koachan wrote:
Ping?
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/106951
___
cfe-commits mailing list
cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org
https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits
llvm-ci wrote:
LLVM Buildbot has detected a new failure on builder `clang-ppc64le-rhel`
running on `ppc64le-clang-rhel-test` while building `clang-tools-extra,clang`
at step 5 "build-unified-tree".
Full details are available at:
https://lab.llvm.org/buildbot/#/builders/145/builds/1921
Here
https://github.com/nikic approved this pull request.
LGTM
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/100757
___
cfe-commits mailing list
cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org
https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits
@@ -125,7 +126,9 @@ std::string sparc::getSparcTargetCPU(const Driver &D, const
ArgList &Args,
return std::string(CPUName);
}
- if (Triple.getArch() == llvm::Triple::sparc && Triple.isOSSolaris())
+ Distro Dist(D.getVFS(), Triple);
+ if (Triple.getArch() == llvm::Tri
Author: Aaron Ballman
Date: 2024-09-19T09:13:58-04:00
New Revision: 4caf7ccd7fae677115922c3626480dc41627fe37
URL:
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/commit/4caf7ccd7fae677115922c3626480dc41627fe37
DIFF:
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/commit/4caf7ccd7fae677115922c3626480dc41627fe37.diff
@@ -686,12 +686,31 @@ static Value *EmitSignBit(CodeGenFunction &CGF, Value *V)
{
return CGF.Builder.CreateICmpSLT(V, Zero);
}
+/// Checks no arguments or results are passed indirectly in the ABI (i.e. via a
+/// hidden pointer). This is used to check annotating FP libcalls
https://github.com/Szelethus closed
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/108373
___
cfe-commits mailing list
cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org
https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits
tarunprabhu wrote:
> Is `-fdiagnostics-color=auto` too host-environment dependent to test?
I am not sure how I could reliably test it across platforms. One way to do it
on Unix could be
```
$ flang -### -diagnostics-color=auto %s | grep -Eqv
'"-fc1".+"-fcolor-diagnostics"'
```
The pipe to g
https://github.com/labrinea updated
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/108024
>From b6abb4f0fcf50d7498a6f0d0ef8b75808c8b1eb1 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: Alexandros Lamprineas
Date: Tue, 10 Sep 2024 14:02:17 +0100
Subject: [PATCH] [FMV][AArch64] Unify ls64, ls64_v and ls64_accdata.
Or
llvmbot wrote:
@llvm/pr-subscribers-clang-driver
Author: Peter Waller (peterwaller-arm)
Changes
I note that the comment nearby says "They are not needed when the user has
correct LLVM_DEFAULT_TARGET_TRIPLE" and "The lists should shrink over time".
The behviour was diverged between X86 and
https://github.com/peterwaller-arm ready_for_review
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/109263
___
cfe-commits mailing list
cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org
https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits
nikic wrote:
Note that you need to also have softPromoteHalfType return true to get correct
legalization for half operations.
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/109164
___
cfe-commits mailing list
cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org
https://lists.llvm.o
peterwaller-arm wrote:
I've checked the buildkite failures are in cfi-standalone-lld-thinlto-x86_64,
which I believe are unrelated to this change.
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/109263
___
cfe-commits mailing list
cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org
nikic wrote:
As update-verify-tests was reverted, can you rebase this to just the
update_test_checks support? On the LLVM side, we definitely want to have this
feature.
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/108425
___
cfe-commits mailing list
cfe
chenzheng1030 wrote:
> @nemanjai Are you OK with the PPC changes?
on behalf of @nemanjai : ): the change LG to PPC.
FYI @lei137 @stefanp-ibm if we doc these builtins for PPC users, we may need to
change the the docs.
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/109160
___
llvm-ci wrote:
LLVM Buildbot has detected a new failure on builder `lld-x86_64-win` running on
`as-worker-93` while building `clang-tools-extra,clang,llvm,utils` at step 7
"test-build-unified-tree-check-all".
