https://github.com/erichkeane edited
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/93430
___
cfe-commits mailing list
cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org
https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits
@@ -3048,10 +3050,12 @@ class OverloadExpr : public Expr {
Result.HasFormOfMemberPointer = (E == Ovl && Ovl->getQualifier());
Result.IsAddressOfOperand = true;
+ Result.IsAddressOfOperandWithParen = HasParen;
erichkeane wrote:
Cleanup nit: I
@@ -7807,6 +7833,7 @@ void Sema::AddTemplateOverloadCandidate(
Candidate.IgnoreObjectArgument =
isa(Candidate.Function) &&
!isa(Candidate.Function);
+Candidate.TookAddressOfOverload = false;
erichkeane wrote:
Feel like Candidate should
@@ -5813,6 +5813,23 @@ static TypoCorrection TryTypoCorrectionForCall(Sema &S,
Expr *Fn,
return TypoCorrection();
}
+static bool isParenthetizedAndQualifiedAddressOfExpr(Expr *Fn) {
+ if (!isa(Fn))
+return false;
+
+ Fn = Fn->IgnoreParens();
erichkean
https://github.com/ergawy updated
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/93920
>From 926cf8d19c625880c303aff0527e2e6e8a1629bd Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: ergawy
Date: Thu, 30 May 2024 23:16:39 -0500
Subject: [PATCH 1/3] [OpenMP][][LLVM] Update alloca IP after `PrivCB` in
`OMPIRBUIlder`
@@ -2469,11 +2469,20 @@ static bool CheckConstexprFunctionBody(Sema &SemaRef,
const FunctionDecl *Dcl,
// base class sub-objects shall be a constexpr constructor.
//
// Note that this rule is distinct from the "requirements for a constexpr
- // function", so is not
https://github.com/Fznamznon deleted
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/94347
___
cfe-commits mailing list
cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org
https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits
@@ -2469,11 +2469,20 @@ static bool CheckConstexprFunctionBody(Sema &SemaRef,
const FunctionDecl *Dcl,
// base class sub-objects shall be a constexpr constructor.
//
// Note that this rule is distinct from the "requirements for a constexpr
- // function", so is not
@@ -2469,11 +2469,20 @@ static bool CheckConstexprFunctionBody(Sema &SemaRef,
const FunctionDecl *Dcl,
// base class sub-objects shall be a constexpr constructor.
//
// Note that this rule is distinct from the "requirements for a constexpr
- // function", so is not
https://github.com/AaronBallman commented:
The changes generally LGTM, but should come with a release note. Do you think
there's a reasonable way to share code between the two constant expression
interpreters in this case?
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/94118
___
@@ -430,6 +430,78 @@ static bool interp__builtin_iszero(InterpState &S, CodePtr
OpPC,
return true;
}
+static bool interp__builtin_signbit(InterpState &S, CodePtr OpPC,
+const InterpFrame *Frame, const Function
*F,
+
https://github.com/AaronBallman edited
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/94118
___
cfe-commits mailing list
cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org
https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits
@@ -961,6 +961,10 @@ def Wdeprecated : Flag<["-"], "Wdeprecated">,
Group,
HelpText<"Enable warnings for deprecated constructs and define
__DEPRECATED">;
def Wno_deprecated : Flag<["-"], "Wno-deprecated">, Group,
Visibility<[ClangOption, CC1Option]>;
+def Winvalid_constexp
@@ -505,6 +505,9 @@ COMPATIBLE_LANGOPT(IncrementalExtensions, 1, 0, " True if
we want to process sta
BENIGN_LANGOPT(CheckNew, 1, 0, "Do not assume C++ operator new may not return
NULL")
+BENIGN_LANGOPT(CheckConstexprFunctionBodies, 1, 1,
+ "True if we want to
@@ -2469,11 +2469,20 @@ static bool CheckConstexprFunctionBody(Sema &SemaRef,
const FunctionDecl *Dcl,
// base class sub-objects shall be a constexpr constructor.
//
// Note that this rule is distinct from the "requirements for a constexpr
- // function", so is not
@@ -2469,11 +2469,20 @@ static bool CheckConstexprFunctionBody(Sema &SemaRef,
const FunctionDecl *Dcl,
// base class sub-objects shall be a constexpr constructor.
