RE: cygwin copy problems usb 2.0

yes that's the most obvious solution for my problem. -- View this message in context: http://www.nabble.com/cygwin-copy-problems-usb-2.0-tf2009189.html#a5537963 Sent from the Cygwin Users forum at Nabble.com. -- Unsubscribe info: http://cygwin.com/ml/#unsubscribe-simple Problem reports:

Re: cygwin copy problems usb 2.0

isn't there a possibitly that cygwin provides a quicker cp-implementation? i mean 4 minutes for a copy of 70MB to a memstick (instead of CopyFile() 20 sec.) is not really good performance. i guess there is a reason for that... -- View this message in context: http://www.nabble.com/cygwin-copy

Re: cygwin copy problems usb 2.0

when running a little program using CopyFile() under cygwin it is about as quick as totalcommander. so it must be the abstraction layer of cygwin which makes copying vry slow... -- View this message in context: http://www.nabble.com/cygwin-copy-problems-usb-2.0-tf2009189.html#a5528112 Sent

RE: cygwin copy problems usb 2.0

total commander is a clone of norton commander. something like midnight commander on linux. i thought the same: choice between usb 1.x and 2.0 is done far lower level that cygwin can really influence it. but the difference of speed made me consipicious. example, copying a single file (.tar.gz) o

cygwin copy problems usb 2.0

hi, i've got usb 2.0, when i copy through TotalCommander the copy speed is quite high. when i copy through cygwin shell it seems that it is transmitting data only with usb 1.x speed. very spooky, because i thought that cygwin is calling windows drivers/api so it should be indirectly supporting u