@@ -455,6 +455,64 @@ The SYCL kernel in the previous code sample meets these
expectations.
}];
}
+def SYCLKernelEntryPointDocs : Documentation {
+ let Category = DocCatFunction;
+ let Content = [{
+The ``sycl_kernel_entry_point`` attribute specifies that a function defini
@@ -0,0 +1,47 @@
+//===--- SYCLKernelInfo.h --- Information about SYCL kernels
--===//
+//
+// Part of the LLVM Project, under the Apache License v2.0 with LLVM
Exceptions.
+// See https://llvm.org/LICENSE.txt for license information.
+// SPDX-License-Identifier: Apa
@@ -0,0 +1,47 @@
+//===--- SYCLKernelInfo.h --- Information about SYCL kernels
--===//
+//
+// Part of the LLVM Project, under the Apache License v2.0 with LLVM
Exceptions.
+// See https://llvm.org/LICENSE.txt for license information.
+// SPDX-License-Identifier: Apa
@@ -455,6 +455,64 @@ The SYCL kernel in the previous code sample meets these
expectations.
}];
}
+def SYCLKernelEntryPointDocs : Documentation {
+ let Category = DocCatFunction;
+ let Content = [{
+The ``sycl_kernel_entry_point`` attribute specifies that a function defini
@@ -455,6 +455,64 @@ The SYCL kernel in the previous code sample meets these
expectations.
}];
}
+def SYCLKernelEntryPointDocs : Documentation {
+ let Category = DocCatFunction;
+ let Content = [{
+The ``sycl_kernel_entry_point`` attribute specifies that a function defini
@@ -14296,6 +14296,31 @@ void
ASTContext::getFunctionFeatureMap(llvm::StringMap &FeatureMap,
}
}
+static SYCLKernelInfo BuildSYCLKernelInfo(ASTContext &Context,
+ CanQualType KernelNameType,
+
@@ -14296,6 +14296,31 @@ void
ASTContext::getFunctionFeatureMap(llvm::StringMap &FeatureMap,
}
}
+static SYCLKernelInfo BuildSYCLKernelInfo(ASTContext &Context,
+ CanQualType KernelNameType,
+
https://github.com/lmarzen created
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/112125
The OMPT Device Tracing Interface was introduced in the OpenMP 5.0
specification (see section 4.6.2).
https://www.openmp.org/wp-content/uploads/OpenMP-API-Specification-5.0.pdf
>From 41e3caa489f5607b3b292f5a75
github-actions[bot] wrote:
Thank you for submitting a Pull Request (PR) to the LLVM Project!
This PR will be automatically labeled and the relevant teams will be notified.
If you wish to, you can add reviewers by using the "Reviewers" section on this
page.
If this is not working for you, it
llvmbot wrote:
@llvm/pr-subscribers-clang
Author: Luke Marzen (lmarzen)
Changes
The OMPT Device Tracing Interface was introduced in the OpenMP 5.0
specification (see section 4.6.2).
https://www.openmp.org/wp-content/uploads/OpenMP-API-Specification-5.0.pdf
---
Full diff: https://github.
lmarzen wrote:
@jdoerfert, @AndreyChurbanov
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/112125
___
cfe-commits mailing list
cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org
https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits
@@ -455,6 +455,64 @@ The SYCL kernel in the previous code sample meets these
expectations.
}];
}
+def SYCLKernelEntryPointDocs : Documentation {
+ let Category = DocCatFunction;
+ let Content = [{
+The ``sycl_kernel_entry_point`` attribute specifies that a function defini
@@ -0,0 +1,137 @@
+// RUN: %clang_cc1 -triple x86_64-linux-gnu -std=c++17 -fsyntax-only
-fsycl-is-device -verify %s
tahonermann wrote:
Those tests are included with the diagnostic work that will be in the next PR.
