On 23/09/2010 01:41, Isaac Dupree wrote:
On 09/22/10 03:26, Simon Peyton-Jones wrote:
I think we are making a bit of a mountain out of a mole hill here.
It's not even as if 'vector' was in a terrible state; we intend to
kick off the HP process for it shortly, so it soon will be a HP package.
I
On 09/22/10 03:26, Simon Peyton-Jones wrote:
I think we are making a bit of a mountain out of a mole hill here. It's not
even as if 'vector' was in a terrible state; we intend to kick off the HP
process for it shortly, so it soon will be a HP package.
I suggest that it might be simpler just t
Simon Peyton-Jones:
> | I think using a different package name is a reasonable compromise.
> | Personally, I think "dph-vector" or "ghc-vector" would be sufficiently
> | explicit to show that it is not a HP sanctioned package, but I could live
> | with something slightly more obscure, too.
>
> I r
| * Release 7.0 including DPH using the new library that is based on
| vector.
OK let's do that then.
Roman: the consequence is that pushing your patches is now very urgent. Ian is
going to start making the release candidate in 24 hrs or so.
| I think using a different package name is a reas
Duncan Coutts:
> On 22 September 2010 02:05Duncan Coutts wrote:
>> On 22 September 2010 01:32, Manuel M T Chakravarty
>> wrote:
>>
Manuel: would you like to talk to Ben, Gabi, Roman, and decide what you'd
like us to do for the release. Specifically:
- Release with DPH, or
On 22 September 2010 02:05Duncan Coutts wrote:
> On 22 September 2010 01:32, Manuel M T Chakravarty
> wrote:
>
>>> Manuel: would you like to talk to Ben, Gabi, Roman, and decide what you'd
>>> like us to do for the release. Specifically:
>>>
>>> - Release with DPH, or rely on 'cabal install dp
On 22 September 2010 01:32, Manuel M T Chakravarty wrote:
>> Manuel: would you like to talk to Ben, Gabi, Roman, and decide what you'd
>> like us to do for the release. Specifically:
>>
>> - Release with DPH, or rely on 'cabal install dph'?
>> - Push the new refactoring into the branch; or not?
Simon wrote,
> Manuel: would you like to talk to Ben, Gabi, Roman, and decide what you'd
> like us to do for the release. Specifically:
>
> - Release with DPH, or rely on 'cabal install dph'?
> - Push the new refactoring into the branch; or not?
Below I attach a summary of our Tuesday Skype
