Re: [llvm-dev] Upcoming upgrade of LLVM buildbot

2020-10-28 Thread John Paul Adrian Glaubitz via cfe-commits
Hello Galina! On 10/28/20 2:53 AM, Galina Kistanova via llvm-dev wrote: > llvm-zorg source code has been updated, and now is open for new changes. If > you have pending patches, please rebase them on top of the llvm-zorg master > and update your reviews on the Phabricator. I'll start reviewing the

[clang] [clang] LazyOffsetPtr: Use native pointer width (PR #111995)

2024-10-15 Thread John Paul Adrian Glaubitz via cfe-commits
glaubitz wrote: > cc @glaubitz (https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=113341) I can confirm that the patch from this PR fixes the GCC bootstrap on 32-bit PowerPC on Linux for me (GCC pr/target 113341). https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/111995

[clang] [clang] LazyOffsetPtr: Use native pointer width (PR #111995)

2024-10-16 Thread John Paul Adrian Glaubitz via cfe-commits
glaubitz wrote: Btw, if you submit a fix, it would be great if it could be backported to the 18 and 19 branches. https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/111995 ___ cfe-commits mailing list cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/ma

[clang] [clang] Make LazyOffsetPtr more portable (PR #112927)

2024-10-19 Thread John Paul Adrian Glaubitz via cfe-commits
glaubitz wrote: > I appreciate it's not exactly a straightforward change given the discussion > it provoked, but any chance you'd be okay with a backport to 19? Clang isn't > really usable on ppc32 without this. We could pull it in just for ppc32 > downstream but we generally dislike doing con

[clang] [Driver][Sparc] Default to -mcpu=v9 for 32-bit Linux/sparc64 (PR #109278)

2024-09-19 Thread John Paul Adrian Glaubitz via cfe-commits
@@ -125,7 +126,9 @@ std::string sparc::getSparcTargetCPU(const Driver &D, const ArgList &Args, return std::string(CPUName); } - if (Triple.getArch() == llvm::Triple::sparc && Triple.isOSSolaris()) + Distro Dist(D.getVFS(), Triple); + if (Triple.getArch() == llvm::Tri

[clang] [Driver][Sparc] Default to -mcpu=v9 for 32-bit Linux/sparc64 (PR #109278)

2024-09-20 Thread John Paul Adrian Glaubitz via cfe-commits
glaubitz wrote: > Just to be certain: the revised version of the patch is ok to commit? I think it would be good to get an ACK from at least one of the SPARC Leon maintainers. CC @andreas-gaisler https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/109278 ___