See
[here](https://github.com/tahonermann/llvm
@@ -14296,6 +14296,31 @@ void
ASTContext::getFunctionFeatureMap(llvm::StringMap &FeatureMap,
}
}
+static SYCLKernelInfo BuildSYCLKernelInfo(ASTContext &Context,
+ CanQualType KernelNameType,
+
@@ -352,21 +352,30 @@ void good13(void) {
int Buffer[BufferSize];
int *P = &Buffer[0];
- while (P < (Buffer + sizeof(Buffer) / sizeof(int))) {
+ while (P < Buffer + sizeof(Buffer) / sizeof(int)) {
// NO-WARNING: Calculating the element count of the buffer here, whic
https://github.com/5chmidti approved this pull request.
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/78
___
cfe-commits mailing list
cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org
https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits
https://github.com/a-tarasyuk updated
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/112081
>From 67c41612085489a2a17eec49f98dbfa0e5bb97cf Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: Oleksandr T
Date: Sat, 12 Oct 2024 08:27:51 +0300
Subject: [PATCH] [Clang] fix range calculation for conditionals with throw
expr
Author: Joseph Huber
Date: 2024-10-12T07:03:28-05:00
New Revision: 3acb0e9e600cbe3668b7db3956238a592ebadc0a
URL:
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/commit/3acb0e9e600cbe3668b7db3956238a592ebadc0a
DIFF:
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/commit/3acb0e9e600cbe3668b7db3956238a592ebadc0a.diff
https://github.com/jhuber6 closed
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/112041
___
cfe-commits mailing list
cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org
https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits
llvm-ci wrote:
LLVM Buildbot has detected a new failure on builder `clang-ppc64le-rhel`
running on `ppc64le-clang-rhel-test` while building `clang` at step 5
"build-unified-tree".
Full details are available at:
https://lab.llvm.org/buildbot/#/builders/145/builds/2444
Here is the relevant pi
llvm-ci wrote:
LLVM Buildbot has detected a new failure on builder
`sanitizer-x86_64-linux-android` running on `sanitizer-buildbot-android` while
building `clang` at step 2 "annotate".
Full details are available at:
https://lab.llvm.org/buildbot/#/builders/186/builds/3148
Here is the releva
Author: Joseph Huber
Date: 2024-10-12T07:09:03-05:00
New Revision: 6a6af0246bd2d68291582e9aefc0543e5c6102fe
URL:
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/commit/6a6af0246bd2d68291582e9aefc0543e5c6102fe
DIFF:
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/commit/6a6af0246bd2d68291582e9aefc0543e5c6102fe.diff
llvm-ci wrote:
LLVM Buildbot has detected a new failure on builder `sanitizer-ppc64le-linux`
running on `ppc64le-sanitizer` while building `clang` at step 2 "annotate".
Full details are available at:
https://lab.llvm.org/buildbot/#/builders/72/builds/4269
Here is the relevant piece of the bu
llvm-ci wrote:
LLVM Buildbot has detected a new failure on builder `sanitizer-x86_64-linux`
running on `sanitizer-buildbot1` while building `clang` at step 2 "annotate".
Full details are available at:
https://lab.llvm.org/buildbot/#/builders/66/builds/4845
Here is the relevant piece of the b
llvm-ci wrote:
LLVM Buildbot has detected a new failure on builder `sanitizer-aarch64-linux`
running on `sanitizer-buildbot7` while building `clang` at step 2 "annotate".
Full details are available at:
https://lab.llvm.org/buildbot/#/builders/51/builds/5057
Here is the relevant piece of the
@@ -455,6 +455,64 @@ The SYCL kernel in the previous code sample meets these
expectations.
}];
}
+def SYCLKernelEntryPointDocs : Documentation {
+ let Category = DocCatFunction;
+ let Content = [{
+The ``sycl_kernel_entry_point`` attribute specifies that a function defini
@@ -455,6 +455,64 @@ The SYCL kernel in the previous code sample meets these
expectations.
}];
}
+def SYCLKernelEntryPointDocs : Documentation {
+ let Category = DocCatFunction;
+ let Content = [{
+The ``sycl_kernel_entry_point`` attribute specifies that a function defini
https://github.com/sunfishcode updated
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/112035
>From b8f33cd68d11759ad774e16b4d25491a1c9fc3e4 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: Dan Gohman
Date: Fri, 11 Oct 2024 04:30:32 -0700
Subject: [PATCH 1/4] [WebAssembly] Define a new "Trail1" CPU
First, define some
https://github.com/owenca commented:
Please update the release notes.