Full details are available at:
https://lab.llvm.org/buildbot/#/builders/146/builds/1
@@ -1281,26 +1277,67 @@ bool Compiler::VisitVectorBinOp(const
BinaryOperator *E) {
const Expr *LHS = E->getLHS();
const Expr *RHS = E->getRHS();
const auto *VecTy = E->getType()->getAs();
+ auto Op = E->isCompoundAssignmentOp()
+? BinaryOperator::getOpFo
https://github.com/tbaederr closed
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/109238
___
cfe-commits mailing list
cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org
https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits
llvmbot wrote:
@llvm/pr-subscribers-backend-x86
@llvm/pr-subscribers-clang
Author: Simon Pilgrim (RKSimon)
Changes
Noticed while working on #109160
I've left out the sub_sat intrinsics for now - not sure about the history
behind them using Intrinsic::wasm_sub_sat_* instead of Intrinsic::
llvmbot wrote:
@llvm/pr-subscribers-clang-codegen
Author: Simon Pilgrim (RKSimon)
Changes
Noticed while working on #109160
I've left out the sub_sat intrinsics for now - not sure about the history
behind them using Intrinsic::wasm_sub_sat_* instead of Intrinsic::*sub_sat
---
Full diff:
RKSimon wrote:
Officially we don't guarantee target intrinsics at all - but I can add a
release note if it will help?
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/109160
___
cfe-commits mailing list
cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org
https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-b
@@ -181,16 +181,16 @@ llvm::Expected>
getFoldingRanges(ParsedAST &AST) {
// Related issue: https://github.com/clangd/clangd/issues/310
llvm::Expected>
getFoldingRanges(const std::string &Code, bool LineFoldingOnly) {
hokein wrote:
I think we should keep it in
https://github.com/hokein edited
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/109154
___
cfe-commits mailing list
cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org
https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits
nhaehnle wrote:
Somebody recently mentioned a test case that ended up producing hundreds of MBs
or even GBs of code :)
Maybe the answer is that we don't support it and just report a compiler error.
That may be a reasonable thing to do, but in any case having certainty about it
would help the
https://github.com/awson updated https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/96464
>From 096b999120cc28844d780acbc16f8308b3a54160 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: awson
Date: Mon, 24 Jun 2024 10:34:51 +0300
Subject: [PATCH 1/3] [Clang][Sema] don't handle ArraySize/AllocType early.
---
clang/lib/Se
Author: Timm Baeder
Date: 2024-09-19T09:12:17+02:00
New Revision: 904f58e6b9418dab53719c7817e9216b95981a49
URL:
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/commit/904f58e6b9418dab53719c7817e9216b95981a49
DIFF:
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/commit/904f58e6b9418dab53719c7817e9216b95981a49.diff
L
RKSimon wrote:
@nemanjai Are you OK with the PPC changes?
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/109160
___
cfe-commits mailing list
cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org
https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits
@@ -732,6 +732,12 @@ void Flang::ConstructJob(Compilation &C, const JobAction
&JA,
// to avoid warn_drv_unused_argument.
Args.getLastArg(options::OPT_fcolor_diagnostics,
options::OPT_fno_color_diagnostics);
+ if (const Arg *A = Args.getLastArg(options::O
AaronBallman wrote:
These changes are no longer needed because we landed
ed8f78827895050442f544edef2933a60d4a7935, so closing this PR.
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/80081
___
cfe-commits mailing list
cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org
https://list
4ast wrote:
> lock *(u64 *)(r1 + 0x0) = r2 release
> lock r2 = *(u64 *)(r1 + 0x0) acquire
tbh I don't like such syntax. It's harder to read comparing to what the patch
does:
r0 = load_acquire((u64 *)(r1 + 0))
store_release((u8 *)(r1 + 0x0), w2)
"lock" part doesn't fit here either. "lock" is x8
https://github.com/HerrCai0907 approved this pull request.