//
// Note that this rule is distinct from the "requirements for a constexpr
- // function", so is not
https://github.com/erichkeane approved this pull request.
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/94288
___
cfe-commits mailing list
cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org
https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits
Author: Vlad Serebrennikov
Date: 2024-06-04T17:42:26+04:00
New Revision: e651ee98cfcdebd799de0d61eca22b7b1493cc96
URL:
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/commit/e651ee98cfcdebd799de0d61eca22b7b1493cc96
DIFF:
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/commit/e651ee98cfcdebd799de0d61eca22b7b1493cc96.
https://github.com/Endilll closed
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/94288
___
cfe-commits mailing list
cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org
https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits
https://github.com/MitalAshok created
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/94355
[CWG2137](https://cplusplus.github.io/CWG/issues/2137.html)
This was previously implemented and then reverted in Clang 18 as #77768
This also implements a workaround for
[CWG2311](https://cplusplus.github.io
kito-cheng wrote:
Could you give few more word on the description to mention we missed that in
the vector crpyto intrinsic proposal, and it's fixing but rather than
incompatible/breaking change for the intrinsic API?
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/94318
_
https://github.com/pdherbemont updated
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/94216
>From bf9a2ba20be8271c30fef456536dd058d599b4cc Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: Pierre d'Herbemont
Date: Wed, 29 May 2024 11:11:03 +0200
Subject: [PATCH] Support [[guarded_by(mutex)]] attribute inside C struct
MitalAshok wrote:
Note that only a single line has changed from the previous PR:
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/commit/d90534729d34da86bb01c4ddc272310f0f0b4ce4#diff-19c518dbc68b30c66e1a2b6bd523c005fb2050dcf1a0e92305df7ab3e1b9e9f3L1653
I was waiting on a proper resolution for CWG2311, but
MitalAshok wrote:
@yxsamliu Re:
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/77768#issuecomment-1957171805: That
is the expected behaviour, since CWG2137 expressly wants to use
initializer_list constructors over non-initializer_list constructors
(especially copy constructors)
https://github.com
Author: Vassil Vassilev
Date: 2024-06-04T13:55:03Z
New Revision: d999ce0302f06d250f6d496b56a5a5f2dc331e61
URL:
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/commit/d999ce0302f06d250f6d496b56a5a5f2dc331e61
DIFF:
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/commit/d999ce0302f06d250f6d496b56a5a5f2dc331e61.diff
LO
vgvassilev wrote:
@jasonmolenda, I struggled quite a bit in reproducing the test failures and
everything but I have a fix. Thanks a lot for your time and I hope the fix
works!
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/89804
___
cfe-commits mailing li
@@ -12,7 +12,7 @@
// RUN: --sysroot=%S/Inputs/mips_mti_linux/sysroot \
// RUN: | FileCheck --check-prefix=CHECK-BE-HF-32R2 %s
//
-// CHECK-BE-HF-32R2: "{{[^"]*}}clang{{[^"]*}}" {{.*}} "-triple"
"mips-mti-linux"
rupprecht wrote:
Instead of changing the c
https://github.com/Rajveer100 updated
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/94159
>From 6dec67c1fe9b64881a7b4f97f2341b2fdf7db48b Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: Rajveer
Date: Sun, 2 Jun 2024 18:33:37 +0530
Subject: [PATCH] [clang] Fix-it hint for `++this` -> `++*this` when deref is
modifiab
yxsamliu wrote:
> @yxsamliu Re: [#77768
> (comment)](https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/77768#issuecomment-1957171805):
> That is the expected behaviour, since CWG2137 expressly wants to use
> initializer_list constructors over non-initializer_list constructors
> (especially copy const
https://github.com/MitalAshok ready_for_review
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/94355
___
cfe-commits mailing list
cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org
https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits
llvmbot wrote:
