On Feb 21 20:54, Pan ruochen wrote:
> Hi all,
>
> I want to use semget function under cygwin. But get "Bad system call" error.
> Do I have to install cygipc package to make these IPC functions work?
> And I cannot find this package in the setup UI, so where can I
>
Hi all,
I want to use semget function under cygwin. But get "Bad system call" error.
Do I have to install cygipc package to make these IPC functions work?
And I cannot find this package in the setup UI, so where can I
download the package?
- BR, Ruochen
--
Problem reports:
Gustavo Seabra wrote:
Hi all,
I apologize for the stupid question... For on program I'm installing
(LAM) I apparently need to have ipc-daemon2 running, and should
probably be part on the cygipc package. I see the cygipc package
listed here http://cygwin.com/packages, but I cannot find
Hi all,
I apologize for the stupid question... For on program I'm installing
(LAM) I apparently need to have ipc-daemon2 running, and should
probably be part on the cygipc package. I see the cygipc package
listed here http://cygwin.com/packages, but I cannot find it in
setup.exe.
Could so
On Mar 9 16:41, neo napster wrote:
> After goining through the code of shm.h and shm.c of Cygipc V1.09 that we are
> using,
> we have noticed that in function ShmCtl we have introduced logic to do the
> following:
>
> 1. Detach all PIDs from the passed Shared Memory Id.
>
After goining through the code of shm.h and shm.c of Cygipc V1.09 that we are
using,
we have noticed that in function ShmCtl we have introduced logic to do the
following:
1. Detach all PIDs from the passed Shared Memory Id.
2. Detach the PID of the process calling this function from
all
On Mar 7 12:30, neo napster wrote:
> All,
>
http://cygwin.com/acronyms/#TOFU
> - Original Message
> From: Corinna Vinschen <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
http://cygwin.com/acronyms/#PCYMTNQREAIYR
Corinna
--
Corinna Vinschen Please, send mails regarding Cygwin to
Cygwin Proje
All,
After goining through the code of shm.h and shm.c of Cygipc V1.09 that we are
using,
we have noticed that in function ShmCtl we have introduced logic to do the
following:
1. Detach all PIDs from the passed Shared Memory Id.
2. Detach the PID of the process calling this function from all
On Mar 6 10:46, neo napster wrote:
> When compiling we are getting the following error:
>
> apitest.c:28:31: ipc.h: No such file or directory
> apitest.c:29:31: shm.h: No such file or directory
These files are under sys, so you have to include sys/ipc.h, sys/shm.h,
etc., as required by SUSv3.
When compiling we are getting the following error:
apitest.c:28:31: ipc.h: No such file or directory
apitest.c:29:31: shm.h: No such file or directory
Since we were told not to include the Cygipc library when building the
application,
we have removed the cygipc library and sources from our
On Mar 5 19:32, neo napster wrote:
> I have tried the suggested solution, but compilation failed as we have
> included
"compilation failed" is everything but detailed enough to help.
> - Original Message
> From: Charles Wilson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
http://cygwin.com/acronyms/#PCYMTNQ
I have tried the suggested solution, but compilation failed as we have included
the following calls to Cygipc:
semctl, semget, semop
shmtcl, shmget, shmat, shmdt
msgctl, msgget, msgsnd, msgrcv
and also included header files like ipc.h,sem.h,shm.h in our application
If i have to sucessfully
> From: Corinna Vinschen
> Sent: Friday, March 02, 2007 2:01 PM
> Subject: Re: Difference Between CYGIPC And CYGServer
>
> On Mar 2 12:54, Charles Wilson wrote:
> > (In cygwin-1.7.0+, cygserver will also implement POSIX-compliant
> > shared memory objects and messag
On Mar 2 12:54, Charles Wilson wrote:
> (In cygwin-1.7.0+, cygserver will also implement
> POSIX-compliant shared memory objects and message queues).
Even better. POSIX shared memory objects and message queues are both
implemented using file backed sharead memory which works without help of
cy
On Fri, 2 Mar 2007, Charles Wilson wrote:
> neo napster wrote:
> > I have a few queries regarding cygserver and cygipc. what will be the
> > impact to move from cygipc to cygserver? I have some systems programs
> > which make calls to the CYGIPC, since these programs ar
neo napster wrote:
I have a few queries regarding cygserver and cygipc.
what will be the impact to move from cygipc to cygserver?
