). Even the current version has the same problem. I do have the **ruby** runtime libraries installed and even the development headers package also installed. The only known latest version supported was vim-8.0.1157-1 which currently has been re

Re: vim-8.0.1376-1: Possible bug with ruby extensions

2018-02-06 Thread Brian Inglis
On 2018-02-06 09:37, Ameya Vikram Singh wrote: > Maintainers of the ViM/GViM text editor. > I am noticing that currently with the latest build of ViM > editor(vim-8.0.1376-1), > I am unable to use the command-t [1] plugin with this release. > When invoking the functionality with the key combination

vim-8.0.1376-1: Possible bug with ruby extensions

2018-02-06 Thread Ameya Vikram Singh
Hello, Maintainers of the ViM/GViM text editor. I am noticing that currently with the latest build of ViM editor(vim-8.0.1376-1), I am unable to use the command-t [1] plugin with this release. When invoking the functionality with the key combination: `\` + `t` I get the following error message o

Re: dd -- bs>=2G, error writing to /dev/null - possible bug? (win7; coreutils 8.26)

2017-03-12 Thread Corinna Vinschen
On Mar 12 15:49, Marco Atzeri wrote: > On 12/03/2017 12:39, Corinna Vinschen wrote: > > On Mar 12 00:33, Josef Frank wrote: > > > > > > Dear all, > > > > > > > > > dd utility has problems to write to /dev/null with bs>=2^31, > > > while bs<2^31 is ok. > > > > > > Increasing bs further to 2^33 l

Re: dd -- bs>=2G, error writing to /dev/null - possible bug? (win7; coreutils 8.26)

2017-03-12 Thread Marco Atzeri
On 12/03/2017 12:39, Corinna Vinschen wrote: On Mar 12 00:33, Josef Frank wrote: Dear all, dd utility has problems to write to /dev/null with bs>=2^31, while bs<2^31 is ok. Increasing bs further to 2^33 leads to extended error message For description see below Thanks for the testcase. It

Re: dd -- bs>=2G, error writing to /dev/null - possible bug? (win7; coreutils 8.26)

2017-03-12 Thread Corinna Vinschen
On Mar 12 00:33, Josef Frank wrote: > > Dear all, > > > dd utility has problems to write to /dev/null with bs>=2^31, > while bs<2^31 is ok. > > Increasing bs further to 2^33 leads to extended error message > > For description see below Thanks for the testcase. It's a combination of two bugs:

dd -- bs>=2G, error writing to /dev/null - possible bug? (win7; coreutils 8.26)

2017-03-11 Thread Josef Frank
Dear all, dd utility has problems to write to /dev/null with bs>=2^31, while bs<2^31 is ok. Increasing bs further to 2^33 leads to extended error message For description see below jf Steps to reproduce: $ dd if=/dev/zero of=/dev/null bs=2147483647 count=1 1+0 records in 1+0 records ou

Re: Possible bug: ssh-host-config - getent when computer name is "-" (dash)

2016-03-24 Thread Andrey Repin
Greetings, cyg Simple! > On 3/24/2016 11:43 AM, Dirk Fassbender wrote: >> Am 24.03.2016 um 15:12 schrieb Unknown Sender: >>> I noticed this bug for the first time today on a computer that has the >>> computer name "-" (dash). >>> >>> During ssh-host-config: >>> *** Query: Do you want to use a diff

Re: Possible bug: ssh-host-config - getent when computer name is "-" (dash)

2016-03-24 Thread Erik Soderquist
On Thu, Mar 24, 2016 at 5:45 PM, cyg Simple wrote: > > the computer name "-" (dash) is illegal in the internet. > > Uh, that isn't true. Yes, it is true. > > See > > https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Hostname > > for a start about host name definitions. > > > > From this reference: > "The Internet st

Re: Possible bug: ssh-host-config - getent when computer name is "-" (dash)

2016-03-24 Thread Marco Atzeri
On 24/03/2016 22:45, cyg Simple wrote: On 3/24/2016 11:43 AM, Dirk Fassbender wrote: Am 24.03.2016 um 15:12 schrieb Unknown Sender: I noticed this bug for the first time today on a computer that has the computer name "-" (dash). See https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Hostname for a start about h

Re: Possible bug: ssh-host-config - getent when computer name is "-" (dash)

2016-03-24 Thread cyg Simple
On 3/24/2016 11:43 AM, Dirk Fassbender wrote: > Am 24.03.2016 um 15:12 schrieb Unknown Sender: >> I noticed this bug for the first time today on a computer that has the >> computer name "-" (dash). >> >> During ssh-host-config: >> *** Query: Do you want to use a different name? (yes/no) no >> /usr/

Re: Possible bug: ssh-host-config - getent when computer name is "-" (dash)

2016-03-24 Thread Dirk Fassbender
Am 24.03.2016 um 15:12 schrieb Unknown Sender: I noticed this bug for the first time today on a computer that has the computer name "-" (dash). During ssh-host-config: *** Query: Do you want to use a different name? (yes/no) no /usr/bin/getent: invalid option -- '+' Try `getent --help' or `gete

Possible bug: ssh-host-config - getent when computer name is "-" (dash)