@llvm/pr-subscribers-clang
Author: Mital Ashok (MitalAshok)
Changes
[CWG2137](https://cplusplus.github.io/CWG/issues/2137.html)
This was previously implemented and then reverted in Clang 18 as #77768
This also implements a workaround for
[CWG2311](https://cplusplus.github
https://github.com/Fznamznon edited
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/91364
___
cfe-commits mailing list
cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org
https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits
https://github.com/NagyDonat created
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/94356
This commit reimplements the functionality of the Clang Static Analyzer checker
`alpha.core.SizeofPointer` within clang-tidy by adding a new (off-by-default)
option to bugprone-sizeof-expression which activate
llvmbot wrote:
@llvm/pr-subscribers-clang-tools-extra
Author: Donát Nagy (NagyDonat)
Changes
This commit reimplements the functionality of the Clang Static Analyzer checker
`alpha.core.SizeofPointer` within clang-tidy by adding a new (off-by-default)
option to bugprone-sizeof-expression
@@ -124,8 +124,6 @@ int Test1(const char* ptr) {
// CHECK-MESSAGES: :[[@LINE-1]]:22: warning: suspicious usage of sizeof
pointer 'sizeof(P*)/sizeof(Q*)'
sum += sizeof(ptr) / sizeof(char);
// CHECK-MESSAGES: :[[@LINE-1]]:22: warning: suspicious usage of sizeof
pointer 's
https://github.com/NagyDonat edited
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/94356
___
cfe-commits mailing list
cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org
https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits
@@ -674,3 +674,26 @@ let TargetGuard = "sme2" in {
def SVLUTI2_LANE_ZT_X2 : Inst<"svluti2_lane_zt_{d}_x2", "2.di[i",
"cUcsUsiUibhf", MergeNone, "aarch64_sme_luti2_lane_zt_x2", [IsStreaming,
IsInZT0], [ImmCheck<0, ImmCheck0_0>, ImmCheck<2, ImmCheck0_7>]>;
def SVLUTI4_LANE_Z
https://github.com/MitalAshok updated
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/94355
>From ac803f979f2779da35a006988d2d42cdabbad252 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: Mital Ashok
Date: Sat, 22 Jul 2023 20:07:00 +0100
Subject: [PATCH 1/6] [SemaCXX] Implement CWG2137 (list-initialization from
objec
https://github.com/DavidSpickett edited
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/94271
___
cfe-commits mailing list
cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org
https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits
https://github.com/MitalAshok updated
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/78060
>From 6ed7cad5d4993603221c3d9a777463675d69643b Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: Mital Ashok
Date: Sat, 13 Jan 2024 18:03:15 +
Subject: [PATCH 1/2] [SemaCXX] Implement CWG2351 `void{}`
---
clang/docs/Releas
https://github.com/EugeneZelenko commented:
Please mention changes in Release Notes.
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/94356
___
cfe-commits mailing list
cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org
https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits
@@ -55,15 +55,21 @@ namespace PR11856 {
template T *end(T*);
- class X { };
+ struct X { };
+ struct Y {
+int end;
+ };
template
void Foo2() {
T it1;
-if (it1->end < it1->end) {
-}
+if (it1->end < it1->end) { }
X *x;
-if (x->end <
https://github.com/Szelethus created
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/94357
In preparation for adding essentially the same visitor to StreamChecker, this
patch factors this visitor out to a common header.
I'll be the first to admit that the interface of these classes are not
terrific
llvmbot wrote:
@llvm/pr-subscribers-clang
Author: Kristóf Umann (Szelethus)
Changes
In preparation for adding essentially the same visitor to StreamChecker, this
patch factors this visitor out to a common header.
I'll be the first to admit that the interface of these classes are not
ter
@@ -674,3 +674,26 @@ let TargetGuard = "sme2" in {
def SVLUTI2_LANE_ZT_X2 : Inst<"svluti2_lane_zt_{d}_x2", "2.di[i",
"cUcsUsiUibhf", MergeNone, "aarch64_sme_luti2_lane_zt_x2", [IsStreaming,
IsInZT0], [ImmCheck<0, ImmCheck0_0>, ImmCheck<2, ImmCheck0_7>]>;
def SVLUTI4_LANE_Z
klensy wrote:
Rebased, Ci green.
