Christopher Faylor wrote: > On Sat, Sep 22, 2007 at 12:47:36PM +0200, Markus E L wrote: >>> There are potentially other libraries which might be required for >>> C++. You really should use g++ to link C++ programs. >> >>Right. I never said differently. > > If you want to get technical, I didn't say that you did. > > Your message could be taken as implying that an alternate way to link > c++ programs was to just add -lstdc++ to the command line. I wanted to
Ah, no. I hope nobody drew that (wrong) conclusion. Actually I only answered into that thread -- which originally I perceived as completely resolved -- because I thought the last post (by Erich Dollansky) showed a slightly wrong picture of the role of the gcc driver. > make sure that we didn't see subsequent email from someone who thought > that was a good way to link c++ programs. Thank's for watching out for such possibilities and forestalling any misunderstandings. Regards -- M -- Unsubscribe info: http://cygwin.com/ml/#unsubscribe-simple Problem reports: http://cygwin.com/problems.html Documentation: http://cygwin.com/docs.html FAQ: http://cygwin.com/faq/
