Hi Cary, On Apr 27 22:52, Cary R. wrote: > The following code: > > #include <stdio.h> > #include <inttypes.h> > > int main() > { > int32_t ival = 1; > uint32_t uval = 2; > > printf("int = %"PRId32", uint = %"PRIu32".\n", ival, uval); > return 0; > } > > > when compiled with either gcc or clang on a 32-bit system and with the -Wall > flag produces the following warnings: > > tmp.c: In function ‘main’: > tmp.c:9:5: warning: format ‘%ld’ expects argument of type ‘long int’, but > argument 2 has type ‘int32_t’ [-Wformat=] > printf("int = %"PRId32", uint = %"PRIu32".\n", ival, uval); > ^ > tmp.c:9:5: warning: format ‘%lu’ expects argument of type ‘long unsigned > int’, but argument 3 has type ‘uint32_t’ [-Wformat=] > tmp.c:9:5: warning: format ‘%ld’ expects argument of type ‘long int’, but > argument 2 has type ‘int32_t’ [-Wformat=] > tmp.c:9:5: warning: format ‘%lu’ expects argument of type ‘long unsigned > int’, but argument 3 has type ‘uint32_t’ [-Wformat=] > > I'm not sure why the double report for this, but both gcc and clang do > the same thing. This looks to be an issue that is generated because a > long is 32 bits on a 32-bit system and in inttypes.h __have_long32 is > likely defined and that is forcing the use of the 'l' formats when > that is incorrect for at least these two 32 bit types.
That looks like the culprit, yes. This is part of the newlib changes to stdint.h/inttypes.h, and this is apparently a problem. Just because long is a 32 bit type doesn't mean it's the base type of int32_t/uint32_t. What bugs me most is that I tried to test the changes and failed to see this problem. Grr. I'll discuss this on the newlib mailing list. Thanks, Corinna -- Corinna Vinschen Please, send mails regarding Cygwin to Cygwin Maintainer cygwin AT cygwin DOT com Red Hat
pgpQF8iJEJmvc.pgp
Description: PGP signature