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/109178
___
cfe-commits mailing list
cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org
https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits
https://github.com/AaronBallman closed
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/80081
___
cfe-commits mailing list
cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org
https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits
https://github.com/AaronBallman approved this pull request.
LGTM!
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/107194
___
cfe-commits mailing list
cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org
https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits
Nathan =?utf-8?q?Gauër?= ,
Nathan =?utf-8?q?Gauër?= ,
Nathan =?utf-8?q?Gauër?= ,
Nathan =?utf-8?q?Gauër?= ,
Nathan =?utf-8?q?Gauër?= ,
Nathan =?utf-8?q?Gauër?= ,
Nathan =?utf-8?q?Gauër?= ,
Nathan =?utf-8?q?Gauër?= ,
Nathan =?utf-8?q?Gauër?= ,
Nathan =?utf-8?q?Gauër?= ,
Nathan =?utf-8?q?Gauër?= ,
Na
Nathan =?utf-8?q?Gauër?= ,
Nathan =?utf-8?q?Gauër?= ,
Nathan =?utf-8?q?Gauër?= ,
Nathan =?utf-8?q?Gauër?= ,
Nathan =?utf-8?q?Gauër?= ,
Nathan =?utf-8?q?Gauër?= ,
Nathan =?utf-8?q?Gauër?= ,
Nathan =?utf-8?q?Gauër?= ,
Nathan =?utf-8?q?Gauër?= ,
Nathan =?utf-8?q?Gauër?= ,
Nathan =?utf-8?q?Gauër?= ,
Na
https://github.com/cor3ntin approved this pull request.
LGTM
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/96464
___
cfe-commits mailing list
cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org
https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits
llvmbot wrote:
@llvm/pr-subscribers-clang
Author: Daniil Kovalev (kovdan01)
Changes
---
Full diff: https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/109247.diff
1 Files Affected:
- (modified) clang/test/CodeGen/ptrauth-init-fini.c (+10-10)
``diff
diff --git a/clang/test/CodeGen/ptr
llvm-ci wrote:
LLVM Buildbot has detected a new failure on builder
`sanitizer-x86_64-linux-fast` running on `sanitizer-buildbot3` while building
`clang` at step 2 "annotate".
Full details are available at:
https://lab.llvm.org/buildbot/#/builders/169/builds/3389
Here is the relevant piece o
https://github.com/Szelethus edited
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/108373
___
cfe-commits mailing list
cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org
https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits
DeinAlptraum wrote:
@fursov yes, since you are a new contributor, you cannot merge this yourself. I
can, but I am also still relatively new so I would like someone else to confirm
that this change is good to go - so we're just waiting for him to take a look
as well :)
https://github.com/llvm/
Author: Timm Baeder
Date: 2024-09-19T11:59:38+02:00
New Revision: d267daa9eb517b2e040a59121c15dba59223ebba
URL:
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/commit/d267daa9eb517b2e040a59121c15dba59223ebba
DIFF:
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/commit/d267daa9eb517b2e040a59121c15dba59223ebba.diff
L
https://github.com/tbaederr closed
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/109256
___
cfe-commits mailing list
cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org
https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits
https://github.com/kadircet closed
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/109099
___
cfe-commits mailing list
cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org
https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits
https://github.com/peterwaller-arm created
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/109263
I note that the comment nearby says "They are not needed when the user has
correct LLVM_DEFAULT_TARGET_TRIPLE" and "The lists should shrink over time".
The behviour was diverged between X86 and aarch64:
llvmbot wrote:
@llvm/pr-subscribers-clang
Author: Oliver Stannard (ostannard)
Changes
The lifetimes of local variables and function parameters must end before the
call to a [[clang::musttail]] function, instead of before the return, because
we will not have a stack frame to hold them whe
@@ -23,7 +23,7 @@
static __inline__ __m512i __DEFAULT_FN_ATTRS
_mm512_popcnt_epi16(__m512i __A)
{
- return (__m512i) __builtin_ia32_vpopcntw_512((__v32hi) __A);
+ return (__m512i)__builtin_elementwise_popcount((__v32hi)__A);
RKSimon wrote:
I've updated all t
https://github.com/tblah commented:
Is `-fdiagnostics-color=auto` too host-environment dependent to test?