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/105597
___
cfe-commits mailing list
cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org
https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits
@@ -972,6 +972,11 @@ struct FormatStyle {
/// \version 3.7
bool AllowShortLoopsOnASingleLine;
+ /// If ``true``, ``namespace a { class b; }`` can be put on a single a single
+ /// line.
owenca wrote:
You need to rerun `dump_format_style.py`.
https://gi
@@ -616,6 +627,62 @@ class LineJoiner {
return 1;
}
+ unsigned tryMergeNamespace(SmallVectorImpl::const_iterator
I,
+ SmallVectorImpl::const_iterator
E,
+ unsigned Limit) {
+if (Limit == 0)
+ return 0;
+
@@ -27981,6 +27981,132 @@ TEST_F(FormatTest, BreakBinaryOperations) {
Style);
}
+TEST_F(FormatTest, ShortNamespacesOption) {
+ auto BaseStyle = getLLVMStyle();
+ BaseStyle.AllowShortNamespacesOnASingleLine = true;
+ BaseStyle.FixNamespaceComments = false;
+
+
owenca wrote:
> > The following are missing:
> >
> > * Run `dump_format_style.py`.
> > * Add a `ConfigParseTest` for the new option.
> >
> > How does the new option interact with `CompactNamespaces`? For example:
> >
> > * `AllowShortNamespacesOnASingleLine: true` and `CompactNamespaces: false
@@ -616,6 +626,62 @@ class LineJoiner {
return 1;
}
+ unsigned tryMergeNamespace(SmallVectorImpl::const_iterator
I,
+ SmallVectorImpl::const_iterator
E,
+ unsigned Limit) {
+if (Limit == 0)
+ return 0;
+
https://github.com/owenca edited
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/105597
___
cfe-commits mailing list
cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org
https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits
https://github.com/nikic approved this pull request.
LGTM
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/112071
___
cfe-commits mailing list
cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org
https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits
https://github.com/nikic approved this pull request.
LGTM
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/112074
___
cfe-commits mailing list
cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org
https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits
https://github.com/yingopq created
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/112084
Fix parts of #102783.
>From 03b1e39f7dd416db9e2eb19303a676a9ddcac5c2 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: Ying Huang
Date: Sat, 12 Oct 2024 03:12:44 -0400
Subject: [PATCH] [MIPS] LLVM data layout give i128 an alignme
llvmbot wrote:
@llvm/pr-subscribers-clang
Author: None (yingopq)
Changes
Fix parts of #102783.
---
Full diff: https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/112084.diff
7 Files Affected:
- (modified) clang/lib/Basic/Targets/Mips.h (+2-2)
- (modified) clang/test/CodeGen/target-data.c (+4-4)
@@ -5340,6 +5340,10 @@ def mno_lasx : Flag<["-"], "mno-lasx">,
Group,
def msimd_EQ : Joined<["-"], "msimd=">, Group,
Flags<[TargetSpecific]>,
HelpText<"Select the SIMD extension(s) to be enabled in LoongArch either
'none', 'lsx', 'lasx'.">;
+def mannotate_tablejump : Flag
https://github.com/SixWeining edited
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/102411
___
cfe-commits mailing list
cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org
https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits
llvm-ci wrote:
LLVM Buildbot has detected a new failure on builder `fuchsia-x86_64-linux`
running on `fuchsia-debian-64-us-central1-a-1` while building `clang` at step 4
"annotate".
Full details are available at:
https://lab.llvm.org/buildbot/#/builders/11/builds/6522
Here is the relevant p
llvm-ci wrote:
LLVM Buildbot has detected a new failure on builder
`ppc64le-lld-multistage-test` running on `ppc64le-lld-multistage-test` while
building `clang` at step 12 "build-stage2-unified-tree".
Full details are available at:
https://lab.llvm.org/buildbot/#/builders/168/builds/4368
He
jhuber6 wrote:
@petrhosek Can someone explain why the clang executable in these tests is
called `llvm` on the Fuchsia bots?
