glaubitz wrote: > I appreciate it's not exactly a straightforward change given the discussion > it provoked, but any chance you'd be okay with a backport to 19? Clang isn't > really usable on ppc32 without this. We could pull it in just for ppc32 > downstream but we generally dislike doing conditional patching. WDYT? > > cc @mgorny
I agree. It would be great if this fix could be backported. https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/112927 _______________________________________________ cfe-commits mailing list cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits