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/109210
___
cfe-commits mailing list
cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org
https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/
@@ -732,6 +732,12 @@ void Flang::ConstructJob(Compilation &C, const JobAction
&JA,
// to avoid warn_drv_unused_argument.
Args.getLastArg(options::OPT_fcolor_diagnostics,
options::OPT_fno_color_diagnostics);
+ if (const Arg *A = Args.getLastArg(options::O
@@ -839,9 +839,11 @@ int clang_scan_deps_main(int argc, char **argv, const
llvm::ToolContext &) {
auto R = std::make_reverse_iterator(FlagsEnd);
for (auto I = R, E = Args.rend(); I != E; ++I) {
StringRef Arg = *I;
+if ((I + 1) == E)
https://github.com/phoebewang approved this pull request.
LGTM.
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/109160
___
cfe-commits mailing list
cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org
https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits
@@ -1267,12 +1267,8 @@ bool Compiler::VisitVectorBinOp(const
BinaryOperator *E) {
assert(E->getLHS()->getType()->isVectorType());
assert(E->getRHS()->getType()->isVectorType());
- // FIXME: Current only support comparison binary operator, add support for
- // other bina
github-actions[bot] wrote:
:warning: C/C++ code formatter, clang-format found issues in your code.
:warning:
You can test this locally with the following command:
``bash
git-clang-format --diff cb98fd977a25d3d778244da4012fd34acf7fab45
73dbd692945899708e2c127ba9972c20e5fcd30f --e
uweigand wrote:
SystemZ changes LGTM.
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/109160
___
cfe-commits mailing list
cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org
https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits
https://github.com/hokein approved this pull request.
This looks good.
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/109154
___
cfe-commits mailing list
cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org
https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits
Author: Ulrich Weigand
Date: 2024-09-19T13:19:03+02:00
New Revision: baf9b7da81025c1e3b0704d7ecf667e06f95642b
URL:
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/commit/baf9b7da81025c1e3b0704d7ecf667e06f95642b
DIFF:
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/commit/baf9b7da81025c1e3b0704d7ecf667e06f95642b.diff
https://github.com/labrinea updated
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/108024
>From b6abb4f0fcf50d7498a6f0d0ef8b75808c8b1eb1 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: Alexandros Lamprineas
Date: Tue, 10 Sep 2024 14:02:17 +0100
Subject: [PATCH 1/2] [FMV][AArch64] Unify ls64, ls64_v and ls64_accdata.
https://github.com/5chmidti approved this pull request.
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/109178
___
cfe-commits mailing list
cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org
https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits
https://github.com/labrinea edited
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/108024
___
cfe-commits mailing list
cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org
https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits
https://github.com/mstorsjo updated
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/109050
From 73dbd692945899708e2c127ba9972c20e5fcd30f Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: =?UTF-8?q?Martin=20Storsj=C3=B6?=
Date: Wed, 18 Sep 2024 00:03:00 +0300
Subject: [PATCH] [clang-scan-deps] Don't inspect Args[0] as a
https://github.com/mstorsjo updated
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/109050
From d7f46152baa1cffea16805bf7b522a237a54918f Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: =?UTF-8?q?Martin=20Storsj=C3=B6?=
Date: Wed, 18 Sep 2024 00:03:00 +0300
Subject: [PATCH] [clang-scan-deps] Don't inspect Args[0] as a
https://github.com/Michael137 created
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/109271
In https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/96422 we started treating empty
records as zero-sized for the purpose of layout. In `C`, empty fields were
never considered `isZeroSize`, so we would never have t
llvmbot wrote:
@llvm/pr-subscribers-clang
Author: Michael Buch (Michael137)
Changes
In https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/96422 we started treating empty
records as zero-sized for the purpose of layout. In `C`, empty fields were
never considered `isZeroSize`, so we would never hav
@@ -0,0 +1,11 @@
+// RUN: %clang_cc1 %s -emit-llvm -triple x86_64-linux-gnu -o - | FileCheck %s
--check-prefixes=CHECK
+// RUN: %clang_cc1 -x c++ %s -emit-llvm -triple x86_64-linux-gnu -o - |
FileCheck %s --check-prefixes=CHECK-CXX
+
+union Foo {
+ struct Empty {} val;
+};
+
+u
chenzheng1030 wrote:
> Officially we don't guarantee target intrinsics at all - but I can add a
> release note if it will help?