2016-03-24 Thread Unknown Sender
I noticed this bug for the first time today on a computer that has the computer name "-" (dash). During ssh-host-config: *** Query: Do you want to use a different name? (yes/no) no /usr/bin/getent: invalid option -- '+' Try `getent --help' or `getent --usage' for more information. *** Query: Crea

Re: 2.2.1(0.289/5/3), GCC5.2.0 Possible Bug

2015-09-10 Thread Qian Hong
On Thu, Sep 10, 2015 at 8:36 PM, Qian Hong wrote: > I'm not the person to answer this, but I can confirm same behavior here. Oh, sorry, I mean it might not be a gcc bug, instead it might be a bug of gdb who didn't translate double quotes correctly. -- Regards, Qian Hong - http://www.winehq.or

Re: 2.2.1(0.289/5/3), GCC5.2.0 Possible Bug

2015-09-10 Thread Qian Hong
Hi, On Thu, Sep 10, 2015 at 8:21 PM, Sebastian Götzinger wrote: > During that, we encountered, that during the compilerinvocation, the > Doublequotes did not got escaped correctly. [1] I'm not the person to answer this, but I can confirm same behavior here. On Linux: $ gdb --args bash -c "bash

2.2.1(0.289/5/3), GCC5.2.0 Possible Bug

2015-09-10 Thread Sebastian Götzinger
Dear Ladies and Gentlemen, We had some issues with our program (a wrapper for compiler). Somehow, not all arguments have been transported correctly to the compiler. We now bootstrapped gcc-5.2.0 and let it run alone with gdb for cygwin. During that, we encountered, that during the compilerinvo

Re: 2.2.0: possible bug with Vim 7.4.764 and syntax highlight

2015-08-04 Thread Gary Johnson
On 2015-08-04, Xealot wrote: > Hello! > There seems to be a possible bug with cygwin 2.2.0 in xterm terminal > mode (default) and using vim 7.4.764 with syntax highlighting enabled. > > To verify and reproduce: > echo "syntax on" >> ~/.vimrc > vim -E > &g

2.2.0: possible bug with Vim 7.4.764 and syntax highlight

2015-08-04 Thread Xealot
Hello! There seems to be a possible bug with cygwin 2.2.0 in xterm terminal mode (default) and using vim 7.4.764 with syntax highlighting enabled. To verify and reproduce: echo "syntax on" >> ~/.vimrc vim -E The prompt at the bottom should now show an escape sequence: Enterin

Re: Incorrect compile warning, possible bug in inttypes.h

2015-04-28 Thread Corinna Vinschen
Hi Cary, On Apr 27 22:52, Cary R. wrote: > The following code: > > #include > #include > > int main() > { > int32_t ival = 1; > uint32_t uval = 2; > > printf("int = %"PRId32", uint = %"PRIu32".\n", ival, uval); > return 0; > } > > > when compiled with either

Incorrect compile warning, possible bug in inttypes.h

2015-04-27 Thread Cary R.
The following code: #include #include int main() { int32_t ival = 1; uint32_t uval = 2; printf("int = %"PRId32", uint = %"PRIu32".\n", ival, uval); return 0; } when compiled with either gcc or clang on a 32-bit system and with the -Wall flag produces the foll

Re: fork/exec vs spawn() - possible bug

2015-04-14 Thread Corinna Vinschen
On Apr 14 14:54, Pavel Fedin wrote: > Hello! > > I decided to try to return to my GNU make patch making use of spawn() on > Cygwin. Since upstream project refused to cooperate, i use my own patched > version of Make. And i came across a problem. When spawn() is used, > sub-process fails to proce

fork/exec vs spawn() - possible bug

2015-04-14 Thread Pavel Fedin
Hello! I decided to try to return to my GNU make patch making use of spawn() on Cygwin. Since upstream project refused to cooperate, i use my own patched version of Make. And i came across a problem. When spawn() is used, sub-process fails to process Ctrl-C. Ctrl-C is simply ignored. If i want t

Re: Native symbolic links to non-existent targets (possible bug?)

2014-09-30 Thread Brian Ericson
Looking at the source, I may be able to address my own questions/points. On 09/29/2014 10:21 PM, Brian Ericson wrote: Cygwin appears to ignore "winsymlinks:native" when asked to create a symbolic link to a non-existent target, reverting to its "magic header" approach. This is true... Shouldn't

Native symbolic links to non-existent targets (possible bug?)

2014-09-29 Thread Brian Ericson
Cygwin appears to ignore "winsymlinks:native" when asked to create a symbolic link to a non-existent target, reverting to its "magic header" approach. This can be demonstrated via the following examples (using a Cygwin shell): echo hello > aaa ln -s aaa bbb notepad bbb ln -s xxx yyy

Re: x86_64 Cygwin 1.7.29: possible bug to trace symlink (Win7)

2014-05-25 Thread Robert Bu
-Original Message- From: Robert Bu Sent: 2014/4/21 9:59 +0800 On Apr 16 17:47, Corinna Vinschen wrote: > > Below is what I get: > > RS-I9E3U8R4:[~/tmp/test_symlink]>uname -a > > CYGWIN_NT-6.1 RS-I9E3U8R4 1.7.29(0.272/5/3) 2014-04-07 13:46 x86_64 Cygwin > > RS-I9E3U8R4:[~/tmp/t

