imply
lists of source & header files to generate. You need to use them in a
target in order for CMake to cause them to be generated.
E.g.
add_executable(foo foo.cc ${PROTO_SRCS} ${PROTO_HDRS})
target_link_libraries(foo ${PROTOBUF_LIBRARIES})
Hope that solves your problem.
--
Phili
ges before they are pushed to next
though (mainly to prevent people from breaking things).
--
Philip Lowman
___
Powered by www.kitware.com
Visit other Kitware open-source projects at
http://www.kitware.com/opensource/opensource.html
Please keep messa
> aaron.mead...@thomsonreuters.com
> thomsonreuters.com
>
> ___
> Powered by www.kitware.com
>
> Visit other Kitware open-source projects at
> http://www.kitware.com/opensource/opensource.html
>
> Please keep messages on
"libboost".
By default FindBoost searches for shared libraries since this matches CMake
default behavior on Unix platforms.
If you want FindBoost to search for static libraries instead, simply set:
set(Boost_USE_STATIC_LIBS ON)
--
Philip Lowman
___
Kitware open-source projects at
> http://www.kitware.com/opensource/opensource.html
>
> Please keep messages on-topic and check the CMake FAQ at:
> http://www.cmake.org/Wiki/CMake_FAQ
>
> Follow this link to subscribe/unsubscribe:
> http://www.cmake.org/mailman/listinfo/cmake
>
to take an issue raised on the mailing list
and force it into the bug tracker. It seems a little rude to the person
that emailed about the issue because you might be asking them to deal with
the rigmarole of creating a mantis account when they already went through
the hassle of joining the
On Sunday, December 5, 2010, Hicham Mouline wrote:
> I've built both win32 and x64 versions of boost thread library with the
> following 2 lines:
>
> 1. 32bit cl.exe from msvc9 directory in the %PATH%
> bjam --with-thread --layout=versioned toolset=msvc address-model=64
> variant=release link=st
>
> Please keep messages on-topic and check the CMake FAQ at:
> http://www.cmake.org/Wiki/CMake_FAQ
>
> Follow this link to subscribe/unsubscribe:
> http://www.cmake.org/mailman/listinfo/cmake
>
--
Philip Lowman
___
Powered by www.
nclude what the filenames look like when generated by
visual studio?
If you want to try to patch FindBoost yourself, please make sure
you're playing with the version from 2.8.3.
http://www.cmake.org/Bug
--
Philip Lowman
___
Powered by www.kitware.com
u could try something like this:
include(CheckTypeSize)
CHECK_TYPE_SIZE(void* SIZEOF_PTR)
message("size of pointer = ${SIZEOF_PTR}")
Then if SIZEOF_PTR is 4, you would set BOOST_LIBRARYDIR to be
${BOOST_ROOT}/lib32 and if it is 8, you set it to ${BOOST_ROOT}/lib64.
--
Philip Lowman
___
#x27;ll need to explicitly specify the libraries during compile
time to resolve those symbols and produce a binary as far as I know.
I'm not sure why you're using add_custom_target() when you could just use
add_executable() and target_link_libraries(), but I doubt this has anything
to do w
e?
>
>
> Best Regards,
>
> --
> Kevyn-Alexandre Paré
>
> ___
> Powered by www.kitware.com
>
> Visit other Kitware open-source projects at
> http://www.kitware.com/opensource/opensource.ht
gt; Please keep messages on-topic and check the CMake FAQ at:
> http://www.cmake.org/Wiki/CMake_FAQ
>
> Follow this link to subscribe/unsubscribe:
> http://www.cmake.org/mailman/listinfo/cmake
>
--
Philip Lowman
___
Powered by www.kitware.
On Sun, Nov 7, 2010 at 8:29 PM, Luigi Calori wrote:
> On 07/11/2010 21.01, Philip Lowman wrote:
>
> On Fri, Nov 5, 2010 at 12:08 PM, Luigi Calori wrote:
>
>> +1 for FindBoost support to "CMakeified" version of Boost at "
>>> http://gitorious.org/~de
ould probably have to be an extended form of the find_library(),
find_path(), etc. commands.