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/112041
___
cfe-commits mailing list
cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org
https://lists.llvm.org
dtcxzyw wrote:
> TBH I am wondering if we should revert this rename. I don't think it's a good
> idea to reuse getDeclaration with substantially different semantics, and if
> we're not reusing it, then there's not much point to rename...
>
> Instead of having getOrInsertDeclaration + getDeclar
https://github.com/nicovank approved this pull request.
Very nice improvement, LGTM, thanks!!!
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/112101
___
cfe-commits mailing list
cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org
https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-
https://github.com/nicovank edited
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/112101
___
cfe-commits mailing list
cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org
https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits
@@ -9,8 +9,10 @@
#include "UseStartsEndsWithCheck.h"
#include "../utils/ASTUtils.h"
-#include "../utils/OptionsUtils.h"
+#include "../utils/Matchers.h"
+#include "clang/ASTMatchers/ASTMatchers.h"
#include "clang/Lex/Lexer.h"
+#include "llvm/ADT/ArrayRef.h"
ni
https://github.com/HerrCai0907 updated
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/108792
>From 795b3ae677210ff50f7710a0cf73d435889b68ae Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: Congcong Cai
Date: Mon, 16 Sep 2024 13:47:10 +0800
Subject: [PATCH 1/2] [clang-tidy] insert ``static`` keyword in correct
positi
https://github.com/wzssyqa updated
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/96281
>From c08b0a8d34107dc4563c434485ba5f326ab8df93 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: YunQiang Su
Date: Fri, 21 Jun 2024 14:28:42 +0800
Subject: [PATCH 01/11] Clang: Support minimumnum and maximumnum intrinsics
We just
https://github.com/5chmidti created
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/112101
Rewrite the AST matchers for slightly more composability and
performance. Furthermore, check that the `starts_with` and `ends_with`
functions return a `bool`.
There is one behavioral change, in that the methods
llvmbot wrote:
@llvm/pr-subscribers-clang-tidy
Author: Julian Schmidt (5chmidti)
Changes
Rewrite the AST matchers for slightly more composability and
performance. Furthermore, check that the `starts_with` and `ends_with`
functions return a `bool`.
There is one behavioral change, in that th
llvmbot wrote:
@llvm/pr-subscribers-clang-tools-extra
Author: Julian Schmidt (5chmidti)
Changes
Rewrite the AST matchers for slightly more composability and
performance. Furthermore, check that the `starts_with` and `ends_with`
functions return a `bool`.
There is one behavioral change, in
github-actions[bot] wrote:
:warning: C/C++ code formatter, clang-format found issues in your code.
:warning:
You can test this locally with the following command:
``bash
git-clang-format --diff 14705a912f6296700cef4d2aa7eb100f71dfbd0a
24e58550483c0569e48f9b1e11edaee5acb1ac1e --e
5chmidti wrote:
Note that his is not an NFC due to the change in what method may be found
first, but given that it's quite out there to have 2+ of `{'starts_with',
'startsWith', 'startswith'}` in one class hierarchy, which is how the non-NFC
part could be observed. Because of this I think thi
https://github.com/5chmidti updated
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/112101
>From cd6de859501e8c0102aa1c1e57341ecc35266ed1 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: Julian Schmidt
Date: Sat, 12 Oct 2024 18:07:38 +0200
Subject: [PATCH 1/2] [clang-tidy] rewrite matchers in
modernize-use-starts-end
jurahul wrote:
I will add getDeclaration back and mark it deprecated. What’s the timeframe
for deprecation thought? A couple of weeks? Because I do want to add back
the getDeclaration with different semantics. Unless we go with @nikic’s
recommendation of getDeclarationIfExists. I am going to wait
Author: Kazu Hirata
Date: 2024-10-12T08:04:17-07:00
New Revision: 571354e25130b213146c26d05524fcd215fbd061
URL:
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/commit/571354e25130b213146c26d05524fcd215fbd061
DIFF:
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/commit/571354e25130b213146c26d05524fcd215fbd061.diff
L
https://github.com/kazutakahirata closed
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/112074
___
cfe-commits mailing list
cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org
https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits
tschuett wrote:
> Hello - any additional feedback on this?