Re: x86_64 Cygwin 1.7.29: possible bug to trace symlink (Win7)

2014-04-20 Thread Robert Bu
> On Apr 16 17:47, Corinna Vinschen wrote: > > > Below is what I get: > > > RS-I9E3U8R4:[~/tmp/test_symlink]>uname -a > > > CYGWIN_NT-6.1 RS-I9E3U8R4 1.7.29(0.272/5/3) 2014-04-07 13:46 x86_64 > Cygwin > > > RS-I9E3U8R4:[~/tmp/test_symlink]>echo $CYGWIN > > > winsymlinks:nativestrict > >

Re: x86_64 Cygwin 1.7.29: possible bug to trace symlink (Win7)

2014-04-18 Thread Corinna Vinschen
On Apr 16 17:47, Corinna Vinschen wrote: > On Apr 16 03:39, 卜勇华 wrote: > > Hi Corinna, > > > Please don't top-post. Thank you. > > > > Below is what I get: > > RS-I9E3U8R4:[~/tmp/test_symlink]>uname -a > > CYGWIN_NT-6.1 RS-I9E3U8R4 1.7.29(0.272/5/3) 2014-04-07 13:46 x86_64 Cygwin > > RS-I9E3U8

Re: x86_64 Cygwin 1.7.29: possible bug to trace symlink (Win7)

2014-04-16 Thread Corinna Vinschen
On Apr 16 03:39, 卜勇华 wrote: > Hi Corinna, Please don't top-post. Thank you. > Below is what I get: > RS-I9E3U8R4:[~/tmp/test_symlink]>uname -a > CYGWIN_NT-6.1 RS-I9E3U8R4 1.7.29(0.272/5/3) 2014-04-07 13:46 x86_64 Cygwin > RS-I9E3U8R4:[~/tmp/test_symlink]>echo $CYGWIN > winsymlinks:nativestrict

Re: x86_64 Cygwin 1.7.29: possible bug to trace symlink (Win7)

2014-04-15 Thread Corinna Vinschen
On Apr 15 01:07, 卜勇华 wrote: > Hi, > > It seems that cygwin cannot follow the Windows native symlink correctly. > set CYGWIN=winsymlinks:nativestrict > > Steps to re-produce: > 1. echo test > test.txt > 2. mkdir dest > 3. cd dest > 4. ln -s ../test.txt test.txt > 5. cd .. > 6. mkdir src > 7. cd sr

x86_64 Cygwin 1.7.29: possible bug to trace symlink (Win7)

2014-04-14 Thread 卜勇华
Hi, It seems that cygwin cannot follow the Windows native symlink correctly. set CYGWIN=winsymlinks:nativestrict Steps to re-produce: 1. echo test > test.txt 2. mkdir dest 3. cd dest 4. ln -s ../test.txt test.txt 5. cd .. 6. mkdir src 7. cd src 8. ln -s ../dest dest 9. cd .. 10. cat src/dest/test

Re: Possible bug with chere 1.4 when configuring for fish

2014-04-11 Thread Andrey Repin
Greetings, Dave Kilroy! > -1 mode fails because fish would prefer cygpath was run on the argument > first. I'm not sure why this works in bash. Because bash know what is going on. In fact, many cygwin tools recognize native paths. > I'll try put together a fix for the latter issue, but it may be

Re: Possible bug with chere 1.4 when configuring for fish

2014-04-10 Thread Dave Kilroy
On 10/04/2014 11:06, Ronald Fischer wrote: I've had more time to look around. If you add the following to the file ~/.config/fish/config.fish (create it if you haven't already got one), then things should work as intended: if status --is-login set PATH /usr/local/bin /usr/bin $PATH end

Re: Possible bug with chere 1.4 when configuring for fish

2014-04-10 Thread Ronald Fischer
> I've had more time to look around. If you add the following to the file > ~/.config/fish/config.fish (create it if you haven't already got one), > then things should work as intended: > > if status --is-login > set PATH /usr/local/bin /usr/bin $PATH > end > > Alternatively drop it in th

Re: Possible bug with chere 1.4 when configuring for fish

2014-04-10 Thread Ronald Otto Valentin Fischer
> I've had more time to look around. If you add the following to the file > ~/.config/fish/config.fish (create it if you haven't already got one), > then things should work as intended: > > if status --is-login > set PATH /usr/local/bin /usr/bin $PATH > end > > Alternatively drop it in th

Re: Possible bug with chere 1.4 when configuring for fish

2014-04-09 Thread Ronald Fischer
On Tue, Apr 8, 2014, at 0:35, Dave Kilroy wrote: > On 07/04/2014 13:02, Ronald Fischer wrote: > > I have installed fish 2.1.0. Works fine, when invoking a new fish shell > > manually. > > > > However, when doing a > > > > chere -ifcm -t mintty -s fish > > > > and invoke the new fish shell from

Re: Possible bug with chere 1.4 when configuring for fish

2014-04-08 Thread Dave Kilroy
On 07/04/2014 23:35, Dave Kilroy wrote: On 07/04/2014 13:02, Ronald Fischer wrote: I have installed fish 2.1.0. Works fine, when invoking a new fish shell manually. However, when doing a chere -ifcm -t mintty -s fish and invoke the new fish shell from the Windows Explorer context menu, I

