Cezary Sliwa wrote:
> I tried to build Lapack 3.1.1 using cygwin. Compilation works fine, but
> testing reports failures.
I often build lapack 3.1.1 with G77, GFortran and G95, and I do not
observe any failure in testing.
To build with G77 (3.4.4-3) I simply copy make.inc.example to make.inc an
On Thu, Aug 02, 2007 at 12:46:16AM +0200, Cezary Sliwa wrote:
>
> Hello,
>
> I tried to build Lapack 3.1.1 using cygwin. Compilation works fine, but
> testing reports failures. The g77 flags were -O3 -funroll-all-loops.
>
> For gcc 3.3.3 failures are reported by CEV, CVX, CGV, DGV, SGV, ZGV.
>
Hello,
I tried to build Lapack 3.1.1 using cygwin. Compilation works fine, but
testing reports failures. The g77 flags were -O3 -funroll-all-loops.
For gcc 3.3.3 failures are reported by CEV, CVX, CGV, DGV, SGV, ZGV.
For gcc 3.4.4 failures are reported by CGV, DGV, SGV, ZGV.
As far as the pre
On Tuesday 01 April 2003 19:04, Underwood, Jonathan wrote:
> Hi
>
> Apologies if this is a little off topic.
Probably more than a little. Failing to follow instructions for non-cygwin
applications is likely to make you a target for such accusations.
>However i run into trouble
> when compiling
Hi
Apologies if this is a little off topic. I'm attempting to build the LAPACK
library under cygwin using the optimized atlas blas library. I have gotten
Atlas to compile correctly and have installed the library files in /usr/lib
and the header files in /usr/include/atlas/. However i run into trou
Erin Catto wrote:
> That worked. Is it usually necessary to modifiy make
> files for Cygwin?
Only when they haven't been written carefully to begin with.
> Are there any other common problems?
Silly question - of course there aren't one or two problems that nearly
everybody runs into. If there w
That worked. Is it usually necessary to modifiy make
files for Cygwin? Are there any other common problems?
Thanks,
Erin
--- Max Bowsher <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Short answer: Add ".PHONY: install" to the makefile
>
> Long answer: make sees the INSTALL directory, and
> concludes that it is
Erin Catto wrote:
> I'm having trouble building LAPACK. I downloaded
> lapack.tgz from www.netlib.org/lapack. I'm using
> make.inc.LINUX for make.inc. I type
>
> make install
>
> and make says that install is up to date but it is
> not! I have done the same
I'm having trouble building LAPACK. I downloaded
lapack.tgz from www.netlib.org/lapack. I'm using
make.inc.LINUX for make.inc. I type
make install
and make says that install is up to date but it is
not! I have done the same operation on Linux and it
works.
Here is the install
9 matches
Mail list logo