On Oct 3 02:37, TAN TH wrote:
> hi Wilson,
> from
> http://sources.redhat.com/ml/cygwin-announce/2003-09/msg00055.html
> you say that CygIPC 2 is now an official package.
>
> at
> http://www.neuro.gatech.edu/users/cwilson/cygutils/cygipc/
>
> it is not longer valid.
> Also, I see quite a number
hi Wilson,
from
http://sources.redhat.com/ml/cygwin-announce/2003-09/msg00055.html
you say that CygIPC 2 is now an official package.
at
http://www.neuro.gatech.edu/users/cwilson/cygutils/cygipc/
it is not longer valid.
Also, I see quite a number of postings on problems
relating to CygIPC-2. What
Robert Groenewegen wrote:
Sorry if this reply bothers you.
Please keep cygwin messages on the cygwin list.
Please, can you inform me (and the rest of the Cygwin community) if
this solves the issue with Postgresql?
Nowadays, when you want to activate Postgresql you have to install
the package from
Jason Tishler wrote:
On Wed, Sep 03, 2003 at 03:35:39AM -0400, Charles Wilson wrote:
This is a lot of changes; I expect growing pains. But, it's a .01
release, so what did you expect? However, it's been in test, and used
by test-python users for almost a month, so...
^^
Yes, of cou
On Wed, Sep 03, 2003 at 03:35:39AM -0400, Charles Wilson wrote:
> This is a lot of changes; I expect growing pains. But, it's a .01
> release, so what did you expect? However, it's been in test, and used
> by test-python users for almost a month, so...
^^
Actually, PostgreSQL users
Yes, it's finally happened. I've made CygIPC into an official package.
This version is SUBSTANTIALLY different from
the 1.14 version distributed from
http://www.neuro.gatech.edu/users/cwilson/cygutils/cygipc/
SO READ THIS EMAIL ALL THE WAY THRU !!!
CygIPC
6 matches
Mail list logo