Re: Possible bug with chere 1.4 when configuring for fish

2014-04-07 Thread Dave Kilroy
On 07/04/2014 13:02, Ronald Fischer wrote: I have installed fish 2.1.0. Works fine, when invoking a new fish shell manually. However, when doing a chere -ifcm -t mintty -s fish and invoke the new fish shell from the Windows Explorer context menu, I get plenty of error messages, like this:

Re: possible bug in 1.7.22-1 core DLLs

2013-08-01 Thread Christopher Faylor
On Thu, Aug 01, 2013 at 01:38:07PM +0400, Andrey Repin wrote: >Greetings, starlight.2013z3! >>Some people like myself cannot abide subscribing to firehose mailing >>lists and prefer to view discussion threads with a browser. It does >>not mean contributors, direct or indirect, are any of value. E

Re: possible bug in 1.7.22-1 core DLLs

2013-08-01 Thread Andrey Repin
Greetings, starlight.201...@binnacle.cx! > Some people like myself cannot abide subscribing > to firehose mailing lists and prefer to view > discussion threads with a browser. It does not > mean contributors, direct or indirect, are any > of value. Even if I were a direct contributor > monitori

RE: possible bug in 1.7.22-1 core DLLs

2013-07-31 Thread starlight . 2013z3
Fixes the CTRL-C problem and the point behind it all, running a critical build script, work as well. > >stephan($0.02); > >-Original Message- >From: cygwin-owner at cygwin dot com >On Behalf Of starlight.2013z3 at binnacle dot cx >Sent: Wednesday, July 31, 2013 10:26 AM >

Re: possible bug in 1.7.22-1 core DLLs

2013-07-31 Thread starlight . 2013z3
Well I uncovered a serious regression and expressed a willingness to track down the cause. However your nasty reply and bad attitude assures that I will defintiely not help now. At 01:21 PM 7/31/2013 -0400, Christopher Faylor wrote: >You are right in assuming that newer DLLs should >work with old

Re: possible bug in 1.7.22-1 core DLLs

2013-07-31 Thread Christopher Faylor
On Wed, Jul 31, 2013 at 12:24:32PM -0400, starlight.201...@binnacle.cx wrote: >Have been running 1.7.16 for some time and living with the annoying >CTRL-C hang bug. > >Tried swapping in cygwin1.dll cyglsa.dll and cyglsa64.dll from 1.7.22-1 >without (thankfully) updating the entire CYGWIN release. >

possible bug in 1.7.22-1 core DLLs

2013-07-31 Thread starlight . 2013z3
Hello, Have been running 1.7.16 for some time and living with the annoying CTRL-C hang bug. Tried swapping in cygwin1.dll cyglsa.dll and cyglsa64.dll from 1.7.22-1 without (thankfully) updating the entire CYGWIN release. The 22-1 DLLs fix the CTRL-C problem, but cause a high-intensity parallel b

Re: Possible Bug (clarification) in Cygwin 1.7.5 -- findfirstfile (and findnextfile) yeild bad cfilename when file names have special characters. Works in cygwin 1.5, fails in 1.7

2011-11-10 Thread Corinna Vinschen
On Nov 10 10:58, Corinna Vinschen wrote: > On Nov 9 22:18, Leon Vanderploeg wrote: > > Many thanks to Charles and Corinna for the help. I have modified the > > code to use the POSIX functions. I still have one problem I cannot > > seem to conquer. > > > > I need to be able to read and write t

Re: Possible Bug (clarification) in Cygwin 1.7.5 -- findfirstfile (and findnextfile) yeild bad cfilename when file names have special characters. Works in cygwin 1.5, fails in 1.7

2011-11-10 Thread Corinna Vinschen
On Nov 9 22:18, Leon Vanderploeg wrote: > Many thanks to Charles and Corinna for the help. I have modified the > code to use the POSIX functions. I still have one problem I cannot > seem to conquer. > > I need to be able to read and write the (yes, I know it's evil) > archive bit. Unless the

RE: Possible Bug (clarification) in Cygwin 1.7.5 -- findfirstfile (and findnextfile) yeild bad cfilename when file names have special characters. Works in cygwin 1.5, fails in 1.7

2011-11-09 Thread Leon Vanderploeg
Many thanks to Charles and Corinna for the help. I have modified the code to use the POSIX functions. I still have one problem I cannot seem to conquer. I need to be able to read and write the (yes, I know it's evil) archive bit. Unless there is a POSIX function (which I seriously doubt) fo

Re: Possible Bug (clarification) in Cygwin 1.7.5 -- findfirstfile (and findnextfile) yeild bad cfilename when file names have special characters. Works in cygwin 1.5, fails in 1.7

2011-11-04 Thread Corinna Vinschen
On Nov 3 17:56, Charles Wilson wrote: > On 11/3/2011 4:48 PM, Leon Vanderploeg wrote: > > With cygwin 1.7.5, cFileName with a special characters such as ñ (n > > with tidle above it) fail be properly extracted from a > > WIN32_FIND_DATA structure with findFirstFile (or findNextFile). > > > > To s

