RE: CYGWIN as an acronym? (Was Re: Official List of Cygwin Acronyms)

2003-03-01 Thread Gary R. Van Sickle
"Cramming Your Gut With Indispensible Necessities" Thought that up all by myself. -- Gary R. Van Sickle Brewer. Patriot. > Hey, I just had a thought: if we have an expansion for ACRONYM, we should > really have an expansion for CYGWIN, something like "Coolness You Get > Where Initially None",

Was that the sound of a snapshot going off?

2003-03-01 Thread Christopher Faylor
Please try the latest cygwin snapshot and report any problems or successes here. The latest snapshot may be close to cygwin 1.3.21. It's a shame that 1.3.20 had problems. I was hoping that the 20 in the version was lucky. B seeing you. cgf -- Please use the resources at cygwin.com rather than

CYGWIN as an acronym? (Was Re: Official List of Cygwin Acronyms)

2003-03-01 Thread Igor Pechtchanski
Hey, I just had a thought: if we have an expansion for ACRONYM, we should really have an expansion for CYGWIN, something like "Coolness You Get Where Initially None", or "Can You Guess What's Implemented Next?"... Since I don't know how this one will stand with the powers-that-be (and the Cygwin co

Re: how to run a process from DOS within a cygwin .bat file

2003-03-01 Thread David Christensen
[EMAIL PROTECTED]: I knew that last one would stir up the pot... :-) David -- Unsubscribe info: http://cygwin.com/ml/#unsubscribe-simple Bug reporting: http://cygwin.com/bugs.html Documentation: http://cygwin.com/docs.html FAQ: http://cygwin.com/faq/

RE: how to run a process from DOS within a cygwin .bat file

2003-03-01 Thread Gary R. Van Sickle
> On Sat, 1 Mar 2003, Gary R. Van Sickle wrote: > > > > > 4. Writing technical documentation is not sexy, and is viewed as an > > > > inferior role. This drives people away from the skill. > > > > > > Hey! > > > > I'm with Josh on this one. Writing technical docs is *ubersexy*! Man, just >

RE: how to run a process from DOS within a cygwin .bat file

2003-03-01 Thread Igor Pechtchanski
On Sat, 1 Mar 2003, Gary R. Van Sickle wrote: > > > 4. Writing technical documentation is not sexy, and is viewed as an > > > inferior role. This drives people away from the skill. > > > > Hey! > > I'm with Josh on this one. Writing technical docs is *ubersexy*! Man, just > thinking about

RE: how to run a process from DOS within a cygwin .bat file

2003-03-01 Thread Gary R. Van Sickle
> > 4. Writing technical documentation is not sexy, and is viewed as an > > inferior role. This drives people away from the skill. > > Hey! > I'm with Josh on this one. Writing technical docs is *ubersexy*! Man, just thinking about it makes me SO HOT!! ;-) -- Gary R. Van Sickle Brewer.

Re: GPL Violation

2003-03-01 Thread Jon A. Lambert
Thanks for your thoughful arguments. However I am not the poster who is distributing fetchmail. I do distribute a version of gdbm with full sources though. J. Lambert - Original Message - From: "Christopher Faylor" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Cc: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Sent

Re: how to run a process from DOS within a cygwin .bat file

2003-03-01 Thread Randall R Schulz
Joshua, Hey!, indeed. David, while what you say may be true, it's just another example of the problem of sadly misplaced values. It's not that far off from the niggardly way teachers are compensated in the U.S. On the other hand, if you know how to manipulate human emotions to get lots of peop

Re: Avoid creation of DOS-console when running gdb in X11-xemacs

2003-03-01 Thread fenk
On Wednesday, February 26, 2003 at 16:52:51, I wrote: [...] > PS: Is there a way to teach GDB opening the program-file to debug > read-only, in order to be able to rebuilt it without > calling the "file" command twice, i.e. > "file", "make", "file myprog.exe" If I am not the only-one s