--
Philip Lowman
___
Powered by www.kitware.com
Visit other Kitware open-source projects at
http://www.kitware.com/opensource/opensource.html
Please keep mess
in a bug report what does and doesn't work between
FindBoost.cmake and the branch of Boost that you're referring to and I would
be more than happy to look into the issue. I've heard reports of people
getting FindBoost and CMakeified boost to play nice together but it involved
changing build
(nearly all
users will want it to be OFF)
Boost_USE_STATIC_RUNTIME
--
Philip Lowman
___
Powered by www.kitware.com
Visit other Kitware open-source projects at
http://www.kitware.com/opensource/opensource.html
Please keep messages on-topic and check the CMake FAQ
>
>
>
> ___
> Powered by www.kitware.com
>
> Visit other Kitware open-source projects at
> http://www.kitware.com/opensource/opensource.html
>
> Please keep messages on-topic and check the CMake FAQ at:
> http://www.c
VERBATIM)
>
> CMake never knows that the file boom.txt is written, and therefor can't
> clean it away.
I think this is a bit of a red herring. CMake could be perfectly capable of
cleaning up after itself (i.e. its own files).
If the user is doing things like making a b
r (it would help for both use-cases you specify). This is
kind of related to my ticket asking for a distclean target, so I'll just
throw it out there in case anyone has some free time on their hands.
http://www.cmake.org/Bug/view.php?id=6647
--
Philip Lowman
is
redundant so if there are more RC's for CMake 2.8.3, I plan on removing it
and just counting on if the user has defined Boost_USE_STATIC_RUNTIME or not
(regardless if they set it ON or OFF) to disable the "double" search on
WIN32.
--
Philip Lowman
___
for the compiler and run that.
My time is really limited. If you're interested, please create a new ticket
and submit a patch. It would save probably at least a second off of an
initial configure.
--
Philip Lowman
___
Powered by www.kitware.com
Vi
ressed in this message are those of the individual sender,
> except where the sender specifically states them to be the views of Thomson
> Reuters.
>
> ___
> Powered by www.kitware.com
>
> Visit other Ki
we need to fix 6399 first.
For now I would just recommend adding the target_link_library manually
against pthreads when you're using it and ensure we have a bug filed for
this issue in the tracker.
On Fri, Sep 10, 2010 at 1:29 PM, Matthew Woehlke <
matthew.woeh...@kitware.com> wrote:
&g
Hi everyone,
I'm volunteering to become the primary maintainer of FindBoost.cmake.
--
Philip Lowman
___
Powered by www.kitware.com
Visit other Kitware open-source projects at
http://www.kitware.com/opensource/opensource.html
Please keep messag
nd on supporting find modules, so if anyone wants to take this over... It
was one approach for how to solve the version number problem...
http://www.cmake.org/Bug/view.php?id=8396
--
Philip Lowman
___
Powered by www.kitware.com
Visit other Kitw
38 AM, Michael Wild wrote:
>
> On 8. Sep, 2010, at 8:25 , Philip Lowman wrote:
>
> > Let's say I have many different potential names for a library and the
> > following filesystem
> >
> > /usr/lib/libnspr4.so
> > ${CMAKE_CURRENT_SOURCE_DIR}/libnspr4a.so
&g
lib/libnspr4.so
${CMAKE_CURRENT_SOURCE_DIR}/libnspr4a.so
/usr/lib/libnspr4a.so
This is with CMake 2.8.2
--
Philip Lowman
___
Powered by www.kitware.com
Visit other Kitware open-source projects at
http://www.kitware.com/opensource/opensource.html
Please keep messages on-topi
>
> ___
> Powered by www.kitware.com
>
> Visit other Kitware open-source projects at
> http://www.kitware.com/opensource/opensource.html
>
> Please keep messages on-topic and check the CMake FAQ at:
> http://www.cmake.org/Wiki/CMake_FA
is for other projects at:
>>
>> http://www.cmake.org/Bug/roadmap_page.php
>>
>>
>
> ___
> cmake-developers mailing list
> cmake-develop...@cmake.org
> http://public.kitware.com/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cmake-developers
c15
HTH
--
Philip Lowman
___
Powered by www.kitware.com
Visit other Kitware open-source projects at
http://www.kitware.com/opensource/opensource.html
Please keep messages on-topic and check the CMake FAQ at:
http://www.cmake.org/Wiki/CMake_FAQ
Fol
om
>
> Visit other Kitware open-source projects at
> http://www.kitware.com/opensource/opensource.html
>
> Please keep messages on-topic and check the CMake FAQ at:
> http://www.cmake.org/Wiki/CMake_FAQ
>
> Follow this link to subscribe/unsubscribe:
> http://www.cmake.org/ma
4.1" "1.34.0" "1.34" "1.33.1" "1.33.0" "1.33")
>
>
>
> Maybe there’s a pre-release checklist of items that get updated before each
> list that this can be added to. It looks like this variable will need to be
> constantly updated. A
it's highly undocumented...