Re: Possible Bug (clarification) in Cygwin 1.7.5 -- findfirstfile (and findnextfile) yeild bad cfilename when file names have special characters. Works in cygwin 1.5, fails in 1.7

2011-11-03 Thread Charles Wilson
On 11/3/2011 4:48 PM, Leon Vanderploeg wrote: > With cygwin 1.7.5, cFileName with a special characters such as ñ (n > with tidle above it) fail be properly extracted from a > WIN32_FIND_DATA structure with findFirstFile (or findNextFile). > > To set up a simple test scenario, I created a file in C

Possible Bug (clarification) in Cygwin 1.7.5 -- findfirstfile (and findnextfile) yeild bad cfilename when file names have special characters. Works in cygwin 1.5, fails in 1.7

2011-11-03 Thread Leon Vanderploeg
Greetings, This issue is making my head flat from pounding it against the wall. It appears to be a bug in Cygwin 1.7, but I can't say with any certainty. I've been down too many dead end trails already... With cygwin 1.7.5, cFileName with a special characters such as ñ (n with tidle above it

Re: Possible Bug ???

2011-11-02 Thread Csaba Raduly
Hi, On Wed, Nov 2, 2011 at 12:36 AM, Leon Vanderploeg wrote: > Greetings, > > This issue is making my head flat from pounding it against the wall.  It > appears to be a bug in Cygwin 1.7, but I can't say with any certainty.  I've > been down too many dead end trails already... > > With cygwin 1

Possible Bug ???

2011-11-01 Thread Leon Vanderploeg
Greetings, This issue is making my head flat from pounding it against the wall. It appears to be a bug in Cygwin 1.7, but I can't say with any certainty. I've been down too many dead end trails already... With cygwin 1.7.5, file name with a special characters such as ñ (n with tidle above it

Re: possible bug in stat() -- not working with special characters on 64 bit systems

2011-10-25 Thread Corinna Vinschen
On Oct 25 07:06, Leon Vanderploeg wrote: > I have been fighting a problem with a compiled C program and seem to have > narrowed it down. When file names contain special characters such as the n > with the tilde above it (ñ), stat() works fine on 32 bit machines, but fails > on 64 bit machines (bot

possible bug in stat() -- not working with special characters on 64 bit systems

2011-10-25 Thread Leon Vanderploeg
I have been fighting a problem with a compiled C program and seem to have narrowed it down. When file names contain special characters such as the n with the tilde above it (ñ), stat() works fine on 32 bit machines, but fails on 64 bit machines (both windows 7 and server 2008 R2). At the end of

Re: Possible bug in setup.exe (checking for pre-requisites)

2011-01-02 Thread Jon TURNEY
On 02/01/2011 15:30, Jim Reisert AD1C wrote: > I'm re-installing Cygwin from scratch, using the latest setup.exe on a > Windows 7 64-bit system > > I had downloaded and installed gcc4, then discovered I had failed to > download the corresponding g++ package. I ran "setup -M" and selected > gcc4-g

Possible bug in setup.exe (checking for pre-requisites)

2011-01-02 Thread Jim Reisert AD1C
I'm re-installing Cygwin from scratch, using the latest setup.exe on a Windows 7 64-bit system I had downloaded and installed gcc4, then discovered I had failed to download the corresponding g++ package. I ran "setup -M" and selected gcc4-g++. When setup tried to check for dependencies, it got i

Re: 1.7.0-67: syslog() not working properly - possible bug in writev() ?

2009-12-02 Thread Christian Franke
Corinna Vinschen wrote: > On Dec  2 12:07, Christian Franke wrote: > > > > Another test: > > > > This sends one UDP package on 1.5, but two on 1.7: > > > > int sd = socket(AF_LOCAL, SOCK_DGRAM, 0); > > > > struct sockaddr_un sa; sa.sun_family = AF_LOCAL; > > strcpy(sa.sun_path, "/dev/log"); > >

Re: 1.7.0-67: syslog() not working properly - possible bug in writev() ?

2009-12-02 Thread Corinna Vinschen
On Dec 2 15:17, Corinna Vinschen wrote: > On Dec 2 12:07, Christian Franke wrote: > > Corinna Vinschen wrote: > > > On Dec 2 10:31, Christian Franke wrote: > > > > I presume that the root of the problem is that the > > > > > > > > writev(fd, { {"< PRI >", . }, { "MSG", . } }, 2) > > > > used w

Re: 1.7.0-67: syslog() not working properly - possible bug in writev() ?

2009-12-02 Thread Corinna Vinschen
On Dec 2 12:07, Christian Franke wrote: > Corinna Vinschen wrote: > > On Dec 2 10:31, Christian Franke wrote: > > > I presume that the root of the problem is that the > > > > > > writev(fd, { {"< PRI >", . }, { "MSG", . } }, 2) > > > used within syslog() sends "< PRI >" and "MSG" in > > > two s

Re: 1.7.0-67: syslog() not working properly - possible bug in writev() ?

