MitalAshok wrote:

Note that only a single line has changed from the previous PR: 
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/commit/d90534729d34da86bb01c4ddc272310f0f0b4ce4#diff-19c518dbc68b30c66e1a2b6bd523c005fb2050dcf1a0e92305df7ab3e1b9e9f3L1653

I was waiting on a proper resolution for CWG2311, but the 
(identical/duplicate?) CWG2742 claims that "The consensus is to try an 
initializer-list constructor first and then fall back to copy-initialization", 
which is what this does. This is still slightly different from what GCC does.


https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/94355
_______________________________________________
cfe-commits mailing list
cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org
https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits

Reply via email to