>
It doesn't appear like there is a class for storing the test results before
serializing the XML document to a file. Sounds like that's what would have
to be written.
cmCTestTestHandler::GenerateDartOutput
Looks like it may be a place to start?
--
Phili
he CMake FAQ at:
> http://www.cmake.org/Wiki/CMake_FAQ
>
> Follow this link to subscribe/unsubscribe:
> http://www.cmake.org/mailman/listinfo/cmake
>
--
Philip Lowman
___
Powered by www.kitware.com
Visit other Kitware open-source proje
> http://www.cmake.org/Wiki/CMake_FAQ
>
> Follow this link to subscribe/unsubscribe:
> http://www.cmake.org/mailman/listinfo/cmake
>
--
Philip Lowman
___
Powered by www.kitware.com
Visit other Kitware open-source projects at
http:
tra cruft I messed that up.
> Just image they're matching :)
>
> On 05/23/10 11:36, Philip Lowman wrote:
> > On Sun, May 23, 2010 at 10:31 AM, Clark Gaebel >wrote:
> >
> >
> >> When I link Boost.Thread to my boost_test executable, it gives me
> >&g
gt; ${Boost_THREAD_LIBRARY}
> )
> endif()
>
> Don't you want:
target_link_libraries(boost_test ${Boost_THREAD_LIBRARY})
instead of "test_boost"?
--
Philip Lowman
___
Powered by www.kitware.com
Visit other Kitware open
new to CMake 2.8. For
better compatibility with CMake 2.6 and lower, simply omit it which should
give you a similar effect.
--
Philip Lowman
___
Powered by www.kitware.com
Visit other Kitware open-source projects at
http://www.kitware.com/opensource/o
__________
> Powered by www.kitware.com
>
> Visit other Kitware open-source projects at
> http://www.kitware.com/opensource/opensource.html
>
> Please keep messages on-topic and check the CMake FAQ at:
> http://www.cmake.org/Wiki/CMake_FAQ
>
> Foll
e were added by Microsoft there would be no need for all of the
crazy macro stuff.
On Fri, May 14, 2010 at 10:53 AM, David Cole wrote:
> On Fri, May 14, 2010 at 8:02 AM, Philip Lowman wrote:
>
>> This is Microsoft's fault. You should complain to them.
>
>
> Well, yes and no. It
___
> Powered by www.kitware.com
>
> Visit other Kitware open-source projects at
> http://www.kitware.com/opensource/opensource.html
>
> Please keep messages on-topic and check the CMake FAQ at:
> http://www.cmake.org/Wi
> http://www.kitware.com/opensource/opensource.html
> >
> > Please keep messages on-topic and check the CMake FAQ at:
> http://www.cmake.org/Wiki/CMake_FAQ
> >
> > Follow this link to subscribe/unsubscribe:
> > http://www.cmake.org/mailman/listinfo/cmake
&g
at start of find_package() and subsequently unset at
end).
--
Philip Lowman
___
Powered by www.kitware.com
Visit other Kitware open-source projects at
http://www.kitware.com/opensource/opensource.html
Please keep messages on-topic and check the CMake F
ion. It would
basically set NO_CMAKE_SYSTEM_PATH on all of the find_library() and
find_path() calls.