2009-12-02 Thread Christian Franke
Corinna Vinschen wrote: > On Dec 2 10:31, Christian Franke wrote: > > I presume that the root of the problem is that the > > > > writev(fd, { {"< PRI >", . }, { "MSG", . } }, 2) > > used within syslog() sends "< PRI >" and "MSG" in > > two separate datagrams to /dev/log. > > > > Probably not.

Re: 1.7.0-67: syslog() not working properly - possible bug in writev() ?

2009-12-02 Thread Corinna Vinschen
On Dec 2 10:31, Christian Franke wrote: > syslog() produces bogus lines in /var/log/messages. > > Testcase (with syslog-ng): > > $ echo -e 'one\ntwo\nthree' | logger -t test > > $ tail /var/log/messages > ... > Dec 2 10:12:31 localhost kernel: > Dec 2 10:12:31 localhost test: one > Dec 2 10:

1.7.0-67: syslog() not working properly - possible bug in writev() ?

2009-12-02 Thread Christian Franke
syslog() produces bogus lines in /var/log/messages. Testcase (with syslog-ng): $ echo -e 'one\ntwo\nthree' | logger -t test $ tail /var/log/messages ... Dec 2 10:12:31 localhost kernel: Dec 2 10:12:31 localhost test: one Dec 2 10:12:31 localhost kernel: Dec 2 10:12:31 localhost test: two Dec

Re: Possible Bug or limitation in Cygwin 1.7 and Rsync and file number limit

2009-07-15 Thread Lists
snip< I just discovered some additional information that may help get to the bottom of this. Not sure what made me think of this, but I decided to try an older version of rsync. If I run rsync 3.0.4-1 or 3.0.5-1, I experience the problem. However, when I run 2.6.9-2, the only other version of

Re: Possible Bug or limitation in Cygwin 1.7 and Rsync and file number limit

2009-07-01 Thread Lists
On Jul 1 07:36, Lists wrote: I tried it 6 times in a row, every time erasing the destination files. Works fine for me. Corinna Perhaps you have hit upon the problem. I am just downloading and running setup-1.7.exe and it definetly has this problem. I tried to download and Setup-1.7.exe

Re: Possible Bug or limitation in Cygwin 1.7 and Rsync and file number limit

2009-07-01 Thread Lists
On Jul 1 07:36, Lists wrote: I tried it 6 times in a row, every time erasing the destination files. Works fine for me. Corinna Perhaps you have hit upon the problem. I am just downloading and running setup-1.7.exe and it definetly has this problem. I tried to download and Setup-1.7.exe c

Re: Possible Bug or limitation in Cygwin 1.7 and Rsync and file number limit

2009-07-01 Thread Corinna Vinschen
On Jul 1 07:36, Lists wrote: >> I tried it 6 times in a row, every time erasing the destination files. >> Works fine for me. >> >> >> Corinna >> > Perhaps you have hit upon the problem. I am just downloading and running > setup-1.7.exe and it definetly has this problem. I tried to download and

Re: Possible Bug or limitation in Cygwin 1.7 and Rsync and file number limit

2009-07-01 Thread Lists
On Jun 26 23:42, Lists wrote: On Jun 19 15:55, Lists wrote: Works fine for me under the latest Cygwin 1.7.0-50 using your perl script and your rsync options. I tend to agree to Larry's assumption that some 3PP is interferring. Sorry to just now be replying but I have been out of the country

Re: Possible Bug or limitation in Cygwin 1.7 and Rsync and file number limit

2009-06-29 Thread Corinna Vinschen
On Jun 26 23:42, Lists wrote: >> On Jun 19 15:55, Lists wrote: >>> >> Works fine for me under the latest Cygwin 1.7.0-50 using your perl >> script and your rsync options. I tend to agree to Larry's assumption >> that some 3PP is interferring. > > Sorry to just now be replying but I have been out

Re: Possible Bug or limitation in Cygwin 1.7 and Rsync and file number limit

2009-06-26 Thread Lists
On Jun 19 15:55, Lists wrote: Can you upgrade to the latest Cygwin 1.7 package and try again. From your cygcheck output, it looks like things are not correct but this may be just a problem with an old cygcheck that doesn't know how to find the implicit mounts. If the issue is still the sam

Re: Possible Bug or limitation in Cygwin 1.7 and Rsync and file number limit

2009-06-22 Thread Corinna Vinschen
On Jun 19 15:55, Lists wrote: > >> Can you upgrade to the latest Cygwin 1.7 package and try again. From your >> cygcheck output, it looks like things are not correct but this may be just >> a problem with an old cygcheck that doesn't know how to find the implicit >> mounts. If the issue is still

Re: Possible Bug or limitation in Cygwin 1.7 and Rsync and file number limit

2009-06-21 Thread Larry Hall (Cygwin)
Lists wrote: Lists wrote: Larry Hall wrote: Can you upgrade to the latest Cygwin 1.7 package and try again. From your cygcheck output, it looks like things are not correct but this may be just a problem with an old cygcheck that doesn't know how to find the implicit mounts. If the issue i

Re: Possible Bug or limitation in Cygwin 1.7 and Rsync and file number limit

2009-06-19 Thread Lists
Lists wrote: Larry Hall wrote: Can you upgrade to the latest Cygwin 1.7 package and try again. From your cygcheck output, it looks like things are not correct but this may be just a problem with an old cygcheck that doesn't know how to find the implicit mounts. If the issue is still the s