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/92231
___
cfe-commits mailing list
cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org
https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits
https://github.com/skatrak created
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/94359
This patch enables the `-fopenmp-force-usm` option to be passed to the flang
driver, which forwards it to the compiler frontend. This flag, when set,
results in the introduction of the `unified_shared_memory` bi
llvmbot wrote:
@llvm/pr-subscribers-clang
Author: Sergio Afonso (skatrak)
Changes
This patch enables the `-fopenmp-force-usm` option to be passed to the flang
driver, which forwards it to the compiler frontend. This flag, when set,
results in the introduction of the `unified_shared_memor
llvmbot wrote:
@llvm/pr-subscribers-flang-fir-hlfir
@llvm/pr-subscribers-flang-openmp
@llvm/pr-subscribers-clang-driver
Author: Sergio Afonso (skatrak)
Changes
This patch enables the `-fopenmp-force-usm` option to be passed to the flang
driver, which forwards it to the compiler frontend.
https://github.com/Endilll updated
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/94208
>From 5c757153a3f462d40663add6a9ae7caf42272913 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: Vlad Serebrennikov
Date: Mon, 3 Jun 2024 13:33:36 +0300
Subject: [PATCH 1/6] Enable LLDB tests in pre-submit CI
---
.ci/generate-bui
higher-performance wrote:
**Please** don't do this, it's an incredibly heavy hammer for something so
narrow. If you really must add a diagnosis, please make it a warning instead of
an outright error. It breaks people's working code that was never suffering
from this problem to begin with. Ther
@@ -55,15 +55,21 @@ namespace PR11856 {
template T *end(T*);
- class X { };
+ struct X { };
+ struct Y {
+int end;
+ };
template
void Foo2() {
T it1;
-if (it1->end < it1->end) {
-}
+if (it1->end < it1->end) { }
X *x;
-if (x->end <
https://github.com/Endilll created
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/94361
This is a spin-off of #94208.
CC @DavidSpickett
>From 5c757153a3f462d40663add6a9ae7caf42272913 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: Vlad Serebrennikov
Date: Mon, 3 Jun 2024 13:33:36 +0300
Subject: [PATCH 1/7] Enable
https://github.com/Meinersbur edited
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/94359
___
cfe-commits mailing list
cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org
https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits
https://github.com/Meinersbur approved this pull request.
LGTM
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/94359
___
cfe-commits mailing list
cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org
https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits
@@ -766,6 +766,8 @@ void Flang::ConstructJob(Compilation &C, const JobAction
&JA,
Args.AddAllArgs(CmdArgs, options::OPT_fopenmp_version_EQ);
// FIXME: Clang supports a whole bunch more flags here.
Meinersbur wrote:
The FIXME should stay behind al
@@ -172,13 +174,17 @@ struct OffloadModuleOpts {
module.getOperation())) {
offloadMod.setIsTargetDevice(Opts.OpenMPIsTargetDevice);
offloadMod.setIsGPU(Opts.OpenMPIsGPU);
+if (Opts.OpenMPForceUSM) {
+ offloadMod.setRequires(mlir::omp::ClauseRequires::
github-actions[bot] wrote:
:warning: C/C++ code formatter, clang-format found issues in your code.
:warning:
You can test this locally with the following command:
``bash
git-clang-format --diff 703e83611cd8bb7174ae76ba2e301f5a5e88b905
b6beb7098bb8e5148fe0467dc976506ff6691f15 --
https://github.com/legrosbuffle created
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/94362
…and operators that have non-const overloads.
This allows `unnecessary-copy-initialization` to warn on more cases.
The common case is a class with a a set of const/non-sconst overloads (e.g.
std::vector::
llvmbot wrote:
@llvm/pr-subscribers-clang-tidy
Author: Clement Courbet (legrosbuffle)
Changes
…and operators that have non-const overloads.
This allows `unnecessary-copy-initialization` to warn on more cases.
The common case is a class with a a set of const/non-sconst overloads (e.g.
s
@@ -2469,11 +2469,20 @@ static bool CheckConstexprFunctionBody(Sema &SemaRef,
const FunctionDecl *Dcl,
// base class sub-objects shall be a constexpr constructor.
//
// Note that this rule is distinct from the "requirements for a constexpr
- // function", so is not
@@ -505,6 +505,9 @@ COMPATIBLE_LANGOPT(IncrementalExtensions, 1, 0, " True if
we want to process sta
BENIGN_LANGOPT(CheckNew, 1, 0, "Do not assume C++ operator new may not return
NULL")
+BENIGN_LANGOPT(CheckConstexprFunctionBodies, 1, 1,
+ "True if we want to
@@ -961,6 +961,10 @@ def Wdeprecated : Flag<["-"], "Wdeprecated">,
Group,
HelpText<"Enable warnings for deprecated constructs and define
__DEPRECATED">;
def Wno_deprecated : Flag<["-"], "Wno-deprecated">, Group,
Visibility<[ClangOption, CC1Option]>;
+def Winvalid_constexp
https://github.com/Xazax-hun approved this pull request.