I have some systems programs which make calls to the CYGIPC,
since these programs are coded long back.
Can you please give us an idea of the things that need to
Hi,
I have a few queries regarding cygserver and cygipc.
what will be the impact to move from cygipc to cygserver?
I have some systems programs which make calls to the CYGIPC,
since these programs are coded long back.
Can you please give us an idea of the things that need to be done
to move
ation industry as real-time simulation.
So there are cases where you NEED cygwin for dSpace also. But never
cygipc unless you are using a really old cygwin.
Also let suggest me other linux plateform which will be user friendly for
instyallinf DSpace( Specially which will have all the req
>> >> Sir,
> >> >> I am not in position ot download the above file from the portal
> >> >>
> >> >> http://www.neuro.gatech.edu/users/cwilson/cygutils/cygipc/cygipc-1.13-2.tar.bz2
> >> >>
> >> >> Please guide
Sir,
Thanks for your comment. Infact initially I was installing the DSpace(is a
digital repository system, Linux based application,
http://www.dspace.org/). on the windows Xp hence I was playing with
Cygwin, and hence cygipc.
Presently I am trying on the Linux plateform , since many
--On Monday, March 20, 2006 12:17:31 -0500 Igor Peshansky wrote:
On Mon, 20 Mar 2006, Rajendra S. Gad wrote:
Please inform me where I will have better instruction for installing and
configuring DSpace on this plateform.
I have no idea what DSpace is, but if it does indeed require Cygwin tools
Ugh, top-posting... Reformatted.
On Mon, 20 Mar 2006, Rajendra S. Gad wrote:
> > On Fri, 17 Mar 2006, Rajendra S. Gad wrote:
> >
> >> Sir,
> >> I am not in position ot download the above file from the portal
> >>
> >> http://www.neuro.gatech
t; http://www.neuro.gatech.edu/users/cwilson/cygutils/cygipc/cygipc-1.13-2.tar.bz2
>>
>> Please guide me.
>
> The question is: why do you need it? This package has been obsolete for
> some time, and has been superceded with functionality within Cygwin
> itself (see
Igor Peshansky wrote:
http://www.neuro.gatech.edu/users/cwilson/cygutils/cygipc/cygipc-1.13-2.tar.bz2
Please guide me.
The question is: why do you need it? This package has been obsolete for
some time, and has been superceded with functionality within Cygwin itself
(see /usr/share/doc
On Fri, 17 Mar 2006, Rajendra S. Gad wrote:
> Sir,
> I am not in position ot download the above file from the portal
>
> http://www.neuro.gatech.edu/users/cwilson/cygutils/cygipc/cygipc-1.13-2.tar.bz2
>
> Please guide me.
The question is: why do you need it? This package has
Sir,
I am not in position ot download the above file from the portal
"http://www.neuro.gatech.edu/users/cwilson/cygutils/cygipc/cygipc-1.13-2.tar.bz2";
Please guide me.
Regards
--
Mr. R. S. Gad
Senior Lecture
Electronics Division
Department of Physics
Goa University
Goa Ind
On Oct 3 02:37, TAN TH wrote:
> hi Wilson,
> from
> http://sources.redhat.com/ml/cygwin-announce/2003-09/msg00055.html
> you say that CygIPC 2 is now an official package.
>
> at
> http://www.neuro.gatech.edu/users/cwilson/cygutils/cygipc/
>
> it is not longer valid.
&
is version 2 of CygIPC reliable? I see a lot of
posting on problems using CygIPC 2.
what is your advise?
I need to install LAM_MPI using Cygwin, but it needs
CygIPC 2 to be installed. pls advise.
thanks.
__
Yahoo! Mail - PC Magazine Editors
hi Wilson,
from
http://sources.redhat.com/ml/cygwin-announce/2003-09/msg00055.html
you say that CygIPC 2 is now an official package.
at
http://www.neuro.gatech.edu/users/cwilson/cygutils/cygipc/
it is not longer valid.
Also, I see quite a number of postings on problems
relating to CygIPC-2. What
On Feb 15 20:56, Jason Tishler wrote:
> Frank,
>
> On Sun, Feb 15, 2004 at 08:06:05AM +0100, Frank W?bbeling wrote:
> > I execute it, it dies saying "bad system call". In the logs of
> > cygserver, I get absolutely nothing.
