4ast wrote: > lock *(u64 *)(r1 + 0x0) = r2 release > lock r2 = *(u64 *)(r1 + 0x0) acquire
tbh I don't like such syntax. It's harder to read comparing to what the patch does: r0 = load_acquire((u64 *)(r1 + 0)) store_release((u8 *)(r1 + 0x0), w2) "lock" part doesn't fit here either. "lock" is x86 specific. https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/108636 _______________________________________________ cfe-commits mailing list cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits