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/94332
___
cfe-commits mailing list
cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org
https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits
https://github.com/erichkeane approved this pull request.
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/94347
___
cfe-commits mailing list
cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org
https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits
Author: martinboehme
Date: 2024-06-04T17:08:20+02:00
New Revision: 492417278d986ddd8206b2b9bba626ce690ea244
URL:
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/commit/492417278d986ddd8206b2b9bba626ce690ea244
DIFF:
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/commit/492417278d986ddd8206b2b9bba626ce690ea244.diff
https://github.com/martinboehme closed
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/94332
___
cfe-commits mailing list
cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org
https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits
@@ -8287,6 +8289,13 @@ AArch64TargetLowering::LowerCall(CallLoweringInfo &CLI,
SDValue InGlue;
if (RequiresSMChange) {
+
+if (Subtarget->hasSVE()) {
kmclaughlin-arm wrote:
If we still emit the spill of VG with `-fno-asynchronous-unwind-tables`, I
don
https://github.com/cor3ntin updated
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/93430
>From 131f515c1341122896ea3c9624751a634db06cb7 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: Corentin Jabot
Date: Mon, 27 May 2024 01:16:06 +0200
Subject: [PATCH 1/5] [Clang] Static and explicit object member functions with
t
github-actions[bot] wrote:
:warning: C/C++ code formatter, clang-format found issues in your code.
:warning:
You can test this locally with the following command:
``bash
git-clang-format --diff 331eb8a0047504f3ae2cdf2d6c60b93e5d0543f1
f7a13a2821a415ea7342fafa63740dc82e589e26 --
https://github.com/hokein updated
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/94349
>From b9bd6c36196c7f1fdf6ec7a56260425e0b7255f7 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: Haojian Wu
Date: Tue, 4 Jun 2024 14:51:10 +0200
Subject: [PATCH] [Driver] Dont use absolute paths for invoking subcommands for
driver
@@ -12,7 +12,7 @@
// RUN: --sysroot=%S/Inputs/mips_mti_linux/sysroot \
// RUN: | FileCheck --check-prefix=CHECK-BE-HF-32R2 %s
//
-// CHECK-BE-HF-32R2: "{{[^"]*}}clang{{[^"]*}}" {{.*}} "-triple"
"mips-mti-linux"
hokein wrote:
Thanks, I wasn't aware of th
https://github.com/rupprecht edited
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/94349
___
cfe-commits mailing list
cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org
https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits
https://github.com/rupprecht approved this pull request.
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/94349
___
cfe-commits mailing list
cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org
https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits
Author: Aaron Ballman
Date: 2024-06-04T11:31:59-04:00
New Revision: b9f1fdcfd9803689461f0c12e04ab1743ad9a030
URL:
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/commit/b9f1fdcfd9803689461f0c12e04ab1743ad9a030
DIFF:
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/commit/b9f1fdcfd9803689461f0c12e04ab1743ad9a030.diff
https://github.com/vitalybuka approved this pull request.
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/93783
___
cfe-commits mailing list
cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org
https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits
https://github.com/smanna12 created
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/94368
…erToDecl
This patch adds null check for 'Init' before dereferencing it to prevent
potential null pointer dereferences reported by static Analyzer tool in the
function.
>From b6d45ded3d0d1ad6a50a1292d4f827508
https://github.com/smanna12 edited
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/94368
___
cfe-commits mailing list
cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org
https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits
llvmbot wrote:
@llvm/pr-subscribers-clang
Author: None (smanna12)
Changes
This patch adds null check for 'Init' before dereferencing it to prevent
potential null pointer dereferences reported by static Analyzer tool in the
function.