> >
> > I feel completely lost here and have no idea what I could check to
Frank,
On Sun, Feb 15, 2004 at 08:06:05AM +0100, Frank Wübbeling wrote:
> I execute it, it dies saying "bad system call". In the logs of
> cygserver, I get absolutely nothing.
>
> I feel completely lost here and have no idea what I could check to
> find an error.
Did you forgot to define CYGWIN=s
Ok, I think I didn't make myself clear. I thought my trouble was somehow
related to cygipc, but obviously it is not. I *do not* want to use cygipc. I
*do* want to use the new IPC routines in libcygwin.a.
I startup cygserver (usually as a service, also tried it by hand) with log
level 7 and
Frank Wuebbeling wrote:
Hi,
I'm still having trouble understanding how IPC is supposed to be working now. I
used to be running apache 2.0, but that fails now due to lots of IPC problems.
cygcheck tells me my installation has cygipc version 2.03-2, cygwin is at
1.5.7-1, and yes, I reinst
Hi,
I'm still having trouble understanding how IPC is supposed to be working now. I
used to be running apache 2.0, but that fails now due to lots of IPC problems.
cygcheck tells me my installation has cygipc version 2.03-2, cygwin is at
1.5.7-1, and yes, I reinstalled cygwin after insta
cygipc and cygutils have some incompatibilities with cygwin-1.5.7; this
updated version resolves those conflicts. Note that you will probably
need to re-install cygwin-1.5.7 after upgrading cygipc -- this is an
unfortunate consequence of the pre-existing conflict between
cygipc-[OLDVERSION
Dr. Volker Zell wrote:
"Charles" == Charles Wilson writes:
Charles> 2) cygipc header files are now installed in /usr/include/cygipc/sys.
Charles> IF (and only if) /usr/include/sys/ipc.h and friends do not exist, then
Charles> a postinstall script creates sym
>>>>> "Charles" == Charles Wilson writes:
Charles> 2) cygipc header files are now installed in /usr/include/cygipc/sys.
Charles> IF (and only if) /usr/include/sys/ipc.h and friends do not exist, then
Charles> a postinstall script creates syml
a RE-installation of cygwin-1.5.7 (because un-installing
cygipc-2.02 will remove /usr/include/sys/ipc.h & friends, and
un-installing cygutils-1.2.2 will remove /usr/bin/ipcs.exe and
/usr/bin/ipcrm.exe)
Here are the changes in these two packages:
1) cygipc-based IPC utilities (ipcs, ipcrm, semtool,
Emanuele,
On Tue, Nov 04, 2003 at 07:57:43AM +0100, Emanuele Bonin wrote:
> How can i check if i have all the neccessary things to run postgresql?
By reading the README:
http://www.tishler.net/jason/software/postgresql/postgresql-7.3.4.README
Jason
--
PGP/GPG Key: http://www.tishler.net/j
HI!
I'm an italian developer, i want develope an application using
postgresql. I know unix very little.
I have some problem 8(( can u help me ?
I installed
CygWin 1.5.5
CygIpc 2.02
I'm using Windows XP.
I haven't ipc-daemon.exe ... but i have ipc-daemon2.exe is the same
thing ?
Chuck,
On Wed, Oct 01, 2003 at 11:50:45AM -0400, Charles Wilson wrote:
> Jason Tishler wrote:
> >The attached patch expands "normal" above to include the following
> >two cases:
> >
> >[snip]
>
> Thanks for the patch.
You are quite welcome.
> I will include it in the next release which should b
Jason Tishler wrote:
The attached patch expands "normal" above to include the following two
cases:
1. SIGINT, SIGQUIT, and SIGTERM signals when running as a process
2. SERVICE_CONTROL_SHUTDOWN requests when running as a service
Now ipc-daemon2 will clean up after itself during system shutd
/www.tishler.net/jason/pubkey.asc or key servers
Fingerprint: 7A73 1405 7F2B E669 C19D 8784 1AFD E4CC ECF4 8EF6
--- cygipc-2.01.orig/ipc-daemon.c 2003-07-13 16:27:50.0 -0400
+++ cygipc-2.01/ipc-daemon.c2003-09-30 16:15:04.172763200 -0400
@@ -260,6 +260,22 @@ static int create_map(co
. See the README.