Alternatively, we could make the module behave as you describe and
hope that it doesn't break too many people.
What do you think?
--
Philip Lowman
___
Someone could add an option to FindBoost that will simply exclude the system
paths from the search. This has never been implied by setting BOOST_ROOT.
As long as the unversioned library names are being searched for with
find_library they are likely going to be found. Currently the onus is on
the
e a foo.lib in your PATH CMake shouldn't find it with that
option. NO_DEFAULT_PATH should work as well although it excludes all
of the default search paths not just the ones specified by the PATH
environment variable.
See:
http://www.cmake.org/cmake/help/cmake-2-8-docs.html#command:find_li
www.kitware.com
>
> Visit other Kitware open-source projects at
> http://www.kitware.com/opensource/opensource.html
>
> Please keep messages on-topic and check the CMake FAQ at:
> http://www.cmake.org/Wiki/CMake_FAQ
>
> Follow this link to subscribe/unsubscribe:
> http://ww
The second line seems like a good idea to me. The user can always modify
the property in their code if they have custom build types.
The first line seems like a bad idea. I think the default build type should
be left to the project. Currently you can set it manually before
project(). I think a
on-topic and check the CMake FAQ at:
> http://www.cmake.org/Wiki/CMake_FAQ
>
> Follow this link to subscribe/unsubscribe:
> http://www.cmake.org/mailman/listinfo/cmake
>
--
Philip Lowman
___
Powered by www.kitware.com
Visit other Kitwa
I have visual studio 8 sp1 installed and have keys in
HKCU/Software/Microsoft/VisualStudio/8.0/vsmacros/OtherProjects7
On Feb 22, 2010 10:32 AM, "Wheeler, Frederick W (GE, Research)" <
whee...@ge.com> wrote:
I did an uninstall/reinstall and have some more info on this problem.
> From: David Co
html
>
> Please keep messages on-topic and check the CMake FAQ at:
> http://www.cmake.org/Wiki/CMake_FAQ
>
> Follow this link to subscribe/unsubscribe:
> http://www.cmake.org/mailman/listinfo/cmake
>
--
Philip Lowman
__
I've been meaning to add something like that to our nightly builds just
using shell/batch scripting. You should be able to set CMAKE_PREFIX_PATH in
the initial cache and then just make install or use the vs command line app
to run the INSTALL project after calling ctest -S.
Not sure on how to det
Not that I know of. I think FindBoost expects only versioned releases.
Please open a ticket with your requirements and preferably a patch.
Http://public.kitware.com/Bug
On Feb 14, 2010 5:34 PM, "Hicham Mouline" wrote:
Hello,
Is there a way to find the boost trunk include directories and li
gzguts.h
> Anyone has ever tested it under MSVC? It would be nice to have helpers to
> build patches, as in CMakePorts...
I was testing it on MSVC but it seems like they keep checking in code
which breaks MSVC every 1.2.3.X and I haven't been checking X
consistently. Your above comm
CT_BINARY_DIR}/Parser.h")
>>
>> But then both Parser.hpp and Parser.h are generated. But this is also
>> a very small issue.
>>
>> Finally, thanks a lot for supporting bison and flex in CMake.
>>
>> Kind regards,
>> visibility guy
> ____
to contain debug/optimized
keywords from your macro could break people. Leaving it in if
FOO_LIBRARY is used in the manor I illustrated causes warnings. You
might want to check with if(DEFINED FOO_LIBRARY) and if so not set it
maybe?
--
Philip Lowman
___
downloads you need yet another target.
Also, for any that are interested, beta releases of zlib now have a
CMakeLists.txt in them. It could use testing on Mac OSX and other
unix systems.
http://zlib.net/current/beta/
--
Philip Lowman
___
Powered by
what the Visual Studio GUI looks like and doesn't
affect the compiling of the code since the /GL shows up in the
additional options line and thus gets added to the command line when
the compiler is run.