Re: Bug in dumper

2003-03-01 Thread Ronald Landheer-Cieslak
Just to set the record straight: none of the text I wrote is still in the mail below - yet my name is? Anyways, dumper works fine for me (on an NT/4 box with all the latest), which is what I told the original poster. I also told him to take a closer look at the exit code of dumper. I just don't

Re: AF_UNIX in current CVS

2003-03-01 Thread Steven O'Brien
On Sat, 1 Mar 2003 16:29:52 +0100, Corinna Vinschen wrote: > Should be solved now. Could you try the next snapshot, please? Thanks Corinna, X clients are working correctly again with the new snapshot. Steven -- Unsubscribe info: http://cygwin.com/ml/#unsubscribe-simple Bug reporting:

Re: how to run a process from DOS within a cygwin .bat file

2003-03-01 Thread Joshua Daniel Franklin
> 4. Writing technical documentation is not sexy, and is viewed as an > inferior role. This drives people away from the skill. Hey! -- Unsubscribe info: http://cygwin.com/ml/#unsubscribe-simple Bug reporting: http://cygwin.com/bugs.html Documentation: http://cygwin.com/

Re: Official List of Cygwin Acronyms

2003-03-01 Thread Ronald Landheer-Cieslak
Way cool! Some acronyms to add: OT - "Off Topic", the most-used acronym on this list (I think) PWBTC - "Patches will Be Thoughtfully Considered" (I think you have the trademark on this one, don't you?) WJM - "We're Just Mean" I've added it to my bookmarks - this will revolutionise the terseness

RE: how to run a process from DOS within a cygwin .bat file

2003-03-01 Thread Ronald Landheer-Cieslak
Tom, Have you typed $ man bash lately? IMHO, it is one of the most comprehensive man documents I know. I have never needed to read it until my eyes bled - probably because my eyes don't shed blood so easily, but I like to think it is also because the document(ation) is so clear. If you don't ag

Re: English speller to spell plain files

2003-03-01 Thread Alex Vinokur
"Igor Pechtchanski" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote in message news:[EMAIL PROTECTED] [snip] > > Try "aspell -l -c < file.txt". BTW, this is just an educated guess -- I > don't have aspell, so can't check. > Igor > -- Thanks, aspell -l < file.txt // works fine. cat file.txt | aspell -l // wor

Re: Official List of Cygwin Acronyms

2003-03-01 Thread Randall R Schulz
At 05:52 2003-03-01, Igor Pechtchanski wrote: On Sat, 1 Mar 2003, Max Bowsher wrote: > Igor Pechtchanski wrote: > > Everyone, > > > > The OLOCA [Official List of Cygwin Acronyms] is available for the > > referral of newbies and your perusal from your friendly neighborhood > > CKOA [Cygwin Keeper o

Re: Donate a [aip]spell package? (was Re: English speller to spell plain files)

2003-03-01 Thread Christopher Faylor
On Sat, Mar 01, 2003 at 09:40:52AM -0500, Ajay Simha wrote: >On Fri Feb 28 16:53:20 2003, Christopher Faylor wrote: >> On Fri, Feb 28, 2003 at 04:08:49PM -0500, Ajay Simha wrote: >> >On Fri Feb 28 12:03:38 2003, Christopher Faylor wrote: >> >> Is anyone interested in donating a ?spell package to cy

Re: sed 4.0.5 regexp problem

2003-03-01 Thread Corinna Vinschen
On Fri, Feb 28, 2003 at 03:37:33PM -0800, Berger David-MGI2063 wrote: > The following should be equivalent, they no longer are: > > echo 'T _atan2' | sed -e 's/^T\W*\(\w*\)/FuncSymbol(\1),/ > > echo 'T _atan2' | sed -e 's/^T[[:space:]]*\([[:alnum:]_]*\)/FuncSymbol(\1),/ > > The first