But yes, now you can just point and click to download and unpack (I
won't call it "installing") cygipc.
In the documentation of Postgresql (at least 6
months ago) the author had written that he would compile against
CYGIPC untill cygipc is part of the Cygwin packages
Jason Tishler wrote:
On Wed, Sep 03, 2003 at 03:35:39AM -0400, Charles Wilson wrote:
This is a lot of changes; I expect growing pains. But, it's a .01
release, so what did you expect? However, it's been in test, and used
by test-python users for almost a month, so...
^^
Yes, of cou
On Wed, Sep 03, 2003 at 03:35:39AM -0400, Charles Wilson wrote:
> This is a lot of changes; I expect growing pains. But, it's a .01
> release, so what did you expect? However, it's been in test, and used
> by test-python users for almost a month, so...
^^
Actually, PostgreSQL users
Yes, it's finally happened. I've made CygIPC into an official package.
This version is SUBSTANTIALLY different from
the 1.14 version distributed from
http://www.neuro.gatech.edu/users/cwilson/cygutils/cygipc/
SO READ THIS EMAIL ALL TH
On Sat, 19 Jul 2003, Kevin Jones wrote:
> Thanks to everybody that replied to this, I now have cygipc-1.14.1.
> However if I do an --install-as-service, it seems to install OK, but I
> can't start the service (this is on Windows 2003 server). Any pointers
> would be welcome,
Tak
Thanks to everybody that replied to this, I now have cygipc-1.14.1.
However if I do an --install-as-service, it seems to install OK, but I
can't start the service (this is on Windows 2003 server). Any pointers
would be welcome,
Kevin Jones
Developmentor
www.develop.com
> -Original
oo long).
>
> OK, so where do I get the 1.3 package that all the PostGreSQL install
> pages talk about?
>
> Kevin Jones
> Developmentor
> www.develop.com
Here <http://koeln.convey.de/cywgin/bluefish/cygipc-1.14-1.tar.bz2>.
--
Elfyn McBratney, EMCB | http://www.nongn
GreSQL install
pages talk about?
Kevin Jones
Developmentor
www.develop.com
> -Original Message-
> From: Elfyn McBratney [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Sent: 19 July 2003 08:58
> To: guenter strubinsky
> Cc: 'Kevin Jones'; [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Subject: RE: CygIPC
http://koeln.convey.de/cywgin/bluefish/
> -Original Message-
> From: Elfyn McBratney [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Sent: Saturday, 19 July, 2003 02:58
> To: guenter strubinsky
> Cc: 'Kevin Jones'; [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Subject: RE: CygIPC
>
> On Sat, 19
On Sat, 19 Jul 2003, guenter strubinsky wrote:
> http://mirror.mcs.anl.gov/cygwin/release/cygipc/
>
> > I'm trying to get PostGreSQL to run under Cygwin and need to get cygipc
> > from http://www.neuro.gatech.edu/users/cwilson/cygutils/cygipc/ and I
> > can't
http://mirror.mcs.anl.gov/cygwin/release/cygipc/
> -Original Message-
> From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf
> Of Kevin Jones
> Sent: Saturday, 19 July, 2003 02:42
> To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Subject: CygIPC
>
> I'm trying to get PostG
I'm trying to get PostGreSQL to run under Cygwin and need to get cygipc
from http://www.neuro.gatech.edu/users/cwilson/cygutils/cygipc/ and I
can't connect to the site.
Does anybody have a copy of this package they could please send to me,
or let me know where the latest version is
Jason Tishler wrote:
Chuck,
On Sun, Jul 13, 2003 at 03:48:43PM -0400, Charles Wilson wrote:
However, it MAY be fixed in the upcoming 1.2.0 version of cygipc, ...
^
Is the above a typo? Shouldn't the next version be > 1.14? For
example,
Igor,
On Mon, Jul 14, 2003 at 11:03:55AM -0400, Igor Pechtchanski wrote:
> On Mon, 14 Jul 2003, Jason Tishler wrote:
> > On Sun, Jul 13, 2003 at 03:48:43PM -0400, Charles Wilson wrote:
> > > However, it MAY be fixed in the upcoming 1.2.0
On Mon, 14 Jul 2003, Jason Tishler wrote:
> Chuck,
>
> On Sun, Jul 13, 2003 at 03:48:43PM -0400, Charles Wilson wrote:
> > However, it MAY be fixed in the upcoming 1.2.0 version of cygipc, ...
