Re: Fwd: CRLF

2012-01-03 Thread Franz Fehringer
Am 01.01.2012 17:08, schrieb Christopher Faylor: > On Sun, Jan 01, 2012 at 09:45:11AM +0100, Franz Fehringer wrote: >> What is this "interesting workaround"? >> Most probably we will use bash with "set -o igncr" btw. > > Read the forwarded email in this thread. > > cgf > thanks got it -- Pro

Re: Fwd: CRLF

2012-01-01 Thread Andrew DeFaria
On 01/01/2012 12:45 AM, Franz Fehringer wrote: Hi Christopher, What is this "interesting workaround"? Most probably we will use bash with "set -o igncr" btw. Actually I hadn't heard about set -o igncr until this thread but thinking about it I wouldn't use it. If I did then things would "just

Re: Fwd: CRLF

2012-01-01 Thread Christopher Faylor
On Sun, Jan 01, 2012 at 09:45:11AM +0100, Franz Fehringer wrote: >What is this "interesting workaround"? >Most probably we will use bash with "set -o igncr" btw. Read the forwarded email in this thread. cgf -- Problem reports: http://cygwin.com/problems.html FAQ: http://c

Re: Fwd: CRLF

2012-01-01 Thread Franz Fehringer
Hi Christopher, What is this "interesting workaround"? Most probably we will use bash with "set -o igncr" btw. Best regards Franz Am 01.01.2012 00:31, schrieb Christopher Faylor: > On Sat, Dec 31, 2011 at 01:55:58PM -0800, Andrew DeFaria wrote: >> On 12/31/11 13:32, Chris Sutcliffe wrote: >>>

Re: Fwd: CRLF

2011-12-31 Thread Christopher Faylor
On Sat, Dec 31, 2011 at 01:55:58PM -0800, Andrew DeFaria wrote: >On 12/31/11 13:32, Chris Sutcliffe wrote: >> Below please find the response from Thorsten (the mksh developer) >> regarding CRLF. >I must say, then why bother with this offbeat mksh? His answers are >unconvincing ("I keep everything

Re: Fwd: CRLF

2011-12-31 Thread Chris Sutcliffe
On 31 December 2011 16:55, Andrew DeFaria wrote: > If you just want a ksh Cygwin's got one. It has two: mksh and the orphaned and unmaintained pdksh, you are free to use whichever you please. > move over to bash, which is much better. Everyone is free to their own opinion. Chris -- Chris Sutc

Re: Fwd: CRLF

2011-12-31 Thread Andrew DeFaria
On 12/31/11 13:32, Chris Sutcliffe wrote: Below please find the response from Thorsten (the mksh developer) regarding CRLF. I must say, then why bother with this offbeat mksh? His answers are unconvincing ("I keep everything the same no matter what! Even if it's better to do it differently"). I

Fwd: CRLF

2011-12-31 Thread Chris Sutcliffe
Below please find the response from Thorsten (the mksh developer) regarding CRLF. Chris -- Forwarded message -- From: Thorsten Glaser Date: 31 December 2011 15:00 Subject: Re: CRLF To: miros-disc...@mirbsd.org Chris Sutcliffe dixit: >The mksh developer's preference is that mksh