--
Philip Lowman
___
Powered by w
y not be desired. The only harm I can see
this causing is if a user were to have done this already in his
CMakeLists.txt. In this case they might find themselves with a CMake
error or linking against liboptimized.so! :)
if(FOO_LIBRARY_DEBUG)
targe
user who preferes pretty website to read doc
> than dark console :-)
Also, it might not be a bad idea to mention the version number within
the documentation when features are added, especially if features are
going to be added during a patch release.
The same should probably be true of new f
_CXX_FLAGS and make them
whatever they are in the CACHE by default but with /W4 instead of /W3.
http://www.itk.org/Wiki/CMake_FAQ#Make_Override_Files
--
Philip Lowman
___
Powered by www.kitware.com
Visit other Kitware open-source projects at
http://www.kitwa
looks different from the one that was
released with CMake 2.8.0.
Also, The latest version in CMake CVS (with some minor changes from
2.8.0) is here:
http://public.kitware.com/cgi-bin/viewcvs.cgi/Modules/FindGTest.cmake?revision=1.4&root=CMake&view=markup
--
Philip Lowman
osoft.com/en-us/library/abx4dbyh(VS.71).aspx
For tips on how to change your CMakeLists.txt, see also:
http://www.cmake.org/Wiki/CMake_FAQ#How_can_I_build_my_MSVC_application_with_a_static_runtime.3F
--
Philip Lowman
___
Powered by www.kitware.com
Visi
o this without
requiring CMakeLists.txt modifications, at least do something simpler
such as adding a variable like CMAKE_MSVC_COMPILE_WITH_MT or something
like that. This way all that needs to be modified is
Modules/Platform/Windows-cl.cmake to set the initial cache differently
and perhaps addin
ne FindOCaml and UseOCaml script. There is no
sense having two of them out there.
--
Philip Lowman
___
Powered by www.kitware.com
Visit other Kitware open-source projects at
http://www.kitware.com/opensource/opensource.html
Please keep messages on-top
ways so the list gets a copy of the thread.
I think the best way to get it available it to have it released as
part of CMake's Modules folder. To do this you have to volunteer to
maintain the module (basically to deal with patches and bugs) and
follow the proc
just get turned into a list you
can iterate on? Couldn't you just use foreach() on it and add the
"-I" argument and path argument to a separate list that gets passed to
add_custom_command()?
foreach(path ${includelist})
list(APPEND myargs "-I")
list(APPEND myargs &
Visit other Kitware open-source projects at
> http://www.kitware.com/opensource/opensource.html
>
> Please keep messages on-topic and check the CMake FAQ at:
> http://www.cmake.org/Wiki/CMake_FAQ
>
> Follow this link to subscribe/unsubscribe
r Kitware open-source projects at
> http://www.kitware.com/opensource/opensource.html
>
> Please keep messages on-topic and check the CMake FAQ at:
> http://www.cmake.org/Wiki/CMake_FAQ
>
> Follow this link to subscribe/unsubscribe:
> http://www.cmake.org/mailman/listinfo/cmake
On Mon, Jan 4, 2010 at 10:48 AM, Michael Wild wrote:
> On 8. Jan, 2009, at 9:54 , Philip Lowman wrote:
>> If you use GTK2 in any of your projects and have time, please test this
>> CMake module and post any issues to this thread. I intend to check it into
>> CMake and sup
ome special functions which maybe could be checked
> with something like nm ?
If I recall correctly we discussed this a long time ago and there were
some dll specific symbols present in the accompanying import library
that weren't there in the
ww.kitware.com
>
> Visit other Kitware open-source projects at
> http://www.kitware.com/opensource/opensource.html
>
> Please keep messages on-topic and check the CMake FAQ at:
> http://www.cmake.org/Wiki/CMake_FAQ
>
> Follow this link to subscribe/unsubscribe:
> http:/
TIVE{./xxx}
> )
>
> here RELATIVE means relative to CMakeLists.txt file.
You can use ${CMAKE_CURRENT_SOURCE_DIR} and the path relative to that.
http://www.cmake.org/Wiki/CMake_Useful_Variables
--
Philip Lowman
___
Powered by www.kitware.com
Visit o
Hi, I wrote FindGTK2.