The house rule is to ping:
If you have received no comments on your patch for a week, you can request a
review by ‘ping’ing the GitHub PR with “Ping”. The common courtesy ‘ping’ rate
is once a week. Please remember that you are asking
https://github.com/5chmidti edited
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/112101
___
cfe-commits mailing list
cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org
https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits
llvmbot wrote:
@llvm/pr-subscribers-clang-driver
Author: Keith Smiley (keith)
Changes
---
Full diff: https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/112106.diff
2 Files Affected:
- (modified) clang/lib/Driver/ToolChains/Gnu.cpp (+1-1)
- (modified) clang/test/Driver/Xlinker-args.c (+2-2)
https://github.com/keith created
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/112106
None
>From becf5f4848e1482ef440ce5e04af6a5b715031ed Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: Keith Smiley
Date: Sat, 12 Oct 2024 18:08:33 +
Subject: [PATCH] [clang][GNU] Pass -t through to the linker
---
clang/lib/Dr
@@ -1391,22 +1412,65 @@ static void AddParamAndFnBasicAttributes(const CallBase
&CB,
AttributeList AL = NewInnerCB->getAttributes();
for (unsigned I = 0, E = InnerCB->arg_size(); I < E; ++I) {
-// Check if the underlying value for the parameter is an argum
@@ -82,34 +84,25 @@ UseStartsEndsWithCheck::UseStartsEndsWithCheck(StringRef
Name,
void UseStartsEndsWithCheck::registerMatchers(MatchFinder *Finder) {
const auto ZeroLiteral = integerLiteral(equals(0));
- const auto HasStartsWithMethodWithName = [](const std::string &Name
@@ -1358,18 +1360,37 @@ static void AddParamAndFnBasicAttributes(const CallBase
&CB,
auto &Context = CalledFunction->getContext();
// Collect valid attributes for all params.
- SmallVector ValidParamAttrs;
+ SmallVector ValidObjParamAttrs, ValidExactParamAttrs;
bool
@@ -82,34 +84,25 @@ UseStartsEndsWithCheck::UseStartsEndsWithCheck(StringRef
Name,
void UseStartsEndsWithCheck::registerMatchers(MatchFinder *Finder) {
const auto ZeroLiteral = integerLiteral(equals(0));
- const auto HasStartsWithMethodWithName = [](const std::string &Name
@@ -150,8 +150,8 @@ void test(std::string s, std::string_view sv, sub_string
ss, sub_sub_string sss,
// CHECK-FIXES: puv.starts_with("a");
puvf.find("a") == 0;
- // CHECK-MESSAGES: :[[@LINE-1]]:{{[0-9]+}}: warning: use starts_with
- // CHECK-FIXES: puvf.starts_with("a")
@@ -787,6 +787,11 @@ class AttributeList {
[[nodiscard]] AttributeList addRangeRetAttr(LLVMContext &C,
const ConstantRange &CR) const;
+ /// Add the range attribute to the attribute set at the given arg index.
+ /// Returns a n
@@ -373,6 +373,13 @@ FPClassTest CallBase::getParamNoFPClass(unsigned i) const {
return Mask;
}
+std::optional CallBase::getParamRange(unsigned ArgNo) const {
nikic wrote:
I don't think this API is used?
