total commander is a clone of norton commander. something like midnight commander on linux.
i thought the same: choice between usb 1.x and 2.0 is done far lower level that cygwin can really influence it. but the difference of speed made me consipicious. example, copying a single file (.tar.gz) of size ~70MB: with total commander it takes 20 sec. with cygwin it takes 4 minutes (!), which is plain too long to include it in my script. i know through its abstracton layer cygwin must be slower. but regarding that slowliness could it be another reason? thanks again! -- View this message in context: http://www.nabble.com/cygwin-copy-problems-usb-2.0-tf2009189.html#a5525767 Sent from the Cygwin Users forum at Nabble.com. -- Unsubscribe info: http://cygwin.com/ml/#unsubscribe-simple Problem reports: http://cygwin.com/problems.html Documentation: http://cygwin.com/docs.html FAQ: http://cygwin.com/faq/
