"Spencer Bailey" wrote:
> Hi,
>
> I've created two different profiles in /etc. profile.1 and profile.2
> which both contain different aliases etc. Based on the user logging in
> I want to be able to run the correct profile.
>
> Is it possible to put in a check in the /etc/profile that is a certai
Christopher Faylor wrote:
> On Sat, Sep 22, 2007 at 12:47:36PM +0200, Markus E L wrote:
>>> There are potentially other libraries which might be required for
>>> C++. You really should use g++ to link C++ programs.
>>
>>Right. I never said differently.
>
>
Christopher Faylor wrote:
> On Sat, Sep 22, 2007 at 04:29:53AM +0200, Markus E L wrote:
>>Erich Dollansky wrote:
>>
>>> Hi,
>>>
>>> Framk gave you the answer.
>>
>>Was the right answer ...
>>
>>> gcc is a plain c compiler.
Erich Dollansky wrote:
> Hi,
>
> Framk gave you the answer.
Was the right answer ...
> gcc is a plain c compiler.
... but this is wrong. Gcc determines from the file suffic which language
applies
.cpp -> c++
.c -> C
and so on.
Calling it as g++ vs. calling it as gcc though determine
"Cole Radcliffe" wrote:
> Is there any math package that I can install for free on cygwin that
> will allow me to do symbolic algebra and symbolically solve DEs and
> symbolically integrate better than my TI-89? Apparently Octave only
> produces numeric solutions.
Maxima? I'm almost sure it's no
"Cole Radcliffe" wrote:
> Type ./executable or set your PATH variable to include "." (the latter
> is usually not recommended, even in cygwin, I think).
>
> And try to read up about PATH.
>
> Regards -- Markus
>
> I tried "set PATH=.:$PATH" and that did not work. When I echoed the
> $PATH I reali
Charles Wilson wrote:
> Max Bowsher wrote:
>> I just updated to rxvt-20050409-7, and the font changed to a very weird
>> display using a proportional-width font, but displayed with each
>> character left-aligned within a fixed-size area which appears to
>> correspond to the largest character with
> "Cole Radcliffe" wrote:
> > "Cole Radcliffe" wrote:
> >
> >> I do an ls -la and I see I have an executable called "executable.exe".
> >> I chmod to 777. Then I try to type "execut" and I press tab and it
> >> does not find it. When I type in the entire name and press enter, bash
> >> says the c
"Cole Radcliffe" wrote:
> I do an ls -la and I see I have an executable called "executable.exe".
> I chmod to 777. Then I try to type "execut" and I press tab and it
> does not find it. When I type in the entire name and press enter, bash
> says the command is not found! It works fine on cygwin-x
Thorsten Kampe wrote:
> * Andrew DeFaria (Fri, 14 Sep 2007 18:19:00 -0700)
>> DePriest, Jason R. wrote:
>> > sftp gives you a familiar FTP shell; it is not just a command you run
>> I understand that.
>> > you can list the files on the remote system and make decisions about
>> > what files you wa
> 3) Calm down, breath deeply, and try not to be so hysterical.
Good advice, Dave. Did you try it once?
- M
--
Unsubscribe info: http://cygwin.com/ml/#unsubscribe-simple
Problem reports: http://cygwin.com/problems.html
Documentation: http://cygwin.com/docs.html
FAQ:
> 1) Why does the Reply-To have cygwin 3 times?
Because cfg's mails at the moment have 1 Reply-To- and 2
Mail-Followup-To-Fields in the header at the moment. Like this:
> Reply-To: cygwin@cygwin.com
> Mail-Followup-To: cygwin@cygwin.com
> Mail-Followup-To: cygwin@cygwin.com
Everyone elses mail
Hi Dave,
Markus E.L. writes:
> "DaveKorn" writes:
Rereading parts of the thread and your reply, I fear it happens again:
Lot's of reproaches in your's and Barry's replys, accusations of stuff
_I_ never wrote, down to questioning the legitimacy of addressing
features of any kind in any softwa
"DaveKorn" writes:
> On 15 May 2007 00:24, Markus E.L. wrote:
>
>> is concerned with questions of trust and
>> endorsement
>
> That's the underlying source of your error right there: a false assumption.
So Alex has been concerned with different questions? My apologies if I
read him wrong ther
"Buchbinder,Barry(NIH/NIAID)[E]" writes:
> I understand that you are perturbed that setup does not behave as you
> might have expected.
Did you actually read what me or Alex wrote? Me seems none of us
expressed ANY perturbation with regard to that setup wouldn't behave
as expected or advertise
"Buchbinder,Barry(NIH/NIAID)[E]" writes:
Barry, my and (AFAI understand) Alex' problem is not with using setup
- I for my part am quite comfortable with how I start setup. Alex (in
my humble opinion rightly) is concerned with questions of trust and
endorsement (like: cygwin.com lists the mirror
"DaveKorn" writes:
> On 14 May 2007 21:27, Markus E.L. wrote:
>
>> often. Did you mean setup.ini instead? But setup.ini is coming from
>> the mirror, isn't it?
>
> Well, it comes from the mirror, same as the packages do, but it isn't
> generated there, if that's what you mean.
No, that wasn't
Hi,
I hope this is on topic for the list. The link to VNC at the page
mentioned in the subject
http://www.uk.research.att.com/vnc/
is broken. It seems www.uk.research.att.com has been dropped from the
DNS. Possible replacements:
- http://www.cl.cam.ac.uk/research/dtg/attarchive/vnc/index.h
"LarryHall(Cygwin)" writes:
> Alexander Sotirov wrote:
>> Christopher Faylor wrote:
>>> It was actually all academic before since: 1) there was nothing wrong
>>> with the setup.exe on the mirrors and 2) people shouldn't have been
>>> running setup.exe from the mirrors to begin with.
>>
>> Can yo
Christopher Faylor writes:
> On Sun, May 13, 2007 at 03:13:58PM +0200, ls-cygwin-2006 wrote:
>>Brian Dessent writes:
>>
>>> [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
>>>
Please anyone touch setup.exe? If the mirrors pick it up then we (you!
:) know that it is, somehow, a time stamping issue. The issue c
"LarryHall(Cygwin)" writes:
> Alexander Sotirov wrote:
>> Christopher Faylor wrote:
>>> That + if you want to talk about trust then you should trust the method
>>> that we advertise for installing cygwin which is to click on the
>>> "Install Cygwin Now!" link.
>>
>> Are you saying that I should
Markus Schönhaber <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> [manually deleted] wrote:
>
>> PS: Brian, I've been living under the impression that we are under the
>> rule not to include cleartext email addresses in quotes? Is that
>> still so and would you, please, not burn my address further?
>
> If
22 matches
Mail list logo