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/91101
@@ -1391,22 +1412,65 @@ static void AddParamAndFnBasicAttributes(const CallBase
&CB,
AttributeList AL = NewInnerCB->getAttributes();
for (unsigned I = 0, E = InnerCB->arg_size(); I < E; ++I) {
-// Check if the underlying value for the parameter is an argum
@@ -1391,22 +1412,65 @@ static void AddParamAndFnBasicAttributes(const CallBase
&CB,
AttributeList AL = NewInnerCB->getAttributes();
for (unsigned I = 0, E = InnerCB->arg_size(); I < E; ++I) {
-// Check if the underlying value for the parameter is an argum
@@ -1391,22 +1412,65 @@ static void AddParamAndFnBasicAttributes(const CallBase
&CB,
AttributeList AL = NewInnerCB->getAttributes();
for (unsigned I = 0, E = InnerCB->arg_size(); I < E; ++I) {
-// Check if the underlying value for the parameter is an argum
@@ -1391,22 +1412,65 @@ static void AddParamAndFnBasicAttributes(const CallBase
&CB,
AttributeList AL = NewInnerCB->getAttributes();
for (unsigned I = 0, E = InnerCB->arg_size(); I < E; ++I) {
-// Check if the underlying value for the parameter is an argum
Author: Kazu Hirata
Date: 2024-10-12T08:00:31-07:00
New Revision: 9c2fc17ee79eea7e18964d3d1b910dd8c1d7e733
URL:
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/commit/9c2fc17ee79eea7e18964d3d1b910dd8c1d7e733
DIFF:
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/commit/9c2fc17ee79eea7e18964d3d1b910dd8c1d7e733.diff
L
https://github.com/kazutakahirata closed
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/112071
___
cfe-commits mailing list
cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org
https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits
https://github.com/sunfishcode updated
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/112035
>From b8f33cd68d11759ad774e16b4d25491a1c9fc3e4 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: Dan Gohman
Date: Fri, 11 Oct 2024 04:30:32 -0700
Subject: [PATCH 1/3] [WebAssembly] Define a new "Trail1" CPU
First, define some
https://github.com/sookach created
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/112111
Fixes #111594. The crash is caused by the following call
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/blob/main/clang/lib/AST/ComputeDependence.cpp#L81-L82
We already check for a null TypeInfo when creating a UnaryExprO
llvmbot wrote:
@llvm/pr-subscribers-clang
Author: Andrew Sukach (sookach)
Changes
Fixes #111594. The crash is caused by the following call
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/blob/main/clang/lib/AST/ComputeDependence.cpp#L81-L82
We already check for a null TypeInfo when creating a UnaryE
llvmbot wrote:
@llvm/pr-subscribers-clang-tools-extra
Author: Keith Smiley (keith)
Changes
Fixes: https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/issues/109385
---
Full diff: https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/112112.diff
2 Files Affected:
- (modified) clang-tools-extra/clang-tidy/readabi
https://github.com/keith created
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/112112
Fixes: https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/issues/109385
>From b74b4fec46c871c5981422a7779fdf39c215487c Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: Keith Smiley
Date: Sat, 12 Oct 2024 13:38:36 -0700
Subject: [PATCH] [clang-
llvmbot wrote:
@llvm/pr-subscribers-clang-tidy
Author: Keith Smiley (keith)
Changes
Fixes: https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/issues/109385
---
Full diff: https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/112112.diff
2 Files Affected:
- (modified) clang-tools-extra/clang-tidy/readability/Id
@@ -1888,6 +1888,14 @@ void Clang::AddLoongArchTargetArgs(const ArgList &Args,
CmdArgs.push_back("-tune-cpu");
CmdArgs.push_back(Args.MakeArgString(TuneCPU));
}
+
+ if (Arg *A = Args.getLastArg(options::OPT_mannotate_tablejump,
+ options
https://github.com/SixWeining commented:
Better to add gcc's links to commit message to let people know the background.
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/102411
___
cfe-commits mailing list
cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org
https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-
@@ -5340,6 +5340,10 @@ def mno_lasx : Flag<["-"], "mno-lasx">,
Group,
def msimd_EQ : Joined<["-"], "msimd=">, Group,
Flags<[TargetSpecific]>,
HelpText<"Select the SIMD extension(s) to be enabled in LoongArch either
'none', 'lsx', 'lasx'.">;
+def mannotate_tablejump : Flag
philnik777 wrote:
While the libc++ checks are in the same tree as clang-tidy itself we (libc++)
don't actually consider them in-tree, since they are compiled as a plugin
against a clang-tidy that's already installed on the system.
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/90634
___
llvm-ci wrote:
LLVM Buildbot has detected a new failure on builder `lldb-aarch64-ubuntu`
running on `linaro-lldb-aarch64-ubuntu` while building `clang` at step 6 "test".
