On Wed, Oct 03, 2012 at 02:58:55AM -0700, Gregory M. Turner wrote: >On 10/2/2012 5:55 PM, Christopher Faylor wrote: >>On Tue, Oct 02, 2012 at 01:45:08PM -0700, Gregory M. Turner wrote: >>>On 10/2/2012 1:19 PM, Christopher Faylor wrote: >>>>On Tue, Oct 02, 2012 at 03:15:37PM -0400, bob wrote: >>>>>Any suggestions on how we can achieve a higher performance blocking >>>>>read on a Cygwin RDWR fifo? >>>> >>>>As always, if you can provide test cases of bugs we will endeavor to >>>>fix problems. >>> >>>I didn't think the RDWR fifo's worked at all -- they certainly don't if >>>you create them via bash. >> >>If you want to submit an assignment I'll be happy to look at the patch. >>It is too big to be included without an assignment. See: >> >>http://cygwin.com/contrib.html >> >>FYI, a quick scan seems to show that you've pretty much undone a lot of >>what I've recently added for fifos so I don't expect to really be too >>keen on applying the patch. But, I don't want to spend too much time >>inspecting a change which can't yet be applied. > >Yeah, I'm aware of this; I'd be happy to assign -- I'm always easy when >it comes to IP stuff. FTR, that doesn't mean I expect this patch to go >in or even be looked at; I'd just like for it to be a non-issue in the >future. > >Is your tree available somewhere for perusal, Chris? Or is there some >way we could get a look at your WIP pipe/fifo deltas? I'm on >-developers and -patches if you want to change venues.
Maybe you are misinterpreting "What I've recently added". I made big changes to fifo handling in the last couple of Cygwin releases. That is what I was referring to. Otherwise, no, you can't look at my sandbox. cgf -- Problem reports: http://cygwin.com/problems.html FAQ: http://cygwin.com/faq/ Documentation: http://cygwin.com/docs.html Unsubscribe info: http://cygwin.com/ml/#unsubscribe-simple