You might try removing the "gtk/" from line 350? Line 345 where the include
path is searched for may also need to be modified...
I don't have a MAC so if anyone has any better ideas, help would be
appreciated.
On Dec 1, 2009 1:27 PM, "Aleksander Demko" wrote:
I can't see
cts at
> http://www.kitware.com/opensource/opensource.html
>
> Please keep messages on-topic and check the CMake FAQ at:
> http://www.cmake.org/Wiki/CMake_FAQ
>
> Follow this link to subscribe/unsubscribe:
> http://www.cmake.org/mailman/listinfo/cmake
>
--
Philip Lowman
___
ALL_[HEADERS | LIBRARIES |
EXECUTABLES | FILES | ALL].
--
Philip Lowman
___
Powered by www.kitware.com
Visit other Kitware open-source projects at
http://www.kitware.com/opensource/opensource.html
Please keep messages on-topic and check the CMake FAQ at
affect which libraries are detected and certain ones like boost_thread can't
be found if Boost_USE_MULTITHREADED is not true.
If this doesn't help, delete your build tree, then add this line prior to
calling find_package(Boost...)
set(Boost_DEBUG TRUE)
Paste the output here and the relevant p
; MSVC libs usually do not have the lib... prefix. I am not sure if CMake
> does find them in this case.
>
>
The static MSVC libraries always have the lib prefix on Windows, the dynamic
MSVC libraries do not.
You have to set this variable to enable searching for static libra
other Kitware open-source projects at
> http://www.kitware.com/opensource/opensource.html
>
> Please keep messages on-topic and check the CMake FAQ at:
> http://www.cmake.org/Wiki/CMake_FAQ
>
> Follow this link to subscribe/unsubscribe:
> http://www.cmake.org/mailman/listinfo/cmake
TER 1.36)
list(APPEND Boost_wave_DEPENDENCIES system)
endif()
Does that make any sense?
Best regards,
Marcel Loose.
On Wed, 2009-11-04 at 11:14 -0500, Philip Lowman wrote: > Mathieu, > > It's
a nice idea, but give...
> __
Mathieu,
It's a nice idea, but given that Boost could make any one of its libraries
dependent on "system" at any time they want in the future (and for all I
know there are others already dependent on it, besides wave and filesystem),
I'd rather the user be responsible for adding "system" manually.
other inconsistencies in
how CMake behaves. Changing the CMAKE_CXX_FLAGS in-between add_executable()
calls also doesn't seem to work for me, for example.
In the meantime you're probably can make do with set_target_properties(),
specifically the COMPILE_FLAGS property.
http://www.cmake.org/cma
t()
http://www.cmake.org/cmake/help/cmake2.6docs.html#command:add_executable
http://www.cmake.org/cmake/help/cmake2.6docs.html#command:add_test
--
Philip Lowman
___
Powered by www.kitware.com
Visit other Kitware open-source projects at
http://ww
txt:33 (FIND_PACKAGE)
...
Thanks
On Mon, Nov 2, 2009 at 6:24 PM, Philip Lowman wrote: > Add
system to the list of ...
--
Mathieu
___
Powered by www.kitware.com
Visit other Kitware open-source projects at
http://www.kitware.com/opensource/opensource.html
ou might be able to adapt something from options
#2 or #3 below.
http://www.cmake.org/Wiki/CMake_FAQ#How_can_I_build_my_MSVC_application_with_a_static_runtime.3F
--
Philip Lowman
___
Powered by www.kitware.com
Visit other Kitware open-source projects at
http://
`boost::system::get_generic_category()'
/usr/include/boost/system/error_code.hpp:213: undefined reference to
`boost::system::get_system_category()'
What should have I been writing instead ?
Thanks !
On Mon, Nov 2, 2009 at 4:41 PM, Philip Lowman wrote: >
Which FindBoost are you u...
--
Mathieu
___
Which FindBoost are you using? I'm pretty sure I fixed this issue a while
ago.
