On Mon, 24 Oct 2011, Corinna Vinschen wrote:
then
! rebase "${Verbose}" -s "${Mach}" -T "${TmpFile}"
else
! rebase "${Verbose}" -s "${Mach}" -b "${BaseAddress}" -o "${Offset}" -T
"${TmpFile}"
fi
ExitCode=$?
Ouch, that's probably a residue of my testing. Fixed in CVS.
tha
27;$xserverauthfile'" HUP INT QUIT ILL TRAP KILL BUS TERM
xauth -q -f "$xserverauthfile" 2>/dev/null << EOF
add :$dummy . $mcookie
EOF
Marc
--
View this message in context:
http://old.nabble.com/Install-error-with-rebase-4.0.0-1-tp32705124p32708885.html
Se
On Oct 23 16:05, Marco Atzeri wrote:
> On 10/23/2011 3:57 PM, Marc Girod wrote:
> >
> >
> >Marc Girod wrote:
> >>
> >>To be honest, I find that cygcheck too behaves strangely:
> >>
> >>...
> >>~> cygcheck -l rebase-3.0.1-1
> >>
> >OK: my mistake (Thanks Marco):
> >
> >~> cygcheck -c rebase
> >Cyg
On Oct 23 19:36, scow...@ckhb.org wrote:
>
> this new release of rebaseall has an error at lines 217 and 219.
> the version i just downloaded erroneously assumes invocation of the
> utility from the current directory. if i missed any previous
> mention of this in the list, i apologize for the dup
this new release of rebaseall has an error at lines 217 and 219. the
version i just downloaded erroneously assumes invocation of the utility
from the current directory. if i missed any previous mention of this in
the list, i apologize for the duplication.
and thanks to Marco Atzeri for the
Marc Girod wrote:
>
> It seems that xauth doesn't like the double-quote around the filename...
>
Sorry. This made a difference on the command line, but not in the file.
Marc
--
View this message in context:
http://old.nabble.com/Install-error-with-rebase-4.0.0-1-tp32705124p3270
cookie
EOF
It seems that xauth doesn't like the double-quote around the filename...
Doesn't /bin/sh consume them?
Marc
--
View this message in context:
http://old.nabble.com/Install-error-with-rebase-4.0.0-1-tp32705124p32705311.html
Sent from the Cygwin list mailing list archive at Nabb
On 10/23/2011 3:57 PM, Marc Girod wrote:
Marc Girod wrote:
To be honest, I find that cygcheck too behaves strangely:
...
~> cygcheck -l rebase-3.0.1-1
OK: my mistake (Thanks Marco):
~> cygcheck -c rebase
Cygwin Package Information
Package VersionStatus
rebase
ext:
http://old.nabble.com/Install-error-with-rebase-4.0.0-1-tp32705124p32705227.html
Sent from the Cygwin list mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
--
Problem reports: http://cygwin.com/problems.html
FAQ: http://cygwin.com/faq/
Documentation: http://cygwin.com/docs.html
Marc
--
View this message in context:
http://old.nabble.com/Install-error-with-rebase-4.0.0-1-tp32705124p32705183.html
Sent from the Cygwin list mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
--
Problem reports: http://cygwin.com/problems.html
FAQ: http://cygwin.com/faq/
Docum
I try here to send my cygcheck output as an attachment.
This relates to a report made a few minutes ago using the old nabble
site, with the same subject.
Last time, my sending mail failed.
Marc
cygcheck.rvc
Description: Binary data
--
Problem reports: http://cygwin.com/problems.html
FAQ:
On 10/23/2011 9:29 AM, Marc Girod wrote:
Hello,
I just ran setup, but could not run rebaseall: this one (4.0.0-1 iirc)
failed to access
a rebasedb file (under a non-existing /usr/etc directory).
I reverted to 3.0.1-1.
This looks like a packaging bug. The rebasedb file is supposed to go in
/
age VersionStatus
Thanks,
Marc
--
View this message in context:
http://old.nabble.com/Install-error-with-rebase-4.0.0-1-tp32705124p32705124.html
Sent from the Cygwin list mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
--
Problem reports: http://cygwin.com/problems.html
13 matches
Mail list logo