Re: Possible Bug or limitation in Cygwin 1.7 and Rsync and file number limit

2009-06-19 Thread Larry Hall (Cygwin)
Lists wrote: Larry Hall wrote: Can you upgrade to the latest Cygwin 1.7 package and try again. From your cygcheck output, it looks like things are not correct but this may be just a problem with an old cygcheck that doesn't know how to find the implicit mounts. If the issue is still the sa

Re: Possible Bug or limitation in Cygwin 1.7 and Rsync and file number limit

2009-06-19 Thread Lists
Can you upgrade to the latest Cygwin 1.7 package and try again. From your cygcheck output, it looks like things are not correct but this may be just a problem with an old cygcheck that doesn't know how to find the implicit mounts. If the issue is still the same, resending the output of the new

Re: Possible Bug or limitation in Cygwin 1.7 and Rsync and file number limit

2009-06-19 Thread Larry Hall (Cygwin)
lists wrote: See the attached cygcheck.out as per posting instructions. Note I have also tried this on machines with much stronger hardware with the exact same results. ALso note that the machine never runs out of memory so that doesn't appear to be the problem either. Not Found: awk Not

Possible Bug or limitation in Cygwin 1.7 and Rsync and file number limit

2009-06-19 Thread lists
I'm not sure if this is a bug or a limitation that can be worked around with a setting somewhere, but I have found a problem with cygwin 1.7 while using rsync. I have been using rsync and cygwin v1.5 for quite some time. I recently started testing cygwin v1.7 and I ran into a problem with an a

Re: Possible bug in passwd cygwin 1.7, "you may not change the password for"

2009-06-17 Thread Corinna Vinschen
On Jun 16 16:52, Jerry A wrote: > Hi, > > I am a "local administrator" on an otherwise locked down corporate > laptop that is running XP and currently, cygwin 1.7, the beta. > > I was running the released version of cygwin and having problems > installing sshd and passwd. I found a thread from b

Possible bug in passwd cygwin 1.7, "you may not change the password for"

2009-06-16 Thread Jerry A
Hi, I am a "local administrator" on an otherwise locked down corporate laptop that is running XP and currently, cygwin 1.7, the beta. I was running the released version of cygwin and having problems installing sshd and passwd. I found a thread from back in March regarding passwd working in domai

RE: Possible Bug: Spurious SIGTERM from Cygrunsrv 1.20 on W2K3EE

2008-02-20 Thread Greg Gibeling
That certainly fixed it. Thanks. -Greg > -Original Message- > From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf > Of Corinna Vinschen > Sent: Tuesday, February 19, 2008 1:00 PM > To: cygwin@cygwin.com > Subject: Re: Possible Bug: Spurious SIGTERM from

Re: Possible Bug: Spurious SIGTERM from Cygrunsrv 1.20 on W2K3EE

2008-02-19 Thread Corinna Vinschen
On Feb 19 12:43, Greg Gibeling wrote: > Program: cygrunsrv 1.20-1 > OS: Windows 2003 Server Enterprise Edition SP2 > Problem: The child process of cygrunsrv (openSSH/sshd in this case) receives > a SIGTERM ~10-30 seconds after cygrunsrv is started. Looks like a really dumb last-minute change on my

Possible Bug: Spurious SIGTERM from Cygrunsrv 1.20 on W2K3EE

2008-02-19 Thread Greg Gibeling
Program: cygrunsrv 1.20-1 OS: Windows 2003 Server Enterprise Edition SP2 Problem: The child process of cygrunsrv (openSSH/sshd in this case) receives a SIGTERM ~10-30 seconds after cygrunsrv is started. Steps to reproduce: 1) Install Cygwin with OpenSSH 2) Use ssh-host-config to set

RE: RE: Re: Possible bug: d does not seem to read ~/.d.conf

2007-08-11 Thread Thorsten Kampe
* Dave Korn (Fri, 10 Aug 2007 17:48:13 +0100) > On 10 August 2007 17:23, Thorsten Kampe wrote: > > * Phil Betts (Fri, 10 Aug 2007 17:05:18 +0100) > >> Thorsten Kampe wrote on Friday, August 10, 2007 4:09 PM:: > >>> Phil, please, you don't know what you're talking about and you don't > >>> know what

Re: Possible bug: d does not seem to read ~/.d.conf

2007-08-10 Thread Steve Holden
Dave Korn wrote: On 10 August 2007 17:23, Thorsten Kampe wrote: * Phil Betts (Fri, 10 Aug 2007 17:05:18 +0100) [...] As a matter of fact I stopped reading his article after the line where he says d does not read ~/.d.conf because this matched my own experience. Bad practice. Stopping read

RE: RE: Re: Possible bug: d does not seem to read ~/.d.conf

2007-08-10 Thread Dave Korn
On 10 August 2007 17:23, Thorsten Kampe wrote: > * Phil Betts (Fri, 10 Aug 2007 17:05:18 +0100) >> Thorsten Kampe wrote on Friday, August 10, 2007 4:09 PM:: >>> Phil, please, you don't know what you're talking about and you don't >>> know what I and Ronald were talking about. >> >> If you re-read

