On Fri, 17 Jan 2025 23:08:20 GMT, Vladimir Ivanov wrote:
> The HashMap for caching was deleted. Now it use only ThreadLocal variable
> without synchronization.
> According to the specjvm2008::xml.transform workload the performance for low
> threads counts was not affected and improved for high
On Fri, 14 Mar 2025 18:35:22 GMT, Joe Wang wrote:
>> Add public identifiers to the JDK built-in Catalog; Replace the incorrect
>> Schema 1.1 DTD files (note the Public Identifier at line 2) with the correct
>> Shema 1.0 DTDs.
>
> Joe Wang has updated the pull request incrementally with one addi
On Tue, 18 Mar 2025 18:50:24 GMT, Roger Riggs wrote:
> The XMLSchema.dtd changes the referenced version from the 2009 version to the
> 2001 version. Is that intentional.
Yes. Note the Public Identifier: "-//W3C//DTD XSD 1.1//EN" vs "-//W3C//DTD
XMLSCHEMA 200102//EN" at line 2. The 2009 version
On Tue, 18 Mar 2025 18:37:17 GMT, Alexey Semenyuk wrote:
>> Follow up code cleanup for https://github.com/openjdk/jdk/pull/23936 PR.
>>
>> Details on cleanup actions are given in commit descriptions.
>
> @justin-curtis-lu PTAL. Is it a valid assumption that removing property keys
> from the mai
On Fri, 14 Mar 2025 11:15:26 GMT, Matthias Baesken wrote:
> On Linux there are some special settings for LIBVERIFY_OPTIMIZATION that are
> most likely not needed any more and could be removed.
> The removal (on Linux) brings the lib optimization level de facto from LOW to
> HIGH.
This pull req
On Fri, 14 Mar 2025 11:15:26 GMT, Matthias Baesken wrote:
> On Linux there are some special settings for LIBVERIFY_OPTIMIZATION that are
> most likely not needed any more and could be removed.
> The removal (on Linux) brings the lib optimization level de facto from LOW to
> HIGH.
Thanks for th
On Fri, 14 Mar 2025 15:49:44 GMT, Magnus Ihse Bursie wrote:
> We should allow pre-built JVMs to be included in a build, so they are just
> copied into place, and the jvm.cfg file properly updated.
make/modules/java.base/Copy.gmk line 128:
> 126: $(foreach import_jvm, $(IMPORT_JVM_NAMES), \
>
On Fri, 14 Mar 2025 15:49:44 GMT, Magnus Ihse Bursie wrote:
> We should allow pre-built JVMs to be included in a build, so they are just
> copied into place, and the jvm.cfg file properly updated.
If we want to support CDS archives for the imported JVMs, then we would need to
modify the loop i
On Tue, 18 Mar 2025 13:09:10 GMT, Erik Joelsson wrote:
> If we want to support CDS archives for the imported JVMs, then we would need
> to modify the loop in Images.gmk so that it covers them as well. I think that
> makes sense to do.
Yes, I agree. That, and importing the whole directory, is t
> After "JDK-8339480: Build static-jdk image with a statically linked launcher"
> AIX was not able to build the new target. Therefore with "JDK-8345590 AIX
> 'make all' fails after JDK-8339480" the new target was disabled again.
>
> Now with this change we can enable the statically linked launch
> Hi all,
>
> please review this change that implements (currently Draft) JEP: G1:
> Improve Application Throughput with a More Efficient Write-Barrier.
>
> The reason for posting this early is that this is a large change, and the JEP
> process is already taking very long with no end in sight
> Please review a tiny fix in the ForkJoinPool. Since JDK 9 (JDK-8134852 [1])
> in one case when TC subfield in ctl field is decremented, the applied masking
> (UMASK, upper bits) may not preserve neighbor RC subfield sometimes. In JDKs
> prior to 19 FJP may stop executing tasks, which requires
On Thu, 13 Mar 2025 13:34:51 GMT, Dmitry Chuyko wrote:
> Please review a tiny fix in the ForkJoinPool. Since JDK 9 (JDK-8134852 [1])
> in one case when TC subfield in ctl field is decremented, the applied masking
> (UMASK, upper bits) may not preserve neighbor RC subfield sometimes. In JDKs
>
On Thu, 13 Mar 2025 16:21:07 GMT, Maurizio Cimadamore
wrote:
>> Quan Anh Mai has updated the pull request incrementally with one additional
>> commit since the last revision:
>>
>> expand wildcard imports
>
> Marked as reviewed by mcimadamore (Reviewer).
@mcimadamore @JornVernee Thanks a lo
On Tue, 18 Mar 2025 10:44:46 GMT, Joachim Kern wrote:
>> Ups, thank you for giving me the 'S'. But nevertheless if I make with
>> `make all LOG=info` an `$(info generate_export_list:
>> $(generate_export_list))` still shows an empty list
>
> I did not get the SetupExecute to function, even if I
On Mon, 17 Mar 2025 09:10:50 GMT, Alan Bateman wrote:
> The discussion on jdk-dev was useful but I don't think adding
> --with-import-jvms is the right direction. It's too fragile and loose to
> import from a build created somewhere else.