Re: AF_UNIX in current CVS

2003-03-01 Thread Corinna Vinschen
On Sat, Mar 01, 2003 at 08:53:18AM +, Steven O'Brien wrote: > The new snapshot, 28 Feb 03 DOES have this problem. Should be solved now. Could you try the next snapshot, please? Corinna -- Corinna Vinschen Please, send mails regarding Cygwin to Cygwin Developer

Re: Donate a [aip]spell package? (was Re: English speller to spell plain files)

2003-03-01 Thread Max Bowsher
Ajay Simha wrote: > On Fri Feb 28 16:53:20 2003, Christopher Faylor wrote: >> On Fri, Feb 28, 2003 at 04:08:49PM -0500, Ajay Simha wrote: >>> On Fri Feb 28 12:03:38 2003, Christopher Faylor wrote: Is anyone interested in donating a ?spell package to cygwin? It is an obvious lack in the c

Re: Donate a [aip]spell package? (was Re: English speller to spell plain files)

2003-03-01 Thread Ajay Simha
On Fri Feb 28 16:53:20 2003, Christopher Faylor wrote: > On Fri, Feb 28, 2003 at 04:08:49PM -0500, Ajay Simha wrote: > >On Fri Feb 28 12:03:38 2003, Christopher Faylor wrote: > >> Is anyone interested in donating a ?spell package to cygwin? It is an > >> obvious lack in the current package offerin

Re: English speller to spell plain files

2003-03-01 Thread Ajay Simha
On Sat Mar 01 09:06:11 2003, Igor Pechtchanski wrote: > On Sat, 1 Mar 2003, Alex Vinokur wrote: > > > - Original Message - > > From: "Andrew Markebo" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > > To: "Alex Vinokur" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > > Sent: Saturday, March 01, 2003 12:13 PM > > Subject: Re: English speller

Re: English speller to spell plain files

2003-03-01 Thread Igor Pechtchanski
On Sat, 1 Mar 2003, Alex Vinokur wrote: > - Original Message - > From: "Andrew Markebo" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > To: "Alex Vinokur" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > Sent: Saturday, March 01, 2003 12:13 PM > Subject: Re: English speller to spell plain files > > > > / "Alex Vinokur" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wr

Re: Official List of Cygwin Acronyms

2003-03-01 Thread Igor Pechtchanski
On Sat, 1 Mar 2003, Max Bowsher wrote: > Igor Pechtchanski wrote: > > Everyone, > > > > The OLOCA [Official List of Cygwin Acronyms] is available for the > > referral of newbies and your perusal from your friendly neighborhood > > CKOA [Cygwin Keeper of Acronyms] at .

Re: English speller to spell plain files

2003-03-01 Thread Alex Vinokur
- Original Message - From: "Andrew Markebo" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: "Alex Vinokur" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Sent: Saturday, March 01, 2003 12:13 PM Subject: Re: English speller to spell plain files > / "Alex Vinokur" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > [...] > > | > | I want aspell to print a list

Re: English speller to spell plain files

2003-03-01 Thread Alex Vinokur
"Thorsten Kampe" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote in message news:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > * Alex Vinokur (03-02-28 06:26 +0100) > > Is there any English speller in Cygwin to spell plain files from command line ? > > Aspell > Thanks. = Windows 2000 Aspell 0.50.3 alpha. = I w

Re: AF_UNIX in current CVS

2003-03-01 Thread Steven O'Brien
On Fri, 28 Feb 2003 19:36:38 +, Steven O'Brien wrote: > $ XWin :0 & > $ xclock -display :0 > > The clock does not appear, at least I gave up waiting after 7 minutes; > control-c to get the prompt back. But if you try: > > $ xclock -display localhost:0 > > then the clock appears immediately

Re: Official List of Cygwin Acronyms

2003-03-01 Thread Max Bowsher
Igor Pechtchanski wrote: > Everyone, > > The OLOCA [Official List of Cygwin Acronyms] is available for the > referral > of newbies and your perusal from your friendly neighborhood CKOA > [Cygwin Keeper of Acronyms] at . Hey! You misspelt my name! Max Bowsher.