hmm, I meant IBM OpenXLC compiler product doc, many builtins are listed there,
not the community clang/llvm docs.
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/109160
__
https://github.com/NagyDonat approved this pull request.
LGTM with some additional bikeshedding in a comment that could be shorter IMO.
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/108900
___
cfe-commits mailing list
cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org
https://lis
https://github.com/NagyDonat edited
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/108900
___
cfe-commits mailing list
cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org
https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits
@@ -278,6 +278,13 @@ class SMTConstraintManager : public
clang::ento::SimpleConstraintManager {
if (const SymbolCast *SC = dyn_cast(Sym))
return canReasonAbout(SVB.makeSymbolVal(SC->getOperand()));
+// If a UnarySymExpr is encountered, the Z3
+// wrapper doe
https://github.com/DanielKristofKiss approved this pull request.
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/109247
___
cfe-commits mailing list
cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org
https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits
https://github.com/kovdan01 ready_for_review
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/109247
___
cfe-commits mailing list
cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org
https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits
Author: Simon Pilgrim
Date: 2024-09-19T12:40:36+01:00
New Revision: 0013f94b24d18ee5c4535763b7d64ccdf4d6fa9e
URL:
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/commit/0013f94b24d18ee5c4535763b7d64ccdf4d6fa9e
DIFF:
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/commit/0013f94b24d18ee5c4535763b7d64ccdf4d6fa9e.diff
https://github.com/RKSimon closed
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/109160
___
cfe-commits mailing list
cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org
https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits
https://github.com/JonPsson1 updated
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/109164
>From c70d421c42417a3f1a266907ef36057e51183d97 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: Jonas Paulsson
Date: Tue, 17 Sep 2024 19:34:34 +0200
Subject: [PATCH] Initial experiments
---
clang/lib/Basic/Targets/SystemZ.h
https://github.com/RKSimon updated
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/109160
>From 3b9c6daf70ab26224d619f4beede2aaf94ed19bd Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: Simon Pilgrim
Date: Thu, 12 Sep 2024 10:39:26 +0100
Subject: [PATCH] [clang][powerpc][wasm][systemz][x86] Replace target vector
popc
JonPsson1 wrote:
> Note that you need to also have softPromoteHalfType return true to get
> correct legalization for half operations.
Thanks for pointing that out - patch updated.
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/109164
___
cfe-commits maili
Author: Kristóf Umann
Date: 2024-09-19T10:04:47+02:00
New Revision: 752e10379c2ffb4f6eebf490f1fab7eb769dfbf6
URL:
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/commit/752e10379c2ffb4f6eebf490f1fab7eb769dfbf6
DIFF:
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/commit/752e10379c2ffb4f6eebf490f1fab7eb769dfbf6.diff
jayfoad wrote:
+1 to @efriedma-quic and @jdoerfert's comments. DataLayout should remain as
generic as possible. Trying to encode a concept of "_the_ flat address space"
in it seems way too specific to one optimization for one or two targets.