>^
> Is the above a typo? Shouldn&
Chuck,
On Sun, Jul 13, 2003 at 03:48:43PM -0400, Charles Wilson wrote:
> However, it MAY be fixed in the upcoming 1.2.0 version of cygipc, ...
^
Is the above a typo? Shouldn't the next version be > 1.14? For
example, 1.15 or 2.0.
Th
Sergey,
Please post instead of sending private email.
Thanks,
Jason
--
PGP/GPG Key: http://www.tishler.net/jason/pubkey.asc or key servers
Fingerprint: 7A73 1405 7F2B E669 C19D 8784 1AFD E4CC ECF4 8EF6
--- Begin Message ---
Dear Jason,
I've got some issues with IPC_RMID under cygwin, I got cyg
Joe Buehler wrote:
The semaphores provided by the 1.14-1 version of cygipc are not
persistent -- once
all client processes close a semaphore, it disappears. This is
different than standard
UNIX semantics, in which semaphores persist until removed or system
reboot. The
attached patch fixes
Joe Buehler wrote:
The semaphores provided by the 1.14-1 version of cygipc are not
persistent -- once
all client processes close a semaphore, it disappears. This is
different than standard
UNIX semantics, in which semaphores persist until removed or system
reboot. The
attached patch fixes
Mark Paulus wrote:
Are you running the ipcdaemon process? At one time
the cygipc libraries required the ipcdaemon process
to manage the global objects. I thought I read something
that the ipc-daemon is going away, and being incorporated
into the cygwin architecture, but I did not gather that it
No that's right. The goal was to move the functionality of cygipc into
the Cygwin DLL itself and expand on it. However, this work is incomplete.
But cygipc and the work to add IPC functionality to the Cygwin DLL are
mutually exclusive pieces of functionality. So there's nothing that&
The semaphores provided by the 1.14-1 version of cygipc are not persistent -- once
all client processes close a semaphore, it disappears. This is different than standard
UNIX semantics, in which semaphores persist until removed or system reboot. The
attached patch fixes this, providing the
Are you running the ipcdaemon process? At one time
the cygipc libraries required the ipcdaemon process
to manage the global objects. I thought I read something
that the ipc-daemon is going away, and being incorporated
into the cygwin architecture, but I did not gather that it had
happened yet
I am attempting to use cygipc for its semaphore functionality
in porting some existing UNIX code.
It would appear that semaphores are not persistent?
The code depends on the UNIX semantic of a semaphore being a global
system object that exists regardless of whether any processes are
currently
hi,
i just want to know, how far the development of the cygipc-replacement
is. i'm just interested in that technique.
Check the email archives or CVS for details. Allot of good work has
been done but more is needed. It needs maintainers with some free time
to devote. Wanna sign up? :-)
hi,
i just want to know, how far the development of the cygipc-replacement
is. i'm just interested in that technique.
BTW: what does the cygwin-daemon do different?
I always wondered, why cygipc needs a deamon-process, because as far as
i know, a DLL is only loaded once, and so the cygip
Roland Glenn McIntosh wrote:
> I noticed the cygutils page said that most of the packages were
> obsolete.
> At this current moment, using the latest released cygwin, do I still
> need cygipc for postgres?
/usr/doc/Cygwin/postgresql-7.3.2.README
Max.
--
Unsubscribe inf
I noticed the cygutils page said that most of the packages were obsolete.
At this current moment, using the latest released cygwin, do I still need cygipc for
postgres?
I am assuming I do and using the following as an install guide:
http://www.postgresql.org/docs/faqs/text/FAQ_MSWIN
-rgm
Corinna,
Chris,
On Tue, Feb 04, 2003 at 08:11:28PM +0100, Corinna Vinschen wrote:
> On Tue, Feb 04, 2003 at 02:09:19PM -0500, Christopher Faylor wrote:
> > On Tue, Feb 04, 2003 at 08:00:43PM +0100, Corinna Vinschen wrote:
> > >Hmmm. It looks as if cygipc would have to b
>> then?