Why's that? It's more loose than just "importing" a jtr
On Fri, 14 Mar 2025 15:49:44 GMT, Magnus Ihse Bursie wrote:
> We should allow pre-built JVMs to be included in a build, so they are just
> copied into place, and the jvm.cfg file properly updated.
And to be absolutely clear: this PR is just about adding new functionality that
was not present b
Follow up code cleanup for https://github.com/openjdk/jdk/pull/23936 PR.
Details on cleanup actions are given in commit descriptions.
-
Commit messages:
- Update copyright year
- "message.version-string-too-many-components" ID is not used
- Remove dead code. ERR_NoJreInstallerName
On Fri, 6 Dec 2024 16:30:47 GMT, Quan Anh Mai wrote:
> Hi,
>
> This patch improves the performance of a typical `Arena::allocate` in several
> ways:
>
> - Delay the creation of the NativeMemorySegmentImpl. This avoids the merge of
> the instance with the one obtained from the call in the unco
On Fri, 14 Mar 2025 15:41:56 GMT, Joachim Kern wrote:
> After "JDK-8339480: Build static-jdk image with a statically linked launcher"
> AIX was not able to build the new target. Therefore with "JDK-8345590 AIX
> 'make all' fails after JDK-8339480" the new target was disabled again.
>
> Now wit
On Tue, 18 Mar 2025 13:12:16 GMT, Magnus Ihse Bursie wrote:
>> make/modules/java.base/Copy.gmk line 128:
>>
>>> 126: $(foreach import_jvm, $(IMPORT_JVM_NAMES), \
>>> 127: $(eval $(import_jvm)_path := $(patsubst $(import_jvm):%,%,$(filter
>>> $(import_jvm):%, $(IMPORT_JVMS \
>>> 128:
On Tue, 18 Mar 2025 18:11:36 GMT, Alexey Semenyuk wrote:
> Fix a typo.
@sashamatveev PTAL
-
PR Comment: https://git.openjdk.org/jdk/pull/24101#issuecomment-2734354464
Fix a typo.
-
Commit messages:
- 8352293: jpackage tests build rpm packages on Ubuntu test machines after
JDK-8351372
Changes: https://git.openjdk.org/jdk/pull/24101/files
Webrev: https://webrevs.openjdk.org/?repo=jdk&pr=24101&range=00
Issue: https://bugs.openjdk.org/browse/JDK
On Tue, 18 Mar 2025 15:25:40 GMT, Alexey Semenyuk wrote:
> Follow up code cleanup for https://github.com/openjdk/jdk/pull/23936 PR.
>
> Details on cleanup actions are given in commit descriptions.
@sashamatveev PTAL
-
PR Comment: https://git.openjdk.org/jdk/pull/24099#issuecomment
On Tue, 18 Mar 2025 15:25:40 GMT, Alexey Semenyuk wrote:
> Follow up code cleanup for https://github.com/openjdk/jdk/pull/23936 PR.
>
> Details on cleanup actions are given in commit descriptions.
Looks good.
-
Marked as reviewed by almatvee (Reviewer).
PR Review: https://git.ope
On Tue, 18 Mar 2025 18:11:36 GMT, Alexey Semenyuk wrote:
> Fix a typo.
This pull request has now been integrated.
Changeset: c8a11f28
Author:Alexey Semenyuk
URL:
https://git.openjdk.org/jdk/commit/c8a11f28dff58382f943b3615ca8c7e33d6eab8e
Stats: 1 line in 1 file changed: 0 ins; 0
On Fri, 14 Mar 2025 18:35:22 GMT, Joe Wang wrote:
>> Add public identifiers to the JDK built-in Catalog; Replace the incorrect
>> Schema 1.1 DTD files (note the Public Identifier at line 2) with the correct
>> Shema 1.0 DTDs.
>
> Joe Wang has updated the pull request incrementally with one addi
On Tue, 18 Mar 2025 18:57:04 GMT, Jiangli Zhou wrote:
> Please review this PR that adds `@requires !jdk.static` to tests, thanks.
>
> - runtime/StackGap/TestStackGap.java
> - runtime/StackGuardPages/TestStackGuardPages.java
> - runtime/TLS/TestTLS.java
> - runtime/jni/daemonDestroy/TestDaemonDes
On Tue, 18 Mar 2025 19:05:32 GMT, Roger Riggs wrote:
>> Joe Wang has updated the pull request incrementally with one additional
>> commit since the last revision:
>>
>> update the test: change variables and etc.
>
> test/jaxp/javax/xml/jaxp/unittest/common/jdkcatalog/JDKCatalogTest.java line
> Add public identifiers to the JDK built-in Catalog; Replace the incorrect
> Schema 1.1 DTD files (note the Public Identifier at line 2) with the correct
> Schema 1.0 DTDs. The JDK built-in Catalog contains Schema 1.0 files only.
