On 10/3/2012 8:26 PM, Sean Murphy wrote:
Hello all,
Decided to check out hdparm today after reading about the utility.
After install, I attempted to run the utility by executing a check on my
computer's hard drive and received a message from bash stating that
the hdparm command could not be fou
I have run into an issue when trying to create a symlink/shortcut to a
network share (SMB) that will work between Cygwin, Windows XP, and Windows
7.
If you set the environment variable CYGWIN=winsymlinks, you get the
benefit that ln -s will create files that work as both Windows shortcuts,
and
Hello all,
Decided to check out hdparm today after reading about the utility.
After install, I attempted to run the utility by executing a check on my
computer's hard drive and received a message from bash stating that
the hdparm command could not be found. Can anyone else confirm
this behavior?
On 10/3/2012 6:02 PM, Vincent Rivière wrote:
On 01/10/2012 13:24, marco atzeri wrote:
cygcheck -c
I wonder how much "cygcheck -c" is reliable.
For example, the libmpfr4 package.
I delete /bin/cygmpfr-4.dll and /etc/setup/libmpfr4.lst.gz
As a result, I can't compile sources with gcc anymore
On 01/10/2012 13:24, marco atzeri wrote:
cygcheck -c
I wonder how much "cygcheck -c" is reliable.
For example, the libmpfr4 package.
I delete /bin/cygmpfr-4.dll and /etc/setup/libmpfr4.lst.gz
As a result, I can't compile sources with gcc anymore due to the missing
cygmpfr-4.dll.
But "cygc
I'm on the mailing list in digest mode, so this response may not get
threaded correctly.
Here is some basic test code which illustrates all the things I spoke about in
my previous note. The Cygwin machine and the Linux machine are identical (I
have a harddrive swap system).Notice that t
On 10/3/2012 6:02 AM, Christopher Faylor wrote:
On Wed, Oct 03, 2012 at 02:58:55AM -0700, Gregory M. Turner wrote:
On 10/2/2012 5:55 PM, Christopher Faylor wrote:
FYI, a quick scan seems to show that you've pretty much undone a lot of
what I've recently added for fifos so I don't expect to real
> Jari Aalto writes:
> PACKAGE DESCRIPTION
> ===
> Homepage: http://freecode.com/projects/sendxmpp
> License : GPL
> A perl script to send XMPP (jabber) messages, similar to what mail(1)
> does for mail. XMPP is an open, non-proprietary protocol for in
On Wed, Oct 03, 2012 at 08:29:21AM -0400, Earnie Boyd wrote:
>On Tue, Oct 2, 2012 at 3:15 PM, bob wrote:
>>While this hack works the performance under Cygwin is orders of
>>magnitude slower than the equivalent Linux performance.
>>
>>Any suggestions on how we can achieve a higher performance blocki
On Wed, Oct 03, 2012 at 02:58:55AM -0700, Gregory M. Turner wrote:
>On 10/2/2012 5:55 PM, Christopher Faylor wrote:
>>On Tue, Oct 02, 2012 at 01:45:08PM -0700, Gregory M. Turner wrote:
>>>On 10/2/2012 1:19 PM, Christopher Faylor wrote:
On Tue, Oct 02, 2012 at 03:15:37PM -0400, bob wrote:
>
On Wed, Oct 3, 2012 at 5:22 AM, Simon Barnes wrote:
> The experimental mosh package, version 1.2.2-2, works very well while the
> "current" package 1.2.2-1 does not. Would it be possible to promote 1.2.2-2
> to current?
>
> Thanks
> Simon
>
>
> --
> Problem reports: http://cygwin.com/pro
Hi
man 1 rake
gzip: /usr/share/man/man1/rake.1.gz: unexpected end of file
Ciao
Volker
--
Problem reports: http://cygwin.com/problems.html
FAQ: http://cygwin.com/faq/
Documentation: http://cygwin.com/docs.html
Unsubscribe info: http://cygwin.com/ml/#u
On Tue, Oct 2, 2012 at 3:15 PM, bob wrote:
> While this hack works the performance under Cygwin is orders of
> magnitude slower than the equivalent Linux performance.
>
> Any suggestions on how we can achieve a higher performance blocking read on a
> Cygwin RDWR fifo?
>
You expect too much, it is
On 10/2/2012 5:55 PM, Christopher Faylor wrote:
On Tue, Oct 02, 2012 at 01:45:08PM -0700, Gregory M. Turner wrote:
On 10/2/2012 1:19 PM, Christopher Faylor wrote:
On Tue, Oct 02, 2012 at 03:15:37PM -0400, bob wrote:
Any suggestions on how we can achieve a higher performance blocking read on a
The experimental mosh package, version 1.2.2-2, works very well while the
"current" package 1.2.2-1 does not. Would it be possible to promote 1.2.2-2
to current?
Thanks
Simon
--
Problem reports: http://cygwin.com/problems.html
FAQ: http://cygwin.com/faq/
Documentation
Reini Urban writes:
> Looks a bit weird. Don't we have a better field for this cpan quirks?
> Like a new CPAN_DIR which defaults to CPAN_AUTHOR?
I've just added an alternative configuration variable CPAN_DIR that
records just the directory component and sent the patch (together with a
few more to
16 matches
Mail list logo