RE: RE: Re: Possible bug: d does not seem to read ~/.d.conf

2007-08-10 Thread Thorsten Kampe
* Phil Betts (Fri, 10 Aug 2007 17:05:18 +0100) > Thorsten Kampe wrote on Friday, August 10, 2007 4:09 PM:: > > Phil, please, you don't know what you're talking about and you don't > > know what I and Ronald were talking about. > > If you re-read what was posted, you'll find I was totally correct >

RE: Re: Possible bug: d does not seem to read ~/.d.conf

2007-08-10 Thread Thorsten Kampe
* Dave Korn (Fri, 10 Aug 2007 16:49:31 +0100) > On 10 August 2007 16:44, Thorsten Kampe wrote: > > Fact is that d under Cygwin ignores ~/.d.conf while under Linux it works > > as expected. > > >> Thorsten, he may or may not know what you're talking about, but your > >> statement > >> >

RE: RE: Re: Possible bug: d does not seem to read ~/.d.conf

2007-08-10 Thread Phil Betts
Thorsten Kampe wrote on Friday, August 10, 2007 4:09 PM:: > Phil, please, you don't know what you're talking about and you don't > know what I and Ronald were talking about. I'm so sorry, but my telepathy module has a malfunction. Until it's fixed, I can only respond to what is actually written

RE: Possible bug: d does not seem to read ~/.d.conf

2007-08-10 Thread Thorsten Kampe
* Dave Korn (Fri, 10 Aug 2007 16:37:23 +0100) > On 10 August 2007 16:22, Thorsten Kampe wrote: > > > > The problem (/my/ problem and maybe Ronald's) is that d reads the home > > directory from /etc/passwd and not from the environment variable > > $HOME. In my setup these differ. > > Is that ev

RE: Re: Possible bug: d does not seem to read ~/.d.conf

2007-08-10 Thread Dave Korn
On 10 August 2007 16:44, Thorsten Kampe wrote: > Fact is that d under Cygwin ignores ~/.d.conf while under Linux it works > as expected. >> Thorsten, he may or may not know what you're talking about, but your >> statement >> >> "d under Cygwin ignores ~/.d.conf " >> >> is demonstra

RE: Re: Possible bug: d does not seem to read ~/.d.conf

2007-08-10 Thread Thorsten Kampe
* Dave Korn (Fri, 10 Aug 2007 16:19:22 +0100) > On 10 August 2007 16:09, Thorsten Kampe wrote: > > * Phil Betts (Fri, 10 Aug 2007 15:04:11 +0100) > >> Thorsten Kampe wrote on Friday, August 10, 2007 2:21 PM:: > > >>> These resources don't contradict the info file but state the same. > >>> Fact is

RE: Possible bug: d does not seem to read ~/.d.conf

2007-08-10 Thread Dave Korn
On 10 August 2007 16:22, Thorsten Kampe wrote: > The problem (/my/ problem and maybe Ronald's) is that d reads the home > directory from /etc/passwd and not from the environment variable > $HOME. In my setup these differ. Is that even valid? Hmmm. Posix does say: http://www.opengroup.org/on

RE: Possible bug: d does not seem to read ~/.d.conf

2007-08-10 Thread Thorsten Kampe
* Dave Korn (Fri, 10 Aug 2007 15:02:03 +0100) > On 10 August 2007 14:21, Thorsten Kampe wrote: > > * Yaakov (Cygwin Ports) (Fri, 10 Aug 2007 07:09:11 -0500) > >> Ronald Fischer wrote: > >>> From > >>> > >>>info d > >>> > >>> we can see that /usr/bin/d is supposed to honour a configuration fil

RE: Re: Possible bug: d does not seem to read ~/.d.conf

2007-08-10 Thread Dave Korn
On 10 August 2007 16:09, Thorsten Kampe wrote: > * Phil Betts (Fri, 10 Aug 2007 15:04:11 +0100) >> Thorsten Kampe wrote on Friday, August 10, 2007 2:21 PM:: >>> These resources don't contradict the info file but state the same. >>> Fact is that d under Cygwin ignores ~/.d.conf while under Linux i

RE: Re: Possible bug: d does not seem to read ~/.d.conf

2007-08-10 Thread Thorsten Kampe
* Phil Betts (Fri, 10 Aug 2007 15:04:11 +0100) > Thorsten Kampe wrote on Friday, August 10, 2007 2:21 PM:: > > * Yaakov (Cygwin Ports) (Fri, 10 Aug 2007 07:09:11 -0500) > >> Ronald Fischer wrote: > >>> From > >>> > >>>info d > >>> > >>> we can see that /usr/bin/d is supposed to honour a confi

RE: Re: Possible bug: d does not seem to read ~/.d.conf

2007-08-10 Thread Phil Betts
Thorsten Kampe wrote on Friday, August 10, 2007 2:21 PM:: > * Yaakov (Cygwin Ports) (Fri, 10 Aug 2007 07:09:11 -0500) >> Ronald Fischer wrote: >>> From >>> >>>info d >>> >>> we can see that /usr/bin/d is supposed to honour a configuration >>> file ~/.d.conf and that in this file, the boolean

  1   2   3   >