On Nov 2, 2009 9:46 AM, "Mathieu Malaterre"
wrote:
Hi there,
I am wondering if I am missing something. I'd like to write:
FIND_PACKAGE ( Boost COMPONENTS filesystem )
However using a recent boost (1.40), it give
ource.html
>
> Please keep messages on-topic and check the CMake FAQ at:
> http://www.cmake.org/Wiki/CMake_FAQ
>
> Follow this link to subscribe/unsubscribe:
> http://www.cmake.org/mailman/listinfo/cmake
>
--
Philip Lowman
___
Powered b
The version in CMake CVS supports a Unix make install or using a VS build
tree the last I checked. You can also manually arrange the MSVC generated
stuff into a Unix style prefix if you want.
Please have a look at the latest GTest.cmake and post an example of your
problem if you can't resolve it.
cmake.org/Bug/view.php?id=6493
On Oct 20, 2009 11:29 AM, "Steven Wilson"
wrote:
I am asking why CMake doesn't support the following:
set_target_properties(${TARGET} PROPERTIES COMPILE_FLAGS_
"-fmyflag")
> Would set_target_properties() work? Then you can do something like: > >
set_target_prope
quot; feature so fixing it via a public
conditional (defaulting off) is probably the only way to go.
--
Philip Lowman
___
Powered by www.kitware.com
Visit other Kitware open-source projects at
http://www.kitware.com/opensource/opensource.html
Please
Thanks for linking. Posting via mobile :)
On Oct 16, 2009 4:27 PM, "John Drescher" wrote:
On Fri, Oct 16, 2009 at 4:14 PM, Philip Lowman wrote: >
You may want to also look ...
Found that:
http://www.itk.org/Wiki/CMake_FAQ#Make_Override_Files
Thanks. I will have to bookmark
You may want to also look into platform override files. See the FAQ and
search for override.
On Oct 16, 2009 3:50 PM, "Tyler Roscoe" wrote:
On Fri, Oct 16, 2009 at 12:16:12PM -0600, Steven Wilson wrote: > Is there a
way to turn off all the ...
I don't know of an easy way.
I guess the best way
searching for boost, what library names it is
> using, did it find environment variables. Things like that. Just a thought.
>
Feel free to attach a patch to the bugtracker for whatever you'd like added
to Boost_DEBUG.
--
Philip Lowman
___
Po
source code is scattered across multiple subdirectories
but is all supposed to be part of the same library then build it together.
You can use PARENT_SCOPE to hand lists of source files up a directory, if
that is of interest.
set(FOO_SRCS ${list_of_sources} PARENT_SCOPE)
--
Philip Lowma
On Fri, Oct 9, 2009 at 4:04 PM, Aleksandr Udovenko wrote:
> On Fri, Oct 9, 2009 at 5:33 PM, Philip Lowman wrote:
> > On Fri, Oct 9, 2009 at 4:15 AM, Aleksandr Udovenko >
> > wrote:
> >>
> >> On Fri, Oct 9, 2009 at 10:04 AM, Philip Lowman wrote:
> >>
On Fri, Oct 9, 2009 at 6:05 AM, Fabio Fracassi wrote:
> Philip Lowman schrieb:
>
>> If you have any other CMake related suggestions please feel free to
>> accompany your mailing list posts with a feature request and/or patch on the
>> bugtracker if you have
On Fri, Oct 9, 2009 at 4:15 AM, Aleksandr Udovenko wrote:
> On Fri, Oct 9, 2009 at 10:04 AM, Philip Lowman wrote:
> > On Wed, Oct 7, 2009 at 11:45 AM, Aleksandr Udovenko <
> udovenk...@gmail.com>
> > wrote:
> >>
> >> I try cmake 2.6, 2.8 for micros
or exe and shared.
>
> How i can send my option to linker for static library?
>
You might be able to use this:
http://www.cmake.org/cmake/help/cmake-2-8-docs.html#prop_tgt:STATIC_LIBRARY_FLAGS
--
Philip Lowman
___
Powered by www.kitwar
1 - 100 of 589 matches
Mail list logo