> >
> >Hmmm. It looks as if cygipc would have to be changed to allow working
> >w/o O_TRUNC. I can't see any chance to change something in Cygwin to
> >get that working.
>
> Doesn't CREATE_ALWAYS truncate the file anyway? Couldn't we
On Tue, Feb 04, 2003 at 08:00:43PM +0100, Corinna Vinschen wrote:
>On Tue, Feb 04, 2003 at 01:22:43PM -0500, Jason Tishler wrote:
>> Any other ideas? Or, are Cygwin PostgreSQL PL/Tcl users out of luck
>> then?
>
>Hmmm. It looks as if cygipc would have to be changed to allow
On Tue, Feb 04, 2003 at 01:22:43PM -0500, Jason Tishler wrote:
> Any other ideas? Or, are Cygwin PostgreSQL PL/Tcl users out of luck
> then?
Hmmm. It looks as if cygipc would have to be changed to allow working
w/o O_TRUNC. I can't see any chance to change something in Cygwin
Corinna,
On Tue, Feb 04, 2003 at 06:48:04PM +0100, Corinna Vinschen wrote:
> On Tue, Feb 04, 2003 at 11:59:30AM -0500, Jason Tishler wrote:
> > The root cause of the problem is opening the file with the "O_TRUNC"
> > flag -- without it, the open (in open2) succeeds.
succeeds. Unfortunately, cygipc
> seems to need open with truncation semantics for proper operation.
I'm surprised that this is meant to work at all. However, did you
check to omit the O_CREAT? The combination of O_CREATE and O_TRUNC
will result in a CreateFile() call using the CREATE_AL
em is opening the file with the "O_TRUNC"
flag -- without it, the open (in open2) succeeds. Unfortunately, cygipc
seems to need open with truncation semantics for proper operation.
Is there any way to work around this problem? Or, is this just an
inherent Windows limitation? I'
Colin,
Please post instead of sending private email.
On Thu, Jan 16, 2003 at 09:13:33AM -0800, Colin wrote:
> Can't seem to get ipc-daemon to compile on my w2k machine???
Do you Google?
http://www.google.com/search?q=cygipc
Jason
--
PGP/GPG Key: http://www.tishler.net/jason/pu
MAny Thanks aRE giNg to You ... iDiDn't kNew aboUT that ...
Now i aM a LittLe biT smarTer ;)
You SaVed ME .
TAHNx JEzeK
--
Unsubscribe info: http://cygwin.com/ml/#unsubscribe-simple
Bug reporting: http://cygwin.com/bugs.html
Documentation:
Hi,
Well Are you sure your including the files correctly? Where did you install
cygipc? Are the lib and include dir (normally /usr/local) in the -L and -I
paths? Im also pretty sure the -lcygipc should be at the end. By default
these paths are not added by gcc and ld. eg:
$ gcc -ggdb -Wall -I
Hi All ...
I have a big probLem.
I haVe instALLed cygwin-1.3.17-1 anD i have DownLoaded and installed a PacKAge
called cygipc-1.13-2 to make soMe programs for my sTudy uSe ...
I need To comPiLe a sOurce uSing sys/(shm.h, sem.h, msg.h) but when
i trYed to CompiLE a teSt souRce the Only Thing iT
[this announcement includes additional information; it's not identical
to the one posted a hour ago]
cygipc is an implementation of IPC services for cygwin. Although it
will eventually be replaced by the developing "cygwin daemon", cygipc is
currently the more complete implem
Oops. Missed a few necessary patches. 1.13-2 out now.
Charles Wilson wrote:
cygipc is an implementation of IPC services for cygwin. Although it
will eventually be replaced by the developing "cygwin daemon", cygipc is
currently the more complete implementation and is used by pos
ngstanding) bug in the
install_reg_entries routine.
Sigh.
cygipc-1.13-2 coming soon.
