Re: Validates failures on Mac OS X AND Linux

2009-11-16 Thread Ian Lynagh
On Tue, Nov 10, 2009 at 08:55:45AM +, Simon Marlow wrote: > > Perhaps some floating-point weirdness. The test is > > testSin f g = [ (f x == g x) | x <- [0,0.01 .. 1] ] > > and it looks like it is returning a list of different length on Leopard. It looks to me like the list is the same length

Re: Validates failures on Mac OS X AND Linux

2009-11-11 Thread Manuel M T Chakravarty
I fixed the locale issue. The driver script was only looking for locales containing the string UTF8, but on Mac OS, it's UTF-8. Manuel > On 10/11/2009 00:13, Manuel M T Chakravarty wrote: >> Simon Marlow: On Leopard, the lists is still longer: > Unexpected failures: > 2302(n

Re: Validates failures on Mac OS X AND Linux

2009-11-10 Thread Simon Marlow
On 10/11/2009 00:13, Manuel M T Chakravarty wrote: Simon Marlow: On Leopard, the lists is still longer: Unexpected failures: 2302(normal) 2816(ghci) T1969(normal) T3294(normal) conc070(ghci) ffi005(normal) ghci028(ghci) print021(ghci) How are the others failing, can you post the output? I

Re: Validates failures on Mac OS X AND Linux

2009-11-09 Thread Manuel M T Chakravarty
Simon Marlow: On Leopard, the lists is still longer: Unexpected failures: 2302(normal) 2816(ghci) T1969(normal) T3294(normal) conc070(ghci) ffi005(normal) ghci028(ghci) print021(ghci) How are the others failing, can you post the output? I attach the error messages of all failures of the HEA

Re: Validates failures on Mac OS X AND Linux

2009-11-06 Thread Roman Leshchinskiy
On 06/11/2009, at 03:24, Simon Marlow wrote: conc070(ghci) Sorry to nag again, but this one eats 100% of my CPU and doesn't terminate on my Leopard machine which means that I can't validate with the IO manager patches. Roman ___ Cvs-ghc maili

Re: Validates failures on Mac OS X AND Linux

2009-11-04 Thread Manuel M T Chakravarty
Am 04/11/2009 um 22:03 schrieb Simon Marlow: On 04/11/2009 02:14, Manuel M T Chakravarty wrote: Simon Peyton-Jones: I've pushed a fix for the ones marked * Apart from that, only T1969 (a delicate resource test) fails for me. | Unexpected failures: | Base1(normal) * | Compose(normal) * | PLi

Re: Validates failures on Mac OS X AND Linux

2009-11-04 Thread Simon Marlow
On 04/11/2009 02:14, Manuel M T Chakravarty wrote: Simon Peyton-Jones: I've pushed a fix for the ones marked * Apart from that, only T1969 (a delicate resource test) fails for me. | Unexpected failures: | Base1(normal) * | Compose(normal) * | PList1(normal) * | PList2(normal) * | T1969(normal)

Re: Validates failures on Mac OS X AND Linux

2009-11-03 Thread Manuel M T Chakravarty
Simon Peyton-Jones: I've pushed a fix for the ones marked * Apart from that, only T1969 (a delicate resource test) fails for me. | Unexpected failures: | Base1(normal) * | Compose(normal) * | PList1(normal) * | PList2(normal) * | T1969(normal) | T3007(normal) |

Re: Validates failures on Mac OS X AND Linux

2009-11-03 Thread Simon Marlow
On 03/11/2009 13:10, Simon Marlow wrote: On 03/11/2009 13:04, Simon Peyton-Jones wrote: | Can I remind people that T1969 is there for a good reason: when it | wobbles, it may indicate a performance regression. We should keep the | boundaries updated so that people don't just ignore it as a matte

Re: Validates failures on Mac OS X AND Linux

2009-11-03 Thread Simon Marlow
On 03/11/2009 13:04, Simon Peyton-Jones wrote: | Can I remind people that T1969 is there for a good reason: when it | wobbles, it may indicate a performance regression. We should keep the | boundaries updated so that people don't just ignore it as a matter of | course. | | I realise it's difficu

RE: Validates failures on Mac OS X AND Linux

2009-11-03 Thread Simon Peyton-Jones
| Can I remind people that T1969 is there for a good reason: when it | wobbles, it may indicate a performance regression. We should keep the | boundaries updated so that people don't just ignore it as a matter of | course. | | I realise it's difficult to keep it updated because it has to be done

Re: Validates failures on Mac OS X AND Linux

2009-11-03 Thread Simon Marlow
On 31/10/2009 12:21, Manuel M T Chakravarty wrote: Out of curiosity, I just validated on Linux (on some flavour of 32-bit Debian), too — it doesn't look much better: Unexpected failures: Base1(normal) Compose(normal) PList1(normal) PList2(normal) T1969(normal) T3007(normal) T3294(normal) boxy(no

RE: Validates failures on Mac OS X AND Linux

2009-11-03 Thread Simon Peyton-Jones
I've pushed a fix for the ones marked * Apart from that, only T1969 (a delicate resource test) fails for me. | Unexpected failures: | Base1(normal) * | Compose(normal) * | PList1(normal) * | PList2(normal) * | T1969(normal) | T3007(normal) | T3294(normal) |

Re: Validates failures on Mac OS X AND Linux

2009-10-31 Thread Manuel M T Chakravarty
Out of curiosity, I just validated on Linux (on some flavour of 32-bit Debian), too — it doesn't look much better: Unexpected failures: Base1(normal) Compose(normal) PList1(normal) PList2(normal) T1969(normal) T3007(normal) T3294(normal) boxy(normal) break008(ghci)

Validates failures on Mac OS X

2009-10-31 Thread Manuel M T Chakravarty
Today, I am getting 17 failures in validate: Unexpected failures: 2302(normal) 2816(ghci) Base1(normal) Compose(normal) PList1(normal) PList2(normal) T1969(normal) T3294(normal) boxy(normal) ffi005(normal) ghci028(ghci) print021(ghci) print033(ghci) simpl