---
Full diff: https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pu
https://github.com/smanna12 edited
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/94368
___
cfe-commits mailing list
cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org
https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits
https://github.com/smanna12 edited
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/94368
___
cfe-commits mailing list
cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org
https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits
https://github.com/pdherbemont updated
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/94216
>From 3cfee204f62e029fb1aaadae6a598e1d46b5c465 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: Pierre d'Herbemont
Date: Wed, 29 May 2024 11:11:03 +0200
Subject: [PATCH] Support [[guarded_by(mutex)]] attribute inside C struct
github-actions[bot] wrote:
:warning: C/C++ code formatter, clang-format found issues in your code.
:warning:
You can test this locally with the following command:
``bash
git-clang-format --diff 2bc098b8aba089fe8328b3b8a8b6b6816cd5a908
b6d45ded3d0d1ad6a50a1292d4f8275081089150 --
https://github.com/MaskRay approved this pull request.
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/94349
___
cfe-commits mailing list
cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org
https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits
@@ -3330,6 +3340,63 @@ void Parser::DistributeCLateParsedAttrs(Decl *Dcl,
}
}
+/// GuardedBy attributes (e.g., guarded_by):
+/// AttrName '(' expression ')'
+void Parser::ParseGuardedByAttribute(IdentifierInfo &AttrName,
+ SourceLocation
https://github.com/cor3ntin updated
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/93430
>From 131f515c1341122896ea3c9624751a634db06cb7 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: Corentin Jabot
Date: Mon, 27 May 2024 01:16:06 +0200
Subject: [PATCH 1/5] [Clang] Static and explicit object member functions with
t
https://github.com/smanna12 updated
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/94368
>From b6d45ded3d0d1ad6a50a1292d4f8275081089150 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: "Manna, Soumi"
Date: Tue, 4 Jun 2024 08:33:51 -0700
Subject: [PATCH 1/2] [Clang] Fix potential null pointer dereferences in
Sema::Ad
Author: Haojian Wu
Date: 2024-06-04T17:56:54+02:00
New Revision: 335fb9467172683d1b9418ee17120598d0d0a1af
URL:
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/commit/335fb9467172683d1b9418ee17120598d0d0a1af
DIFF:
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/commit/335fb9467172683d1b9418ee17120598d0d0a1af.diff
LO
https://github.com/hokein closed https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/94349
___
cfe-commits mailing list
cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org
https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits
https://github.com/feg208 commented:
Why add the check here rather than add an assertion at the point of assignation
(i.e.
```
Init = Result.getAs();
```
Since Init is passed into CheckSelfReference on line 13712 where it's
dereferenced the same issue binds there as well
https://github.com/llv
https://github.com/AaronBallman edited
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/94208
___
cfe-commits mailing list
cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org
https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits
https://github.com/AaronBallman commented:
I think it makes a lot of sense for lldb to have a precommit CI pipeline which
tests changes to lldb. I don't think we're at a point where it would make sense
to enable lldb precommit CI testing for changes to clang, though.
For starters, the false po
https://github.com/AaronBallman approved this pull request.
LGTM, thank you!
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/93519
___
cfe-commits mailing list
cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org
https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits
https://github.com/AaronBallman edited
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/93519
___
cfe-commits mailing list
cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org
https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits
https://github.com/Endilll updated
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/94208
>From 5c757153a3f462d40663add6a9ae7caf42272913 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: Vlad Serebrennikov
Date: Mon, 3 Jun 2024 13:33:36 +0300
Subject: [PATCH 1/7] Enable LLDB tests in pre-submit CI
---
.ci/generate-bui
https://github.com/Endilll edited
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/94208
___
cfe-commits mailing list
cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org
https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits
https://github.com/Endilll edited
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/94208
___
cfe-commits mailing list
cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org
https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits
bhandarkar-pranav wrote:
ping! Gentle reminder, I'd appreciate reviews on this.
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/93977
___
cfe-commits mailing list
cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org
https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits
Author: Artem Chikin
Date: 2024-06-04T09:16:49-07:00
New Revision: 68eb3b202f30a1c3f2575f44b9d16365258e66b6
URL:
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/commit/68eb3b202f30a1c3f2575f44b9d16365258e66b6
DIFF:
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/commit/68eb3b202f30a1c3f2575f44b9d16365258e66b6.diff
https://github.com/benlangmuir closed
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/93588
___
cfe-commits mailing list
cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org
https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits
101 - 200 of 373 matches
Mail list logo