--Chuck
--
Unsubscribe info: http://cygwin.com/ml/#unsubscribe-simple
Bug reporting: http://cygwin.com/bugs.html
Documentation: http://cygwin.com/docs.html
FAQ: http://cygwin.com/faq/
Chuck,
On Wed, Nov 13, 2002 at 02:31:22PM -0500, Charles Wilson wrote:
> Jason Tishler wrote:
> >Attached are the following files:
> >
> >o cygipc-1.13pre1.patch: ENOSYS patch
>
> Thanks. Applied, and cygipc-1.13 is now available at
> http://www.neuro.gat
cygipc is an implementation of IPC services for cygwin. Although it
will eventually be replaced by the developing "cygwin daemon", cygipc is
currently the more complete implementation and is used by postgresql as
well as by the kde-cygwin project.
cygipc-1.13 fixes some long-standin
Jason Tishler wrote:
My patch (against cygipc-1.13pre1) changes the following cygipc
functions to return ENOSYS instead of EACCES if ipc-daemon is not
running:
msgctl()
msgget()
msgrcv()
msgsnd()
semctl()
semget()
semop()
shmat()
shmctl()
shmget
Chuck,
On Tue, Nov 12, 2002 at 02:44:45PM -0500, Charles Wilson wrote:
> The attached src tarball contains cygipc-1.13pre1. It has been
> reverted to the 32bit key_t treatment (e.g. pre-1.12), but other
> improvements in 1.12 remain. Please generate your ENOSYS patches --
> if th
On Tue, Nov 12, 2002 at 10:57:32AM -0500, Charles Wilson wrote:
>I've no objection. But would somebody PLEASE tell me what the HELL
>we're waiting for with respect to the 64bit key_t change in newlib?
>
>I've had a new release of cygipc waiting for months, predicate
aster is started.
> I'm proposing that the attached patch (against cygipc-1.11-1) be
applied to cygipc since it solves the Cygwin PostgreSQL hang problems.
Specifically, this patch changes cygipc's shmget() and semget() to
return ENOSYS instead of EACCES if ipc-daemon is not runni
> running when either initdb or postmaster is started.
>
> I'm proposing that the attached patch (against cygipc-1.11-1) be
> applied to cygipc since it solves the Cygwin PostgreSQL hang problems.
> Specifically, this patch changes cygipc's shmget() and semget() to
> re
in
PostgreSQL problem. Specifically, Cygwin PostgreSQL will hang and
consume all available CPU cycles if cygipc's ipc-daemon is not running
when either initdb or postmaster is started.
I'm proposing that the attached patch (against cygipc-1.11-1) be applied
to cygipc since it solves t
On Sat, Feb 02, 2002 at 09:16:57AM +1100, Robert Collins wrote:
>From: "Michael Haubenwallner" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
>>The problem is, that the pid-numbering of Windows is quite "confuse" (i
>>don't know any better word), meaning that a later ipctest.exe gets the
>>same pid as before, while the atta
===
- Original Message -
From: "Michael Haubenwallner" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> The problem is, that the pid-numbering of Windows is quite "confuse"
> (i don't know any better word), meaning that a later ipctest.exe
> gets the same pid as before, while the attach before with the same
> pid i
Hi,
while i'm looking for new messages depending on cygipc,
found this and i am able to say:
Christophe LEITIENNE wrote:
>
> Hi all,
> I've noticed some problems using shared memory with cygipc, which don't
> seem
> to be present in the mailing list archives.
&
Hi all,
I've noticed some problems using shared memory with cygipc, which don't seem
to be present in the mailing list archives.
I'm running cygwin 1.3.9 with cygipc 1.11 on a W2K machine.
SYMPTOMS
If you run multiple times a simple app that attaches a shared memory segment
(wi
David,
On Wed, Jan 23, 2002 at 10:10:10PM +0100, David Ecker wrote:
> I tried to install the ipc-deamon and the postmaster as a nt service. The
> installation was ok. I could start "(net start) ipc-deamon" and after that
> I could start the "(net start) postmaster" service. I also added a
> re
At 04:10 PM 1/23/2002, David Ecker wrote:
>Hi,
>
>I tried to install the ipc-deamon and the postmaster as a nt service. The
>installation was ok. I could start "(net start) ipc-deamon" and after that I could
>start the "(net start) postmaster" service. I also added a requirement that the
>postm
Hi,
I tried to install the ipc-deamon and the postmaster as a nt service. The
installation was ok. I could start "(net start) ipc-deamon" and after that
I could start the "(net start) postmaster" service. I also added a
requirement that the postmaster server is not started before the ipc-deamo
1 - 100 of 105 matches
Mail list logo
