On Mon, 2014-08-04 at 00:19 -0500, Steven Penny wrote:
> On Sun, Aug 3, 2014 at 11:51 PM, Yaakov Selkowitz wrote:
> >> Problem reports: http://cygwin.com/problems.html
> >
> > Without this information, it is very hard for us to help you.
>
> Hm, seems pretty easy to me
You're right: the afo
Eric Blake (cygwin) wrote:
A new release of coreutils, 8.23-1, is available for download for
testing purposes, leaving 8.15-1 (32-bit) or 8.15-3 (64-bit) as current
for another week until I am sure there are no major regressions.
...
[ arch base64 basename cat chcon chgrp chmod chown chroot cksu
On Sun, Aug 3, 2014 at 11:51 PM, Yaakov Selkowitz wrote:
>> Problem reports: http://cygwin.com/problems.html
>
> Without this information, it is very hard for us to help you.
Hm, seems pretty easy to me
$ curl -s box-soft.com/x86_64/setup.ini | awk '$1=="coreutils"' RS='\n\n@'
coreutils
sd
On Sun, 2014-08-03 at 23:37 -0500, Steven Penny wrote:
> With latest "setup-x86_64.exe" now yields this
>
> Package: base-cygwin
> 000-cygwin-post-install.sh exit code 1
> Package: _autorebase
> autorebase.bat exit code 1
> Package: bash
> bash.sh exit code 1
> Pa
Using a 64-bit system
C:\> echo %PROCESSOR_ARCHITECTURE%
AMD64
With latest "setup-x86_64.exe" now yields this
Package: base-cygwin
000-cygwin-post-install.sh exit code 1
Package: _autorebase
autorebase.bat exit code 1
Package: bash
bash.sh exit code 1
Pa
On Sun, Aug 3, 2014 at 10:00 PM, Yaakov Selkowitz wrote:
> package_grep.cgi could probably use some optimization; PTC.
No, the whole point of this thread is to kill "package_grep.cgi" in favor of a
master file list, like is used with
- Debian
- Ubuntu
- Arch Linux
- MSYS2
- apt-get
- pacman
--
P
On Sun, 2014-08-03 at 16:07 -0500, Steven Penny wrote:
> In June I presented the idea of a "Package file lists archive" and was met
> with
> this
>
> > I understand how the package generation would have to work and don't see a
> > major benefit to introducing a package list file given the amount
On Sun, Aug 3, 2014 at 5:34 PM, Yaakov Selkowitz <> wrote:
> On 2014-08-03 17:55, Doug Henderson wrote:
>>
>> cygcheck -p segment faults on my laptop where I have only installed
>> the 64-bit version of cygwin.
>
>
> How are you calling cygcheck -p?
>
>> Note: this install is the first and only ins
On 8/1/2014 9:32 AM, Corinna Vinschen wrote:
On Aug 1 14:17, Peter Hull wrote:
On Fri, Aug 1, 2014 at 1:50 PM, Angelo Graziosi
wrote:
Since I upgraded to Cygwin-1.7.31*, I see similar issue in building Emacs
trunk (--with-w32 build)... The build always hangs in compiling some .el
file. CTRL-C
Thank you for your great service on this project Chris. Your contributions
will be missed. I wish you great fortune in your new endevors.
Please contact me if you have any questions or concerns.
Sincerely,
Brian S. Wilson
Software Configuration Manager
: bria...@bellsouth.net
: wil...@ds.net
':
On 2014-08-03 17:55, Doug Henderson wrote:
cygcheck -p segment faults on my laptop where I have only installed
the 64-bit version of cygwin.
How are you calling cygcheck -p?
Note: this install is the first and only install of any version of
cygwin on this machine.
Your installation is actua
cygcheck -p segment faults on my laptop where I have only installed
the 64-bit version of cygwin.
Note: this install is the first and only install of any version of
cygwin on this machine.
attached are:
strace output from cygcheck -p
cygcheck -svr output
Your assistance is appreciated,
Doug
In June I presented the idea of a "Package file lists archive" and was met with
this
> I understand how the package generation would have to work and don't see a
> major benefit to introducing a package list file given the amount of work and
> the fact that I would have to do the work.
http://cyg
The following packages have been updated:
- doxygen-1.8.7-2
- doxygen-doxywizard-1.8.7-2
CHANGES:
This is a rebuild of doxygen 1.8.7 to enable Clang assisted parsing.
Only the x86_64 build has been updated; Clang assisted parsing was
already enabled in the x86 build.
Note that Cl
On Sat, Aug 2, 2014 at 2:29 PM, Eric Blake (cygwin) wrote:
> Yes, I'm aware that it has been more than 2 years since I last built
> coreutils, and that there has been some question on the mailing list of
> whether I'm being responsive enough as a maintainer. I apologize for
> the delays in getting
15 matches
Mail list logo