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/108786
___
https://github.com/AaronBallman closed
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/109154
___
cfe-commits mailing list
cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org
https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits
@@ -0,0 +1,2267 @@
+// NOTE: Assertions have been autogenerated by utils/update_cc_test_checks.py
UTC_ARGS: --function-signature --include-generated-funcs --replace-value-regex
"__omp_offloading_[0-9a-z]+_[0-9a-z]+" "reduction_size[.].+[.]"
"pl_cond[.].+[.|,]" --prefix-filechec
Nathan =?utf-8?q?Gauër?= ,
Nathan =?utf-8?q?Gauër?= ,
Nathan =?utf-8?q?Gauër?= ,
Nathan =?utf-8?q?Gauër?= ,
Nathan =?utf-8?q?Gauër?= ,
Nathan =?utf-8?q?Gauër?= ,
Nathan =?utf-8?q?Gauër?= ,
Nathan =?utf-8?q?Gauër?= ,
Nathan =?utf-8?q?Gauër?= ,
Nathan =?utf-8?q?Gauër?= ,
Nathan =?utf-8?q?Gauër?= ,
Na
Nathan =?utf-8?q?Gau=C3=ABr?= ,
Nathan =?utf-8?q?Gau=C3=ABr?= ,
Nathan =?utf-8?q?Gau=C3=ABr?= ,
Nathan =?utf-8?q?Gau=C3=ABr?= ,
Nathan =?utf-8?q?Gau=C3=ABr?= ,
Nathan =?utf-8?q?Gau=C3=ABr?= ,
Nathan =?utf-8?q?Gau=C3=ABr?= ,
Nathan =?utf-8?q?Gau=C3=ABr?= ,
Nathan =?utf-8?q?Gau=C3=ABr?= ,
Nathan =?ut
https://github.com/c8ef created https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/109298
Fixes https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/issues/95895.
It appears that there was a logic error in the code of
Parser::TryParseProtocolQualifiers related to parsing the identifier list. This
pull request fixed th
https://github.com/yronglin updated
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/108949
>From 3601f708847f70485fae640c5b5d96fed965e7c3 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: yronglin
Date: Tue, 17 Sep 2024 17:39:47 +0800
Subject: [PATCH 1/2] [clang][bytecode] Implement arithmetic, bitwise and
compound as
llvmbot wrote:
@llvm/pr-subscribers-clang
Author: None (c8ef)
Changes
Fixes https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/issues/95895.
It appears that there was a logic error in the code of
Parser::TryParseProtocolQualifiers related to parsing the identifier list. This
pull request fixed the is
@@ -1267,12 +1267,8 @@ bool Compiler::VisitVectorBinOp(const
BinaryOperator *E) {
assert(E->getLHS()->getType()->isVectorType());
assert(E->getRHS()->getType()->isVectorType());
- // FIXME: Current only support comparison binary operator, add support for
- // other bina
c8ef wrote:
I have opened #109298 for this purpose.
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/95917
___
cfe-commits mailing list
cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org
https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits
@@ -1281,26 +1277,67 @@ bool Compiler::VisitVectorBinOp(const
BinaryOperator *E) {
const Expr *LHS = E->getLHS();
const Expr *RHS = E->getRHS();
const auto *VecTy = E->getType()->getAs();
+ auto Op = E->isCompoundAssignmentOp()
+? BinaryOperator::getOpFo
https://github.com/dmpolukhin updated
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/109167
>From 72b43bd2f392a009187e1cdd90627691a4017707 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: Dmitry Polukhin
Date: Wed, 18 Sep 2024 09:02:23 -0700
Subject: [PATCH 1/2] [C++20][Modules] Fix crash when function and lambda
in
https://github.com/AaronBallman edited
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/108475
___
cfe-commits mailing list
cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org