>
> DTD files: the Schema 1.1 files, XMLSchema.dtd and datatypes.
On Wed, 19 Mar 2025 00:29:49 GMT, David Holmes wrote:
> @jianglizhou shouldn't these native executables be built differently to work
> with the static JDK? Otherwise how does a user create a native executable
> that launches the JVM?
I think it's the case of using customized launcher and we ne
On Tue, 18 Mar 2025 15:25:40 GMT, Alexey Semenyuk wrote:
> Follow up code cleanup for https://github.com/openjdk/jdk/pull/23936 PR.
>
> Details on cleanup actions are given in commit descriptions.
This pull request has now been integrated.
Changeset: 8e530633
Author:Alexey Semenyuk
URL:
On Thu, 13 Mar 2025 15:22:43 GMT, Per Minborg wrote:
>> Implement JEP 502.
>>
>> The PR passes tier1-tier3 tests.
>
> Per Minborg has updated the pull request with a new target base due to a
> merge or a rebase. The pull request now contains 246 commits:
>
> - Merge branch 'master' into imple
On Fri, 14 Mar 2025 18:35:22 GMT, Joe Wang wrote:
>> Add public identifiers to the JDK built-in Catalog; Replace the incorrect
>> Schema 1.1 DTD files (note the Public Identifier at line 2) with the correct
>> Shema 1.0 DTDs.
>
> Joe Wang has updated the pull request incrementally with one addi
On Sun, 16 Mar 2025 02:54:36 GMT, Ioi Lam wrote:
> This PR tries to cut down the use of `WhiteBox` in the HotSpot test cases. It
> modifies `VMProps` to save the set of VM properties into a file called
> "vm.properties" under Jtreg's work directory. The new API
> `jdk.test.lib.VMPropsGetter` l
On Tue, 18 Mar 2025 18:57:04 GMT, Jiangli Zhou wrote:
> Please review this PR that adds `@requires !jdk.static` to tests, thanks.
>
> - runtime/StackGap/TestStackGap.java
> - runtime/StackGuardPages/TestStackGuardPages.java
> - runtime/TLS/TestTLS.java
> - runtime/jni/daemonDestroy/TestDaemonDes
On Fri, 7 Mar 2025 23:17:53 GMT, Kim Barrett wrote:
> Please review this revision of a previously puzzling comment intending to
> provide the rationale for a bit of non-obvious code.
This pull request has now been integrated.
Changeset: 355b2f3b
Author:Kim Barrett
URL:
https://git.o
Automate setting up an environment for mac signing tests: create keychain(s),
self-signing certificates, and register them in the system.
To set up the environment, run `make test-only
TEST=test/jdk/tools/jpackage/macosx/base/SigningBase.java
JTREG=JAVA_OPTIONS=-Djpackage.test.SignEnv=setup` co
On Tue, 18 Mar 2025 18:26:09 GMT, Roger Riggs wrote:
>> Joe Wang has updated the pull request incrementally with one additional
>> commit since the last revision:
>>
>> update the test: change variables and etc.
>
> src/java.xml/share/classes/jdk/xml/internal/jdkcatalog/w3c/dtd/schema10/XMLSc
On Tue, 18 Mar 2025 18:11:36 GMT, Alexey Semenyuk wrote:
> Fix a typo.
Looks good.
-
Marked as reviewed by almatvee (Reviewer).
PR Review: https://git.openjdk.org/jdk/pull/24101#pullrequestreview-2696339103
On Mon, 17 Mar 2025 17:22:10 GMT, Kim Barrett wrote:
>> Please review this revision of a previously puzzling comment intending to
>> provide the rationale for a bit of non-obvious code.
>
> Kim Barrett has updated the pull request incrementally with one additional
> commit since the last revisio
Please review this PR that adds `@requires !jdk.static` to tests, thanks.
- runtime/StackGap/TestStackGap.java
- runtime/StackGuardPages/TestStackGuardPages.java
- runtime/TLS/TestTLS.java
- runtime/jni/daemonDestroy/TestDaemonDestroy.java
- runtime/jni/getCreatedJavaVMs/TestGetCreatedJavaVMs.java
On Tue, 18 Mar 2025 15:25:40 GMT, Alexey Semenyuk wrote:
> Follow up code cleanup for https://github.com/openjdk/jdk/pull/23936 PR.
>
> Details on cleanup actions are given in commit descriptions.
@justin-curtis-lu PTAL. Is it a valid assumption that removing property keys
from the main L10N p
On Fri, 14 Mar 2025 18:35:22 GMT, Joe Wang wrote:
>> Add public identifiers to the JDK built-in Catalog; Replace the incorrect
>> Schema 1.1 DTD files (note the Public Identifier at line 2) with the correct
>> Shema 1.0 DTDs.
>
> Joe Wang has updated the pull request incrementally with one addi
44 matches
Mail list logo