Full details are available at:
https://lab.llvm.org/buildbot/#/builders/59/builds/6480
Here is the relevant piece of the b
@@ -0,0 +1,713 @@
+//===-- Mustache.cpp
--===//
+//
+// Part of the LLVM Project, under the Apache License v2.0 with LLVM
Exceptions.
+// See https://llvm.org/LICENSE.txt for license information.
+// SPDX-License-Identifier: Ap
@@ -0,0 +1,713 @@
+//===-- Mustache.cpp
--===//
+//
+// Part of the LLVM Project, under the Apache License v2.0 with LLVM
Exceptions.
+// See https://llvm.org/LICENSE.txt for license information.
+// SPDX-License-Identifier: Ap
@@ -0,0 +1,713 @@
+//===-- Mustache.cpp
--===//
+//
+// Part of the LLVM Project, under the Apache License v2.0 with LLVM
Exceptions.
+// See https://llvm.org/LICENSE.txt for license information.
+// SPDX-License-Identifier: Ap
@@ -0,0 +1,713 @@
+//===-- Mustache.cpp
--===//
+//
+// Part of the LLVM Project, under the Apache License v2.0 with LLVM
Exceptions.
+// See https://llvm.org/LICENSE.txt for license information.
+// SPDX-License-Identifier: Ap
@@ -0,0 +1,713 @@
+//===-- Mustache.cpp
--===//
+//
+// Part of the LLVM Project, under the Apache License v2.0 with LLVM
Exceptions.
+// See https://llvm.org/LICENSE.txt for license information.
+// SPDX-License-Identifier: Ap
@@ -0,0 +1,713 @@
+//===-- Mustache.cpp
--===//
+//
+// Part of the LLVM Project, under the Apache License v2.0 with LLVM
Exceptions.
+// See https://llvm.org/LICENSE.txt for license information.
+// SPDX-License-Identifier: Ap
@@ -0,0 +1,713 @@
+//===-- Mustache.cpp
--===//
+//
+// Part of the LLVM Project, under the Apache License v2.0 with LLVM
Exceptions.
+// See https://llvm.org/LICENSE.txt for license information.
+// SPDX-License-Identifier: Ap
@@ -0,0 +1,713 @@
+//===-- Mustache.cpp
--===//
+//
+// Part of the LLVM Project, under the Apache License v2.0 with LLVM
Exceptions.
+// See https://llvm.org/LICENSE.txt for license information.
+// SPDX-License-Identifier: Ap
@@ -0,0 +1,713 @@
+//===-- Mustache.cpp
--===//
+//
+// Part of the LLVM Project, under the Apache License v2.0 with LLVM
Exceptions.
+// See https://llvm.org/LICENSE.txt for license information.
+// SPDX-License-Identifier: Ap
@@ -75,6 +75,14 @@ TEST(DataLayoutUpgradeTest, ValidDataLayoutUpgrade) {
EXPECT_EQ(UpgradeDataLayoutString("E-m:e-i64:64-n32:64-S128", "sparcv9"),
"E-m:e-i64:64-i128:128-n32:64-S128");
+ // Check that SPARC targets add -i128:128.
brad0 wrote:
S
https://github.com/yingopq updated
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/112084
>From 956c8622fc120db71cc2ed7ab4e2269cbadf9d95 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: Ying Huang
Date: Sat, 12 Oct 2024 03:12:44 -0400
Subject: [PATCH] [MIPS] LLVM data layout give i128 an alignment of 16 for
mips64
F
@@ -75,6 +75,14 @@ TEST(DataLayoutUpgradeTest, ValidDataLayoutUpgrade) {
EXPECT_EQ(UpgradeDataLayoutString("E-m:e-i64:64-n32:64-S128", "sparcv9"),
"E-m:e-i64:64-i128:128-n32:64-S128");
+ // Check that SPARC targets add -i128:128.
yingopq wrote:
@@ -352,21 +352,30 @@ void good13(void) {
int Buffer[BufferSize];
int *P = &Buffer[0];
- while (P < (Buffer + sizeof(Buffer) / sizeof(int))) {
+ while (P < Buffer + sizeof(Buffer) / sizeof(int)) {
// NO-WARNING: Calculating the element count of the buffer here, whic
1 - 100 of 116 matches
Mail list logo