https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits
Nathan =?utf-8?q?Gauër?= ,
Nathan =?utf-8?q?Gauër?= ,
Nathan =?utf-8?q?Gauër?= ,
Nathan =?utf-8?q?Gauër?= ,
Nathan =?utf-8?q?Gauër?= ,
Nathan =?utf-8?q?Gauër?= ,
Nathan =?utf-8?q?Gauër?= ,
Nathan =?utf-8?q?Gauër?= ,
Nathan =?utf-8?q?Gauër?= ,
Nathan =?utf-8?q?Gauër?= ,
Nathan =?utf-8?q?Gauër?= ,
Na
Nathan =?utf-8?q?Gauër?= ,
Nathan =?utf-8?q?Gauër?= ,
Nathan =?utf-8?q?Gauër?= ,
Nathan =?utf-8?q?Gauër?= ,
Nathan =?utf-8?q?Gauër?= ,
Nathan =?utf-8?q?Gauër?= ,
Nathan =?utf-8?q?Gauër?= ,
Nathan =?utf-8?q?Gauër?= ,
Nathan =?utf-8?q?Gauër?= ,
Nathan =?utf-8?q?Gauër?= ,
Nathan =?utf-8?q?Gauër?= ,
Na
Nathan =?utf-8?q?Gauër?= ,
Nathan =?utf-8?q?Gauër?= ,
Nathan =?utf-8?q?Gauër?= ,
Nathan =?utf-8?q?Gauër?= ,
Nathan =?utf-8?q?Gauër?= ,
Nathan =?utf-8?q?Gauër?= ,
Nathan =?utf-8?q?Gauër?= ,
Nathan =?utf-8?q?Gauër?= ,
Nathan =?utf-8?q?Gauër?= ,
Nathan =?utf-8?q?Gauër?= ,
Nathan =?utf-8?q?Gauër?= ,
Na
https://github.com/tarunprabhu updated
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/109210
>From c5c827ab2c65da7b5fa04a2906d3d03d3dbfc508 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: Tarun Prabhu
Date: Wed, 18 Sep 2024 16:12:36 -0600
Subject: [PATCH 1/2] [flang][Driver] Support -fdiagnostics-color
Add support
Nathan =?utf-8?q?Gauër?= ,
Nathan =?utf-8?q?Gauër?= ,
Nathan =?utf-8?q?Gauër?= ,
Nathan =?utf-8?q?Gauër?= ,
Nathan =?utf-8?q?Gauër?= ,
Nathan =?utf-8?q?Gauër?= ,
Nathan =?utf-8?q?Gauër?= ,
Nathan =?utf-8?q?Gauër?= ,
Nathan =?utf-8?q?Gauër?= ,
Nathan =?utf-8?q?Gauër?= ,
Nathan =?utf-8?q?Gauër?= ,
Na
https://github.com/tkoeppe updated
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/109169
From 2f98433ec43d9285e1701cddd31a0d181f0bbcdc Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: =?UTF-8?q?Thomas=20K=C3=B6ppe?=
Date: Wed, 18 Sep 2024 17:04:44 +
Subject: [PATCH] [clang-tidy] Make modernize-use-nullptr matcher
https://github.com/Wilco1 approved this pull request.
Looks good to me
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/108024
___
cfe-commits mailing list
cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org
https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits
Dinistro wrote:
Then I'll merge it for you.
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/94014
___
cfe-commits mailing list
cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org
https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits
https://github.com/SamTebbs33 edited
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/100579
___
cfe-commits mailing list
cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org
https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits
@@ -183,6 +183,10 @@ Changes in existing checks
` check to
remove `->`, when redundant `get()` is removed.
+- Improved :doc:`modernize-use-nullptr
+ ` check to also recognize
+ `NULL`/`__null` (but not `0`) when used with a templated type.
EugeneZelenko
@@ -183,6 +183,10 @@ Changes in existing checks
` check to
remove `->`, when redundant `get()` is removed.
+- Improved :doc:`modernize-use-nullptr
EugeneZelenko wrote:
Please keep alphabetical order (by check name) in this section.
https://github.com/llv
uweigand wrote:
LGTM as well, thanks.
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/100757
___
cfe-commits mailing list
cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org
https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits
201 - 300 of 489 matches
Mail list logo
